Iatrogenic disease: an epidemiologic perspective

Ambulatory care of febrile infants younger than 2 months of age classified as being at low risk for having serious bacterial infections

We prospectively examined whether febrile infants younger than 2 months of age who were defined as being at low risk for having bacterial infection could be observed as outpatients without the usual complete evaluation for sepsis and without antibiotic treatment. A total of 237 previously healthy febrile infants were seen at the Pediatric Emergency Room over 17 1/2 months. One hundred forty-eight infants (63%) fulfilled the criteria for being at low risk: no physical findings consisting of soft tissue or skeletal infections, no purulent otitis media, normal urinalysis, less than 25 white blood cells per high-power field on microsopic stool examination, peripheral leukocyte count 5000 to 15,000/mm3 with less than 1500 band cells/mm3. One infant appeared too ill to be included, and had sepsis and meningitis. None of the 148 infants at low risk had bacterial infections, versus 21 of 88 (24%) of those at high risk (P less than 0.0001); eight of 88 (9%) had bacteremia. Of the 148 infants classified as being at low risk for having bacterial infection, 62 (42%) were discharged to home, and 72 (49%) were initially observed for less than or equal to 24 hours and then discharged. Seventeen infants (11%) were hospitalized: in six, low risk became high risk; six had indications other than fever; and five because the study physicians could not be found. The 137 nontreated infants were closely observed as outpatients. The duration of fever was less than 48 hours in 42%, and less than 96 hours in 91%. All infants were observed for at least 10 days after the last examination. The fever resolved spontaneously in all infants but two, with otitis media, who were treated as outpatients. Our data suggest that management of fever in selected young infants as outpatients is feasible if meticulous follow-up is provided.

Principles of irrational drug therapy

Drugs are extensively used in medicine when they are unlikely to produce a benefit to the patient. In most instances this does no apparent harm to the patient but sometimes (for example, the extensive use of thorotrast) the results are tragic. Even when the patient is not injured, overuse of medicines is an undesirable and money-wasting behavioral pattern. Several factors relating to the social process of drug use which encourage overprescribing are discussed and the Principles of Irrational Drug Therapy are derived. These principles are presented as negative role models for the use of medicines in developing countries.

The business of good doctoring or doctoring as good business: reflections on Freidson's view of the medical game

This paper reflects on selected aspects of the work of Eliot Freidson and is based mainly on his three latest books--Profession of Medicine, Professional Dominance, and Doctoring Together--in which he draws together his various contributions and elaborates a substantial argument concerning the dominant position of physicians within the institution of medicine in particular and, more generally, their unique position within the broader society. Freidson's work is considered from the perspective of political economy. The paper discusses, on a broad level, some of the assumptions underlying his analysis, the adequacy of his theoretical orientation and level of analysis for understanding the House of Medicine in the United States, and some implications that follow.