The effects of a psychoneuroimmunology (PNI) based lifestyle intervention in modifying the progression of depression in clinically depressed adults

Association between peripheral biomarkers and clinical response to IV ketamine for unipolar treatment-resistant depression: An open label study

BACKGROUND

Major Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide. A cohort of patients do not respond adequately to available antidepressants, leading to treatment-resistant depression (TRD). We evaluated the antidepressant efficacy of an acute intravenous ketamine treatment (0.5 mg/kg) for patients with unipolar TRD, and measured peripheral blood-based biomarkers associated with response to treatment.

METHODS

Fifteen adults diagnosed with TRD completed an open label study of ten infusions of subanesthetic ketamine over four weeks. Out of fifteen patients, blood was collected from eleven patients at three timepoints to analyze peripheral biomarkers in isolated plasma, including IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, BDNF, and irisin. Irisin analysis was completed using an ELISA assay, and the remaining biomarkers were analyzed together simultaneously using a multiplex immunoassay.

RESULTS

Repeated ketamine infusions produced a significant decrease in total average depressive symptoms (MADRS) at all timepoints. Improvements in depressive symptoms were significant at one week, and continued to significantly decrease until two weeks, where it was maintained. Ketamine was generally well tolerated, and we observed improvements in functional impairment, anhedonia, and psychiatric symptoms, with no increases in manic symptoms. Levels of BDNF throughout treatment inversely correlated to decreases in MADRS scores, and higher levels of baseline BDNF predicted mood responses at one- and four weeks.

LIMITATIONS

The study was observational and uncontrolled, with a sample size of 15. Outpatients remained on their course of medications, unless they were pharmacological agents that have previously been identified to block ketamine's effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Ketamine may be an efficacious and safe pharmacological option for the acute treatment of patients suffering from severe TRD. BDNF has the potential to function as a prognostic biomarker for predicting response to ketamine treatments.

Clinical practice guidelines on the evidence-based use of integrative therapies during and after breast cancer treatment

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Patients with breast cancer commonly use complementary and integrative therapies as supportive care during cancer treatment and to manage treatment-related side effects. However, evidence supporting the use of such therapies in the oncology setting is limited. This report provides updated clinical practice guidelines from the Society for Integrative Oncology on the use of integrative therapies for specific clinical indications during and after breast cancer treatment, including anxiety/stress, depression/mood disorders, fatigue, quality of life/physical functioning, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, lymphedema, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, pain, and sleep disturbance. Clinical practice guidelines are based on a systematic literature review from 1990 through 2015. Music therapy, meditation, stress management, and yoga are recommended for anxiety/stress reduction. Meditation, relaxation, yoga, massage, and music therapy are recommended for depression/mood disorders. Meditation and yoga are recommended to improve quality of life. Acupressure and acupuncture are recommended for reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Acetyl-L-carnitine is not recommended to prevent chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy due to a possibility of harm. No strong evidence supports the use of ingested dietary supplements to manage breast cancer treatment-related side effects. In summary, there is a growing body of evidence supporting the use of integrative therapies, especially mind-body therapies, as effective supportive care strategies during breast cancer treatment. Many integrative practices, however, remain understudied, with insufficient evidence to be definitively recommended or avoided. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:194-232. © 2017 American Cancer Society.