1
|
Lau LS, Allingham C, Anazodo A, Sullivan M, Peate M, Hunter S, Stern C, Ryan AL, Super L, Orme LM, McCarthy M, Gook D, Lewin J, Marino J, Ryan J, Downie P, Manudhane R, Winstanley M, Pettit T, Lantsberg D, Irving H, Reid S, Heath JA, Kabalan-Baeza P, Wanaguru D, Moore L, Gillam L, Zacharin M, Assis M, Rozen G, Hunter T, Julania S, Sharwood E, Ameratunga D, Jayasinghe Y. The Australian New Zealand Consortium in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Oncofertility action plan. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2024; 71:e31041. [PMID: 38715224 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.31041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Abstract
International and national oncofertility networks, including the US-led Oncofertility Consortium, FertiProtekt, and the Danish Network, have played pivotal roles in advancing the discipline of oncofertility over the last decade. Many other countries lack a shared approach to pediatric oncofertility health service delivery. This study aims to describe baseline oncofertility practices at Australian New Zealand Children's Haematology/Oncology Group centers in 2019-2021, describe binational priorities for care, and propose a 5-year action plan for best practice to be implemented by the newly formed Australian New Zealand Consortium in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults (CAYA) Oncofertility (ANZCO).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Shong Lau
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Catherine Allingham
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Sullivan
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarah Hunter
- Starship Blood and Cancer Centre, Starship Hospital Te Whatu Ora-Health New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Catharyn Stern
- Department of Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anne Louise Ryan
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Leanne Super
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Children's Cancer Centre, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa M Orme
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maria McCarthy
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Debra Gook
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeremy Lewin
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Victorian Adolescent & Young Adult Cancer Service, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer Marino
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jessica Ryan
- Cancer Centre for Children, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter Downie
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Children's Cancer Centre, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rebecca Manudhane
- Michael Rice Centre for Haematology and Oncology, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mark Winstanley
- Starship Blood and Cancer Centre, Starship Hospital Te Whatu Ora-Health New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Tristan Pettit
- Children's Haematology Oncology Centre, Waipapa Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Daniel Lantsberg
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Melbourne IVF, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Irving
- Oncology Services Group, Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sally Reid
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - John A Heath
- School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
- Department of Pediatrics, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Paola Kabalan-Baeza
- Hunter and Northern New South Wales Youth Cancer Service, John Hunter Children's Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dylan Wanaguru
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lyndal Moore
- Hunter and Northern New South Wales Youth Cancer Service, Calvary Mater Hospital, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lynn Gillam
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Children's Bioethics Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Margaret Zacharin
- Department of Endocrinology & Diabetes, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Assis
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Oncofertility Service, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Genia Rozen
- Department of Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tamara Hunter
- Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Shital Julania
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Erin Sharwood
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Devini Ameratunga
- Gynaecology and Women's Service, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Yasmin Jayasinghe
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Oncofertility Service, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Affdal AO, Salama M, Ravitsky V. Ethical, legal, social, and policy issues of ovarian tissue cryopreservation in prepubertal girls: a critical interpretive review. J Assist Reprod Genet 2024; 41:999-1026. [PMID: 38430324 PMCID: PMC11052756 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03059-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite the increasing number of childhood cancer survivors, significant advances in ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) technique and medical societies' recommendations, fertility preservation (FP) and FP discussions are not always offered as a standard of care in the pediatric context. The aim of this literature review is to understand what ethical, legal, social, and policy issues may influence the provision of FP by OTC in prepubertal girls with cancer. METHODS A critical interpretive review of peer-reviewed papers published between 2000 and January 2023 was conducted, guided by the McDougall's version of the critical interpretive synthesis (Dixon-Woods), to capture recurring concepts, principles, and arguments regarding FP by OTC for prepubertal girls. RESULTS Of 931 potentially relevant papers, 162 were included in our analysis. Data were grouped into seven thematic categories: (1) risks of the procedure, (2) unique decision-making issues in pediatric oncofertility, (3) counseling, (4) cultural and cost issues, and (5) disposition of cryopreserved reproductive tissue. CONCLUSION This first literature review focusing on ethical, legal, social, and policy issues surrounding OTC in prepubertal girls highlights concerns in the oncofertility debate. Although OTC is no longer experimental as of December 2019, these issues could limit its availability and the child's future reproductive autonomy. This review concludes that specific actions must be provided to enable the offer of FP, such as supporting families' decision-making in this unique and complex context, and providing pediatric patients universal and full access to free or highly subsidized OTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Vardit Ravitsky
- University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
- The Hastings Center, Garrison, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Siegal AR, Ferrer FA, Herndon CDA, Wallis MC, Schaeffer AJ, Malhotra NR. Inter-disciplinary provider development of an online, interactive adolescent varicocele decision aid prototype. Andrology 2024; 12:429-436. [PMID: 37417400 PMCID: PMC10771535 DOI: 10.1111/andr.13491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision-making regarding varicocele management can be a complex process for patients and families. However, to date, no studies have presented ways to mitigate the decisional conflict surrounding varicoceles. OBJECTIVE To facilitate a discussion among physicians in order to develop a framework of the decision-making process regarding adolescent varicocele management, which will inform the development of the first online, interactive decision aid. MATERIALS AND METHODS Semi-structured interviews with pediatric urologists and interventional radiologists were conducted to discuss their rationale for varicocele decision-making. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded. Key themes were identified, grouped, and then qualitatively analyzed using thematic analysis. Utilizing the common themes identified and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, a decision aid prototype was developed and transformed into a user-friendly website: varicoceledecisionaid.com. RESULTS Pediatric urologists (n = 10) and interventional radiologists (n = 2) were interviewed. Key themes identified included: (1) definition/epidemiology; (2) observation as an appropriate management choice; (3) reasons to recommend repair; (4) types of repair; (5) reasons to recommend one repair over another; (6) shared decision-making; and (7) appropriate counseling. With this insight, a varicocele decision aid prototype was developed that engages patients and parents in the decision-making process. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS This is the first interactive and easily accessible varicocele decision aid prototype developed by inter-disciplinary physicians for patients. This tool aids in decision-making surrounding varicocele surgery. It can be used before or after consultation to help families understand more about varicoceles and their repair, and why intervention may or may not be offered. It also considers a patient and family's personal values. Future studies will incorporate the patient and family perspective into the decision-making aid as well as implement and test the usability of this decision aid prototype in practice and in the wider urologic community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra R Siegal
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Fernando A Ferrer
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Mount Sinai Kravis Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - C D Anthony Herndon
- Division of Urology, Children's Hospital of Richmond at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - M Chad Wallis
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Intermountain Primary Children at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Anthony J Schaeffer
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Intermountain Primary Children at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Neha R Malhotra
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Mount Sinai Kravis Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Glackin A, Marino JL, Peate M, McNeil R, Orme LM, McCarthy MC, Sawyer SM. Experiences of Oncofertility Decision-Making and Care in a National Sample of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients and Parents. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024; 13:170-179. [PMID: 37535814 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Cancer and its treatments are known to compromise fertility in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). The emotional burden of possible infertility is reduced in those who receive supportive oncofertility care. In legal minors, provision of health care must consider the legal context and desire that AYAs have for autonomous decision-making, together with their competence to make health decisions. This has important implications for how oncofertility discussions may, or may not, involve parents. The aim of this study was to explore oncofertility decision-making and care experiences in a national Australian sample of AYA cancer patients and their parents. Methods: AYAs aged 15-25 years and parents were recruited from 17 cancer care sites and CanTeen Australia as part of a national AYA cancer care study. The cross-sectional survey included open-ended questions regarding oncofertility care experiences. We used reflexive thematic analysis to identify themes. Results: Data were available for 99 AYAs and 111 parents. Four themes were identified: emotional care needs; parent-AYA dynamics including AYA autonomy and agency; decision-making considerations including values and practicalities; and reflections on oncofertility care and follow-up. Both AYAs and parents placed importance on AYA autonomy in fertility decision-making, but many AYAs appreciated the role of parents in providing support and guidance throughout the process. Conclusion: Health care professionals are encouraged to autonomously engage AYAs around fertility decision-making, while concurrently offering opportunities that promote parental support. Better psychological support and follow-up oncofertility care are also needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aoife Glackin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer L Marino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robyn McNeil
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa M Orme
- ONTrac at Peter Mac, Victorian Youth Cancer Service, Peter MacCallum Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maria C McCarthy
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan M Sawyer
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rosati P, Crocoli A, Saulle R, Amato L, Brancaccio M, Mitrova Z, Ciliento G, Ciofi degli Atti M, Raponi M. Does letting adolescent and young adult inpatients share decisions in choosing the central-line insertion site reduce central-line-associated bloodstream infections? An empty systematic review. J Vasc Access 2024; 25:51-59. [PMID: 35114837 PMCID: PMC10845812 DOI: 10.1177/11297298221074448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
To study whether allowing adolescents and young adults (AYA) with chronic or oncologic diseases admitted to tertiary or intensive care units to share decisions in choosing the insertion site for central-venous catheters (CVC) implanted for intravenous therapies or parenteral nutrition reduces central-line-associated and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CLABSI and CRBSI). Following the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed the literature by searching MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to December 2019. According to our aims, the review identified no study that could be included. This empty systematic review on healthcare teams allowing AYA with chronic or oncologic diseases admitted in tertiary or intensive care units to share decisions in choosing the site for implanting CVC prompts further research on clinical pathways on this hot-topic. By considering purportedly risk-taking behaviors in youngsters thus reducing CLABSI and CRBSI, healthcare teams should test specific strategies by engaging AYA empathetically in sharing decisions on the site for implanting CVC to improve quality in health care bundles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Rosati
- Clinical Pathways and Epidemiology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Crocoli
- Department of Surgery and Surgical Oncology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosella Saulle
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Amato
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy
| | - Matilde Brancaccio
- Health Management Department, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Critical Care Department, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Zuzana Mitrova
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy
| | - Gaetano Ciliento
- Health Management Department, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Ciofi degli Atti
- Clinical Pathways and Epidemiology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Plummer K, McCarthy M, Newall F, Manias E. The management of pain during pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A qualitative study of contextual factors that influenced pain management practices. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70:e30614. [PMID: 37548486 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children hospitalized following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) experience complex and prolonged pain in response to the intensity of this treatment. OBJECTIVES To describe how pain was managed for children during HSCT therapy and how contextual factors related to the clinical environment influenced healthcare providers' and parents' pain management practices. METHODS A qualitative case study was conducted and involved semi-structured interviews at two time points following transplantation (30 and 90 days) with parents (n = 10) and naturalistic observations of pain-related care provided to children (n = 29) during HSCT therapy by their healthcare providers (n = 10). Semi-structured interviews were also conducted with healthcare providers (n = 14). RESULTS The effectiveness of pain management interventions was hindered by the multifactorial nature of pain children experienced, a gap in the provision of psychosocial interventions for pain and a lack of evidence-based guidelines for the sustained, and often long-term, administration of opioids and adjuvant medications. Misconceptions were demonstrated by healthcare providers about escalating pain management according to pain severity and differentiating between opioid tolerance and addiction. Parents were active in the management of pain for children, especially the provision of nonpharmacological interventions. Collaboration with external pain services and the impact of caring for children in protective isolation delayed timely management of pain. CONCLUSIONS There is a pressing need to create evidence-based supportive care guidelines for managing pain post transplantation to optimize children's relief from pain. If parents and children are to be involved in managing pain, greater efforts must be directed toward building their capacity to make informed decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Plummer
- Department of Nursing, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Menzies Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Australia
| | - Maria McCarthy
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Fiona Newall
- Department of Nursing, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Nursing Research, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Manias
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Melbourne School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pawłowski P, Ziętara KJ, Michalczyk J, Fryze M, Buchacz A, Zaucha-Prażmo A, Zawitkowska J, Torres A, Samardakiewicz M. Fertility Preservation in Children and Adolescents during Oncological Treatment-A Review of Healthcare System Factors and Attitudes of Patients and Their Caregivers. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4393. [PMID: 37686669 PMCID: PMC10487203 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Oncofertility is any therapeutic intervention to safeguard the fertility of cancer patients. Anti-cancer therapies (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, etc.) entail the risk of reproductive disorders through cytotoxic effects on gamete-building cells, especially those not yet fully developed. This literature review analyzes the available data on securing fertility in pediatric and adolescent populations to identify the methods used and describe aspects related to financing, ethics, and the perspective of patients and their parents. Topics related to oncofertility in this age group are relatively niche, with few peer-reviewed articles available and published studies mostly on adults. Compared to pubertal individuals, a limited number of fertility preservation methods are used for prepubertal patients. Funding for the procedures described varies from country to country, but only a few governments choose to reimburse them. Oncofertility of pediatric and adolescent patients raises many controversies related to the decision, parents' beliefs, having a partner, ethics, as well as the knowledge and experience of healthcare professionals. As the fertility of young cancer patients is at risk, healthcare professionals should make every effort to provide them with an opportunity to fulfill their future reproductive plans and to have a family and offspring. Systemic solutions should form the basis for the development of oncofertility in pediatric and adolescent populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Pawłowski
- Student Scientific Association at the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Karolina Joanna Ziętara
- Student Scientific Association at the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Justyna Michalczyk
- Student Scientific Association at the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Magdalena Fryze
- Department of Psychology, Psychosocial Aspects of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (M.F.); (M.S.)
| | - Anna Buchacz
- Youth Cancer Europe, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Agnieszka Zaucha-Prażmo
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Transplantology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (A.Z.-P.); (J.Z.)
| | - Joanna Zawitkowska
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Transplantology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (A.Z.-P.); (J.Z.)
| | - Anna Torres
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Marzena Samardakiewicz
- Department of Psychology, Psychosocial Aspects of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (M.F.); (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nahata L, Anazodo A, Cherven B, Logan S, Meacham LR, Meade CD, Zarnegar-Lumley S, Quinn GP. Optimizing health literacy to facilitate reproductive health decision-making in adolescent and young adults with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70 Suppl 5:e28476. [PMID: 32633029 PMCID: PMC7785658 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Despite being considered "standard of care" by many organizations, fertility and reproductive health communications and counseling practices remain inconsistent for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) newly diagnosed with cancer and during survivorship. One factor known to affect how information is provided and received in the medical setting is health literacy. Providers should consider health literacy to optimize reproductive health communication with AYAs as they cope with their diagnosis, understand what it means for their future, process information about treatment options, learn about their potential harmful effects on fertility, make quick decisions about fertility preservation, and navigate a future family planning course. Thus, the objectives of this manuscript are to (a) summarize literature on reproductive health literacy; (b) describe health literacy frameworks; (c) examine ways to assess health literacy; and (d) identify ways to enhance clinician-patient communication in the AYA oncofertility setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leena Nahata
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
- Center for Biobehavioral Health, The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- School of Women and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Brooke Cherven
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine
| | - Shanna Logan
- School of Women and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lillian R. Meacham
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine
| | - Cathy D. Meade
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Division of Population Science, Health Outcomes & Behavior
| | - Sara Zarnegar-Lumley
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Gwendolyn P. Quinn
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ko JKY, Cheung CSY, Cheng HHY, Yung SSF, Ng TY, Tin WWY, Yuen HY, Lam MHC, Chan ASY, Fung SWW, Man VCM, Kwong A, Ng EHY. Knowledge, attitudes and intention on fertility preservation among breast cancer patients. Sci Rep 2023; 13:9645. [PMID: 37316503 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36377-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in reproductive age women. The aim of this study is to assess the knowledge, attitude and intention on fertility preservation among women diagnosed to have breast cancer. This is a multi-centre cross-sectional questionnaire study. Reproductive age women diagnosed with breast cancer attending Oncology, Breast Surgery and Gynaecology Clinics and support groups were invited to participate. Women filled in paper or electronic form of the questionnaire. 461 women were recruited and 421 women returned the questionnaire. Overall, 181/410 (44.1%) women had heard of fertility preservation. Younger age and higher education level were significantly associated with increased awareness of fertility preservation. Awareness and acceptance of the different fertility preservation methods in reproductive age women with breast cancer was suboptimal. However, 46.1% women felt that their fertility concerns affected their decision for cancer treatment in some way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Y Ko
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 6/F Professorial Block, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Charleen S Y Cheung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 6/F Professorial Block, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Heidi H Y Cheng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 6/F Professorial Block, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Sofie S F Yung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 6/F Professorial Block, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ting Ying Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Winnie W Y Tin
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ho Yan Yuen
- Department of Surgery, Pok Oi Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Martin H C Lam
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ann S Y Chan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Sara W W Fung
- Department of Surgery, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Vivian C M Man
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ava Kwong
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ernest H Y Ng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 6/F Professorial Block, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sandhu S, Hickey M, Lew R, Hammarberg K, Braat S, Agresta F, Parle A, Allingham C, Peate M. The development and phase 1 evaluation of a Decision Aid for elective egg freezing. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:83. [PMID: 37147687 PMCID: PMC10161420 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02178-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elective egg freezing decisions are complex. We developed a Decision Aid for elective egg freezing and conducted a phase 1 study to evaluate its acceptability and utility for decision-making. METHODS The online Decision Aid was developed according to International Patient Decision Aid Standards and evaluated using a pre/post survey design. Twenty-six Australian women aged 18-45 years, interested in receiving elective egg freezing information, proficient in English, and with access to the internet were recruited using social media and university newsletters. Main outcomes were: acceptability of the Decision Aid; feedback on the Decision Aid design and content; concern raised by the Decision Aid, and; utility of the Decision Aid as measured by scores on the Decisional Conflict Scale and on a study-specific scale assessing knowledge about egg freezing and age-related infertility. RESULTS Most participants found the Decision Aid acceptable (23/25), balanced (21/26), useful for explaining their options (23/26), and for reaching a decision (18/26). Almost all reported satisfaction with the Decision Aid (25/26) and the level of guidance it provided (25/26). No participant reported serious concerns about the Decision Aid, and most would recommend it to other women considering elective egg freezing (22/26). Median Decisional Conflict Scale score decreased from 65/100 (Interquartile range: 45-80) pre-Decision Aid to 7.5/100 (Interquartile range: 0-37.5) post-Decision Aid review (p < 0.001). Median knowledge score increased from 8.5/14 (Interquartile range: 7-11) pre-Decision Aid to 11/14 (Interquartile range: 10-12) post-Decision Aid review (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION This elective egg freezing Decision Aid appears acceptable and useful for decision-making. It improved knowledge, reduced decisional conflict and did not raise serious concerns. The Decision Aid will be further evaluated using a prospective randomised control trial. STUDY REGISTRATION ACTRN12618001685202 (retrospectively registered: 12 October 2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherine Sandhu
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Level 7, Cnr Grattan Street & Flemington Road, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Martha Hickey
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Level 7, Cnr Grattan Street & Flemington Road, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Raelia Lew
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Level 7, Cnr Grattan Street & Flemington Road, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
- Reproductive Services Unit, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Karin Hammarberg
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sabine Braat
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- MISCH (Methods and Implementation Support for Clinical and Health) Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Anna Parle
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Level 7, Cnr Grattan Street & Flemington Road, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Catherine Allingham
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Level 7, Cnr Grattan Street & Flemington Road, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Level 7, Cnr Grattan Street & Flemington Road, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Salama M, Nahata L, Jayasinghe Y, Gomez-Lobo V, Laronda MM, Moravek MB, Meacham LR, Christianson MS, Lambertini M, Anazodo A, Quinn GP, Woodruff TK. Pediatric oncofertility care in limited versus optimum resource settings: results from 39 surveyed centers in Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I & II. J Assist Reprod Genet 2023; 40:443-454. [PMID: 36542312 PMCID: PMC9768400 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02679-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE As a secondary report to elucidate the diverse spectrum of oncofertility practices for childhood cancer around the globe, we present and discuss the comparisons of oncofertility practices for childhood cancer in limited versus optimum resource settings based on data collected in the Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I & II. METHODS We surveyed 39 oncofertility centers including 14 in limited resource settings from Africa, Asia, and Latin America (Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I), and 25 in optimum resource settings from the USA, Europe, Australia, and Japan (Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part II). Survey questions covered the availability of fertility preservation and restoration options offered in case of childhood cancer as well as their degree of utilization. RESULTS In the Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I & II, responses for childhood cancer and calculated oncofertility scores showed the following characteristics: (1) higher oncofertility scores in optimum resource settings than in limited resource settings for ovarian and testicular tissue cryopreservation; (2) frequent utilization of gonadal shielding, fractionation of anticancer therapy, oophoropexy, and GnRH analogs; (3) promising utilization of oocyte in vitro maturation (IVM); and (4) rare utilization of neoadjuvant cytoprotective pharmacotherapy, artificial ovary, in vitro spermatogenesis, and stem cells reproductive technology as they are still in preclinical or early clinical research settings. CONCLUSIONS Based on Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I & II, we presented a plausible oncofertility best practice model to help optimize care for children with cancer in various resource settings. Special ethical concerns should be considered when offering advanced and innovative oncofertility options to children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Salama
- grid.17088.360000 0001 2150 1785Oncofertility Consortium, Michigan State University, 965 Wilson Road, Room A626B, East Lansing, MI 48824-1316 USA
| | - L. Nahata
- grid.240344.50000 0004 0392 3476Endocrinology and Center for Biobehavioral Health, The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205 USA
- grid.261331.40000 0001 2285 7943Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43205 USA
| | - Y. Jayasinghe
- grid.416107.50000 0004 0614 0346Royal Children’s Hospital, Flemington Rd, Parkville, Melbourne, Vic 3054 Australia
| | - V. Gomez-Lobo
- grid.239560.b0000 0004 0482 1586Children’s National Hospital, 111 Michigan Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20010 USA
- grid.420089.70000 0000 9635 8082Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda MD, Annapolis, 20892 USA
| | - MM. Laronda
- grid.413808.60000 0004 0388 2248Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, 225 East Chicago Ave, Box 63, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
| | - MB. Moravek
- grid.412590.b0000 0000 9081 2336Center for Reproductive Medicine, Michigan Medicine, 475 Market Place, Building 1, Suite B, Ann Arbor, MI 48108 USA
| | - LR. Meacham
- grid.428158.20000 0004 0371 6071Aflac Cancer Center Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA USA
- grid.189967.80000 0001 0941 6502Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, 2015 Uppergate Dr, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| | - MS. Christianson
- grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Johns Hopkins Fertility Center, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 10751 Falls Road, Suite 280, Lutherville, MD 21093 USA
| | - M. Lambertini
- grid.410345.70000 0004 1756 7871Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - A. Anazodo
- grid.414009.80000 0001 1282 788XKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, High Street Randwick, Sydney, Randwick 2031 Australia
| | - GP. Quinn
- grid.137628.90000 0004 1936 8753New York University, NYU Langone Fertility Center, 660 First Ave, 5Th Floor, New York, NY 10016 USA
| | - TK. Woodruff
- grid.17088.360000 0001 2150 1785Oncofertility Consortium, Michigan State University, 965 Wilson Road, Room A626B, East Lansing, MI 48824-1316 USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
El Alaoui-Lasmaili K, Nguyen-Thi PL, Demogeot N, Lighezzolo-Alnot J, Gross MJ, Mansuy L, Chastagner P, Koscinski I. Fertility discussions and concerns in childhood cancer survivors, a systematic review for updated practice. Cancer Med 2023; 12:6023-6039. [PMID: 36224740 PMCID: PMC10028046 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide ways to improve the clinical practice of fertility preservation (FP) for children, adolescents, and young adults (AYA) with cancer. DESIGN A systematic research of online databases was undertaken in March 2020 following the PRISMA criteria, including Medline and Web of Science. RESULTS Fifty-nine articles were included. Surveys, interviews, and focus groups were used to collect data from patients, parents, and health care providers (HCPs). Four themes worth exploring emerged: (a) what do patients and professionals think of and know about FP? (b) what makes the fertility discussion happen or not? (c) what, retrospectively, led to FP being pursued or not? and (d) how do patients and HCPs feel about fertility issues? CONCLUSION A minority of AYAs preserve their fertility (banking assay for 45% of boys and 23% of girls). Yet fertility concerns have a significant impact on the quality of life of young cancer survivors. Although recommendations and guidelines regarding FP are available internationally, there are no specific guidelines as to how to conduct fertility counseling for children and adolescents. Some barriers are not removable, such as a poor prognosis of an obvious severe disease, time constraints for starting treatment, and cultural and religious beliefs. In response to aspects hindering patients and families to be receptive to any discussion at the time of diagnosis, psychological support could reduce the level of emotional distress and help restore a degree of open-mindedness to open a window for discussion. Moreover, as the lack of knowledge of professionals about fertility is frequently pointed out as a limiting factor for fertility discussion, reinforcing professional training regarding FP could be proposed to promote fertility discussion and eventually referral for FP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Phi Linh Nguyen-Thi
- Unité d'évaluation médicale, Unité de Méthodologie, Data management et Statistique - UMDS, CHRU de Nancy
| | - Nadine Demogeot
- Interpsy Laboratory (UR4432), University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | | | | | - Ludovic Mansuy
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Pascal Chastagner
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Isabelle Koscinski
- Laboratory of Biology of Reproduction-CECOS Lorraine, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France
- INSERM U1256, NGERE, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Factors influencing perceived communication quality for successful fertility preservation counseling for adolescent and young adult cancer patients and their caregivers in Korea. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:9751-9762. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07425-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
14
|
Barriers to Oncofertility Care among Female Adolescent Cancer Patients in Canada. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:1583-1593. [PMID: 35323333 PMCID: PMC8947634 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29030133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
High survival rates in adolescent cancer patients have shifted the medical focus to the long-term outcomes of cancer treatments. Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation increase the risk of infertility and infertility-related distress in adolescent cancer patients and survivors. The aims of this narrative review were to (1) describe the psychosocial impacts of cancer-related infertility in adolescents, (2) identify multilevel barriers to fertility preservation (FP) conversations and referrals, and (3) conclude with evidence-based clinical solutions for improving the oncofertility support available to Canadian adolescents. The results of this review revealed that FP decisions occur within the patient, parent, and health care provider (HCP) triad, and are influenced by factors such as parent attitudes, patient maturity, and HCP knowledge. Decision tools and HCP education can promote the occurrence of developmentally appropriate fertility discussions. At the systems level, cost and resource barriers prevent patients from receiving sufficient fertility information and referrals. Clinical models of care (MOCs) can define interdisciplinary roles and referral pathways to improve the integration of oncofertility services into adolescent cancer care. The continued integration of oncofertility care will ensure that all Canadian adolescents receive the exemplary medical and psychological support necessary to make empowered decisions about their own fertility.
Collapse
|
15
|
Canzona MR, Victorson DE, Murphy K, Clayman ML, Patel B, Puccinelli-Ortega N, McLean TW, Harry O, Little-Greene D, Salsman JM. A conceptual model of fertility concerns among adolescents and young adults with cancer. Psychooncology 2021; 30:1383-1392. [PMID: 33843104 PMCID: PMC8363581 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE For adolescents and young adults (AYAs), cancer-related fertility concerns (FC) are salient, disruptive, and complex. Clinical communication about FC and fertility preservation options are suboptimal, increasing patient distress. The purpose of this study is to construct a conceptual model of FC among AYAs with cancer to inform future measurement development. METHODS Concept elicitation interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of stakeholders: 36 AYAs (10 adolescents, 12 emerging adults, and 14 young adults), 36 AYA oncology health care providers, and 12 content experts in cancer-related infertility. The constant comparative method was used to identify themes and properties that illustrate AYAs' conceptualization and/or experience of FC. RESULTS Thirteen themes characterized FC among AYAs with cancer, varying by stakeholder group and domain affiliations. Themes were grouped by four domains (e.g., affective, information, coping, and logistical), which organized the conceptual model. Affective experiences were further determined to be an important component within the other three domains. AYAs' fertility and fertility preservation experiences were shaped by communication factors and timing factors including placement along the lifespan/cancer continuum. CONCLUSIONS AYA FC are characterized by uncertainty and confusion that may contribute to future decisional regret or magnify feelings of loss. Results add to previous research by examining individual, relational, and health care factors that fluctuate to inform fertility preservation perceptions and decision-making across the AYA age spectrum. Findings will be used to develop and test new self-report measures of FC among AYAs with cancer and survivors using classic and modern measurement theory approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mollie R. Canzona
- Department of Communication, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - David E. Victorson
- Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Karly Murphy
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Marla L. Clayman
- General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Northwestern Medicine Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Bonnie Patel
- Reproductive Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nicole Puccinelli-Ortega
- Qualitative and Patient-Reported Outcomes Shared Resource, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Thomas W. McLean
- Pediatric Hematology And Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Onengiya Harry
- Pediatrics - Rheumatology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Denisha Little-Greene
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - John M. Salsman
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
- Clinical Research in Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mulder RL, Font-Gonzalez A, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Quinn GP, Ginsberg JP, Loeffen EAH, Hudson MM, Burns KC, van Santen HM, Berger C, Diesch T, Dirksen U, Giwercman A, Gracia C, Hunter SE, Kelvin JF, Klosky JL, Laven JSE, Lockart BA, Neggers SJCMM, Peate M, Phillips B, Reed DR, Tinner EME, Byrne J, Veening M, van de Berg M, Verhaak CM, Anazodo A, Rodriguez-Wallberg K, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Asogwa OA, Brownsdon A, Wallace WH, Green DM, Skinner R, Haupt R, Kenney LB, Levine J, van de Wetering MD, Tissing WJE, Paul NW, Kremer LCM, Inthorn J. Communication and ethical considerations for fertility preservation for patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer: recommendations from the PanCareLIFE Consortium and the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e68-e80. [PMID: 33539755 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30595-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer who will be treated with gonadotoxic therapies are at increased risk for infertility. Many patients and their families desire biological children but effective communication about treatment-related infertility risk and procedures for fertility preservation does not always happen. The PanCareLIFE Consortium and the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group reviewed the literature and developed a clinical practice guideline that provides recommendations for ongoing communication methods for fertility preservation for patients who were diagnosed with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer at age 25 years or younger and their families. Moreover, the guideline panel formulated considerations of the ethical implications that are associated with these procedures. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to grade the evidence and recommendations. In this clinical practice guideline, existing evidence and international expertise are combined to develop transparent recommendations that are easy to use to facilitate ongoing communication between health-care providers and patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer who might be at high risk for fertility impairment and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée L Mulder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Anna Font-Gonzalez
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Gwendolyn P Quinn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Population Health, and Division of Medical Ethics, New York University School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jill P Ginsberg
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Erik A H Loeffen
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, UMC Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Melissa M Hudson
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control and Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Karen C Burns
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Hanneke M van Santen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Claire Berger
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France; Host Research Team EA4607 Autonomic Nervous System, Epidemiology, Physiology, Exercise, and Health, Jean Monnet University of Saint-Étienne, Education and Research Cluster Lyon, Saint-Étienne, France
| | - Tamara Diesch
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Children's Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Uta Dirksen
- Department of Pediatrics III, West German Cancer Centre, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, Essen, Germany
| | - Aleksander Giwercman
- Division of Molecular Reproductive Medicine, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Clarisa Gracia
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarah E Hunter
- Starship Blood and Cancer Centre, Starship Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - James L Klosky
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Joop S E Laven
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Barbara A Lockart
- Division of Pediatric Surgery and Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sebastian J C M M Neggers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Sophia Children's Hospital and Pituitary Center Rotterdam, Endocrinology Section, Department of Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Bob Phillips
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Damon R Reed
- Adolescent Young Adult Oncology Program, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Eva Maria E Tinner
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University Children's Hospital, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Margreet Veening
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marleen van de Berg
- Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Chris M Verhaak
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboudumc Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kenny Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Alexandra Brownsdon
- Children and Young Peoples' Cancer Service, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - W Hamish Wallace
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Daniel M Green
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control and Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Roderick Skinner
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Haematology/Oncology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Riccardo Haupt
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit and DOPO Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | - Lisa B Kenney
- Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer Levine
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Wim J E Tissing
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, UMC Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Norbert W Paul
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Population Health, and Division of Medical Ethics, New York University School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Julia Inthorn
- Institute for the History, Philosophy, and Ethics of Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Woodruff TK, Ataman-Millhouse L, Acharya KS, Almeida-Santos T, Anazodo A, Anderson RA, Appiah L, Bader J, Becktell K, Brannigan RE, Breech L, Bourlon MT, Bumbuliene Ž, Burns K, Campo-Engelstein L, Campos JR, Centola GM, Chehin MB, Chen D, De Vos M, Duncan FE, El-Damen A, Fair D, Famuyiwa Y, Fechner PY, Fontoura P, Frias O, Gerkowicz SA, Ginsberg J, Gracia CR, Goldman K, Gomez-Lobo V, Hazelrigg B, Hsieh MH, Hoyos LR, Hoyos-Martinez A, Jach R, Jassem J, Javed M, Jayasinghe Y, Jeelani R, Jeruss JS, Kaul-Mahajan N, Keim-Malpass J, Ketterl TG, Khrouf M, Kimelman D, Kusuhara A, Kutteh WH, Laronda MM, Lee JR, Lehmann V, Letourneau JM, McGinnis LK, McMahon E, Meacham LR, Mijangos MFV, Moravek M, Nahata L, Ogweno GM, Orwig KE, Pavone ME, Peccatori FA, Pesce RI, Pulaski H, Quinn G, Quintana R, Quintana T, de Carvalho BR, Ramsey-Goldman R, Reinecke J, Reis FM, Rios J, Rhoton-Vlasak AS, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Roeca C, Rotz SJ, Rowell E, Salama M, Saraf AJ, Scarella A, Schafer-Kalkhoff T, Schmidt D, Senapati S, Shah D, Shikanov A, Shnorhavorian M, Skiles JL, Smith JF, Smith K, Sobral F, Stimpert K, Su HI, Sugimoto K, Suzuki N, Thakur M, Victorson D, Viale L, Vitek W, Wallace WH, Wartella EA, Westphal LM, Whiteside S, Wilcox LH, Wyns C, Xiao S, Xu J, Zelinski M. A View from the past into our collective future: the oncofertility consortium vision statement. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:3-15. [PMID: 33405006 PMCID: PMC7786868 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01983-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Today, male and female adult and pediatric cancer patients, individuals transitioning between gender identities, and other individuals facing health extending but fertility limiting treatments can look forward to a fertile future. This is, in part, due to the work of members associated with the Oncofertility Consortium. Methods The Oncofertility Consortium is an international, interdisciplinary initiative originally designed to explore the urgent unmet need associated with the reproductive future of cancer survivors. As the strategies for fertility management were invented, developed or applied, the individuals for who the program offered hope, similarly expanded. As a community of practice, Consortium participants share information in an open and rapid manner to addresses the complex health care and quality-of-life issues of cancer, transgender and other patients. To ensure that the organization remains contemporary to the needs of the community, the field designed a fully inclusive mechanism for strategic planning and here present the findings of this process. Results This interprofessional network of medical specialists, scientists, and scholars in the law, medical ethics, religious studies and other disciplines associated with human interventions, explore the relationships between health, disease, survivorship, treatment, gender and reproductive longevity. Conclusion The goals are to continually integrate the best science in the service of the needs of patients and build a community of care that is ready for the challenges of the field in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa K Woodruff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Lauren Ataman-Millhouse
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kelly S Acharya
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Duke Fertility Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Teresa Almeida-Santos
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal.,Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia.,Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard A Anderson
- Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Leslie Appiah
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Joy Bader
- ReproTech, Ltd., Saint Paul, MN, USA
| | | | - Robert E Brannigan
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Lesley Breech
- Department of Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Maria T Bourlon
- Hemato-Oncology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Žana Bumbuliene
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Karen Burns
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Division of Oncology, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Lisa Campo-Engelstein
- Institute for the Medical Humanities, Department of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | | | - Grace M Centola
- Dadi, Inc., Brooklyn, NY, USA.,Phoenix Sperm Bank of Seattle Sperm Bank, Phoenix, AZ, USA.,New England Cryogenic Center/New England Cord Blood Bank, Marlborough, MA, USA
| | | | - Diane Chen
- Potocsnak Family Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine and Pritzker Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.,Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, and Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michel De Vos
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Follicle Biology Laboratory (FOBI), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, Perinatology and Reproductology, Institute of Professional Education, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Francesca E Duncan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ahmed El-Damen
- IVIRMA Middle East Fertility Clinic, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.,Division of Embryology and Comparative Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Douglas Fair
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Utah, Primary Children's Hospital, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Yemi Famuyiwa
- Montgomery Fertility Center, Rockville, MD, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Patricia Y Fechner
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Olivia Frias
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | - Jill Ginsberg
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Clarisa R Gracia
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kara Goldman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Veronica Gomez-Lobo
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Michael H Hsieh
- Department of Urology, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Luis R Hoyos
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alfonso Hoyos-Martinez
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Diabetes and Endocrinology, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert Jach
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Jacek Jassem
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Murid Javed
- OriginElle Fertility Clinic and Women's Health Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Yasmin Jayasinghe
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Roohi Jeelani
- Vios Fertility Institute, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jacqueline S Jeruss
- Departments of Surgery, Pathology, and Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nalini Kaul-Mahajan
- Mother & Child Hospital, New Delhi, India.,Ferticity Fertility Clinics, New Delhi, India
| | - Jessica Keim-Malpass
- School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Tyler G Ketterl
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Dana Kimelman
- Centro de Esterilidad Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Atsuko Kusuhara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - William H Kutteh
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.,Department of Surgery, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Monica M Laronda
- Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jung Ryeol Lee
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Fertility Preservation and Enhancement Research Laboratory, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Vicky Lehmann
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph M Letourneau
- University of Utah Center for Reproductive Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Lynda K McGinnis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Eileen McMahon
- Sinai Health System, Mount Sinai Fertility, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lillian R Meacham
- Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer Center of Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Monserrat Fabiola Velez Mijangos
- Biology of Human Reproduction Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Molly Moravek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Leena Nahata
- Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - George Moses Ogweno
- Reproductive Endocrinology and Fertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Nairobi Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.,Esis Health Services (EHS), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Kyle E Orwig
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mary Ellen Pavone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
- Fertility & Procreation Unit, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Romina Ileana Pesce
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Hanna Pulaski
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Gwendolyn Quinn
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Medical Ethics, Population Health, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman
- Department of Medicine/Division of Rheumatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Fernando M Reis
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Julie Rios
- Department of Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Alice S Rhoton-Vlasak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Cassandra Roeca
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Seth J Rotz
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Erin Rowell
- Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mahmoud Salama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Amanda J Saraf
- Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Anibal Scarella
- Centro de Reproducción Humana, Facultad Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.,Departamento de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
| | | | - Deb Schmidt
- Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Suneeta Senapati
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Divya Shah
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ariella Shikanov
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Margarett Shnorhavorian
- Department of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jodi L Skiles
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - James F Smith
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kristin Smith
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Fabio Sobral
- Pregna Medicina Reproductiva, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Kyle Stimpert
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - H Irene Su
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Kouhei Sugimoto
- International Center for Reproductive Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Nao Suzuki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Mili Thakur
- Reproductive Genomics Program, The Fertility Center, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - David Victorson
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Wendy Vitek
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - W Hamish Wallace
- Paediatric Oncology, University of Edinburgh & Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Ellen A Wartella
- Center on Media and Human Development, School of Communication, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Lynn M Westphal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Stacy Whiteside
- Fertility & Reproductive Health Program, Department of Hematology/Oncology/BMT, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Christine Wyns
- Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Shuo Xiao
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Environmental Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Jing Xu
- Division of Reproductive & Developmental Sciences, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, OR, USA.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Mary Zelinski
- Division of Reproductive & Developmental Sciences, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, OR, USA.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nakayama H, Toh Y, Fujishita M, Nakagama H. Present status of support for adolescent and young adult cancer patients in member hospitals of Japanese Association of Clinical Cancer Centers. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2020; 50:1282-1289. [PMID: 32761084 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND the proportion of adolescent and young adult cancer patients is relatively small, but they require age-specific support. We conducted a survey on the present status of support for adolescent and young adult cancer patients in the Japanese Association of Clinical Cancer Centers. METHODS in December 2018, the primary questionnaires were sent to 32 hospitals of Japanese Association of Clinical Cancer Centers regarding support for adolescent and young adult cancer patients. Secondary questionnaires were sent to doctors, nurses and medical social workers in 24 hospitals for the implementation rates of information provision and consultation on 17 unmet needs identified in the study by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. RESULTS there were marked differences in support for adolescent and young adult cancer patients among hospitals. Only one hospital facilitated an adolescent and young adult department and ward. Thirteen hospitals cooperated with the paediatric cancer designated hospitals. A learning support for high school-aged patients was provided in 15 hospitals. Adolescent and young adult support teams were active in seven hospitals and staff training sessions were held in eight hospitals. Many hospitals had referrals for fertility preservation. The rates of information provision and consultation for more than 70% of adolescent and young adult patients showed statistically significant differences among the medical professions in most of the 17 items. CONCLUSIONS support systems and activities for adolescent and young adult cancer patients vary extremely across hospitals. Information provision and consultation for unmet needs are still insufficient. Therefore, sharing information and experiences is required to enhance the support for adolescent and young adult cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideki Nakayama
- The Japanese Association of Clinical Cancer Centers, Japan.,Department of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yasushi Toh
- The Japanese Association of Clinical Cancer Centers, Japan.,National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Manami Fujishita
- The Japanese Association of Clinical Cancer Centers, Japan.,The Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Nakagama
- The Japanese Association of Clinical Cancer Centers, Japan.,National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kolbuck VD, Sajwani A, Kyweluk MA, Finlayson C, Gordon EJ, Chen D. Formative development of a fertility decision aid for transgender adolescents and young adults: a multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 37:2805-2816. [PMID: 32995972 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01947-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE No educational and decision support tools exist to aid transgender and non-binary (TNB) adolescents and young adults (AYA) in making decisions about fertility preservation in the context of initiating gender-affirming medical care that can impair fertility. This study identified critical content areas and learning objectives to include in a decision aid about fertility preservation targeted for TNB AYA. METHODS Delphi methodology was leveraged to engage 80 multidisciplinary experts in reproductive medicine and pediatric transgender health care in a two round consensus building procedure. Proposed content areas rated as "probably keep" or "definitely keep" by 75% of experts were retained. Proposed learning objectives reaching 75% agreement on ratings of importance and priority were also identified. RESULTS The Delphi procedure identified five priority content areas (Basic Reproduction; Gender-Affirming Medical Interventions: Impacts on Fertility; Established Fertility Preservation Options; Benefits and Risks of Established Fertility Preservation Procedures; Alternative Pathways to Parenting) and 25 learning objectives to prioritize in a fertility-related decision aid for TNB AYA. CONCLUSION A multidisciplinary panel of experts achieved agreement around content areas and learning objectives to incorporate into a decision aid about fertility preservation for TNB AYA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria D Kolbuck
- Potocsnak Family Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 East Chicago Avenue, Box 161B, Chicago, IL, 60611-2605, USA
| | - Afiya Sajwani
- Potocsnak Family Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 East Chicago Avenue, Box 161B, Chicago, IL, 60611-2605, USA
| | - Moira A Kyweluk
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Courtney Finlayson
- Division of Endocrinology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.,Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research and Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Elisa J Gordon
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Diane Chen
- Potocsnak Family Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 East Chicago Avenue, Box 161B, Chicago, IL, 60611-2605, USA. .,Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research and Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. .,Pritzker Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. .,Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Robertson EG, Cohen J, Signorelli C, Grant DM, Fardell JE, Wakefield CE. What instruments should we use to assess paediatric decision-making interventions? A narrative review. J Child Health Care 2020; 24:458-472. [PMID: 31450963 DOI: 10.1177/1367493519869717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
There is an increasing number of shared decision-making (SDM) interventions in paediatrics. However, there is little consensus as to the best instruments to assess the feasibility and impact of these interventions. This narrative review aims to answer: (1) what feasibility, knowledge and decision-making instruments have been used to assess paediatric SDM interventions and (2) what are the psychometric properties of used decision-making instruments, guided by the 'consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instrument' criteria. We conducted a review of the peer-reviewed literature. We identified 23 studies that evaluated a paediatric intervention to facilitate SDM for a specific health decision. Eighteen studies assessed intervention feasibility, with a wide variability in assessment between studies. Twelve studies assessed objective knowledge, and four studies assessed subjective knowledge with all but one study aggregating correct responses. We identified nine decision-making instruments that had been assessed psychometrically, although few had been thoroughly evaluated. The Decisional Conflict Scale was the most commonly-used instrument and the only instrument evaluated in paediatrics. Our study revealed a lack of consistency in the instruments used to evaluate decision-making interventions in paediatrics, making it difficult to compare interventions. We provide several recommendations for researchers to improve the assessment of SDM interventions in paediatrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eden G Robertson
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.,Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jennifer Cohen
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.,Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Christina Signorelli
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.,Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - David M Grant
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
| | - Joanna E Fardell
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.,Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Claire E Wakefield
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.,Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Korte E, Schilling R, Balcerek M, Campbell H, Dirksen U, Herrmann G, Kepakova K, Kepak T, Klco-Brosius S, Kruseova J, Kunstreich M, Lackner H, Langer T, Panasiuk A, Stefanowicz J, Strauß G, Ranft A, Byrne J, Goldbeck L, Borgmann-Staudt A. Fertility education for adolescent cancer patients: Gaps in current clinical practice in Europe. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2020; 29:e13279. [PMID: 32567091 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As adolescent cancer patients may suffer from infertility following treatment, fertility counselling is essential. Our aim was to explore the current situation in four European countries in terms of (I) education about the risk for infertility, (II) counselling on fertility preservation, (III) patients' knowledge on fertility, (IV) sufficiency of information and (V) uptake of cryopreservation. METHODS In total, 113 patients (13-20 years) at 11 study centres completed a self-report questionnaire three and six months after cancer diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS As many as 80.2% of participants reported having received education about the risk for infertility prior to treatment, 73.2% recalled counselling on fertility preservation. Only 52.3% stated they felt sufficiently informed to make a decision. Inability to recall counselling on fertility preservation (OR = 0.03, CI: 0.00-0.47) and female gender (OR = 0.11, CI: 0.03-0.48) was associated with lower use of cryopreservation, whereas older age was associated with higher use. CONCLUSION Fertility counselling was available to a relatively high proportion of patients, and it did influence the utilisation of cryopreservation. However, many patients did not feel sufficiently informed. Further improvement is needed to enable adolescent cancer patients to make an informed decision on fertility preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Korte
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralph Schilling
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Magdalena Balcerek
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health, BIH, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Uta Dirksen
- University Hospital Essen Pediatrics III, West German Cancer Centre, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Research Centre (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gloria Herrmann
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Katerina Kepakova
- University Hospital Brno & International Clinical Research Center (FNUSA-ICRC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Kepak
- University Hospital Brno & International Clinical Research Center (FNUSA-ICRC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Marina Kunstreich
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Haematology and Immunology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Herwig Lackner
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Thorsten Langer
- Paediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Joanna Stefanowicz
- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Gabriele Strauß
- Helios Kliniken Berlin-Buch, Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Andreas Ranft
- University Hospital Essen Pediatrics III, West German Cancer Centre, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Research Centre (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Lutz Goldbeck
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Anja Borgmann-Staudt
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Robertson EG, Wakefield CE, Cohn RJ, Battisti RA, Donoghoe MW, Ziegler DS, Fardell JE, Mitchell R, O'Brien TA. Piloting a parent and patient decision aid to support clinical trial decision making in childhood cancer. Psychooncology 2019; 28:1520-1529. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.5109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Revised: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eden G. Robertson
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
- School of Women's and Children's HealthUNSW Sydney Kensington New South Wales Australia
| | - Claire E. Wakefield
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
- School of Women's and Children's HealthUNSW Sydney Kensington New South Wales Australia
| | - Richard J. Cohn
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
- School of Women's and Children's HealthUNSW Sydney Kensington New South Wales Australia
- Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Robert A. Battisti
- Cancer Centre for ChildrenChildren's Hospital at Westmead Westmead New South Wales Australia
| | | | - David S. Ziegler
- School of Women's and Children's HealthUNSW Sydney Kensington New South Wales Australia
- Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Joanna E. Fardell
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
- School of Women's and Children's HealthUNSW Sydney Kensington New South Wales Australia
| | - Richard Mitchell
- School of Women's and Children's HealthUNSW Sydney Kensington New South Wales Australia
- Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Tracey A. O'Brien
- School of Women's and Children's HealthUNSW Sydney Kensington New South Wales Australia
- Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|