1
|
Tao H, Wei Y, Shen Z, Liu Z. Matched-pair analysis of the impact of low-dose postoperative radiotherapy on prognosis in patients with advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma without positive surgical margins and extracapsular extension. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1089275. [PMID: 37746267 PMCID: PMC10513504 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1089275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We conducted a comparative analysis between low and high-dose postoperative radiotherapy in patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC) in stage III or IV without positive surgical margins and extracapsular extension (ECE). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to eliminate confounding factors and reduce bias. Methods The matched-pair analysis included 156 patients divided into two groups: the low-dose radiotherapy group (LD-RT 50 Gy, 78 cases) and the high-dose radiotherapy group (HD-RT 60 Gy, 78 cases). Both cohorts were statistically comparable in terms of age, gender, subsite, and TNM classification. Results The median follow-up time was 49 months (ranging from 5 to 100 months). The overall survival (OS) rate, progression-free survival (PFS) rate, locoregional control rate (87% vs. 85.7%; p = 0.754), distant metastases-free survival (79.2% vs. 76.6%; p = 0.506), and the occurrence of second primary tumors (96.1% vs. 93.5%; p = 0.347) showed no significant differences between the LD-RT group and the HD-RT group. The 3-year OS was 64.9% and 61% in the low-dose and high-dose group, respectively, and 63% in the entire group (p = 0.547). The 3-year PFS was 63.6% and 54.5% (p = 0.250), respectively, and the 3-year PFS of the entire group was 59.1%. Multivariate analyses revealed that pathological T and N classification, and pathological differentiation were associated with 3-year OS, PFS, and LRFS and were independent prognostic factors (p < 0.05). LD-RT was not associated with an increased risk of death and disease progression compared to HD-RT. Conclusion The results of postoperative low-dose radiotherapy did not show inferiority to those of high-dose radiation for patients with advanced hypopharyngeal cancer without positive surgical margins and ECE in terms of OS, PFS, locoregional control, and metastases-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yumei Wei
- Department of Head and Neck Radiotherapy, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marques O, Brenet E, Gaultier V, Marchand-Crety C. [Postoperative radiotherapy with cetuximab for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients at high risk of recurrence not eligible for cisplatin: A single-center experience and literature review]. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:17-22. [PMID: 35853823 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of concurrent cetuximab with postoperative radiotherapy for patients with head and neck cancer has been scarcely discussed in the literature. The main aim of this study was to report clinical outcomes of high-risk head and neck cancer patients treated by postoperative radiotherapy with cetuximab. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 2013 and December 2016, all medical records of patients operated for head and neck cancer who underwent postoperative radiochemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who received cisplatin were excluded; only patients who received cetuximab were included in the analysis. RESULTS Among 52 patients with head and neck cancer treated with postoperative radiochemotherapy, 18 patients received cetuximab potentiation due to ineligibility for cisplatin. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 23 and 19,5 months and 3-year OS and PFS were 30,5% and 25,9%, respectively. There was a 22% treatment discontinuation rate. CONCLUSION In our single-center retrospective analysis, postoperative radiotherapy with cetuximab for patients with high-risk head and neck cancer ineligible for cisplatin showed similar outcomes to the literature data for exclusive postoperative radiotherapy, with a high discontinuation rate. These low-power data support the lack of indication for cetuximab in combination with postoperative radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Marques
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Godinot, Reims, France
| | - E Brenet
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hôpital Robert Debré, Reims, France
| | - V Gaultier
- Department of Oncology Care Unit, Hôpital Robert Debré, Reims, France
| | - C Marchand-Crety
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Polyclinique Courlancy, Reims, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fukumoto C, Sawatani Y, Shiraishi R, Zama M, Shimura M, Hasegawa T, Komiyama Y, Fujita A, Wakui T, Kawamata H. Effectiveness of cetuximab as preemptive postsurgical therapy for oral squamous cell carcinoma patients with major risk: a single-center retrospective cohort study. Invest New Drugs 2021; 39:846-852. [PMID: 33449240 PMCID: PMC8068704 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-021-01062-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
A retrospective cohort study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of preemptive postsurgical therapy with cetuximab for patients with a major risk of recurrence or metastasis after clinical complete resection of primary oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The study period was from 2007 to 2019 for patients treated at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine. OSCC patients with major risk (n = 88) in the follow-up period were divided into groups with no postsurgical treatment (NP group), with standard postsurgical treatment (SP group), and with postsurgical treatment including cetuximab (CP group), and prognosis were compared among those groups. The 5-year overall survival rate was significantly higher in patients who received postsurgical treatment with cetuximab (CP) compared to that in the other two groups ((CP vs. NP, p = 0.028; CP vs. SP, p = 0.042). Furthermore, we performed multivariate analysis to evaluate the effects of the main components of the treatment. Among CDDP, radiotherapy, and cetuximab, only cetuximab significantly contributed to improved survival by univariate analysis (crude HR:0.228, 95%CI:0.05-0.968, p = 0.045). cetuximab also showed the same tendency in multivariate analysis, although p value did not reach significant level (Adjusted HR: 0.233, 95%CI: 0.053-1.028, p = 0.054). The results suggest that the postsurgical treatment with cetuximab as a preemptive postsurgical therapy after complete surgical resection of a visible tumor is considerably effective for OSCC patients with major risk, in other words, invisible dormant metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chonji Fukumoto
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Tochigi, Shimo-Tsuga, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Yuta Sawatani
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Tochigi, Shimo-Tsuga, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Ryo Shiraishi
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Tochigi, Shimo-Tsuga, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Manabu Zama
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Tochigi, Shimo-Tsuga, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Michiko Shimura
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Tochigi, Shimo-Tsuga, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Tomonori Hasegawa
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Tochigi, Shimo-Tsuga, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Yuske Komiyama
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Tochigi, Shimo-Tsuga, 321-0293, Japan
- Department of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sano Kosei General Hospital, 1728 Horigome, Sano, Tochigi, 327-8511, Japan
| | - Atsushi Fujita
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Tochigi, Shimo-Tsuga, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Takahiro Wakui
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Tochigi, Shimo-Tsuga, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Kawamata
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Tochigi, Shimo-Tsuga, 321-0293, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|