Measurement of Quality of Life in Patients with Mycosis Fungoides/Sézary Syndrome Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: Development of an Electronic Instrument

Health-related quality of life and its influencing factors in patients with primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas: A multicentric study in 100 patients

BACKGROUND

Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas (CBCL) are a group of rare malignant skin diseases that represent approximately 20%-30% of all primary cutaneous lymphomas (PCL). Previous studies revealed impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients diagnosed with primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Currently, only small-sized studies investigated HRQoL in CBCL patients and lacked detailed analysis of respective subtypes.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate HRQoL in CBCL patients to identify independent factors of HRQoL impairment in CBCL patients.

METHODS

One hundred CBCL patients were recruited from eight German PCL centres in this multicentric, cross-sectional study from 2021 to 2022. The patients completed the dermatologic HRQoL questionnaire Skindex-29 and an investigator-designed 'CBCL-Questionnaire' with additional questions on HRQoL and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

The Skindex-29 revealed that HRQoL in CBCL patients is impaired on a mild to moderate level. The multiple regression analysis identified parameters like worries about dying, feeling prejudiced/discriminated and impairment of daily activities to be independently associated with impairment of HRQoL. Highest scores for HRQoL impairment were found in patients with primary cutaneous follicle centre lymphoma while on rituximab treatment and in patients with primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma while on watchful waiting.

CONCLUSIONS

HRQoL is impaired in CBCL patients, even though, in the face of indolent disease course and favourable prognosis in the majority of cases. Of note, our investigator-designed tool identified worries about dying, feeling prejudiced/discriminated, and the type of treatment to have a negative impact on patients' HRQoL. Our study highlights the importance of a thorough patient-doctor communication to capture overall disease burden because generic HRQoL tools might lack of disease-specific items.

Current Utilization of Qualitative Methodologies in Dermatology: A Scoping Review

The focus of this review was to determine how qualitative methods are used in dermatology research and whether published manuscripts meet current standards for qualitative research. A scoping review of manuscripts published in English between January 1, 2016 and September 22, 2021 was conducted. A coding document was developed to collect information on authors, methodology, participants, research theme, and the presence of quality criteria as outlined by the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Manuscripts were included if they described original qualitative research about dermatologic conditions or topics of primary interest to dermatology. An adjacency search yielded 372 manuscripts, and after screening, 134 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies utilized interviews or focus groups, and researchers predominantly selected participants on the basis of disease status, including over 30 common and rare dermatologic conditions. Research themes frequently included patient experience of disease, development of patient-reported outcomes, and descriptions of provider and caregiver experiences. Although most authors explained their analysis and sampling strategy and included empirical data, few referenced qualitative data reporting standards. Missed opportunities for qualitative methods in dermatology include examination of health disparities, exploration of surgical and cosmetic dermatology experiences, and determination of the lived experience of and provider attitudes toward diverse patient populations.

Feasibility of Deriving Health State Utilities in Mycosis Fungoides Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Using Mapping Algorithms

BACKGROUND

A prospective, observational, US-based study (PROVe) used three questionnaires (Pruritus-VAS, Skindex-29, MF/SS-CTCL QoL) to assess quality of life in patients diagnosed with mycosis fungoides cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (MF-CTCL); however, none of these studies was provided with a preference-based algorithm yielding health state utility values (HSUVs).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of deriving HSUVs from published mapping algorithms by comparing mapped utilities with the HSUVs reported in the MF-CTCL literature.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, the School of Health and Related Research Health Utility Database (ScHARRHUD), and the Health Economics Research Centre (HERC) database of mapping studies (version 7.0) to identify any studies mapping Pruritus-VAS, Skindex-29, or MF/SS-CTCL QoL to a preference-based instrument (ideally, EQ-5D), and any studies assessing HSUVs in MF-CTCL. Two algorithms from a recent study that mapped Pruritus-VAS onto EQ-5D-3L were applied to the PROVe patient-level data. We performed multiple imputation to handle missing VAS data, calculated average mapped utilities in the whole sample, and compared them with relevant factors using the t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

Overall, 298 patients provided 1441 Pruritus-VAS scores over a 2-year follow-up (1-21 visits per patient). The average mapped HSUVs ranged between 0.950 and 0.999 depending on the algorithm applied and imputation of missing data. In subgroup analysis, significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed according to age, race, and cancer stage. A few previous studies that collected HSUVs from MF-CTCL patients reported mean values of between 0.82 and 0.87 using time trade-off, 0.63 and 0.83 using EQ-5D, and 0.51 and 0.69 using the HUI3.

CONCLUSIONS

The HSUVs derived by applying published mapping algorithms to PROVe Pruritus-VAS data appeared largely overestimated if compared with the existing literature. More research is required to understand the applicability of existing mapping algorithms and to develop new mapping algorithms in MF-CTCL.

Methodological Issues in Analyzing Real-World Longitudinal Occupational Health Data: A Useful Guide to Approaching the Topic

Ever greater technological advances and democratization of digital tools such as computers and smartphones offer researchers new possibilities to collect large amounts of health data in order to conduct clinical research. Such data, called real-world data, appears to be a perfect complement to traditional randomized clinical trials and has become more important in health decisions. Due to its longitudinal nature, real-world data is subject to specific and well-known methodological issues, namely issues with the analysis of cluster-correlated data, missing data and longitudinal data itself. These concepts have been widely discussed in the literature and many methods and solutions have been proposed to cope with these issues. As examples, mixed and trajectory models have been developed to explore longitudinal data sets, imputation methods can resolve missing data issues, and multilevel models facilitate the treatment of cluster-correlated data. Nevertheless, the analysis of real-world longitudinal occupational health data remains difficult, especially when the methodological challenges overlap. The purpose of this article is to present various solutions developed in the literature to deal with cluster-correlated data, missing data and longitudinal data, sometimes overlapped, in an occupational health context. The novelty and usefulness of our approach is supported by a step-by-step search strategy and an example from the Wittyfit database, which is an epidemiological database of occupational health data. Therefore, we hope that this article will facilitate the work of researchers in the field and improve the accuracy of future studies.

Updated review on prognostic factors in mycosis fungoides and new skin lymphoma trials

BACKGROUND

Ten-year survival rates in mycosis fungoides (MF) broadly varies, however, there is no standardized prognostic index available. This is presumably due to low prevalence, heterogeneity, and diagnostic challenges in MF. Recent studies have focused on identifying objective prognostic indices by using different parameters for survival determinants. The Cutaneous Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (CLIPI) and the Prospective Cutaneous Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (PROCLIPI) represent prototypical studies that identify prognostic factors, seeking to improve management and outcomes in early-stage MF. Detecting these factors and stratifying MF patients according to their disease progression risk may help to manage these patients more efficiently.

AIMS

Review the current literature to determine the risk factors determining prognosis in MF.

METHODOLOGY

A Comprehensive literature search was performed using electronic online databases "PubMed" and "Google Scholar" using key words 'prognostic factor', 'prognostic indicator', 'mycosis fungoides', 'Sezary syndrome', 'Skin Lymphoma', 'Cutaneous Lymphoma'. Articles published in English language were considered for the review.

RESULTS

The strongest prognostic factor in MF patients is the stage of the disease. T stage and the presence of extracutaneous disease are the most important factors for survival. Other factors that are associated with worse prognosis are male gender, age >60, presence of plaques, folliculotropism, eosinophilia and lymph node stage above N1/Nx. Elevated LDH was associated with later tumor stages and large cell phenotype at diagnosis had a better prognosis. KIR3DL2 was associated with malignant transformation.

CONCLUSION

The PROCLIPI study has assessed risk factors collected in MF patients from different countries and across different ethnicities following a rigorous clinicopathologic process. The findings presented here illustrated that disease prognosis in early stages depends on many contributing factors. Detection and stratification of such factors may allow a personalized approach to management of these patients.

The changing therapeutic landscape, burden of disease, and unmet needs in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) have a chronic, relapsing course, and the most common subtypes are mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. The disease causes visible skin alterations and can also cause alopecia, pruritus and pain, all of which can impact patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The goal of treatment is to reduce symptoms and prevent disease progression. However, treatment recommendations are often based on low levels of evidence due to the lack of well-designed randomised clinical trials and treatment guidelines, and approved drugs vary considerably across different countries and regions. Currently, available treatments rarely lead to durable remissions and eventually become less effective, meaning patients often require multiple therapy changes. Skin-directed therapies (SDTs) are first-line treatments for early-stage CTCL, whereas systemic therapies may be needed for early-stage disease that does not respond to SDT or for advanced-stage disease. However, patients can experience significant side-effects with these treatments or may be unable to tolerate them. Hence, there is an unmet need for effective therapies with good safety profiles for the treatment of early- and late-stage CTCL. Here, we review current treatment guidelines, investigational and approved treatments, the impact of CTCL on patients' HRQoL, and the treatment of pruritus.

Current measures are not sufficient: an interview-based qualitative assessment of quality of life in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) negatively impacts quality of life (QoL), but existing QoL questionnaires may not comprehensively reflect patients' experience.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the aspects of QoL that are most meaningful to patients with CTCL and to evaluate existing QoL instruments in this context.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted between May and June 2019 using purposive sampling of patients with CTCL. Data were analysed by an inductive thematic approach using Dedoose Version 8.0.35.

RESULTS

One-on-one interviews lasting a median of 43 min were completed by 18 patients [median age 62 years (interquartile range 52-70); 39% advanced-stage (IIB-IV)]. Itch was the most common clinical symptom reported (16 of 18 patients), followed by pain (12 of 18), skin breaks (11 of 18) and skin flaking (10 of 18). Eleven patients reported that their symptoms interfered with sleep, which impacted daily functioning. Patients also noted a lack of understanding of the disease in the community and felt uncertain (12 of 18), depressed (11 of 18), suicidal (four of 18) and hopeless (nine of 18). Nearly all patients (17 of 18) reported a sense of 'otherness' (not feeling 'normal' or 'like themselves'), and most patients (16 of 18) specifically mentioned concern about their physical appearance. Patients also noted substantial treatment burden. Salient patient concerns, including individual clinical symptoms, concern about appearance and problems with sleep, were not adequately or consistently represented in generic, skin-specific or CTCL-specific QoL measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating the concerns and priorities that distinguish patients with CTCL from other patient populations will be of paramount importance in developing a comprehensive CTCL-specific measure of QoL that adequately captures patients' experience.