Defining the Supportive Care Needs and Psychological Morbidity of Patients With Functioning Versus Nonfunctioning Neuroendocrine Tumors: Protocol for a Phase 1 Trial of a Nurse-Led Online and Phone-Based Intervention

The unmet information needs, quality of life, and care experiences of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) at follow-up: 6 months from diagnosis

OBJECTIVES

To identify changes in the healthcare preferences, patient experiences, and quality of life of patients with NETs at 6-month follow-up, informing the design of supportive care services.

METHODS

This study presents 6-month follow-up data of a mixed-methods multi-site study. Demographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcome questionnaire data was collected.

RESULTS

High percentages of suboptimal experiences of care were reported. Patients reported less positive experiences with being involved in decisions about their care and treatment; their family or someone close to them having the opportunity to talk to their cancer doctor, or having their family or someone close to them receive all the information they need to help care for them at home. Patients also reported negative experiences for on the information about their cancer accessible online and the usefulness of the information they accessed. Differences between baseline and follow-up scores were mostly not significant apart from anxiety and sleep disturbance scales, CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NETs report difficulties in accessing and understanding written information that is persistent over time.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Outcomes will inform the design and development of an informational resource aimed at facilitating improved understanding for patients with NETs.

The unmet supportive care needs, quality of life, and care experiences of patients with functioning and non-functioning Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) at early diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

Healthcare experiences, quality of life and psychosocial needs of patients with Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) will be assessed to identify differences between NET sub-groups and inform the design of supportive care services.

METHODS

This study constitutes phase one of a three-phase mixed-methods multi-site study with NET patients (n = 123). Demographic, clinical and patient reported outcome questionnaire data was collected.

RESULTS

No differences in patient reported outcomes were found beyond symptoms of diarrhoea and flushing between NET sub-groups. For combined NET patients, the majority reported negative experiences in their understanding of the explanation of what was wrong with them (67%); receiving written information about their cancer (69%), their family/carer receiving all the information required to care for them (61%); and the usefulness of information about NETs online (66%). NET patients reported at least one moderate-to-high need for disease specific information (63%). Medium- to large-sized differences in quality of life subscales were also observed with the functioning group reporting more anxiety compared to population norms.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need to improve the current provision of information for people with NETs.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

These findings will inform the design and development of an informational resource to facilitate improved understanding for patients with NETs.

The Role of Patient Support Groups in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to establish the role patient support groups play in NENs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Published data on the role and work done by these groups is extremely sparse, so the review references publications in the wider cancer advocacy context. For the purposes of the review, a survey was carried out among the members of a global umbrella organization to ascertain the level of activities undertaken in support of the NEN patient community. The concept of "support groups" has changed significantly, as these groups have evolved from patient peer-to-peer support provision to a strategic focus on improving awareness and education among all stakeholders, generating patient evidence to influence policies for access to optimal diagnostics, treatment, and care, and setting the research agenda. Today, NEN patient organizations have an instrumental role of catalysts of change across the healthcare spectrum-especially relevant in a setting of less common and not well-understood diseases, where clear pathways and guidelines are still a challenge.