Effects of Patient Portal Use on Patient Satisfaction: Survey and Partial Least Squares Analysis

Investigation of the causal relationship between patient portal utilization and patient's self-care self-efficacy and satisfaction in care among patients with cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the causal relationship between the usage of patient portals and patients' self-care self-efficacy and satisfaction in care outcomes in the context of cancer care.

METHODS

The National Institute's HINTS 5 Cycle 1-4 (2017-2020) data were used to perform a secondary data analysis. Patients who reported being ever diagnosed with cancer were included in the study population. Their portal usage frequency was considered as an intervention. Patient's self-care self-efficacy and satisfaction in care were the primary outcomes considered and they were measured by survey respondents' self-reported information. A set of conditional independence tests based on the causal diagram was developed to examine the causal relationship between patient portal usage and the targeted outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 2579 were identified as patients with cancer or cancer survivors. We identified patient portals' impact on strengthening patients' ability to take care of their own health (P = .02, for the test rejecting which is necessary for the expected causal relationship, ie, the portal usage impacts the target outcome; P = .06, for the test rejecting which is necessary for the reverse causal relationship), and we identified heterogenous causal relationships between frequent patient portal usage and patients' perceived quality of care (P = .04 and P = .001, for the tests rejecting both suggests heterogeneous causal relationships). We could not conclusively determine the causal relationship between patient portal usage and patients' confidence in getting advice or information about health or cancer care related topics (P > .05 for both tests, suggesting inconclusive causal directions).

CONCLUSIONS

The results advocate patient portals and promote the need to provide better support and education to patients. The proposed statistical method exploits the potential of national survey data for causal inference studies.

Improving Patient Portal Activation for Newborns in the Well Baby Nursery

BACKGROUND

Patient portals provide parents access to their child's health information and direct communication with providers. Our study aimed to improve portal activation rates of newborns during nursery hospitalization to >70% over 6 months. Secondarily, we describe the facilitators and barriers to portal use.

METHODS

The study design used a mixed-methodology framework of quality improvement (QI) and cross-sectional analyses. The Model for Improvement guided QI efforts. The primary outcome was the proportion of portals activated for newborns during nursery hospitalization. Interventions included portal activation algorithm, staff huddles, and documentation templates. Telephone interviews were conducted with a randomized sample of mothers of infants who activated the portal. These mothers were divided into portal "users" and "nonusers." We examined sociodemographic variables and health care utilization outcomes in the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Portal activation increased from 12.9% to 85.4% after interventions. Among 482 mothers with active portals, 127 (26.3%) were interviewed. Of those, 70% (89 of 127) reported using the portal, and 85.4% (76 of 89) found it useful. Reasons for accessing the portal included checking appointments and reviewing test results. Lack of knowledge of portal functionality was the main barrier to portal use (42.1%). Portal users were less likely to have a no-show to primary care appointments compared with nonusers (44.9% versus 78.9%, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Portal activation rates increased after QI interventions in the nursery. Most parents accessed the portal and found it useful. Portals can improve health care delivery and patient engagement in the newborn period.

Electronic Patient Portal Use Among People Living With HIV

Collapse

Effect of In-Person vs Video Training and Access to All Functions vs a Limited Subset of Functions on Portal Use Among Inpatients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Inpatient portals provide patients with clinical data and information about their care and have the potential to influence patient engagement and experience. Although significant resources have been devoted to implementing these portals, evaluation of their effects has been limited.

Objective

To assess the effects of patient training and portal functionality on use of an inpatient portal and on patient satisfaction and involvement with care.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 15, 2016, to August 31, 2019, at 6 noncancer hospitals that were part of a single health care system. Patients who were at least 18 years of age, identified English as their preferred language, were not involuntarily confined or detained, and agreed to be provided a tablet to access the inpatient portal during their stay were eligible for participation. Data were analyzed from May 1, 2019, to March 15, 2021.

Interventions

A 2 × 2 factorial intervention design was used to compare 2 levels of a training intervention (touch intervention, consisting of in-person training vs built-in video tutorial) and 2 levels of portal function availability (tech intervention) within an inpatient portal (all functions operational vs a limited subset of functions).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcomes were inpatient portal use, measured by frequency and comprehensiveness of use, and patients' satisfaction and involvement with their care.

Results

Of 2892 participants, 1641 were women (56.7%) with a median age of 47.0 (95% CI, 46.0-48.0) years. Most patients were White (2221 [76.8%]). The median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 1 (95% CI, 1-1) and the median length of stay was 6 (95% CI, 6-7) days. Notably, the in-person training intervention was found to significantly increase inpatient portal use (incidence rate ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.25-1.44]) compared with the video tutorial. Patients who received in-person training had significantly higher odds of being comprehensive portal users than those who received the video tutorial (odds ratio, 20.75 [95% CI, 16.49-26.10]). Among patients who received the full-tech intervention, those who also received the in-person intervention used the portal more frequently (incidence rate ratio, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.25-1.48]) and more comprehensively (odds ratio, 22.52; [95% CI, 17.13-29.62]) than those who received the video tutorial. Patients who received in-person training had higher odds (OR, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.16-3.50]) of reporting being satisfied in the 6-month postdischarge survey. Similarly, patients who received the full-tech intervention had higher odds (OR, 2.06 [95%CI, 1.42-2.99]) of reporting being satisfied in the 6-month postdischarge survey.

Conclusions and Relevance

Providing in-person training or robust portal functionality increased inpatient engagement with the portal during the hospital stay. The effects of the training intervention suggest that providing personalized training to support use of this health information technology can be a powerful approach to increase patient engagement via portals.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02943109.