The Dilemma of TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism (rs1042522) and Breast Cancer Risk: A Case-Control Study and Meta-Analysis in The Iranian Population

How does geographical diversity shape vaccine efficacy?

Vaccination is a cornerstone of public health, saving millions of lives each year by preventing a variety of infectious diseases. Yet, despite global vaccination efforts, emerging research highlights significant geographical disparities in vaccine efficacy and immunogenicity. These variations underscore the critical interplay between immunological factors and environmental, genetic, and nutritional elements across different populations. Our review article aimed to explore the multifactorial reasons behind geographical variations in vaccine efficacy. Also, this study has shown how important host factors like age, obesity, gender, and genetic diversity, especially within the major histocompatibility complex, are in determining how well a vaccine works. Nutritional status, namely deficiencies in micronutrients such as vitamins and zinc, and lifestyle factors including stress, sleep, alcohol consumption, and physical activity are also shown to have profound effects on vaccine-induced immunity. Importantly, our paper also brought to light the influence of microbial and ecological factors, such as the gut microbiome and environmental pollutants, on the immune system's response to vaccination. The findings emphasize the importance of tailoring vaccination strategies to accommodate the unique immunological landscapes shaped by geographical and societal factors. This tailored approach could enhance vaccine efficacy, reduce disparities in vaccine response, and ultimately contribute to the global fight against infectious diseases.

Potential Role of Zinc Finger 365 rs10822013 and rs10995190 in Mammographic Density, Sporadic Breast Cancer Risk, and Prognosis

Background

Despite suggesting many genetic risk markers as the outcome of Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for breast cancer, replicating the results in different populations has remained the main issue. In this regard, this study assessed the association of two variations in Zinc Finger 365 (ZNF365) in an Iranian population.

Methods

In a case-control study conducted at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, between 2017 and 2020, ZNF365-rs10822013 and rs10995190 were genotyped using Allele-Specific PCR (AS-PCR). Breast density was assessed using mammography images. PHASE software module version 2 and SPSS version 16.0 were used for haplotype and statistical analyses. Quantitative and qualitative variables were compared between groups using independent t tests and Chi square tests, respectively. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate odds ratios. Multivariate analysis was then undertaken for the baseline variables, with a P<0.05 in the univariate analysis. The survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.

Results

In this survey, 732 females, including 342 breast cancer patients and 390 healthy subjects, were enrolled. rs10822013-T allele (P=0.014), rs10995190-G allele (P=0.003), and TG haplotype (P=0.002) were significantly associated with the increased risk of breast cancer. Moreover, rs10995190-GG genotype (P=0.042) and C-G haplotype (P=0.019) revealed a significant association with better overall survival. However, considered polymorphisms and their haplotypes indicated no association with breast density and clinical features of breast cancer.

Conclusion

ZNF365 variants might be a potential risk marker of breast cancer in the Iranian population. The interaction between alleles in haplotypes may modulate the amount of the risk conferred by these variants. Further studies on different ethnic groups can validate these results.

A Case Study on PPM1D and 9 Other Shared Germline Alterations in a Family

BACKGROUND

The use of high-throughput genotyping techniques has enabled us to identify the rare germline genetic variants with different pathogenicity and penetrance, and understand their role in cancer predisposition. We report here a familial cancer case, a study from Western Indian.

METHODS

NGS-WES was carried out in a lung cancer patient who has a family history of multiple cancers across generations, including tongue, lung, brain, cervical, urothelial, and esophageal cancer. The results were validated by data mining from available data bases. I-TASSER, RasMol and PyMol were used for protein structure modelling.

RESULTS

The sequencing by NGS-WES revealed PPM1D c.1654C>T (p.Arg552Ter) mutation in hotspot region exon 6 leading to sudden protein truncation and loss of the C-terminal, due to the substitution of C>T. This mutation was classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), due to limited data on lung cancer, The three unaffected siblings of proband did not show any pathogenic variants and comparative analysis of the four siblings indicate 9 shared genetic variants, classified as benign as per ClinVar.

CONCLUSION

PPM1D constitutional genetic alterations are rare and uncommon in different ethnic populations. This gene encodes a phosphatase playing role in regulating the P53 tumor suppressor pathway and DNA damage response. Genetic alterations in the PPM1D gene maybe linked to history of gliomas, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer onset in the proband's family.
.

Association Between Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes and Clinicopathological Characteristics

Objective

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the associations between seven tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (tSNPs) and risk of breast cancer assessed by tumor pathological characteristics and body mass index (BMI).

Methods

Seven tSNPs of four breast cancer susceptibility genes were analyzed in 734 Chinese women with breast cancer and 672 age-matched healthy controls; then, the association with clinicopathological characteristics, BMI, molecular subtype, TNM (T, tumor; N, lymph node; M, metastasis) staging and lymph node status was determined by unconditional logistic regression.

Results

Rs12951053 in TP53 and rs16945628 in BRIP1, displayed increased risk of breast cancer in the BMI ≧ 25 kg/m² group (OR=1.50, 95% CI: 1.02–2.21, P=0.041 and OR=1.92, 95% CI: 1.13–3.26, P=0.015, respectively). The other five tSNPs (rs1805812, rs2735385 and rs6999227 in NBS1, rs7220719 in BRIP1 and rs2299941 in PTEN) displayed a decreased risk of breast cancer in the 18.5≤BMI<25 kg/m² group. Rs12951053 in TP53 and rs7220719 in BRIP1 exhibited an increased risk of triple‐negative breast cancer (OR=1.50, 95% CI: 1.05–2.15, P=0.026 and OR=2.13, 95% CI: 1.05–4.29, P=0.032, respectively), but three tSNPs in NBS1 (rs1805812, rs2735385 and rs6999227) all displayed a negative association with both luminal B and triple-negative breast cancer. The tSNP rs2299941 in PTEN also exhibited a negative association with each molecular subtype, except triple-negative breast cancer. The majority of tSNPs displayed a negative association with stage II or III breast cancer. Most tSNPs showed a negative association with breast cancer that was lymph node negative or with 1–3 positive nodes. Only rs12951053 in TP53 displayed a positive association with lymph node-negative breast cancer (OR=1.43, 95% CI: 1.08–1.91, P=0.013).

Conclusion

The majority of tSNPs displayed a negative association with breast cancer and only a few tSNPs (rs12951053 in TP53, rs16945628 and rs7220719 in BRIP1) showed an increased risk of breast cancer as defined by clinicopathological characteristics.

Two tSNPs in BRIP1 are associated with breast cancer during TDT analysis

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate and confirm the association between 15 single nucleotide polymorphisms of four susceptibility genes (NBS1, TP53, PTEN, and BRIP1) and the susceptibility of breast cancer.

Methods

The genome DNA was extracted from peripheral blood and tumor tissues from one hundred and seventeen core families. 15 SNPs were detected by PCR. The transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) and the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) are used to verify the association between these SNPs and breast cancer. Further correlation between SNPs and certain pathological features of the tumor, including tumor size, location of lymph nodes, pathologic classification, and the stage and subtype of breast cancer, are analyzed by the chi‐square test and logistic regression analysis.

Results

Based on TDTs, two SNPs of rs7220719 and rs11871753 in BRIP1 showed a significant association with breast cancer, while the other 13 selected SNPs did not. However, further statistical analysis demonstrated no obvious differentiation in the clinical characteristics of breast cancer between 37 patients with rs7220719 and 80 patients with wild types. Similar results were also found for rs11871753.

Conclusions

The data provided the evidence for the association between two SNPs of BRIP1 and breast cancer, but did not affect certain clinical phenotypes.