• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4836276)   Today's Articles (3868)
For: Berns EA, Hendrick RE, Solari M, Barke L, Reddy D, Wolfman J, Segal L, DeLeon P, Benjamin S, Willis L. Digital and Screen-Film Mammography: Comparison of Image Acquisition and Interpretation Times. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:38-41. [PMID: 16794152 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.05.1397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Farber R, Houssami N, McGeechan K, Barratt AL, Bell KJL. The impact of the BreastScreen NSW transition from film to digital mammography, 2002-2016: a linked population health data analysis. Med J Aust 2025;222:82-90. [PMID: 39800865 PMCID: PMC11787811 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.52566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2025]
2
Farber R, Houssami N, Barnes I, McGeechan K, Barratt A, Bell KJL. Considerations for Evaluating the Introduction of New Cancer Screening Technology: Use of Interval Cancers to Assess Potential Benefits and Harms. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022;19:14647. [PMID: 36429373 PMCID: PMC9691207 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192214647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
3
Neeter LM, Raat H(F, Alcantara R, Robbe Q, Smidt ML, Wildberger JE, Lobbes MB. Contrast-enhanced mammography: what the radiologist needs to know. BJR Open 2021;3:20210034. [PMID: 34877457 PMCID: PMC8611680 DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20210034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]  Open
4
Comparable prediction of breast cancer risk from a glimpse or a first impression of a mammogram. COGNITIVE RESEARCH-PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS 2021;6:72. [PMID: 34743266 PMCID: PMC8572261 DOI: 10.1186/s41235-021-00339-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
5
Transitioning to Full Field Digital Mammography in Nova Scotia: Using Interrupted Time Series Methods to Study the Impact of Technology Change on Mammography Volumes. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2020;51:227-234. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
6
Pham R, Forsberg D, Plecha D. Improved Screening Mammogram Workflow by Maximizing PACS Streamlining Capabilities in an Academic Breast Center. J Digit Imaging 2018;30:133-140. [PMID: 27766443 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-016-9909-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]  Open
7
Berman CG. Recent Advances in Breast-Specific Imaging. Cancer Control 2017;14:338-49. [PMID: 17914334 DOI: 10.1177/107327480701400404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]  Open
8
Abbreviated MRI Protocols: Wave of the Future for Breast Cancer Screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017;208:284-289. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.16.17205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
9
Trieu PD, Brennan P, Giuffre B, Mello-Thoms C, Tapia K, Santangelo N, Kim H, Cameron K, Hayter C, Da Costa G, Sterba J, Lee W. Evaluation of the effect of zoom function on lesion detection by soft-copy reading of screening mammograms. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2015;59:292-9. [PMID: 25828255 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2014] [Accepted: 01/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
10
Tortajada M, Oliver A, Martí R, Ganau S, Tortajada L, Sentís M, Freixenet J, Zwiggelaar R. Breast peripheral area correction in digital mammograms. Comput Biol Med 2014;50:32-40. [PMID: 24845018 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2013] [Revised: 02/24/2014] [Accepted: 03/24/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
11
Elkin EB, Atoria CL, Leoce N, Bach PB, Schrag D. Changes in the availability of screening mammography, 2000-2010. Cancer 2013;119:3847-53. [PMID: 23943323 PMCID: PMC3805680 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2013] [Revised: 06/26/2013] [Accepted: 07/10/2013] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
12
Is confidence of mammographic assessment a good predictor of accuracy? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:W134-41. [PMID: 22733922 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.11.7701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
13
Association between time spent interpreting, level of confidence, and accuracy of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:970-8. [PMID: 22451568 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.11.6988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
14
Every second counts: digital and analogue mammography - comparison of reading times at the Queen Elizabeth Breast Screening Unit, Gateshead, UK. Breast Cancer Res 2011. [PMCID: PMC3238256 DOI: 10.1186/bcr2971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]  Open
15
Moin P, Deshpande R, Sayre J, Messer E, Gupte S, Romsdahl H, Hasegawa A, Liu BJ. An observer study for a computer-aided reading protocol (CARP) in the screening environment for digital mammography. Acad Radiol 2011;18:1420-9. [PMID: 21971259 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2011] [Revised: 07/14/2011] [Accepted: 07/14/2011] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
16
Detection of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:W761-8. [PMID: 21940549 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.10.5238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
17
Full-Field Digital Mammographic Interpretation With Prior Analog Versus Prior Digitized Analog Mammography: Time for Interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:1436-8. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.10.5430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
18
Guerriero C, Gillan MGC, Cairns J, Wallis MG, Gilbert FJ. Is computer aided detection (CAD) cost effective in screening mammography? A model based on the CADET II study. BMC Health Serv Res 2011;11:11. [PMID: 21241473 PMCID: PMC3032650 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2010] [Accepted: 01/17/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]  Open
19
Wang S, Merlin T, Kreisz F, Craft P, Hiller JE. Cost and cost-effectiveness of digital mammography compared with film-screen mammography in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2010;33:430-6. [PMID: 19811478 DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00424.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]  Open
20
Comparison of image acquisition and radiologist interpretation times in a diagnostic mammography center. Acad Radiol 2010;17:1168-74. [PMID: 20646940 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2010] [Revised: 04/28/2010] [Accepted: 04/29/2010] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
21
Diagnostic digital mammography in Japan: issues to consider. Breast Cancer 2010;17:180-2. [DOI: 10.1007/s12282-009-0196-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2009] [Accepted: 12/21/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
22
Haygood TM, Arribas E, Brennan PC, Atkinson EN, Herndon M, Dieber J, Geiser W, Santiago L, Mills CM, Davis P, Adrada B, Carkaci S, Stephens TW, Whitman GJ. Conspicuity of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming. Acad Radiol 2009;16:1509-17. [PMID: 19896068 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2009] [Revised: 07/10/2009] [Accepted: 06/13/2009] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
23
Sadaf A, Crystal P, Scaranelo A, Helbich T. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers. Eur J Radiol 2009;77:457-61. [PMID: 19875260 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2009] [Revised: 08/26/2009] [Accepted: 08/26/2009] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
24
Detection of masses and calcifications by soft-copy reading: comparison of two postprocessing algorithms for full-field digital mammography. Jpn J Radiol 2009;27:168-75. [DOI: 10.1007/s11604-009-0315-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2008] [Accepted: 02/01/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
25
Nishikawa RM, Acharyya S, Gatsonis C, Pisano ED, Cole EB, Marques HS, D'Orsi CJ, Farria DM, Kanal KM, Mahoney MC, Rebner M, Staiger MJ. Comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy reading for full-field digital mammography. Radiology 2009;251:41-9. [PMID: 19332845 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2511071462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
26
Haygood TM, Wang J, Lane D, Galvan E, Atkinson EN, Stephens T, Whitman GJ. Why does it take longer to read digital than film-screen screening mammograms? A partial explanation. J Digit Imaging 2009;23:170-80. [PMID: 19214635 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-009-9177-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2008] [Revised: 11/21/2008] [Accepted: 01/04/2009] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]  Open
27
Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screen screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:216-20. [PMID: 19098202 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.07.3608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
28
Faridah Y. Digital versus screen film mammography: a clinical comparison. Biomed Imaging Interv J 2008;4:e31. [PMID: 21611016 PMCID: PMC3097746 DOI: 10.2349/biij.4.4.e31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2008] [Revised: 05/13/2008] [Accepted: 05/19/2008] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]  Open
29
Haygood TM, Whitman GJ, Atkinson EN, Nikolova RG, Sandoval SYC, Dempsey PJ. Results of a survey on digital screening mammography: prevalence, efficiency, and use of ancillary diagnostic AIDS. J Am Coll Radiol 2008;5:585-92. [PMID: 18359447 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2007] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
30
Workflow in der digitalen Screeningmammographie. Radiologe 2008;48:335-44. [DOI: 10.1007/s00117-008-1633-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
31
Krupinski EA, Jiang Y. Anniversary Paper: Evaluation of medical imaging systems. Med Phys 2008;35:645-59. [DOI: 10.1118/1.2830376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
32
Pun E, Lau WFE, Cassumbhoy R, Taranto AJ, Pitman AG. Clinical experience of the first digital mammographic unit in Australia in its first year of use. Med J Aust 2007;187:576-9. [DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01420.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2006] [Accepted: 09/11/2007] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
33
Pisano ED, Zuley M, Baum JK, Marques HS. Issues to consider in converting to digital mammography. Radiol Clin North Am 2007;45:813-30, vi. [PMID: 17888771 PMCID: PMC2078259 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2007.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
34
Bick U, Diekmann F. Digital mammography: what do we and what don't we know? Eur Radiol 2007;17:1931-42. [PMID: 17429645 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0586-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2006] [Revised: 12/17/2006] [Accepted: 01/09/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
35
Zuley M. How to Transition to Digital Mammography. J Am Coll Radiol 2007;4:178-83. [PMID: 17412259 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2006] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
36
Trambert M. Digital Mammography Integrated with PACS: Real World Issues, Considerations, Workflow Solutions, and Reading Paradigms. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2006. [DOI: 10.1053/j.sembd.2006.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2025 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA