The role of advanced reconstruction algorithms in cardiac CT

Non-linear iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms have been increasingly incorporated into clinical cardiac CT protocols at institutions around the world. Multiple IR algorithms are available commercially from various vendors. IR algorithms decrease image noise and are primarily used to enable lower radiation dose protocols. IR can also be used to improve image quality for imaging of obese patients, coronary atherosclerotic plaques, coronary stents, and myocardial perfusion. In this article, we will review the various applications of IR algorithms in cardiac imaging and evaluate how they have changed practice.

Multidetector computed tomography for coronary stents imaging: high-voltage (140-kVp) prospective ECG-triggered versus standard-voltage (120-kVp) retrospective ECG-gated helical scanning

OBJECTIVE

To compare prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered high-voltage coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA; 140-kVp P-cCTA) with retrospective ECG-gated standard-voltage cCTA (120-kVp R-cCTA), in patients with coronary stents.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with coronary stents were studied with 64-slice multidetector scanner. Ninety-three stents were analyzed: 55 with 140-kVp P-cCTA and 38 with 120-kVp R-cCTA. Image quality (IQ), diagnostic confidence (DC), in-stent assessable lumen, artificial narrowing, and effective radiation dose were compared between techniques.

RESULTS

Image quality and DC were significantly better for the 140-kVp P-cCTA in comparison with the 120-kVp R-cCTA (IQ, 1.1 ± 0.36 vs 1.7 ± 0.60, respectively; P < 0.00001. Diagnostic confidence: 1.1 ± 0.29 vs 1.5 ± 0.65 respectively; P < 0.0001). In-stent assessable lumen and artificial narrowing were comparable between the techniques. Effective dose was lower for the 140-kVp P-cCTA (6.7 ± 2.07 mSv vs 15.8 ± 6.89 mSv; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

High voltage combined with axial prospective ECG-triggered scan improved IQ and DC in stent cCTA imaging but failed to improve the diameter of in-stent assessable lumen and to reduce the artificial narrowing compared with the 120-kVp R-cCTA. Effective dose was 60% lower for the 140-kVp P-cCTA.

Coronary artery stent evaluation by combining iterative reconstruction and high-resolution kernel at coronary CT angiography

PURPOSE

To evaluate stent lumen visualization by combining high-resolution cardiac kernel and the iterative reconstruction (iDose) on an anthropomorphic moving heart phantom and in patients at coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used the moving heart phantom and a 64 detector-row CT, retrospectively gated helical scanning, and image reconstruction. The heart rate was set at nonpulsating condition of 0 beats/min, 50 beats/min, and 80 beats/min. The 120-kV images were reconstructed in synchronization with electrocardiogram data using filtered back projection (FBP) or iDose algorithm and standard kernel/filter (CB) or high-resolution kernel/filter (CD). We measured image noise, the kurtosis, and stent lumen diameter in the phantom study. We also assessed the visual inspections by two radiologists.

RESULTS

With cardiac motion at 50 and 80 beats/min, the difference of kurtosis improved with CD relative to CB (P < .05). iDose algorithm with level 7 provided lowest noise, with no statistically significance in difference of the kurtosis relative to level 4 (P > .05). Without cardiac motion at 0 beats/min, the stent lumen diameter measurements with CD kernel were better relative to CB kernel (P < .05). In addition, no significant difference was found in stent lumen diameter between iDose level 4 and level 7 (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

The use of iDose and a sharp kernel allowed improved stent visualization at a lower radiation dose.

High-definition computed tomography for coronary artery stent imaging: a phantom study

Objective

To assess the performance of a high-definition CT (HDCT) for imaging small caliber coronary stents (≤ 3 mm) by comparing different scan modes of a conventional 64-row standard-definition CT (SDCT).

Materials and Methods

A cardiac phantom with twelve stents (2.5 mm and 3.0 mm in diameter) was scanned by HDCT and SDCT. The scan modes were retrospective electrocardiography (ECG)-gated helical and prospective ECG-triggered axial with tube voltages of 120 kVp and 100 kVp, respectively. The inner stent diameters (ISD) and the in-stent attenuation value (AV_in-stent) and the in-vessel extra-stent attenuation value (AV_in-vessel) were measured by two observers. The artificial lumen narrowing (ALN = [ISD - ISD_measured]/ISD) and artificial attenuation increase between in-stent and in-vessel (AAI = AV_in-stent - AV_in-vessel) were calculated. All data was analyzed by intraclass correlation and ANOVA-test.

Results

The correlation coefficient of ISD, AV_in-vessel and AV_in-stent between the two observers was good. The ALNs of HDCT were statistically lower than that of SDCT (30 ± 5.7% versus 35 ± 5.4%, p < 0.05). HDCT had statistically lower AAI values than SDCT (15.7 ± 81.4 HU versus 71.4 ± 90.5 HU, p < 0.05). The prospective axial dataset demonstrated smaller ALN than the retrospective helical dataset on both HDCT and SDCT (p < 0.05). Additionally, there were no differences in ALN between the 120 kVp and 100 kVp tube voltages on HDCT (p = 0.05).

Conclusion

High-definition CT helps improve measurement accuracy for imaging coronary stents compared to SDCT. HDCT with 100 kVp and the prospective ECG-triggered axial technique, with a lower radiation dose than 120 kVp application, may be advantageous in evaluating coronary stents with smaller calibers (≤ 3 mm).