Focal eosinophilic necrosis on superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI

Hepatic Lesions that Mimic Metastasis on Radiological Imaging during Chemotherapy for Gastrointestinal Malignancy: Recent Updates

During chemotherapy in patients with gastrointestinal malignancy, the hepatic lesions may occur as chemotherapy-induced lesions or tumor-associated lesions, with exceptions for infectious conditions and other incidentalomas. Focal hepatic lesions arising from chemotherapy-induced hepatopathies (such as chemotherapy-induced sinusoidal injury and steatosis) and tumor-associated eosinophilic abscess should be considered a mimicker of metastasis in patients with gastrointestinal malignancy. Accumulating evidence suggests that chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancy in the liver has roles in both the therapeutic effects for hepatic metastasis and injury to the non-tumor bearing hepatic parenchyma. In this article, we reviewed the updated concept of chemotherapy-induced hepatopathies and tumor-associated eosinophilic abscess in the liver, focusing on the pathological and radiological findings. Awareness of the causative chemo-agent, pathophysiology, and characteristic imaging findings of these mimickers is critical for accurate diagnosis and avoidance of unnecessary exposure of the patient to invasive tissue-based diagnosis and operations.

Differentiating focal eosinophilic liver disease from hepatic metastases using unenhanced and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

PURPOSE

To examine the differential features of focal eosinophilic liver disease (FELD) from liver metastases on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

MATERIALS

Twenty patients with 41 FELD and 20 patients with 55 metastases were enrolled in this study. Liver MRI consisted of precontrast 2D T1-weighted image (T1WI) and gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3D T1WI (arterial, portal, 20 min hepatocyte-selective phases), and a postcontrast T2WI. Images were analyzed for the margin and shape of the lesions; lesion conspicuity on T1- and T2WI; signal intensity of the lesions on 3D T1WI; presence of rim enhancement and misty signs; and presence of significant smaller lesions on the unenhanced T1WI (<50%) compared to hepatocyte phase image.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed the following significant parameters to favor FELD: a fuzzy margin, irregular shape, subtle signal intensity changes on T1- and T2WI, absence of target signs on the hepatocyte phase image, presence of misty signs, and size discrepancies on T1WI and hepatocyte phase images. Multivariate analysis revealed only a significantly smaller lesion size on T1WI compared to hepatocyte phase images to be predictive of FELD.

CONCLUSION

A significantly smaller lesion size on T1WI relative to hepatocyte phase image is the best predictor for identifying FELD on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.