Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Total Ankle Arthroplasty: State-of-The-Art Assessment of Implant-Related Pain and Dysfunction

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an effective alternative for treating patients with end-stage ankle degeneration, improving mobility, and providing pain relief. Implant survivorship is constantly improving; however, complications occur. Many causes of pain and dysfunction after total ankle arthroplasty can be diagnosed accurately with clinical examination, laboratory, radiography, and computer tomography. However, when there are no or inconclusive imaging findings, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly accurate in identifying and characterizing bone resorption, osteolysis, infection, osseous stress reactions, nondisplaced fractures, polyethylene damage, nerve injuries and neuropathies, as well as tendon and ligament tears. Multiple vendors offer effective, clinically available MRI techniques for metal artifact reduction MRI of total ankle arthroplasty. This article reviews the MRI appearances of common TAA implant systems, clinically available techniques and protocols for metal artifact reduction MRI of TAA implants, and the MRI appearances of a broad spectrum of TAA-related complications.

Current Trends in Total Ankle Replacement

Ankle arthritis can result in significant pain and restriction in range of motion. Total ankle replacement (TAR) is a motion-preserving surgical option used as an alternative to total ankle arthrodesis to treat end-stage ankle arthritis. There are several generations of TAR techniques based on component design, implant material, and surgical technique. With more recent TAR implants, an attempt is made to minimize bone resection and mirror the native anatomy. There are more than 20 implant devices currently available. Implant survivorship varies among prosthesis types and generations, with improved outcomes reported with use of the more recent third- and fourth-generation ankle implants. Pre- and postoperative assessments of TAR are primarily performed by using weight-bearing radiography, with weight-bearing CT emerging as an additional imaging tool. Preoperative assessments include those of the tibiotalar angle, offset, and adjacent areas of arthritis requiring additional surgical procedures. US, nuclear medicine studies, and MRI can be used to troubleshoot complications. Effective radiologic assessment requires an understanding of the component design and corresponding normal perioperative imaging features of ankle implants, as well as recognition of common and device-specific complications. General complications seen at radiography include aseptic loosening, osteolysis, hardware subsidence, periprosthetic fracture, infection, gutter impingement, heterotopic ossification, and syndesmotic nonunion. The authors review several recent generations of TAR implants commonly used in the United States, normal pre- and postoperative imaging assessment, and imaging complications of TAR. Indications for advanced imaging of TAR are also reviewed. ©RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Total Ankle Arthroplasty: State-of-The-Art Assessment of Implant-Related Pain and Dysfunction

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an effective alternative for treating patients with end-stage ankle degeneration, improving mobility, and providing pain relief. Implant survivorship is constantly improving; however, complications occur. Many causes of pain and dysfunction after total ankle arthroplasty can be diagnosed accurately with clinical examination, laboratory, radiography, and computer tomography. However, when there are no or inconclusive imaging findings, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly accurate in identifying and characterizing bone resorption, osteolysis, infection, osseous stress reactions, nondisplaced fractures, polyethylene damage, nerve injuries and neuropathies, as well as tendon and ligament tears. Multiple vendors offer effective, clinically available MRI techniques for metal artifact reduction MRI of total ankle arthroplasty. This article reviews the MRI appearances of common TAA implant systems, clinically available techniques and protocols for metal artifact reduction MRI of TAA implants, and the MRI appearances of a broad spectrum of TAA-related complications.

Precision of Bone Mineral Density Measurements Around Total Ankle Replacement Using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry

INTRODUCTION

Joint prosthesis survival is associated with the quality of surrounding bone. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is capable to evaluate areal bone mineral density (BMD) around different prosthetic implants, but no studies evaluated periprosthetic bone around total ankle replacement (TAR). Our aim is to determine the precision of the DXA periprosthetic BMD around TAR.

METHODOLOGY

Short-term precision was evaluated on 15 consecutive patients. Each ankle was scanned 3 times both in the posteroanterior (PA) and lateral views with a dedicated patient positioning protocol. Up to four squared regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in the periprosthetic bone around tibial and talar implants, with an additional ROI to include the calcaneal body in the lateral scan. Coefficient of variation (CV%) and least significant change were calculated according to the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

RESULTS

The lateral projection showed lower mean CV values compared to the PA projection, with an average precision error of 2.21% (lateral scan) compared to 3.34% (PA scans). Overall, the lowest precision error was found at both "global" ROIs (CV = 1.25% on PA and CV = 1.3% on lateral). The highest CV value on PA was found at the medial aspect of talar side (ROI 3; CV = 4.89%), while on the lateral scan the highest CV value was found on the posterior aspect of talar side (ROI 2; CV = 2.99%).

CONCLUSIONS

We found very good reproducibility BMD values of periprosthetic bone around TAR, that were comparable or even better compared to other studies that evaluated periprosthetic BMD around different prosthetic implants. DXA can be used to precisely monitor bone density around ankle prostheses, despite further long-term longitudinal studies are required to assess the clinical utility of such measurements.

Positive and negative factors for the treatment outcomes following total ankle arthroplasty? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Patient selection, surgeon's experience and implant design play an integral role and affect the treatment outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). The aims of this study were to investigate the positive and negative attributes that correlate with different clinical and radiographic outcomes.

METHODS

Eight-nine studies matched the inclusion criteria: (1) studies of primary TAA with uncemented prosthesis; (2) mean follow-up of no less than 2-year; (3) reports of clinical and radiographic outcomes, and exclusion criteria: (1) non-English study; (2) more than one type of prosthesis without separated data; (3) kin studies with shorter follow-up or smaller cohort. Age, etiology, preoperative deformity, surgeon's experience, follow-up duration and prosthetic type were studied with respect to different outcomes by mixed-effects logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Patients factor: older patients reported less pain or stiffness and demonstrated less radiographic loosening which did not require additional surgical intervention. More traumatic arthritis experienced adjacent joints degeneration after TAA. Surgeon factor: less experienced surgeons had more intraoperative complications. Lack of experience for complications management without implant retrieval during early period might result in more revisions or fusion was done. Prosthetic factor: updated instrumentation decreased malalignment. If the polyethylene (PE) insert was significantly narrower than the metal components more implant instability and subsequent severe particulate wear was seen. Designs with flat-on-flat articulation and ridge at the center of the talar component associated with more PE fracture. Minimal bone resection reduced postoperative fractures. A flat cut of the tibial component and a flat undersurface with press-fit by two screws or pegs of the talar component demonstrated less postoperative fractures, whereas a syndesmosis fusion and a small triangular shape with one central fin of the talar component experienced more loosening which did not require additional surgery. Anatomic conical shape of the talar component seemed to reduce adjacent joint degeneration. Finally, fewer failures were found in patients who received HINTEGRA and Salto Talaris.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our investigation, some positive and negative factors for different clinical and radiographic outcomes were found, which should be taken into consideration in clinical practice and ankle implant design.