1
|
Avendano D, Marino MA, Onishi N, Leithner D, Martinez DF, Gibbs P, Jochelson M, Pinker K, Morris EA, Sutton EJ. Can Follow-up be Avoided for Probably Benign US Masses with No Enhancement on MRI? Eur Radiol 2020; 31:975-982. [PMID: 32870394 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07216-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess whether no enhancement on pre-treatment MRI can rule out malignancy of additional US mass(es) initially assessed as BI-RADS 3 or 4 in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. METHODS This retrospective study included consecutive women from 2010-2018 with newly diagnosed breast cancer; at least one additional breast mass (distinct from index cancer) assigned a BI-RADS 3 or 4 on US; and a bilateral contrast-enhanced breast MRI performed within 90 days of US. All malignant masses were pathologically proven; benign masses were pathologically proven or defined as showing at least 2 years of imaging stability. Incidence of malignant masses and NPV were calculated on a per-patient level using proportions and exact 95% CIs. RESULTS In 230 patients with 309 additional masses, 140/309 (45%) masses did not enhance while 169/309 (55%) enhanced on MRI. Of the 140 masses seen in 105 women (mean age, 54 years; range 28-82) with no enhancement on MRI, all had adequate follow-up and 140/140 (100%) were benign, of which 89/140 (63.6%) were pathologically proven and 51/140 (36.4%) demonstrated at least 2 years of imaging stability. Pre-treatment MRI demonstrating no enhancement of US mass correlate(s) had an NPV of 100% (95% CI 96.7-100.0). CONCLUSIONS All BI-RADS 3 and 4 US masses with a non-enhancing correlate on pre-treatment MRI were benign. The incorporation of MRI, when ordered by the referring physician, may decrease unnecessary follow-up imaging and/or biopsy if the initial US BI-RADS assessment and management recommendation were to be retrospectively updated. KEY POINTS • Of 309 BI-RADS 3 or 4 US masses with a corresponding mass on MRI, 140/309 (45%) demonstrated no enhancement whereas 169/309 (55%) demonstrated enhancement • All masses classified as BI-RADS 3 or 4 on US without enhancement on MRI were benign • MRI can rule out malignancy in non-enhancing US masses with an NPV of 100.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daly Avendano
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.,Department of Breast Imaging, Breast Cancer Center TecSalud, ITESM Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - Maria Adele Marino
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.,Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Natsuko Onishi
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Doris Leithner
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Danny F Martinez
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Maxine Jochelson
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Katja Pinker
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Morris
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Elizabeth Jane Sutton
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Suh-Burgmann EJ, Flanagan T, Lee N, Osinski T, Sweet C, Lynch M, Caponigro M, Mehta J, Alavi M, Herrinton LJ. Large-Scale Implementation of Structured Reporting of Adnexal Masses on Ultrasound. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15:755-761. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Revised: 01/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/23/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
4
|
Lee AY, Joe BN, Price ER. The Predicament of the Probably Benign Breast MRI: Should We Rely on Intuition? Breast J 2017; 23:501-503. [PMID: 28914475 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Amie Y Lee
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Bonnie N Joe
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Elissa R Price
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|