Initial Clinical Experience With Extremity Cone-Beam CT of the Foot and Ankle in Pediatric Patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206:431-435. [PMID: 26797374 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.15.15099]

A systematic review comparing the effective radiation dose of musculoskeletal cone beam computed tomography to other diagnostic imaging modalities

PURPOSE

Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) is well established in orofacial diagnostic imaging and is currently expanding into musculoskeletal applications. This systematic review sought to update the knowledge base on radiation dose comparisons between imaging modalities in MSK imaging and consider how research studies have reported dose measures.

METHODS

This review utilised a database search and an online literature tool. Studies with potential relevance were screened then before full text review, each performed by two independent reviewers, with a third independent reviewer available for conflicts. Data was extracted using a bespoke tool created within the literature tool.

RESULTS

21 studies were included in the review which compared CBCT with MSCT (13), conventional radiography (1), or both (7). 19 studies concluded that CBCT provided a reduced radiation dose when compared with MSCT: the factor of reduction ranging from 1.71 to 50 with an average of 12. Studies comparing CBCT to DR found DR to have an average dose reduction of 4.55.

CONCLUSIONS

The claims that CBCT produces a lower radiation dose than MSCT is borne out with most studies confirming doses less than half that of MSCT. Fewer studies include DR as a comparator but confirm that CBCT results in a higher effective dose on average, with scope for CBCT to provide an equivalent radiation dose. This review highlighted a need for consistency in methodology when conducting studies which compare radiation dose across different technologies. Potential solutions lie outside the scope of this review, likely requiring multi-discipline approach to ensure a cohesive outcome.

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)-Based Diagnosis of Dental Bone Defects

Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has completely changed the way that bone disorders are diagnosed and treated, especially in the dental and maxillofacial domains. This article examines the diverse applications of computed tomography (CBCT) in the diagnosis and treatment of facial trauma, including mandibular, dentoalveolar, and other facial fractures, as well as bone abnormalities like dislocations and fractures. CBCT is useful for a wide range of dental conditions and greatly improves diagnostic accuracy in periodontics, orthodontics, endodontics, and dental implantology. Additionally, a comparison between CBCT and conventional imaging methods was conducted, emphasizing the latter's inferior 3D imaging capabilities, allowing for more precise treatment planning and better patient outcomes with CBCT. Although CBCT has many benefits, it also has some drawbacks, such as requiring specific training for accurate interpretation, cost considerations, and a higher radiation exposure than with traditional dental X-rays. In order to optimize benefits and reduce risks, the conclusion highlights CBCT's revolutionary influence on clinical practice while arguing for its prudent and responsible application.

Weight-Bearing CT with Maximum Ankle Dorsiflexion to Identify Impingement and Tibial Plafond Stress Fracture: A Case Report

CASE

A 25-year-old male pole vaulter presented with several months of right ankle pain. Radiographs showed an anterior tibial osteophyte with a small intra-articular body suggesting impingement. Weight-bearing computed tomography (CT) revealed an associated tibial plafond stress fracture. Subsequent arthroscopy with osteophyte resection and loose body removal significantly improved symptoms, and he gradually resumed training.

CONCLUSION

Stress fractures should always be considered in athletes with ankle pain. A unique aspect of this case was the use of weight-bearing CT in diagnosis and surgical planning. To our knowledge, this is the first described case in which weight-bearing CT was used in this fashion.

Measuring standing hindfoot alignment: reliability of different approaches in conventional x-ray and cone-beam CT

INTRODUCTION

Currently there is no consensus how hindfoot alignment (HA) should be assessed in CBCT scans. The aim of this study is to investigate how the reliability is affected by the anatomical structures chosen for the measurement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Datasets consisting of a Saltzman View (SV) and a CBCT of the same foot were acquired prospectively and independently assessed by five raters regarding HA. In SVs the HA was estimated as follows: transversal shift between tibial shaft axis and heel contact point (1); angle between tibial shaft axis and a tangent at the medial (2) or lateral (3) calcaneal wall. In CBCT the HA was estimated as follows: transversal shift between the centre of the talus and the heel contact point (4); angle between a perpendicular line and a tangent at the medial (5) or lateral (6) calcaneal wall; angle between the distal tibial surface and a tangent at the medial calcaneal wall (7). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess inter-rater reliability. A linear regression was performed to compare the different measurement regarding their correlation.

RESULTS

32 patients were included in the study. The ICCs for the measurements 1-7 were as follows: (1) 0.924 [95% CI 0.876-0.959] (2) 0.533 [95% CI 0.377-0.692], (3) 0.553 [95% CI 0.399-0.708], (4) 0.930 [95% CI 0.866-0.962], (5) 0.00 [95% CI - 0.111 to 0.096], (6) 0.00 [95% CI - 0.103 to 0.111], (7) 0.152 [95% CI 0.027-0.330]. A linear regression between measurement 1 and 4 showed a correlation of 0.272 (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

It could be shown that reliability of measuring HA depends on the investigated anatomical structure. Placing a tangent along the calcaneus (2, 3, 5, 6, 7) was shown to be unreliable, whereas determining the weight-bearing heel point (1, 4) appeared to be a reliable approach. The correlation of the measurement workflows is significant (p = 0.036), but too weak (0.272) to be used clinically.

Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography of the Foot and Ankle in the Pediatric Population

BACKGROUND

Newer cone-beam computed tomography (CT) technology has grown in popularity for evaluation of foot and ankle pathology in the weight-bearing (WB) position. Many studies have demonstrated its benefits within the adult population, but there is a paucity of its use within the pediatric literature. The purpose of this study was to describe the indications and clinical findings of WBCT within a pediatric population.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 68 patients (86 extremities) who underwent WBCT for a variety of conditions were compared with 48 patients (59 extremities) who underwent traditional supine nonweight-bearing (NWB) CTs. Clinical indications, demographic data, radiation doses, and cost were obtained from the medical record. WBCTs were obtained in a private outpatient orthopaedic clinic, and the conventional NWBCTs were obtained within a hospital-based system.

RESULTS

The most common indications for obtaining a WBCT and NWBCT in our study were fracture, tarsal coalition, and Lisfranc injury. The average WBCT radiation dose was 0.63 mGy for patients <100 lbs and 1.1 mGy for patients >100 lbs undergoing WBCT. For NWBCTs, the average radiation dose was 7.92 mGy for patients <100 lbs and 10.37 mGy for patients greater than 100 lbs. There was a significant reduction in radiation dose for all patients who underwent WBCT (P<0.0001 vs. 0.002). The average reimbursement for NWBCTs was $505 for unilateral studies and $1451 for bilateral studies. The average reimbursement for the WBCTs was $345 for unilateral studies and $635 for bilateral studies.

CONCLUSIONS

WBCT offers a new modality for studying complex foot and ankle pathoanatomy in the pediatric population at a reduced radiation exposure and reduced cost.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-a retrospective comparative study.

Evaluation of the accuracy of mobile cone-beam computed tomography after spinal instrumentation surgery

Purpose

Pedicle screw fixation provides 3-column stabilization, multidimensional control, and a higher rate of interbody fusion. Although computed tomography (CT) is recommended for the postoperative assessment of pedicle screw fixation, its use is limited due to the radiation exposure dose. The purpose of this preliminary retrospective study was to assess the clinical usefulness of low-dose mobile cone-beam CT (CBCT) for the postoperative evaluation of pedicle screw fixation.

Methods

The author retrospectively reviewed postoperative mobile CBCT images of 15 patients who underwent posterior pedicle screw fixation for spinal disease from November 2019 to April 2020. Pedicle screw placement was assessed for breaches of the bony structures. The breaches were graded based on the Heary classification.

Results

The patients included 11 men and four women, and their mean age was 66±12 years. Of the 122 pedicle screws, 34 (27.9%) were inserted in the thoracic segment (from T7 to T12), 82 (67.2%) in the lumbar segment (from L1 to L5), and six (4.9%) in the first sacral segment. Although there were metal-related artifacts, the image of the screw position (according to Heary classification) after surgery could be assessed using mobile CBCT at all levels (T7-S1).

Conclusions

Mobile CBCT was accurate in determining the location and integrity of the pedicle screw and identifying the surrounding bony structures. In the postoperative setting, mobile CBCT can be used as a primary modality for assessing the accuracy of pedicle screw fixation and detecting postoperative complications.

Multimodality imaging of the paediatric flatfoot

Flatfoot is commonly encountered in the paediatric population and describes a spectrum of clinical and radiological presentations which encompass both normally developing and pathological feet. Flatfoot can be categorised as flexible or rigid, a distinction which has important implications when considering the potential underlying aetiology and treatment options, and therefore imaging is an important component of the diagnostic workup. Weight-bearing plain radiographs are established initial investigations, although the significance of a number of the commonly derived quantitative parameters in children remains unclear. CT and MRI are important additional imaging modalities reserved for the investigation of symptomatic cases or those in which an underlying structural abnormality is suspected, rigid flatfoot commonly falling into one of these two categories. We review and illustrate the multimodality imaging of the paediatric flatfoot, with reference to both qualitative and quantitative radiographic assessment and cross-sectional imaging appearances.

Imaging of Pediatric Lower Limb Sports Injuries

The importance of physical activity during childhood and adolescence has come to light, with an increase in sports-related acute traumatic and overuse injuries as a major disadvantage. A solid understanding of the physiology of the growing skeleton, together with knowledge about age- and sex-related differences in the occurrence of acute traumatic and overuse injuries is necessary. Every musculoskeletal radiologist should also be familiar with the appearances of these injuries on different imaging modalities. This review focuses on all these aspects concerning acute traumatic and overuse injuries among children and adolescents.

The advantages of cone-beam computerised tomography (CT) in pain management following total knee arthroplasty, in comparison with conventional multi-detector CT

BACKGROUND

Revision of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) requires preoperative assessment to identify the causes of failure. Multidetector computerised tomography (MDCT) is a commonly used imaging technique, but is sensitive to certain artifacts, such as metal implants, limiting its use. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) is a new technique dedicated to musculoskeletal imaging that is less sensitive to artifacts and could be utilised in knee implantation surgery. CBCT has not yet been validated for this indication, and we therefore undertook a retrospective assessment of MDCT versus CBCT, comparing: 1) image quality; 2) reproducibility of angle measurements; 3) effectiveness in screening for periprosthetic radiolucency and implant loosening; and 4) radiation dose.

HYPOTHESIS

This study hypothesised that CBCT provides better image quality, angle measurement reproducibility, and screening for radiolucency and implant loosening at lower doses of radiation than MDCT.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Between October 2017 and March 2018, 28 patients, with a mean age of 61±11.6 years [range, 45-85 years] underwent both MDCT and CBCT for pain following TKA. Two radiologists performed angle measurements on both devices: patellofemoral tilt (PFT), rotation angle of the femoral component (RAFC) and rotation angle of the tibial component (RATC). They also screened for pathological radiolucency and/or implant loosening, and assessed image quality at the various bone/implant interfaces. The mean CT dose index per examination was recorded.

RESULTS

Intraclass correlation coefficients for angles and radiolucency screening on MDCT and on CBCT were respectively good (0.73) and excellent (0.82) for PFT, borderline (0.28) and moderate (0.44) for RAFC, excellent (0.82) and excellent (0.96) for RATC, and moderate (0.45) and excellent (0.84) for radiolucency screening. The inter-observer kappa correlation coefficients for diagnosis of implant loosening and image quality assessment for MDCT and CBCT were respectively moderate (0.45) and excellent (0.93) for tibial loosening and low (0.19) and borderline (0.38) for femoral loosening. The mean image quality at the various interfaces for MDCT and CBCT was respectively 2.2/3 and 2.75/3 at the tibia/tibial implant interface, 1/3 and 2.3/3 at the trochlear region/femoral implant interface, 0.9/3 and 2/3 at the femoral condyle/femoral implant interface, and 1.25/3 and 2.1/3 at the patella/patellar medallion interface. The mean CT dose index was significantly lower, by a factor of 1.24, on CBCT (4.138 mGy) than MDCT (5.125 mGy) (p<00396).

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study revealed added value for CBCT in the etiological work-up for pain following a TKA. It was reliable and reproducible for the rotation measurement and diagnosis of implant loosening, due to enhanced image quality despite a lower radiation dose than conventional MDCT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective comparative study.

Comparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow region

The aim of the study was to estimate and to compare effective doses in the elbow region resulting from four different x-ray imaging modalities. Absorbed organ doses were measured using 11 metal oxide field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters that were placed in a custom-made anthropomorphic elbow RANDO phantom. Examinations were performed using Shimadzu FH-21 HR radiography device, Siemens Sensation Open 24-slice MSCT-device, NewTom 5G CBCT device, and Planmed Verity CBCT device, and the effective doses were calculated according to ICRP 103 recommendations. The effective dose for the conventional radiographic device was 1.5 µSv. The effective dose for the NewTom 5G CBCT ranged between 2.0 and 6.7 µSv, for the Planmed Verity CBCT device 2.6 µSv and for the Siemens Sensation MSCT device 37.4 µSv. Compared with conventional 2D radiography, this study demonstrated a 1.4-4.6 fold increase in effective dose for CBCT and 25-fold dose for standard MSCT protocols. When compared with 3D CBCT protocols, the study showed a 6-19 fold increase in effective dose using a standard MSCT protocol. CBCT devices offer a feasible low-dose alternative for elbow 3D imaging when compared to MSCT.

Impact of introducing extremity cone-beam CT in an emergency radiology department: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal cone-beam CT (CBCT) recently appeared on the market, with image quality comparable to that of high-resolution CT. It was previously implemented mainly in craniofacial surgery and in orthopedic limb surgery for weight-bearing imaging, but without large-scale assessment in emergency settings. We therefore conducted a retrospective comparative study in an emergency radiology department: 1) to assess whether introduction of CBCT dedicated to extremity traumatology reduced radiation dose delivered to the patient undergoing cross-sectional imaging, 2) to assess whether it increased turnover, and 3) to study the feasibility and practical consequences. Study hypothesis Introducing CBCT dedicated to traumatology in an emergency radiology department reduces radiation dose related to cross-sectional imaging in extremity trauma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two periods were distinguished: in May-November 2016, the only cross-sectional imaging available in our emergency radiology department was multi-detector CT (MDCT); in May-November 2017, both MDCT and CBCT were available. Thus, the population in period 1 (n=165) had undergone only MDCT extremity imaging, while patients in period 2 underwent either CBCT (n=139) or MDCT (n=85). Study parameters notably included dose-length product (DLP) and length of patient stay in the radiology department (turnover).

RESULTS

Mean DLP was significantly reduced with the introduction of CBCT: 210.3±133.6 mGy.cm (range, 20-595) in period 1, versus 138.4±92.7 mGy.cm (range, 32-623) in period 2 (p<0.0001). Taking both periods together, mean DLP was 50.7% lower with CBCT (n=139) than MDCT (n=249): respectively, 101.6±14.9 mGy.cm (range, 50.6-126.9) versus 206.5±131.8 mGy.cm (range, 20-623) (p<0.0001). Turnover accelerated with the introduction of CBCT, with mean stay of 84.9minutes in period 1 versus 72.1minutes in period 2 (p=0.011). In period 2, turnover was 23.6% faster with CBCT than MDCT: respectively, 64.9minutes versus 85.0minutes (p=0.0004).

DISCUSSION

Introducing CBCT dedicated to the extremities in an emergency radiology department was feasible. It reduced overall radiation dose and accelerated turnover.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; comparative case-control study.

Advantages of preoperative planning using computed tomography scan for treatment of malleolar ankle fractures

Malleolar ankle fractures have been classified using plain radiographs, and there is no consensus regarding the role of computed tomography (CT) scans in preoperative planning. We analyzed critical aspects, such as limits of standard radiographs, types of injury, classification methods and cost/benefit evaluations. CT scans allow a 3D analysis of the fracture to be obtained and consequently assess the indication for surgical procedure, surgical access and the type of fixation devices required. This exam is useful for detecting lesions that may go unnoticed on radiographs and will help surgeons to clarify the pathoanatomy of ankle fractures. According to Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen/ Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, CT scan is recommended in medial malleolar fractures with vertical rim, type 44B fractures with posterior malleolar involvement and all type 44C fractures (according to AO/OTA). Also Tillaux-Chaput fractures (43-B1 according to AO/OTA), malleolar fractures in the presence of distal tibial fractures (43 according to AO/OTA) and distal tibia fractures in adolescents should be studied with CT scans.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Trauma to the Foot

Acute injuries to the foot are frequently encountered in the emergency room and in general practice settings. This publication defines best practices for imaging evaluations for several variants of patients presenting with acute foot trauma. The variants include scenarios when the Ottawa rules can be evaluated, when there are exclusionary criteria, and when suspected pathology is in anatomic areas not addressed by the Ottawa rules. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Experiences with image quality and radiation dose of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in pediatric extremity trauma

INTRODUCTION

Novel dedicated extremity cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices, recently introduced to the market, raised attention as a possible alternative in advanced diagnostic pediatric trauma imaging, today usually performed by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). This work aimed to compare image quality and radiation dose of CBCT and MDCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four CBCT-MDCT examination pairs, containing nine MDCTs acquired in parallel prospectively and 45 MDCTs matched in retrospect, were included in this study. Image quality was analyzed semi-objectively by measuring noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and subjectively by performing image impression ratings. CT dose records were readout.

RESULTS

Image noise was significantly lower in CBCT compared with MDCT, both semi-objectively and subjectively (both p < 0.001). CNR and SNRs were also in favor of CBCT, though CBCT examinations exhibited significantly more beam hardening artifacts that diminished the advantages of the superior semi-objective image quality. These artifacts were believed to occur more often in children due to numerous bone-cartilage transitions in open growth plates and may have led to a better subjective diagnostic certainty rating (p = 0.001). Motion artifacts were infrequently, but exclusively observed in CBCT. CT dose index (CTDI_vol) was substantially lower in CBCT (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Dedicated extremity CBCT could be an alternative low-dose modality in the diagnostic pathway of pediatric fractures. At lower doses compared with MDCT and commonly affected by beam hardening artifacts, semi-objective CBCT image quality parameters were generally better than in MDCT.

Motion compensation in extremity cone-beam computed tomography

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the improvement in extremity cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image quality in datasets with motion artifact using a motion compensation method based on maximizing image sharpness.

METHODS

Following IRB approval, retrospective analysis of 308 CBCT scans of lower extremities was performed by a fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologist to identify images with moderate to severe motion artifact. Twenty-four scans of 22 patients (18 male, four female; mean, 32 years old, range, 21-74 years old) were chosen for inclusion. Sharp (bone) and smooth (soft tissue) reconstructions were processed using the motion compensation algorithm. Two experts rated visualization of trabecular bone, cortical bone, joint spaces, and tendon on a nine-level Likert scale with and without motion compensation (a total of 96 datasets). Visual grading characteristics (VGC) was used to quantitatively determine the difference in image quality following motion compensation. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was obtained to assess inter-observer agreement.

RESULTS

Motion-compensated images exhibited appreciable reduction in artifacts. The observer study demonstrated the associated improvement in diagnostic quality. The fraction of cases receiving scores better than "Fair" increased from less than 10% without compensation to 40-70% following compensation, depending on the task. The area under the VGC curve was 0.75 (tendon) to 0.85 (cortical bone), confirming preference for motion compensated images. ICC values showed excellent agreement between readers before (ICC range, 0.8-0.91) and after motion compensation (ICC range, 0.92-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

The motion compensation algorithm significantly improved the visualization of bone and soft tissue structures in extremity CBCT for cases exhibiting patient motion.

[Design and optimization of a cone-beam CT system for extremity imaging]

OBJECTIVE

To establish a cone beam computed tomography (ECBCT) system for high-resolution imaging of the extremities.

METHODS

Based on three-dimensional X-Ray CT imaging and high-resolution flat plate detector technique, we constructed a physical model and a geometric model for ECBCT imaging, optimized the geometric calibration and image reconstruction methods, and established the scanner system. In the experiments, the pencil vase phantom, image quality (IQ) phantom and a swine feet were scanned using this imaging system to evaluate its effectiveness and stability.

RESULTS

On the reconstructed image of the pencil vase phantom, the edges were well preserved with geometric calibrated parameters and no aliasing artifacts were observed. The reconstructed images of the IQ phantom showed a uniform distribution of the CT number, and the noise power spectra were stable in multiple scanning under the same condition. The reconstructed images of the swine feet had clearly displayed the bones with a good resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

The ECBCT system can be used for highresolution imaging of the extremities to provide important imaging information to assist in the diagnosis of bone diseases.

Clinical Experience with Real-Time 3-D Guidance Based on C-Arm-Acquired Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) in Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Stent Shunt (TIPSS) Placement

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based real-time 3-D guidance of TIPSS placement and its positioning compared to standard guiding methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, consecutive study design from 2015 to 2017, we included 21 patients in the CBCT guided group and 15 patients in the ultrasound (US) guided group. The prospective groups were compared in terms of success rate of intervention, portal vein puncture/procedure time, number of puncture attempts and applied dose. We furthermore retrospectively analyzed the last 23 consecutive cases with fluoroscopic guided portal vein puncture in terms of success rate, procedure time and applied dose, as it has been the standard method before US guidance.

RESULTS

The median number of puncture attempts (CBCT: n = 2, US: n = 4, p = 0.249) and the mean puncture time (CBCT: 32 ± 45 min, US: 36 ± 45 min, p = 0.515) were not significantly different. There were furthermore no significant differences in the mean time needed for the total TIPSS procedure (CBCT: 115 ± 52 min, US: 112 ± 41 min, fluoroscopy: 110 ± 33 min, p = 0.996). The mean applied dose of the complete procedure also showed no statistically significant differences (CBCT: 563 ± 289 Gy·cm², US: 322 ± 186 Gy·cm², fluoroscopy: 469 ± 352 Gy·cm², p = 0.069). There were no image guidance related complications.

CONCLUSION

Real-time 3-D needle guidance based on CBCT is feasible for TIPSS placement. In terms of puncture attempts, duration and dose, CBCT guidance was not inferior to the control groups and may be a valuable support for interventionists in TIPSS procedures.

Cone beam CT of the musculoskeletal system: clinical applications

Objectives

The aim of this pictorial review is to illustrate the use of CBCT in a broad spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders and to compare its diagnostic merit with other imaging modalities, such as conventional radiography (CR), Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Background

Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has been widely used for dental imaging for over two decades.

Discussion

Current CBCT equipment allows use for imaging of various musculoskeletal applications. Because of its low cost and relatively low irradiation, CBCT may have an emergent role in making a more precise diagnosis, assessment of local extent and follow-up of fractures and dislocations of small bones and joints. Due to its exquisite high spatial resolution, CBCT in combination with arthrography may be the preferred technique for detection and local staging of cartilage lesions in small joints. Evaluation of degenerative joint disorders may be facilitated by CBCT compared to CR, particularly in those anatomical areas in which there is much superposition of adjacent bony structures. The use of CBCT in evaluation of osteomyelitis is restricted to detection of sequestrum formation in chronic osteomyelitis. Miscellaneous applications include assessment of (symptomatic) variants, detection and characterization of tumour and tumour-like conditions of bone.

Teaching Points

• Review the spectrum of MSK disorders in which CBCT may be complementary to other imaging techniques.

• Compare the advantages and drawbacks of CBCT compared to other imaging techniques.

• Define the present and future role of CBCT in musculoskeletal imaging.

Surface radiation dose comparison of a dedicated extremity cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) device and a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) machine in pediatric ankle and wrist phantoms

Objectives

To evaluate and compare surface doses of a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) device in pediatric ankle and wrist phantoms.

Methods

Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) were used to measure and compare surface doses between CBCT and MDCT in a left ankle and a right wrist pediatric phantom. In both modalities adapted pediatric dose protocols were utilized to achieve realistic imaging conditions. All measurements were repeated three times to prove test-retest reliability. Additionally, objective and subjective image quality parameters were assessed.

Results

Average surface doses were 3.8 ±2.1 mGy for the ankle, and 2.2 ±1.3 mGy for the wrist in CBCT. The corresponding surface doses in optimized MDCT were 4.5 ±1.3 mGy for the ankle, and 3.4 ±0.7 mGy for the wrist. Overall, mean surface dose was significantly lower in CBCT (3.0 ±1.9 mGy vs. 3.9 ±1.2 mGy, p<0.001). Subjectively rated general image quality was not significantly different between the study protocols (p = 0.421), whereas objectively measured image quality parameters were in favor of CBCT (p<0.001).

Conclusions

Adapted extremity CBCT imaging protocols have the potential to fall below optimized pediatric ankle and wrist MDCT doses at comparable image qualities. These possible dose savings warrant further development and research in pediatric extremity CBCT applications.