Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of postoperative follow-up with helical CT

The use of non-contrast-enhanced MRI to evaluate serial changes in endoleaks after aortic stenting: a case report

Background

Aortic dissection is a life-threatening syndrome that sometimes requires emergency intervention, and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a treatment option. Long-term image follow-up is also required for patients after EVAR due to possible complications.

Case presentation

We present the case of a 73-year-old male with underlying chronic renal disease diagnosed with a type A aortic dissection who underwent EVAR. Four-dimensional (three spatial dimensions combined with time) phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (4D PC-MRI) was performed during regular follow-up in preference to contrast-enhanced computed tomography or simple MRI while taking his poor renal function into consideration.

Conclusions

We considered this preferable given his issues with renal function.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Multislice Computed Tomography of Thoracic Aortic Endografts

Purpose:

To compare the potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to multislice computed tomography (CT) for evaluating stent-graft placement in the thoracic aorta.

Methods:

Susceptibility artifacts in 2 different stent-graft systems (Talent and Excluder) were evaluated in vitro in 2 angulations (straight and 33° curved) using 3 different MRI gradient echo sequences (True FISP, 2-dimensional FLASH, and 3-dimensional Turbo FLASH). The size of the stent-related artifact was measured, and the relative stent lumen was calculated. In vivo stent demarcation, stent patency, and additional findings were determined in 13 patients (3 Talent, 9 Excluder, and 1 combined) and compared to CT findings.

Results:

In vitro, both endograft systems proved to be MR compatible, with the relative stent lumen value ranging from 82% to 100% in the straight configuration; in a curved model, the relative stent lumen value ranged from 56% to 92% with the 3D Turbo FLASH sequence, which provided the smallest susceptibility artifacts. The Excluder endoprosthesis caused significant signal inhomogeneity within the stent in a curved configuration. In vivo, MRI and multislice CT showed similar results, with CT imaging slightly superior in stent demarcation and MRI better in demonstrating thrombus. CT beam hardening artifacts were pronounced in the Talent system, while the Excluder device caused significant signal inhomogeneity within the stent on magnetic resonance angiography.

Conclusions:

Multislice CT and contrast-enhanced MRI are fast, reliable means of providing all relevant information for surveillance of fully MR-compatible stent-grafts in the thoracic aorta.

Morphometry and Classification in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Patient Selection for Endovascular and Open Surgery

Purpose:

To evaluate the anatomic morphology of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and compose a classification system to facilitate patient selection for endovascular graft (EVG) repair.

Methods:

Data on 242 consecutive AAA patients evaluated on a nonemergent basis in a 3.5-year period to July 1996 were prospectively entered into a registry. Patients were examined using sequential intravenous spiral computed tomographic angiography and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. The data collected and analyzed included: diameters of the supra- and infrarenal aorta, aneurysm, aortoiliac bifurcation, and iliac arteries; lengths of the proximal neck, distal cuff, and aneurysm; degrees of iliac artery tortuosity; and occlusion of the visceral, renal, or iliac arteries.

Results:

The 242 aneurysms could be easily grouped into three distinctive categories related to the extent of the aneurysmal disease. Type I AAAs (11.2%) had nondilated, thrombus-free infrarenal (15 mm) necks and distal (10 mm) cuffs appropriate for EVG anchoring. In type II and its subgroups (72.3%), a sufficient proximal neck was present, but the aneurysm extended into the iliac arteries; 56% of these were eligible for a bifurcated endograft. In type III (16.5%), a sufficient proximal neck was missing, independent of distal involvement. In all, 51.7% were good EVG candidates based on AAA morphology. Taking into consideration relevant concomitant vascular diseases, proximal iliac kinking, and iliac, renal, or visceral occlusive disease, only 30.2% of the population were potential candidates for an efficient and secure EVG repair using the devices currently available.

Conclusions:

In contrast to classical open repair, detailed preoperative measurements are recommended for EVG planning. The use of liberal EVG indications may lead to a higher incidence of complications, whereas restrictive morphology-based selection criteria may offer excellent results.

Endoleak as a Complication of Endoluminal Grafting of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Classification, Incidence, Diagnosis, and Management

The inability to obtain or maintain a secure seal between a vessel wall and a transluminally implanted intra-aneurysmal graft is a complication unique to the evolving technique of endovascular aneurysm exclusion. Because the term “leak” has long been associated with aneurysm rupture, the term “endoleak” is proposed as a more definitive description of this phenomenon.

Embracing both persistent blood flow into the aneurysmal sac from within or around the graft (graft related) and from patent collateral arteries (nongraft related), endoleak can be classified as primary or secondary depending on the time of occurrence (within 30 days of implantation or following apparent initial seal, respectively).

Diagnostic techniques to detect endoleak include arteriography, intraprocedural pressure monitoring, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, abdominal X ray, and duplex scanning. Management strategies for endoleak range from observation with periodic imaging surveillance to correction by additional endoluminal or surgical procedures.

Standardization of the terminology describing this important sequela to endovascular aneurysm exclusion should facilitate uniform reporting of clinical trial data vital to the evaluation of this emerging technique.

Postoperative Color Flow Duplex Scanning in Aortic Endografting

Purpose:

To report the feasibility and sensitivity of duplex sonography compared to computed tomography (CT) for aortic endograft follow-up surveillance.

Methods:

In a 26-month period, 113 aortic aneurysm patients received 79 tube and 34 bifurcated stent-grafts. Follow-up used contrast-enhanced CT scanning and duplex sonography with an intravenous ultrasound contrast agent (Levovist).

Results:

Eleven patients (9.7%) were converted to open repair; 1 died from hemorrhagic shock secondary to retroperitoneal hematoma. The mean follow-up time was 7.2 months (range 1 to 24), during which 5 patients died of unrelated causes. Sixteen primary (within 30 days) and 5 secondary endoleaks were detected by duplex after tube graft implantation. Among 5 endoleaks due to retrograde side-branch perfusion, 3 were detected only with contrast-enhanced duplex scanning. Iliac artery occlusion was also documented using duplex; however, 2 stent fractures could not be seen with ultrasound. Ten primary endoleaks were detected in bifurcated stent-graft patients. One endoleak originating from the distal iliac limb anchoring site was missed by duplex owing to bowel gas. Graft limb thrombosis was clearly identified by lack of a flow signal on duplex.

Conclusions:

Duplex sonography could be a valuable, reliable, and economical surveillance tool for endovascular aortic reconstructions. The adjunctive use of an intravenous ultrasound contrast agent increased the sensitivity for detecting endoleak to a level comparable to contrast-enhanced CT scanning. However, stent fractures may not be seen on ultrasound, and bowel gas can interfere with obtaining an adequate image.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms revisited: MDCT with multiplanar reconstructions for identifying indicators of instability in the pre- and postoperative patient

Rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm is commonly a fatal event. Multidetector computed tomographic (CT) signs of frank aortic rupture are usually readily apparent and widely understood. However, diagnosing an impending aortic rupture on the basis of imaging findings can prove more difficult. CT is the primary modality used for serial imaging in patients with aortic aneurysm and may show findings indicative of aortic instability. Therefore, it is critical that radiologists be familiar with the CT findings of aortic instability to avert the potential complications of hemorrhage, end organ or limb ischemia, and death. Various preoperative CT indicators have been previously described in both research investigations and review articles. A large baseline aneurysm size and a rapid increase in size over time are associated with a higher risk for rupture. The importance of obtaining accurate measurements with multiplanar reconstructions and the role of new semiautomated tools for obtaining accurate, reproducible measurements are discussed. Additional CT findings that reflect aortic aneurysm instability include luminal expansion with lysis of thrombus, intramural hemorrhage (ie, the crescent sign), periaortic hemorrhage, a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, and contained rupture (ie, the draped aorta sign). After open or endovascular aneurysm repair, CT is routinely used to monitor for graft complications. In this setting, radiologists should understand that the presence of an endoluminal stent or surgical graft does not preclude aortic rupture. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Interventional oncology in multidisciplinary cancer treatment in the 21(st) century

Interventional oncology is an evolving branch of interventional radiology, which relies on rapidly evolving, highly sophisticated treatment tools and precise imaging guidance to target and destroy malignant tumours. The development of this field has important potential benefits for patients and the health-care system, but as a new discipline, interventional oncology has not yet fully established its place in the wider field of oncology; its application does not have a comprehensive evidence base, or a clinical or quality-assurance framework within which to operate. In this regard, radiation oncology, a cornerstone of modern cancer care, has a lot of important information to offer to interventional oncologists. A strong collaboration between radiation oncology and interventional oncology, both of which aim to cure or control tumours or to relieve symptoms with as little collateral damage to normal tissue as possible, will have substantial advantages for both disciplines. A close relationship with radiation oncology will help facilitate the development of a robust quality-assurance framework and accumulation of evidence to support the integration of interventional oncology into multidisciplinary care. Furthermore, collaboration between interventional oncology and radiation oncology fields will have great benefits to practitioners, people affected by cancer, and to the wider field of oncology.

Duplex Ultrasound versus Computed Tomography for the Postoperative Follow-Up of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Where Do We Stand Now?

In the last decade, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has rapidly developed to be the preferred method for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with suitable anatomy. EVAR offers the advantage of lower perioperative mortality and morbidity but carries the cost of device-related complications such as endoleak, graft migration, graft thrombosis, and structural graft failure. These complications mandate a lifelong surveillance of EVAR patients and their endografts. The purpose of this study is to review and evaluate the safety of color-duplex ultrasound (CDU) as compared with computed tomography (CT), based on the current literature, for post-EVAR surveillance. The post-EVAR follow-up modalities, CDU versus CT, are evaluated questioning three parameters: (1) accuracy of aneurysm size, (2) detection and classification of endoleaks, and (3) detection of stent-graft deformation. Studies comparing CDU with CT scan for investigation of post-EVAR complications have produced mixed results. Further and long-term research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of CDU versus CT, before CDU can be recommended as the primary imaging modality for EVAR surveillance, in place of CT for stable aneurysms.

CT angiography after 20 years: a transformation in cardiovascular disease characterization continues to advance

Through a marriage of spiral computed tomography (CT) and graphical volumetric image processing, CT angiography was born 20 years ago. Fueled by a series of technical innovations in CT and image processing, over the next 5-15 years, CT angiography toppled conventional angiography, the undisputed diagnostic reference standard for vascular disease for the prior 70 years, as the preferred modality for the diagnosis and characterization of most cardiovascular abnormalities. This review recounts the evolution of CT angiography from its development and early challenges to a maturing modality that has provided unique insights into cardiovascular disease characterization and management. Selected clinical challenges, which include acute aortic syndromes, peripheral vascular disease, aortic stent-graft and transcatheter aortic valve assessment, and coronary artery disease, are presented as contrasting examples of how CT angiography is changing our approach to cardiovascular disease diagnosis and management. Finally, the recently introduced capabilities for multispectral imaging, tissue perfusion imaging, and radiation dose reduction through iterative reconstruction are explored with consideration toward the continued refinement and advancement of CT angiography.

Noninvasive visualization of endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair through unenhanced MRI with motion-sensitized driven equilibrium preparation: Phantom experiments

PURPOSE

To optimize imaging parameters for balanced turbo field echo (BTFE) sequence combined with motion-sensitized driven equilibrium (MSDE) preparation for endoleak detection and type classification in phantom experiments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prepared four phantoms: a pulsatile flow generator with an aortic aneurysm model simulating no endoleak, and a type-1, type-2, and type-3 endoleak. Throughout the experiments, MSDE-BTFE images with and without flow suppression were obtained at 1.5 T and subtraction images were used for image evaluation. The no-endoleak phantom was imaged using different MSDE-BTFE sequences to optimize the k-space trajectory and evaluate the use of electrocardiogram gating. The relative contrast between flowing saline and background was calculated. Then all phantoms were imaged to determine the optimal velocity encoding (VENC) for endoleak detection and type classification. Three independent observers performed the image evaluation. Consistencies between the interpreted and true results were analyzed using kappa statistics.

RESULTS

The 3D low-high k-space trajectory with electrocardiogram gating provided the highest relative contrast. Low VENCs of 2-10 cm/s and high VENCs of 20 cm/s showed perfect consistency in endoleaks detection and type classification, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MSDE-BTFE sequences of appropriate VENCs has potential for endoleak detection and type classification, without contrast material.

Dual-energy CT for detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair: usefulness of colored iodine overlay

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the value of dual-source dual-energy CT with colored iodine overlay for detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. We also calculated the potential dose reduction by using a dual-energy CT single-phase protocol.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

From November 2007 to November 2009, 74 patients underwent CT angiography 2-7 days after endovascular repair during single-energy unenhanced and dual-energy venous phases. By using dual-energy software, the iodine overlay was superimposed on venous phase images with different percentages ranging between 0 (virtual unenhanced images) and 50-75% to show the iodine in an orange color. Two blinded readers evaluated the data for diagnosis of endoleaks during standard unenhanced and venous phase images (session 1, standard of reference) and virtual unenhanced and venous phase images with colored iodine overlay images (session 2). We compared the effective dose radiation of a single-energy biphasic protocol with that of a single-phase dual-energy protocol. The diagnostic accuracy of session 2 was calculated.

RESULTS

The mean dual-energy effective dose was 7.27 mSv. By using a dual-energy single-phase protocol, we obtained a mean dose reduction of 28% with respect to a single-energy biphasic protocol. The diagnostic accuracy of session 2 was: 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% negative predictive value, and 100% positive predictive value. Statistically significant differences in the level of confidence for endoleak detection between the two sessions were found by reviewers for scores 3-5.

CONCLUSION

Dual-energy CT with colored iodine overlay is a useful diagnostic tool in endoleak detection. The use of a dual-energy single-phase study protocol will lower radiation exposure to patients.

A multidetector tomography protocol for follow-up of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to improve the use of 64-channel multidetector computed tomography using lower doses of ionizing radiation during follow-up procedures in a series of patients with endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

METHODS

Thirty patients receiving 5 to 29 months of follow-up after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair were analyzed using a 64-channel multidetector computed tomography device by an exam that included pre-and postcontrast with both arterial and venous phases. Leak presence and type were classified based on the exam phase.

RESULTS

Endoleaks were identified in 8/30 of cases; the endoleaks in 3/8 of these cases were not visible in the arterial phases of the exams.

CONCLUSION

The authors conclude that multidetector computed tomography with pre-contrast and venous phases should be a part of the ongoing follow-up of patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. The arterial phase can be excluded when the aneurism is stable or regresses. These findings permit a lower radiation dose without jeopardizing the correct diagnosis of an endoleak.

Preoperative thrombus volume predicts sac regression after endovascular aneurysm repair

PURPOSE

To examine whether preoperative aneurysm thrombus volume correlated with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac regression following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

Clinical records and computed tomographic angiograms (CTAs) from patients undergoing EVAR from 2003 to 2008 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria for this study were available preoperative CTA images, >or=12-month follow-up with surveillance imaging, lack of re-intervention at 12 months, and treatment with commercially available devices. Patients with ruptured AAAs, those requiring an aortomonoiliac stent-graft, and clinical trial cases were excluded. Based on these criteria, satisfactory images and clinical follow-up were available in 100 patients (90 men; mean age 76.8 years, range 55-95). Preoperative CTAs were categorized as demonstrating "minimal," "moderate," or "severe" aneurysm thrombus load by 2 independent examiners blinded to clinical outcome. Percentage of the aortic cross-sectional area occluded by clot (% clot area) was calculated as [(total area) - (luminal area)]/(total area). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of sac shrinkage at long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

AAA thrombus was classified as minimal in 24%, moderate in 23%, and severe in 53%. Thrombus area averaged 11%+/-13%, 41%+/-14%, and 72+/-12% in each group, respectively. By multivariate analysis, minimal thrombus (OR = 1.47) and greater AAA diameter (OR = 1.3) were independent predictors of sac regression at 1, 6, and 12 months (all p<0.05). Presence of neck plaque and endoleak were also independent predictors of sac expansion (p<0.05). Patients with severe preoperative thrombus were less likely to demonstrate sac regression even in the absence of endoleak. Thrombus judgment (subjective) and percent clot area (objective) were strongly correlated (R = 0.82, p<0.05). Interobserver agreement on thrombus judgment was 86%.

CONCLUSION

Thrombus burden on preoperative CTA is a strong independent predictor of sac regression following EVAR. If validated by prospective studies, relative thrombus burden should be incorporated into postoperative surveillance algorithms to define procedural success and optimize the timing and cost-effectiveness of cross-sectional imaging.

Multidetector-row computed tomography angiography in abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular repair: evaluation of optimal timing of delayed phase imaging for the detection of low-flow endoleaks

PURPOSE

To evaluate the optimal timing of delayed phase imaging for detecting low-flow endoleaks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight patients with unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular repair underwent 1- and 6-month follow-up multidetector row computed tomography (CT) performed during unenhanced, arterial, and delayed phase. At 6-month follow-up, delayed phase imaging, focused on stent graft, was performed with a delay of 60 (early delayed enhanced phase) and 300 seconds (late delayed enhanced phase) after intravenous injection of 120 mL of iodinated nonionic contrast medium (iomeprol 300 mgI/mL, Iomeron), at a flow rate of 3 mL/s via an antecubital vein, with a detector-row configuration of 4 x 1-mm, a 1.25-mm slice width, and a pitch of 6. Six-month follow-up CT images were independently evaluated by 2 readers during 2 different reading sessions: sets A (unenhanced, arterial, and early delayed phase images) and B (unenhanced, arterial, and late delayed phase images). Sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of both reading sessions were compared. The standard of reference was represented by the combined evaluation of 1- and 6-month CT scans.

RESULTS

At standard of reference, 24 of 58 patients had an endoleak classified as type 1 in 2 cases, type 2 in 21 cases, and type 3 in the last 1 case. Seven of 21 type 2 endoleaks were classified as low-flow endoleaks. Set A reading session, including early delayed enhanced phase, allowed the detection of 19 of 24 endoleaks (5 false-negative cases represented by low-flow endoleaks), whereas all endoleaks were detected during set B reading session, including late delayed enhanced phase. Differences between sets A and B in terms of sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For optimal multidetector CT detection of low-flow endoleaks in patients who underwent endovascular repair, delayed phase should be acquired 300 seconds after injection of contrast medium.

Imaging Techniques for Detection and Management of Endoleaks after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair1

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is evolving into a viable alternative to open surgical repair for many patients with abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms. Endoleak development is a complication of EVAR and represents one of the limitations of this procedure. Endoleaks represent blood flow outside the stent-graft lumen but within the aneurysm sac. Lifelong imaging surveillance of patients after EVAR is critical to detect endoleaks for the patient's benefit and to determine the long-term performance of the stent-graft. Although computed tomographic angiography is the most commonly used examination for imaging surveillance, magnetic resonance angiography, ultrasonography, and digital subtraction angiography all have a role in endoleak detection and management. This review will focus on imaging techniques used for endoleak detection and the role imaging surveillance plays in the overall care of the post-EVAR patient.

Endovascular treatment of atherosclerotic and other thoracic aortic aneurysms

The incidence of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) is increasing with the present rate of occurrence at 10.9 cases per 100,000 people per year. The estimated 5-year risk of rupture of a TAA with a diameter between 4 and 5.9 cm is 16%, but it rises to 31% for aneurysms ≥ 6 cm. Despite increasing awareness of the importance of early diagnosis and treatment options, there are no clear guidelines available at the time of writing. Nor is there any clear evidence for specific pharmacological treatment able to resolve or delay the disease progression. Endovascular treatment (EVT), proposed as an alternative to surgery, has been considered a therapeutic innovation, especially because it is minimally invasive, which allows treatment even in high surgical risk patients. Vascular imaging is crucial for patient selection, endoprosthesis choice, and planning of the treatment because not all aneurysms are suitable. Early and midterm results are encouraging, but long-term results are necessary to definitively assess reliability of stent-graft materials and improvement in patient survival. In the choice between surgical or endovascular repair of TAAs, many factors must be considered, including the clinical situation, comorbidities, anatomy, choice of equipment, and last, but not less important, experience of the clinical team.

Multidetector CT in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treated with Endovascular Repair: Are Unenhanced and Delayed Phase Enhanced Images Effective for Endoleak Detection?

PURPOSE

To retrospectively determine the sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced, delayed enhanced phase (DEP), and arterial enhanced phase (AEP) multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) for depicting endoleaks during follow-up of endovascular aneurysm repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients (two women, 48 men; mean age, 72 years) underwent follow-up multi-detector row CT 1, 6, and 12 months after endovascular aneurysm repair. Unenhanced CT was performed with 2.5-mm collimation; 1-mm collimation was used with AEP and DEP examinations. Two independent readers assessed the presence of endoleak in three reading sessions: AEP (session A), unenhanced and AEP (session B), and AEP and DEP (session C). At 6- and 12-month follow-up, a fourth set was included: 1-month unenhanced and AEP (session D). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of each session were calculated. Triple-phase multi-detector row CT was the reference standard.

RESULTS

At 1 month, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, respectively, were 79%, 75%, and 55% for session A; 93%, 97%, and 93% for session B; and 93%, 78%, and 62% for session C. At 6 months, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, respectively, were 92%, 68%, and 48% for session A; 92%, 100%, and 100% for session B; and 100%, 84%, and 67% for session C. At 12 months, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, respectively, were 80%, 80%, and 50% for session A; 90%, 98%, and 90% for session B; and 100%, 80%, and 56% for session C. Sensitivity did not significantly differ (P > .05) among reading sessions A, B, and C, whereas specificity and positive predictive values in session B were significantly higher (P < .001). For 6- and 12-month follow-up, no significant differences (P > .05) were found between sessions D and B.

CONCLUSION

The combination of AEP and unenhanced imaging performed at 1-month follow-up offers improved specificity and positive predictive values compared with AEP alone. DEP imaging does not significantly increase sensitivity for detection of endoleaks, but it does depict low-flow endoleaks not seen at AEP.

Type II Endoleak after Endoaortic Graft Implantation: Diagnosis with Helical CT Arteriography

PURPOSE

To retrospectively assess endoleak shapes and locations within aneurysms to differentiate type II from type I and type III endoleaks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board granted an exemption for this HIPAA-compliant study; patient informed consent was not required. A retrospective review of arterial phase helical computed tomographic (CT) studies and medical records was performed for 39 patients (29 men, 10 women; age range, 60-89 years; mean, 78.5 years) who had an endoleak after endoaortic graft implantation for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm and who subsequently underwent angiography (n = 25), surgery (n = 8), or long-term follow-up (n = 6) to classify their endoleak into a specific type. At CT, endoleak shape (tubular or nontubular) and location (central or peripheral) were recorded. An endoleak was classified as type II if it contained a peripheral tubular component (PTC) near the aortic wall, with or without an identifiable feeding vessel. Endoleaks without these features were classified as type I or III. The Fisher exact test was used to assess associations between CT findings and endoleak type.

RESULTS

There were 22 type II and 17 type I or III endoleaks. CT enabled correct identification of 22 (100%) of 22 type II endoleaks, all of which contained a PTC. Of 17 type I or III endoleaks, only two (12%) contained a PTC and were misclassified as type II endoleaks; the remaining 15 (88%) were correctly classified. Overall, CT enabled correct identification of endoleaks as type II or type I or III in 37 (95%) of 39 patients. PTCs were significantly more common (P < .001) in type II than in type I or III endoleaks, with a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of 100%, 88.2%, 94.9%, 100%, and 91.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A PTC is a statistically significant predictor of type II endoleak in most patients.

Correlation between the Measurement of Transverse Diameter in the Proximal Neck on Computed Tomography and on Aortography before Endovascular Treatment of Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm

The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between the measurement of transverse diameter of the proximal neck on computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and graduated catheter aortography in patients who are candidates for endovascular graft placement in order to replace, if both measurements are equivalent, aortography for CTA alone. Preoperative dual-slice CTA and graduated catheter aortography were performed in 35 consecutive patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysm within 10 days. Transverse proximal neck diameters were measured on a true axial section on CTA reconstructions and on aortographic images, always 6 mm distal from the most inferior main renal artery. Mean, median, and standard deviation were obtained and the measurements correlated for each patient using Pearson's correlation and linear regression analysis. A significant difference in proximal neck transverse diameter measurements was found between graduated catheter aortography and CTA in all cases. CTA values were a mean of 1.74 mm higher than aortography values. Pearson's correlation indicates a strong correlation between both techniques, and a regression equation determines the predictive value of aortography on the basis of CTA values. Estimation of the transverse diameter of the proximal neck on aortography on the basis of that obtained on CTA allows us to affirm that CTA could be used as the sole method for the preoperative selection of appropriate endograft size in patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysm.

Surveillance for endoleaks: How to detect all of them

Endovascular aneurysm repair has proven to be a valuable alternative to open repair in selected patients. This less invasive procedure, however, requires long-term surveillance for its own set of potential complications, including perigraft leakage, or endoleak. This article focuses on the detection of these leaks, first defining and classifying endoleaks and then describing various means of detecting them, including computed tomographic angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, color-flow duplex ultrasonography, and conventional angiography.

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography of 8 Aortic Stent-Graft Models

PURPOSE

To report the systematic comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for evaluating 8 different aortic stent-graft models.

METHODS

MR angiography (MRA) was performed using a 1.5-T whole body system within 2 days of a CT examination (4 detector row scanner) on 8 patients with one of these stent-graft models: AneuRx, Endofit, PowerLink, Excluder, LifePath, Talent, Vanguard, or Zenith. Using a 4-point scale (maximum score 112 points), 4 independent readers (1 vascular surgeon and 3 radiologists) rated the impact of stent-related artifacts on the diagnostic quality of each imaging method for 28 parameters: length, diameter, collateral aortic side branches, stent-graft prostheses, and contrast. Each examiner also scored his personal diagnostic confidence with each stent-graft model.

RESULTS

The scores for diagnostic confidence in the CT imaging were 4 points for each stent-graft, with the exception of the LifePath (3 points). The diagnostic confidence in the MR images was mainly poor, with a median score of only 1; however, 3 stent-grafts (AneuRx, Excluder, and Vanguard) received > or =3 points. The total scores for comparative assessment were significantly different (p<0.05) between CT imaging (111.5) and MR (58.5). CT studies of all stent-grafts received >101 points, while only 3 devices acquired >80 points (AneuRx, Excluder, and Vanguard). Bland-Altman analysis showed that the reliability of the 4 readers was higher using the CT method. The total assessment scores of the stent-graft systems were related only on the different imaging methods (p<0.0001) and not to the different readers (p=0.983).

CONCLUSIONS

CT and MRI are fast, reliable means of providing all relevant information for stent-graft surveillance. Of 8 different stent-graft models, only 3 could be adequately assessed by MRA. Therefore, the potential advantages of the MR technique (e.g., use of minimally nephrotoxic contrast media, lack of ionizing radiation) are available only to a small proportion of patients.

Blood Pool MR Angiography of Aortic Stent-Graft Endoleak

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our research was to investigate the value of a blood pool contrast agent in detecting endoleaks on MR angiography after endoluminal stent-graft repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms.

CONCLUSION

Blood pool MR angiography using Ferumoxytol reveals more aortic stent-graft endoleaks than does CT angiography and depicts more endoleaks 24 hr after administration than during the immediate arterial phase because of a 50-fold increase in the volume of enhancement in the aneurysmal sac outside the stent-graft.

Volume regression of abdominal aortic aneurysms and its relation to successful endoluminal exclusion

OBJECTIVES

Evaluating the success of endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is frequently based on diameter measurements and determining the presence of endoleaks. The use of three-dimensional volumetric data and observation of morphologic changes in the aneurysm and device have been proposed to be more appropriate for postdeployment surveillance. The purpose of this study was to analyze the long-term volumetric and morphologic data of 161 patients who underwent endovascular AAA exclusion and to assess the utility of volume measurements for determining successful AAA repair.

METHODS

Patients with spiral computed tomography scans obtained preoperatively, within the first postoperative month, at 6 months, and annually thereafter, were included in this analysis. Computerized interactive three-dimensional reconstruction of each AAA scan was performed. Total aneurysm sac volume was measured at each time interval (mean preoperative volume 169.0 +/- 78.5 mL), and the significance of volume changes was determined by mixed linear modeling, a form of repeated measures analysis, to account for longitudinal data clustered at the individual level. Sixty-two patients (38%) developed endoleaks at some time during follow-up-15 type I leaks, 45 type II leaks, and 2 type III leaks. The patients with type I and type III leaks were treated with cuffs, and the type II leaks were treated either with observation, side-branch embolization, or required open conversion.

RESULTS

Aneurysm sac volume increased slightly at 1-month follow-up (+3.3%), and then decreased steadily to -12.9% at 5 years (P <.0001). This effect remained unchanged after controlling for the three device types used in our study population. Patients who did not exhibit an endoleak (n = 99) showed a significant decrease in aneurysm volume across the entire follow-up duration when compared with those who did exhibit an endoleak (n = 62) (P <.0001). The presence of a 10% or greater decrease in volume at 6 months demonstrated a sensitivity of 64%, a specificity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 95%, a negative predictive value of 62%, and an accuracy of 75% for predicting primary clinical success defined by successful deployment of the device; freedom from aneurysm- or procedure-related death; freedom from endoleak, rupture, migration, or device malfunction; or conversion to open repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Volumetric analysis may be used to predict successful endoluminal exclusion of AAAs. Volume regression appears to be device-independent and should be expected in most clinically successful cases. The presence of volume increases in the first 6 months is suspicious for an endoleak that is pressurizing the aneurysm sac and heralds the need for closer evaluation and possible intervention. A volume decrease of 10% or greater at 6 months and continuing regression over time is associated with successful endovascular repair.

Midterm outcomes of thoracic aortic stent-grafts: complications and imaging techniques

PURPOSE

To evaluate the midterm outcomes of thoracic aortic stent-grafting and the performance of computed tomographic angiography (CTA), radiography, and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in endograft surveillance.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients with traumatic thoracic aortic ruptures (n=16), aneurysms (n=14), false aneurysms (n=3), penetrating ulcers (n=3), and dissections (n=11) treated with stent-grafts were monitored in follow-up using chest radiography and CTA in all patients and MRA in 23 patients. Two perpendicular maximal aortic diameters, the sum of these diameters, and the elliptical cross-sectional area were determined and compared to baseline for the entire group and in subgroup analyses according to lesion type. CTA, MRA, and radiography were compared for their ability to detect endoleak, monitor stent-graft configuration, and measure aortic diameters.

RESULTS

The mortality rate was 8.5%. Severe complications were observed in 14.8% (6% neurological complications); 12 (25.5%) patients had primary endoleaks. Over a mean 11-month follow-up (range 0.25-46 months), the aortic diameters decreased for all patients without endoleak (p<0.001). In the diameter/area subgroup analyses, only the traumatic rupture cohort demonstrated significant decreases in all 4 measurements. CTA and MRA measurements correlated well, but chest radiography was superior to both for visualizing stent-graft shape. In terms of endoleak detection, MRA missed only 1 (12.5%) endoleak (type II) seen on CTA; there were no false positive results with MRA.

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidity and mortality observed after thoracic stent-grafting are acceptable. Radiography is better for monitoring stent-graft conformation, while CTA provides the best overall morphological information. The performance of MRA in endoleak detection is encouraging.

Detection of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of unenhanced and delayed helical CT acquisitions

PURPOSE

To assess unenhanced and delayed phase computed tomographic (CT) images combined with arterial phase images for detecting endoleaks after endovascular treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT scans were retrospectively evaluated for the presence of endoleaks after endovascular treatment of AAAs in 33 patients with endoleak (positive group) and 40 patients without evidence of endoleak or aneurysm enlargement (negative group). All patients underwent unenhanced and biphasic contrast material-enhanced CT. The CT scans were reviewed in the following combinations: (a) arterial phase and unenhanced scans (uniphasic/unenhanced set), (b) arterial and delayed phase scans only (biphasic set), and (c) arterial and delayed phase scans with unenhanced scans (complete set). Each set was reviewed by two radiologists blinded to the diagnosis of endoleak. Findings were recorded as positive, negative, or indeterminate for endoleak.

RESULTS

Within the positive group, endoleaks were diagnosed with the uniphasic/unenhanced, biphasic, and complete image sets in 30 (91%), 32 (97%), and 33 (100%) patients, respectively. With the uniphasic/unenhanced set, three (9%) endoleaks (seen only on delayed phase images) were missed. With the biphasic set, one (3%) endoleak was interpreted as indeterminate. Within the negative group, uniphasic/unenhanced, biphasic, and complete image sets were negative for endoleaks in 100%, 80%, and 100% of patients, respectively. With the biphasic set, results were indeterminate in 20% of cases.

CONCLUSION

A delayed CT acquisition enables detection of additional endoleaks, while an unenhanced acquisition helps eliminate indeterminate results. Thus, both acquisitions contribute to accurate diagnosis of endoleaks when combined with an arterial phase acquisition.

Elective endovascular stent-graft repair of atherosclerotic thoracic aortic aneurysms: clinical results and midterm follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and midterm results after endovascular treatment of atherosclerotic thoracic aortic aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight consecutive patients who were 53-82 years old (mean age, 71.6 years) were treated with a commercially available endoprosthesis. Subclavian transposition or bypass surgery was performed before the procedure in eight patients. Size dynamics of the aneurysms were analyzed on the basis of diameter and thrombus volume measurements obtained on three-dimensional CT reconstructions before hospital discharge (n = 22) and at the 1-year (n = 22), 2-year (n = 12), and 3-year (n = 5) follow-ups.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 100%. There was no 30-day mortality. None of the patients had symptoms due to spinal cord ischemia. The survival rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 96.1%, 90.9%, and 80.2%, respectively. During the perioperative period, patients presented with leukocytosis (37%), fever (36%), elevated C-reactive protein value (92%), pleural effusion (50%), and periaortic atelectasis (41%). Three early type I endoleaks sealed spontaneously. Three early type II endoleaks persisted over time, and one late type II endoleak was detected. In patients with type II endoleaks, thrombus volume of the aneurysms was constant (n = 2) or increased (n = 2). In patients without endoleaks, mean thrombus volume decreased (-53.2 +/- 56.8 mL, -40%) significantly (p = 0.001) during the first year. There was no significant interval decrease between the 1- and 2-year follow-ups (mean, -2.4 mL, p = 0.92) and between the 2- and 3-year follow-ups (mean, -0.4 mL, p = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

Endovascular treatment of atherosclerotic thoracic aortic aneurysms may result in a substantial reduction of the aneurysm sac in patients without endoleaks.

Controversies in the management of type II "branch" endoleaks following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Successful endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is often defined as complete exclusion of blood flow within the aneurysm sac. Perigraft flow, also known as endoleak, is the most common complication following EVAR. Attachment site related endoleaks (type I) are generally considered to warrant some form of intervention due to the belief that they represent a risk for future rupture. Management of type II endoleaks, also known as branch or collateral endoleaks, is more controversial. Some advocate a policy of watchful-waiting whereas others treat all type II endoleaks as soon as they are discovered. The following review explores the controversies pertaining to the management, diagnosis and surveillance imaging, and treatment of type II endoleaks.

Application of duplex US for characterization of endoleaks in abdominal aortic stent-grafts: report of five cases

Endoleaks were detected with helical computed tomographic (CT) angiography in five patients after placement of an aortobiliac stent-graft. The leaks were subsequently evaluated with duplex ultrasonography (US) and, in four patients, with conventional aortography as well. CT angiography revealed a total of seven endoleaks, all of which were prospectively classified as reconstitution (type II) leaks. Duplex US demonstrated six of the seven endoleaks. At duplex US, two of the leaks were characterized as attachment-site (type I) leaks; these two diagnoses were confirmed during subsequent angiography and profoundly altered clinical care. As an adjunct to CT angiography in evaluating endoleaks, duplex US provides hemodynamic information that enables further characterization of the type of endoleak and facilitates appropriate clinical care.

Endovascular aneurysm repair: Magnetic resonance monitoring of histological organization processes in the excluded aneurysm

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to systematically analyze the histopathologic organization processes in excluded aneurysms after endovascular stenting and to develop a noninvasive monitoring method for these processes using MRI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 36 mongrel dogs, autologous aortic aneurysms were created. Endovascular treatment was performed using covered stents. Follow-up was after 1 week, 6 weeks, and 6 months. MRI was performed with T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequences and T1-weighted spin-echo sequences and was repeated after contrast bolus with gadolinium. Histopathologic findings were correlated to signal intensities (SIs) of MRI images. SIs of distinct areas were analyzed and related to the SI of the reference tissue (SI ratio). The histological organization process was gradated in the following 4 classes: class 0, detritus without organization; classes I and II, connective tissue proliferation with increasing fiber synthesis; and class III, dense fibrous connective tissue. The SI ratios of T2-weighted images were significantly reduced from 4.76 in detritus (0) to 1.70 in dense fibrous connective tissue (III) as a function of histopathologic classes. SI ratios of T1-weighted images were reduced from 1.84 (0) to 1.12 (III). Contrast bolus with gadolinium-DTPA showed no change of SI ratio in detritus (0.99) but an increase from 1.12 (I) to 1.70 (III) as organization increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The histological organization of excluded aneurysms can be monitored by MRI. Progressive organization is indicated by decreasing SIs in T2- and an increasing signal increase in T1-weighted images after gadolinium bolus.

Are type II (branch vessel) endoleaks really benign?

The natural history and clinical significance of type II or branch vessel endoleaks following endovascular aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair remain unclear. Some investigators have suggested that these endoleaks have a benign course and outcome and that they can be safely observed. The purpose of this study was to document the natural history and outcome of all type II endoleaks that have occurred following endovascular AAA repair at our institution. A review of a prospectively compiled database of all endovascular AAA repairs performed at our institution was performed. From this review, we determined that type II endoleaks appear to have a relatively benign course, with a reasonable chance of spontaneously sealing within a 2-year period. No cases of rupture or aneurysm enlargement were documented in patients with open type II leaks. However, almost one-third of the patients did not manifest a type II leak until after their initial CT scan. The implications of such a "delayed" leak are unclear. Careful follow-up remains mandatory in patients with type II endoleaks to better define outcome.

Analysis of initial CT findings after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

PURPOSE

To determine the spectrum and frequency of specific computed tomographic (CT) findings in the acute period after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT images obtained 1--3 days after endograft placement were evaluated in 88 patients. The images were analyzed for stent position, appearance of endograft components, perigraft leak, and postoperative findings including air and acute thrombus within the aneurysm and air surrounding the femoral-femoral bypass graft. Findings that could be misinterpreted as perigraft leak were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifteen (17%) of 88 patients had perigraft leak in the acute postoperative period. The bare segment of the proximal self-expanding stent covered one or both renal arteries in 54 (61%) patients. One patient had CT evidence of renovascular compromise. Postoperative air was within the aneurysmal sac in 51 (58%) patients and surrounded the femoral-femoral bypass graft in 67 (94%) of 71 patients in whom the grafts were evaluated with CT. Mottled attenuation within the aneurysmal sac was seen in 50 (57%) patients. Forty-six (52%) patients had calcifications within longstanding thrombus. In 31 (35%) patients, findings that could have been misinterpreted as perigraft leak were identified.

CONCLUSION

Accurate analysis of CT findings after endovascular AAA repair requires careful review of all available CT images (preprocedural and pre- and postcontrast) and clear understanding of specific stent-graft components and placement.

Stent grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms: pre-and postoperative evaluation with multislice helical CT

Endovascular stent grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms is a new technique that may replace open surgery in selected cases. Pre-and postoperative angiography can be replaced by helical CT. This pictorial essay describes and illustrates the use of multislice helical CT where maximum intensity projection and multiplanar reformats play a central role in the evaluation.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms before and after endograft implantation: evaluation by computed tomography

The evaluation of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms for endograft candidacy and their follow-up after treatment are heavily dependent on radiologic imaging. Factors never considered during conventional open repair have become crucial to patient selection and procedural success, and the new and developing nature of the field of endovascular repair necessitates close surveillance of these devices after deployment. Computed tomography (CT) has emerged as the single most effective imaging tool for the preprocedural assessment and subsequent follow-up of these patients. This article outlines the technical parameters for obtaining pre- and postoperative CT examinations in endograft patients and discusses the important imaging findings.

Relationship between preoperative patency of the inferior mesenteric artery and subsequent occurrence of type II endoleak in patients undergoing endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was (1) to find out whether preoperative inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) patency (on radiographic imaging) predicts IMA-related endoleaks after endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms, (2) to determine feasibility of measuring aneurysm sac pressures in patients with endoleaks, and (3) to report early evidence of effective endovascular obliteration of IMA endoleaks.

METHODS

We studied 76 consecutive cases of infrarenal aortic aneurysms that were repaired with an endovascular approach (March 1998-April 1999).

RESULTS

There were 13 (17%) endoleaks persistent 30 days after the procedure. Eleven (85%) of these 13 were IMA-related endoleaks, which were documented with selective superior mesenteric artery angiography. The preoperative finding (on computed tomographic scan) of a patent IMA does not always predict an IMA-related endoleak, but results in a statistically and clinically significant higher ratio of patients with IMA-related endoleaks in the immediate postoperative period (24% versus 3%, P <.035). In eight of the 11 patients with persistent IMA-related endoleaks, measurement of intra-aneurysm sac pressures was possible, and six of these patients had systemic pressures within the excluded aneurysm sac. Nine (82%) of 11 IMA-related endoleaks were successfully obliterated by means of selective IMA embolization.

CONCLUSIONS

Many endoleaks are caused by a patent IMA, and this can result in persistence of systemic pressure within the aneurysm sac. The preoperative finding (on computed tomographic scan) of a patent IMA is a predictor of increased rates of IMA endoleaks, and IMA endoleaks can be successfully obliterated through endovascular procedures, after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.