Assessment of pulmonary vascular anatomy: comparing augmented reality by holograms versus standard CT images/reconstructions using surgical findings as reference standard

BACKGROUND

We compared computed tomography (CT) images and holograms (HG) to assess the number of arteries of the lung lobes undergoing lobectomy and assessed easiness in interpretation by radiologists and thoracic surgeons with both techniques.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for lobectomy for lung cancer were prospectively included and underwent CT for staging. A patient-specific three-dimensional model was generated and visualized in an augmented reality setting. One radiologist and one thoracic surgeon evaluated CT images and holograms to count lobar arteries, having as reference standard the number of arteries recorded at surgery. The easiness of vessel identification was graded according to a Likert scale. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and κ statistics were used.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were prospectively included. The two doctors detected the same number of arteries in 44/52 images (85%) and in 51/52 holograms (98%). The mean difference between the number of artery branches detected by surgery and CT images was 0.31 ± 0.98, whereas it was 0.09 ± 0.37 between surgery and HGs (p = 0.433). In particular, the mean difference in the number of arteries detected in the upper lobes was 0.67 ± 1.08 between surgery and CT images and 0.17 ± 0.46 between surgery and holograms (p = 0.029). Both radiologist and surgeon showed a higher agreement for holograms (κ = 0.99) than for CT (κ = 0.81) and found holograms easier to evaluate than CTs (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Augmented reality by holograms is an effective tool for preoperative vascular anatomy assessment of lungs, especially when evaluating the upper lobes, more prone to anatomical variations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04227444 RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Preoperative evaluation of the lung lobe arteries through augmented reality may help the thoracic surgeons to carefully plan a lobectomy, thus contributing to optimize patients' outcomes.

KEY POINTS

• Preoperative assessment of the lung arteries may help surgical planning. • Lung artery detection by augmented reality was more accurate than that by CT images, particularly for the upper lobes. • The assessment of the lung arterial vessels was easier by using holograms than CT images.

Split-bolus single-phase versus single-bolus split-phase CT acquisition protocols for staging in patients with testicular cancer: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Computed tomography (CT) imaging has become indispensable in the management of medical oncology patients. Risks associated with high cumulative effective dose (CED) are relevant in testicular cancer patients. Split-bolus protocols, whereby the contrast medium injection is divided into two, followed by combining the required phase images in a single scan acquisition has been shown to provide images of comparable image quality and less radiation dose compared to single-bolus split-phase CT for various indications. We retrospectively evaluated the performance of split-bolus and single-bolus protocols in patients having follow-up CT imaging for testicular cancer surveillance.

METHODS

45 patients with testicular cancer undergoing surveillance CT imaging of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis who underwent split-bolus and single-bolus protocols were included. Quantitative image quality analysis was conducted by placing region of interests in pre-defined anatomical sub-structures within the abdominal cavity. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and radiation dose in the form of dose length product (DLP) and effective dose (ED) were recorded.

RESULTS

The DLP and ED for the single-bolus, split-phase acquisition was 506 ± 89 mGy cm and 7.59 ± 1.3 mSv, respectively. For the split-bolus, single-phase acquisition, 397 ± 94 mGy∗cm and 5.95 ± 1.4 mSv, respectively (p < 0.000). This represented a 21.5 % reduction in radiation dose exposure. The SNR for liver, muscle and fat for the single-bolus were 7.4, 4.7 and 8, respectively, compared to 5.5, 3.8 and 7.4 in the split-bolus protocol (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In a testicular cancer patient cohort undergoing surveillance CT imaging, utilization of a split-bolus single-phase acquisition CT protocol enabled a significant reduction in radiation dose whilst maintaining subjective diagnostic acceptability.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Use of split-bolus, single-phase acquisition has the potential to reduce CED in surveillance of testicular cancer patients.

Patterns of Postoperative Changes in Lung Volume and Perfusion Assessed by Dual-Energy CT: Comparison of Lobectomy and Limited Resection

BACKGROUND. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and perfusion scintigraphy have limited utility for evaluating postoperative changes in regional pulmonary function after lung cancer resection surgery. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative changes in lung volume and perfusion, as assessed by dual-energy CT (DECT), between patients undergoing surgical resection of lung cancer by lobectomy versus limited resection as well as to assess associations between such changes and the lobar location of the resected tumor. METHODS. This study entailed a retrospective post hoc analysis of a prospective study that enrolled patients awaiting lung cancer resection surgery between March 2019 and February 2020. Eighty-one patients (38 men and 43 women; mean age, 60.5 ± 8.9 [SD] years), 43 of whom underwent lobectomy and 38 of whom underwent limited resection, were included. Patients underwent thoracic DECT and PFT evaluation preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Pulmonary lobes were segmented. Lobar lung volume and lung perfusion ratios (both relative to whole-lung values) were computed. Perfusion measures reflected DECT-derived iodine content. Patients completed 6-month postoperative quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaires. RESULTS. Patients undergoing lobectomy, compared with those undergoing limited resection, had greater increases in the lung volume ratio of the ipsilateral nonresected lobe(s) (mean, 42.3% ± 24.2% [SD] vs 22.9% ± 13.2%, p < .001) and the contralateral lung (mean, 14.6% ± 14.0% vs 6.4% ± 6.9%, p = .002) as well as greater increases in the lung perfusion ratio of the ipsilateral nonresected lobe(s) (mean, 39.9% ± 20.7% [SD] vs 22.8% ± 17.8%, p < .001) and the contralateral lung (mean, 20.9% ± 9.4% vs 4.3% ± 5.6%, p < .001). In patients with right lower lobe tumors, the largest postoperative increases in the lung volume ratio were in the right middle lobe in those undergoing lobectomy (mean, 44.1% ± 21.0%) and limited resection (mean, 24.6% ± 14.5%), whereas the largest postoperative increase in the lung perfusion ratio was in the left lower lobe in those undergoing lobectomy (mean, 53.9% ± 8.6%) and in the right middle lobe in those undergoing limited resection (mean, 32.5% ± 24.1%). Otherwise, the largest increases in lung volume and perfusion ratios occurred in the ipsilateral nonresected lobes (vs the contra-lateral lobes), regardless of the operative approach used and the lobar location. Changes in the lung volume and perfusion ratios in the ipsilateral lobe(s) and the contralateral lung showed weak correlations with certain QOL scores (e.g., for role functioning: ρ = 0.234-0.279 [volume] and -0.233 to -0.284 [perfusion]). CONCLUSION. DECT depicts patterns of lung volume and perfusion changes after lung cancer surgery, depending on the surgical approach (lobectomy vs limited resection) used and the lobar location of the tumor. CLINICAL IMPACT. DECT-derived metrics can help understand variable physiologic impacts of lung cancer resection surgeries.

Follow-Up Imaging Guidelines for Patients with Stage III Unresectable NSCLC: Recommendations Based on the PACIFIC Trial

The PACIFIC trial showed a survival benefit with durvalumab through five years in stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, optimal use of imaging to detect disease progression remains unclearly defined for this population. An expert working group convened to consider available evidence and clinical experience and develop recommendations for follow-up imaging after concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CRT). Voting on agreement was conducted anonymously via online survey. Follow-up imaging was recommended for all suitable patients after CRT completion regardless of whether durvalumab is received. Imaging should occur every 3 months in Year 1, at least every 6 months in Year 2, and at least every 12 months in Years 3–5. Contrast computed tomography was preferred; routine brain imaging was not recommended for asymptomatic patients. The medical oncologist should follow-up during Year 1 of durvalumab therapy, with radiation oncologist involvement if pneumonitis is suspected; medical and radiation oncologists can subsequently alternate follow-up. Some patients can transition to the family physician/community primary care team at the end of Year 2. In Years 1–5, patients should receive information regarding smoking cessation, comorbidity management, vaccinations, and general follow-up care. These recommendations provide guidance on follow-up imaging for patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC whether or not they receive durvalumab consolidation therapy.

Biphasic split-bolus injection protocol for routine contrast-enhanced chest CT: comparison with conventional early-phase single bolus technique

OBJECTIVES

To present a routine contrast-enhanced chest CT protocol with a split-bolus injection technique achieving combined early- and delayed phase images with a single aquisition, and to compare this technique with a conventional early-phase single-bolus chest CT protocol we formerly used at our institution, in terms of attenuation of great thoracic vessels, pleura, included hepatic and portal venous enhancement, contrast-related artifacts, and image quality.

METHODS

A total of 202 patients, who underwent routine contrast-enhanced chest CT examination aquired with either conventional early-phase single-bolus technique (group A,n = 102) or biphasic split-bolus protocol (group B,n = 100), were retrospectively included. Attenuation measurements were made by two radiologists independently on mediastinal window settings using a circular ROI at the following sites: main pulmonary artery (PA) at its bifurcation level, thoracal aorta (TA) at the level of MPA bifurcation,portal vein (PV) at porta hepatis, left and right hepatic lobe, and if present, thickened pleura (>2 mm) at the level with the most intense enhancement. Respective normalized enhancement values were also calculated. Contrast-related artifacts were graded and qualitative evaluation of mediastinal lymph nodes was performed by both reviewers independently. Background noise was measured and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the liver and TA were calculated.

RESULTS

While enhancement of thoracic vessels and normalised MPA enhancement did not differ significantly between both groups (p > 0.05), enhancement and normalised enhancement of pleura, liver parenchyma and PV was significantly greater in group B (p < 0.001). Perivenous artifacts limiting evaluation were less frequent in group B than in A and mediastinal lymph nodes were judged to be evaluated worse in group A than in group B with an excellent agreement between both observers. No significant difference was detected in CNRTA (p = 0.633), whereas CNR liver was higher in group B (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our split-bolus chest CT injection protocol enables simultaneous enhancement for both vascular structures and soft tissues, and thus, might raise diagnostic confidence without the need of multiple acquisitions.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

We think that this CT protocol might also be a promising alternative in lung cancer staging, where combined contrast-enhanced CT of the chest and abdomen is indicated. We therefore suggest to further evaluate its diagnostic utility in this setting, in particular in comparison with a late delayed chest-upper abdominal CT imaging protocol.

Contrast medium protocols in routine chest CT: a survey study

BACKGROUND

Administration of contrast medium (CM) is an important image quality factor in computed tomography (CT) of the chest. There is no clear evidence or guidelines on CM strategies for chest CT, thus a consensus approach is needed.

PURPOSE

To survey the potential impact on differences in chest CT protocols, with emphasis on strategies for the administration of CM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 170 respondents were included in this survey, which used two different approaches: (i) an online survey was sent to the members of the European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI); and (ii) an email requesting a copy of their CT protocol was sent to all hospitals in Norway, and university hospitals in Sweden and Denmark. The survey focused on factors affecting CM protocols and enhancement in chest CT.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 24% (n = 170): 76% of the respondents used a CM concentration of ≥350 mgI/mL; 52% of the respondents used a fixed CM volume strategy. Fixed strategies for injection rate and delay were also the most common approach, practiced by 73% and 57% of the respondents, respectively. The fixed delay was in the range of 20-90 s. Of the respondents, 56% used flexible tube potential strategies (kV).

CONCLUSION

The chest CT protocols and CM administration strategies employed by the respondents vary widely, affecting the image quality. The results of this study underline the need for further research and consensus guidelines related to chest CT.

Optimising CT-chest protocols and the added value of venous-phase contrast timing; Observational case-control

INTRODUCTION

To optimize CT chest protocol by comparing venous contrast timing with arterial timing for contrast opacification in vessels, qualitative image quality and radiologists' satisfaction and diagnostic confidence in assessing for potential nodal, pleural and pulmonary disease in general oncology outpatients.

METHOD

Matched case-control study performed following CT protocol update. 92 patients with a range of primary malignancies with 2 CT chests in a 2-year period, one with an arterial phase protocol and the second in the 60 second venous phase, were included. Contrast attenuation in aorta, pulmonary artery and liver were measured. Subjective measurements assessed perivenous artefact, confidence in nodal pleural and pulmonary assessment and presence of pulmonary emboli. Statistical analysis was performed using paired and unpaired t-tests.

RESULTS

Venous-phase CT demonstrated more consistent enhancement of the vessels, with higher attenuation of the nodes, pulmonary and pleural lesions. There was a significant reduction in perivenous beam hardening artefact on venous-phase CT (P < 0.001). Diagnostic confidence was significantly higher for nodal assessment and pleural abnormality visibility (P < 0.001) and pleural assessment (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in pulmonary mass visibility. There was adequate enhancement to diagnose significant pulmonary emboli (PE) with 4 incidental PEs detected on the venous phase, extending to segmental vessels.

CONCLUSION

Venous-phase CT chest performs better than arterial-phase on all fronts, without compromising assessment of incidental pulmonary emboli. When intravenous contrast is indicated in a routine chest CT (excluding a CT-angiogram), the default timing should be a venous or 60s phase.

Role of delayed phase contrast-enhanced CT in the intra-thoracic staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): What does it add?

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to investigate differences in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) intra-thoracic staging by using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (ce-CT) at the arterial phase (AP), at the arterial plus delayed phases (AP + DEP), and at the delayed phase (DEP), and to evaluate their potential impact on disease staging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two chest radiologists with different level of expertise and a general radiologist independently reviewed the chest CT exams of 150 patients with NSCLC; CT scans were performed 40 s (AP) and 60 s (DEP) after contrast material injection. Image assessment included three reading sessions: session A (AP), session B (AP + DEP) and session C (DEP). CT descriptors for the primary tumour (T), regional nodal involvement (N), and intra-thoracic metastases (M) were evaluated in each reading session. Readers had to assign a confidence level (CL) for the assessment of each descriptor and define the TNM stage. Friedman and Cochran Q test was used to compare the assessments of the 3 reading sessions; inter-reader agreement was determined (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient - ICC).

RESULTS

The CL was significantly higher in sessions B and C than in session A for all descriptors, with the exception of pulmonary arterial invasion. Primary tumour inner necrosis and regional nodal involvement were detected in a significantly higher number of cases in sessions B and C as compared to session A (p ≤ 0.001). DEP significantly changed N stage determination (p < 0.001), particularly N3, and excluded chest wall invasion (p = 0.05) and venous invasion (p = 0.001). The agreement was good among the 3 readers (ICC = 0.761) and excellent between the 2 chest radiologists (ICC ≥ 0.940), regardless of the contrast phase.

CONCLUSIONS

The 60-second DEP ce-CT for staging NSCLC significantly increased the readers' CL, changed the N stage determination, and helped excluding chest wall invasion and venous invasion.

The role of unenhanced phase of the liver in the scanning protocol of metastatic breast cancer: implications for sensitivity, response evaluation and size measurement

Background

To analyse if performing unenhanced CT of the liver aids in the evaluation of metastatic lesions, response assessment or alter the size of the lesions, compared with portal phase alone, in patients with hepatic metastases from breast carcinoma.

Patients and methods

One-hundred and fifty-three CT scans of 36 women were included. Scans consisted of unenhanced, arterial and portal delayed phases of the liver. Two readers sorted which phase was best for visualization of metastases, evaluated the number of lesions detected in each phase, selected the best phase for assessment of response in two consecutive scans, and measured one target lesion in all the phases. Χ2 was used to compare differences among phases and paired t test for measurement differences.

Results

Unenhanced, arterial and portal phases were considered better phases by readers 1/2 in 68/67%, 27/28% and 69/70%, and some lesions were missed in 2%, 11% and 7%, respectively. Sensitivity was significantly better for unenhanced and portal phases compared to arterial phase. Comparison between consecutive scans was considered better in unenhanced (80/79%), followed by portal (70/69%) and arterial phases (31/31%). Maximum diameter of target lesions was 15% greater in unenhanced phase (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Portal and unenhanced phases of the liver allow better detection and delineation of metastatic hepatic lesions from breast carcinoma. In most cases, unenhanced CT is the best phase to assess response and provides the largest diameter. Therefore, we recommend the use of unenhanced CT in the evaluation of patients with breast carcinoma and suspected or known hepatic metastatic disease.

Hyperattenuating adrenal lesions in lung cancer: biphasic CT with unenhanced and 1-min enhanced images reliably predicts benign lesions

OBJECTIVES

To investigate usefulness of biphasic computed tomography (CT) in characterizing hyperattenuating adrenal lesions in lung cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 239 patients with lung cancer who underwent adrenal CT for hyperattenuating (> 10 Hounsfield unit) adrenal lesions. Adrenal CT comprised unenhanced and 1-min and 15-min enhanced images. We dichotomized adrenal lesions depending on benign or metastatic lesions. Reference standard for benignity was histologic confirmation or ≥ 6-month stability on follow-up CT. Two independent readers analyzed absolute (APW) or relative percentage wash-out (RPW) using triphasic CT, and enhancement ratio (ER) or percentage wash-in (PWI) using biphasic CT (i.e., unenhanced and 1-min enhanced CT). Criteria for benignity were as follows: criteria 1, (a) APW ≥ 60% or (b) RPW ≥ 40%, and criteria 2, (a) ER > 3 and (b) PWI > 200%. We analyzed area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy for benignity, and inter-reader agreement.

RESULTS

Proportion of benign adrenal lesion was 71.1% (170/239). For criteria 1 and 2, AUCs were 0.872 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.822-0.911) and 0.886 (95% CI, 0.838-0.923), respectively, for reader 1 (p = 0.566) and 0.816 (95% CI, 0.761-0.863) and 0.814 (95% CI, 0.759-0.862), respectively, for reader 2 (p = 0.955), and accuracies were 87.9% (210/239) and 86.2% (206/239), respectively, for reader 1 (p = 0.479) and 81.2% (194/239) and 80.3% (192/239), respectively, for reader 2 (p = 0.763). Weighted kappa was 0.725 (95% CI, 0.634-0.816) for criteria 1 and 0.736 (95% CI, 0.649-0.824) for criteria 2.

CONCLUSION

Biphasic CT can reliably characterize hyperattenuating adrenal lesions in patients with lung cancer.

KEY POINTS

• Criteria from biphasic computed tomography (CT) for diagnosing benign adrenal lesions were enhancement ratio of > 3 and percentage wash-in of > 200%. • In the analysis by two independent readers, area under the curve between criteria 1 and 2 was not significantly different (0.872 and 0.886 for reader 1; 0.816 and 0.814, for reader 2; p > 0.05 for each comparison). • Wash-in characteristics from biphasic CT are helpful to predict benign adrenal lesions in lung cancer.

Impact of iodine concentration and scan parameters on image quality, contrast enhancement and radiation dose in thoracic CT

Background

We investigated the impact of varying contrast medium (CM) densities and x-ray tube potentials on contrast enhancement (CE), image quality and radiation dose in thoracic computed tomography (CT) using two different scanning techniques.

Methods

Seven plastic tubes containing seven different CM densities ranging from of 0 to 600 HU were positioned inside a commercial chest phantom with padding, representing three different patient sizes. Helical scans of the phantom in single-source mode were obtained with varying tube potentials from 70 to 140 kVp. A constant volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) depending on phantom size and automatic dose modulation was tested. CE (HU) and image quality (contrast-to-noise ratio, CNR) were measured for all combinations of CM density and tube potential. A reference threshold of CE and kVp was defined as ≥ 200 HU and 120 kVp.

Results

For the medium-sized phantom, with a specific CE of 100–600 HU, the diagnostic CE (200 HU) at 70 kVp was ~ 90% higher than at 120 kVp, for both scan techniques (p < 0.001). Changes in CM density/specific HU together with lower kVp resulted in significantly higher CE and CNR (p < 0.001). When changing only the kVp, no statistically significant differences were observed in CE or CNR (p ≥ 0.094), using both dose modulation and constant CTDIvol.

Conclusions

For thoracic CT, diagnostic CE (≥ 200 HU) and maintained CNR were achieved by using lower CM density in combination with lower tube potential (< 120 kVp), independently of phantom size.

Image quality evaluation of dual-layer spectral CT in comparison to single-layer CT in a reduced-dose setting

Objectives

To quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate image quality in dual-layer CT (DLCT) compared to single-layer CT (SLCT) in the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis in a reduced-dose setting.

Methods

Intraindividual, retrospective comparisons were performed in 25 patients who received at least one acquisition of all three acquisition protocols SLCT_low (100 kVp), DLCT_high (120 kVp), and DLCT_low (120 kVp), all covering the venous-phase thorax, abdomen, and pelvis with matched CTDI_vol between SLCT_low and DLCT_low. Reconstruction parameters were identical between all scans. Image quality was assessed quantitatively at 10 measurement locations in the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis by two independent observers, and subjectively with an intraindividual forced choice test between the three acquisitions. Dose-length product (DLP) and CTDI_vol were extracted for dose comparison.

Results

Despite matched CTDI_vol in acquisition protocols, CTDI_vol and DLP were lower for SLCT_low compared to DLCT_low and DLCT_high (DLP 408.58, 444.68, 647.08 mGy·cm, respectively; p < 0.0004), as automated tube current modulation for DLCT_low reached the lower limit in the thorax (mean 66.1 mAs vs limit 65 mAs). Noise and CNR were comparable between SLCT_low and DLCT_low (p values, 0.29–0.51 and 0.05–0.20), but CT numbers were significantly higher for organs and vessels in the upper abdomen for SLCT_low compared to DLCT_low. DLCT_high had significantly better image quality (Noise and CNR). Subjective image quality was superior for DLCT_high, but no difference was found between SLCT_low and DLCT_low.

Conclusions

DLCT_low showed comparable image quality to SLCT_low, with the additional possibility of spectral post-processing. Further dose reduction seems possible by decreasing the lower limit of the tube current for the thorax.

Key Points

• Clinical use of reduced-dose DLCT is feasible despite the required higher tube potential.

• DLCT with reduced dose shows comparable objective and subjective image quality to reduced-dose SLCT.

• Further dose reduction in the thorax might be possible by adjusting mAs thresholds.

Imaging protocols for CT chest: A recommendation

Computed Tomography (CT) is the mainstay of diagnostic imaging evaluation of thoracic disorders. However, there are a number of CT protocols ranging from a simple non-contrast CT at one end of the spectrum, and CT perfusion as a complex protocol available only on high-end scanners. With the growing diversity, there is a pressing need for radiologists, and clinicians to have a basic understanding of the recommended CT examinations for individual indications. This brief review aims to summarise the currently prevalent CT examination protocols, including their recommended indications, as well as technical specifications for performing them.

Early and delayed phases of contrast-enhanced CT for evaluating patients with malignant pleural effusion. Results of pairwise comparison by multiple observers

OBJECTIVE

To compare images from early and delayed phases of contrast-enhanced thoracic CT for assessing pleural thickening or nodules in a series of patients with malignant pleural effusions.

METHODS

Blinded images from 36 patients with malignant pleural effusions showing pleural lesions in both early (35 s delayed) and delayed (70 s delayed) phases of thoracic and abdominal contrast-enhanced CT scan were retrospectively assessed by six observers. First, images were individually scored in a six-point scale grading the quality of visualization of pleural findings such as pleural thickening or nodules. This was followed by a paired analysis, where the readers had to choose the one showing the highest quality between two images presented together corresponding to both phases of the same patient showing the same pleural lesion. When possible, contrast attenuation of the abnormal pleura was measured. Statistical analysis was performed by using paired t-test and χ ².

RESULTS

Mean attenuation of pleural lesions was significantly higher in the delayed phase (76.0 ± 25.1 vs 57.5 ± 20.7, p < 0.001). Mean score and score of individual images was statistically significant better for the delayed phase for all observers. In the paired analysis, all the readers preferred the delayed phase over the early phase in 77.8 to 91.7% of the cases.

CONCLUSION

Delayed phase of contrast-enhanced CT is preferable to early phase for evaluating pleural findings. Advances in knowledge: Pleural attenuation is greater for the delayed phase compared with the early phase of contrast-enhanced chest CT. In the pairwise comparison, all the observers prefer the delayed phase over the early phase for pleural evaluation.