Acute Gouty Knee Arthritis: Ultrasound Findings Compared With Dual-Energy CT Findings

The comprehensive role of dual-energy CT in gout as an advanced diagnostic innovation

Gout is a common and growing health concern globally, marked by the deposition of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in joints and soft tissues. While diagnosis relies on synovial fluid analysis, it is limited by technical difficulties and a notable rate of false negatives. Over the past decade, dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has emerged as a highly sensitive and less-invasive modality for detecting MSU crystals. DECT offers several advantages, including the ability to visualize both intra- and extra-articular MSU deposits and to monitor crystal burden over time. It also aids in treatment planning by accurately assessing the therapeutic response. However, sensitivity of DECT can be lower in early-stage gout, and artifacts can occasionally result in false positives. Recent studies have highlighted new values of using DECT, such as predicting future flares in gout patients. In this review, we focus on the comprehensive clinical utility of DECT and its potential pitfalls in the diagnosis and management of gout.

Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of dual-energy CT and ultrasound in gouty arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To explore the performance and effect of dual-energy computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound in the diagnosis of gouty arthritis and to provide a reference for the clinical diagnosis of gouty arthritis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 76 patients with gouty arthritis admitted to the hospital from June 2020 to June 2022 was conducted. Patients were diagnosed with gouty arthritis using ultrasound and dual-energy CT technology. The accuracy of diagnosis by different imaging techniques was analyzed along with the imaging findings of ultrasound and dual-energy CT.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients, 60 men and 16 women, ranging in age from 20 to 77 years (mean age 50.8 ± 10.92 years), presented with uric acid levels of 254.1-720.05 μmol/L (mean 482.17 ± 105.06 μmol/L) and C-reactive protein levels ranging from 4.25 to 10.3 mg/L. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the area under the curve and specificity of serum uric acid were higher by dual-energy CT than those of ultrasound in the diagnosis of gouty arthritis. The dual-energy CT detection rate of tophi was significantly higher than the ultrasound detection rate (p < .05). For inflammatory effusion and synovial thickening, the ultrasound detection rates were significantly higher than the dual-energy CT detection rates (p < .05). Regarding soft-tissue edema, the detection rate of the two methods was not significantly different (p > .05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with ultrasound, dual-energy CT has increased accuracy in the diagnosis of gouty arthritis.

Imaging of Crystal Disorders:: Calcium Pyrophosphate Dihydrate Crystal Deposition Disease, Calcium Hydroxyapatite Crystal Deposition Disease and Gout Pathophysiology, Imaging, and Diagnosis

Crystal arthropathies are a group of joint disorders due to deposition of crystals in and around joints that lead to joint destruction and soft tissue masses. Clinical presentation is variable and diagnosis might be challenging. In this article the pathophysiology is addressed, the preferred deposition of crystal arthropathies and imaging findings. Case studies of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition disease, hydroxyapatite crystal deposition disease, and gout are shown. Guidelines for the use of dual-energy computed tomography are given to enable the diagnosis and follow-up of gout.

The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound - Part II: Joint Pathologies, Pediatric Applications, and Guided Procedures

The second part of the Guidelines and Recommendations for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound (MSUS), produced under the auspices of EFSUMB, following the same methodology as for Part 1, provides information and recommendations on the use of this imaging modality for joint pathology, pediatric applications, and musculoskeletal ultrasound-guided procedures. Clinical application, practical points, limitations, and artifacts are described and discussed for every joint or procedure. The document is intended to guide clinical users in their daily practice.

Prevalence of Monosodium Urate (MSU) Deposits in Cadavers Detected by Dual-Energy Computed Tomography (DECT)

Background: Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) allows direct visualization of monosodium urate (MSU) deposits in joints and soft tissues. Purpose: To describe the distribution of MSU deposits in cadavers using DECT in the head, body trunk, and feet. Materials and Methods: A total of 49 cadavers (41 embalmed and 8 fresh cadavers; 20 male, 29 female; mean age, 79.5 years; SD ± 11.3; range 52–95) of unknown clinical history underwent DECT to assess MSU deposits in the head, body trunk, and feet. Lens, thoracic aorta, and foot tendon dissections of fresh cadavers were used to verify MSU deposits by polarizing light microscopy. Results: 33/41 embalmed cadavers (80.5%) showed MSU deposits within the thoracic aorta. 11/41 cadavers (26.8%) showed MSU deposits within the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints and 46.3% of cadavers demonstrated MSU deposits within foot tendons, larger than and equal to 5 mm. No MSU deposits were detected in the cranium/intracerebral vessels, or the coronary arteries. Microscopy used as a gold standard could verify the presence of MSU deposits within the lens, thoracic aorta, or foot tendons in eight fresh cadavers. Conclusions: Microscopy confirmed the presence of MSU deposits in fresh cadavers within the lens, thoracic aorta, and foot tendons, whereas no MSU deposits could be detected in cranium/intracerebral vessels or coronary arteries. DECT may offer great potential as a screening tool to detect MSU deposits and measure the total uric acid burden in the body. The clinical impact of this cadaver study in terms of assessment of MSU burden should be further proven.

Assessing the Sensitivity of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography 3-Material Decomposition for the Detection of Gout

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and precision of a novel application of 3-material decomposition (3MD) with virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) in the dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) assessment of monosodium urate (MSU) and hydroxyapatite (HA) phantoms compared with a commercial 2-material decomposition (2MD) and dual-thresholding (DT) material decomposition methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Monosodium urate (0.0, 3.4, 13.3, 28.3, and 65.2 mg/dL tubes) and HA (100, 400, and 800 mg/cm3 tubes) phantoms were DECT scanned individually and together in the presence of the foot and ankle of 15 subjects. The raw data were decomposed with 3MD-VMI, 2MD, and DT to produce MSU-only and HA-only images. Mean values of 10 × 10 × 10-voxel volumes of interest (244 μm3) placed in each MSU and HA phantom well were obtained and compared with their known concentrations and across measurements with subjects' extremities to obtain accuracy and precision measures. A statistical difference was considered significant if P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Compared with known phantom standards, 3MD-VMI was accurate for the detection of MSU concentrations as low as 3.4 mg/dL (P = 0.75). In comparison, 2MD was limited to 13.3 mg/dL (P = 0.06) and DT was unable to detect MSU concentrations below 65.2 mg/L (P = 0.16). For the HA phantom, 3MD-VMI and 2MD were accurate for all concentrations including the lowest at 100 mg/cm3 (P = 0.63 and P = 0.55, respectively). Dual-thresholding was not useful for the decomposition of HA phantom. Precision was high for both 3MD-VMI and 2MD measurements for both MSU and HA phantoms. Qualitatively, 3MD-VMI MSU-only images demonstrated reduced beam-hardening artifact and voxel misclassification, compared with 2MD and DT.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-material decomposition-VMI DECT is accurate for quantification of MSU and HA concentrations in phantoms and accurately detects a lower concentration of MSU than either 2MD or DT. For concentration measurements of both MSU and HA phantoms, 3MD-VMI and 2MD have high precision, but DT had limitations. Clinical implementation of 3MD-VMI DECT promises to improve the performance of this imaging modality for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of gout.

Dual-energy computed tomography in crystalline arthritis: knowns and unknowns

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To give an overview of what can reasonably be considered as known about dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in crystal-related arthropathies, and what still needs to be explored.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies suggest an overall superiority of DECT over ultrasound in gout in terms of sensitivity (89 vs. 84%) and specificity (91 vs. 84%), except in early disease. Additional studies are needed to optimize DECT postprocessing settings in order to improve the specificity of the technique and eliminate all artifacts. Evidence has been controversial concerning DECT's ability to detect monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposits on vessel walls, or whether or not MSU-coded plaques are artifacts. DECT can be used to monitor MSU crystal depletion during urate-lowering treatment; MSU crystal volume is associated with cardiovascular risk and disease activity. There are some reports on calcium-containing crystal deposition diseases (calcium pyrophosphate and basic calcium phosphate) demonstrating that DECT can characterize and discriminate between the different types of crystals.

SUMMARY

Our knowledge about the use of DECT in crystal-related arthropathies continues to expand. Some unknowns have been clarified but there's still lots to learn, particularly concerning gout management and the potential use of DECT in calcium-containing crystal-related arthropathies.

Diagnostic Performance of Dual-energy CT Versus Ultrasonography in Gout: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), along with ultrasound (US), has been increasingly utilized for the diagnosis of gout because of its noninvasive advantages. However, the superiority of DECT over US remains controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to investigate whether DECT is superior to US in the diagnosis of gout.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was conducted for potentially eligible articles. Studies that evaluated the utility of DECT or US for gout diagnosis were qualified. Two distinctive ultrasonographic features of gout, namely, the double contour sign and the presence of tophus, were also assessed. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 criteria. Besides, the subgroup analyses of early disease duration (≤ 2 years) was also performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of DECT were 0.89 (0.80-0.94) and 0.91 (0.88-0.94), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of US were 0.70 (0.58-0.79) and 0.95 (0.87-0.98), respectively, for double contour sign; 0.57 (0.38-0.74) and 0.99 (0.88-1.00), respectively, for tophus; and 0.84 (0.73-0.91) and 0.84 (0.78-0.89), respectively, for overall consideration of US signs. At the early disease duration (≤ 2 years), the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.75 (0.60-0.86) and 0.85 (0.75-0.91), respectively, for DECT; 0.93 (0.72-0.99) and 0.80 (0.71-0.86), respectively, for overall consideration of US signs.

CONCLUSION

DECT and US showed promising accuracy for gout diagnosis. DECT has higher sensitivity, specificity, and AUC than overall consideration of US signs and thus has a better diagnostic ability in diagnosing gout. Moreover, the diagnostic sensitivity of DECT is lower than that of overall consideration of US signs at less than 2 years' disease duration.

Dual-energy computed tomography vs ultrasound, alone or combined, for the diagnosis of gout: a prospective study of accuracy

OBJECTIVE

To examine the accuracy of dual-energy CT (DECT) vs ultrasound or their combination for the diagnosis of gout.

METHODS

Using prospectively collected data from an outpatient rheumatology clinic at a tertiary-care hospital, we examined the diagnostic accuracy of either modality alone or their combination, by anatomical site (feet/ankles and/or knees), for the diagnosis of gout. We used two standards: (i) demonstration of monosodium urate crystals in synovial fluid (gold), and (ii) modified (excluding DECT and ultrasound) 2015 ACR-EULAR gout classification criteria (silver).

RESULTS

Of the 147 patients who provided data, 48 (33%) had synovial fluid analysis performed (38 were monosodium urate-crystal positive) and mean symptom duration was 9.2 years. One hundred (68%) patients met the silver standard. Compared with the gold standard, diagnostic accuracy statistics for feet/ankles DECT, feet/ankles ultrasound, knees DECT and knees ultrasound were, respectively: sensitivity: 87%, 84%, 91% and 58%; specificity: 100%, 60%, 87% and 80%; positive predictive value: 100%, 89%, 97% and 92%; negative predictive value: 67%, 50%, 70% and 33%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.93, 0.72, 0.89 and 0.66. Combining feet/ankles DECT with ultrasound or knees DECT with ultrasound led to a numerically higher sensitivity compared with DECT alone, but overall accuracy was lower. Similarly, combining imaging knees to feet/ankles also yielded a numerically higher sensitivity and negative predictive values compared with feet/ankles DECT alone, without differences in overall accuracy. Findings were replicated compared with the silver standard, but with lower numbers.

CONCLUSIONS

Feet/ankles or knees DECT alone had the best overall accuracy for gout diagnosis. The DECT-US combination or multiple joint imaging offered no additional increase in overall diagnostic accuracy.

Dual-energy computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute gouty arthritis

AIMS

To investigate the diagnostic value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in acute gouty arthritis (AGA) or patients presenting with suspected gouty arthritis.

METHODS

This retrospective study was performed in a single centre from May 2017 to August 2018. Two hundred and twenty-six patients with an initial diagnosis of AGA in the preceding 15 days were included. All patients were referred for a DECT scan of the affected joints. The diagnosis criteria of gout with the American College of Rheumatology Classification Standard were regarded as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients were included in the present study at last. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of DECT in the diagnosis of all AGA were 83.83%, 60.61%, 91.5% and 42.55% respectively. When AGA was subdivided according to the joint site, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 80.68%, 61.11%, 91.03%, and 39.29% in feet, 93.55%, 40%, 93.55%, and 40% in knees and 87.5%, 71.43%, 91.3%, and 62.5% in ankles, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

DECT had a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of AGA. However, the specificity was limited, particularly for the diagnosis of acute gouty knee arthritis. Prospective multicenter studies of large samples will enhance the application of DECT among the AGA patients in the future.

Ultrasonography and dual-energy computed tomography: impact for the detection of gouty deposits

Ultrasonography (US) and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) are useful and sensitive diagnostic tools to identify monosodium urate deposits in joints and soft tissues. The purpose of this review is to overview the imaging findings obtained by US and DECT in patients with gout, to understand the strengths and weaknesses of each imaging modality, and to evaluate the added value of using both modalities in combination.

Gout of ankle and foot: DECT versus US for crystal detection

OBJECTIVE

To compare dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) and ultrasound (US) in detecting monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in the ankle and foot in patients with acute gouty arthritis.

METHODS

Bilateral ankle and foot were examined by DECT and US and the differences between the findings were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients underwent DECT and US examinations. At the patient level, the overall positivity of crystal deposition detected by DECT was higher than that by US (92% vs 68%, P = 0.005). The agreement of detecting crystal deposition between DECT and US was not very strong (К = 0.44, P = 0.003). At different joint/area levels, there were significant differences between the two examinations in the area of the dorsum (36% vs 12%, P = 0.009) and metatarsal bone (34% vs 12%, P = 0.017), but the sensitivity of DECT and US was similar in the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP) and ankle areas (P>0.05). Agreement between the two examinations in the ankle and first MTP was very strong (К = 0.86, P < 0.001; К = 0.79, P < 0.001, respectively). However, agreement between the two examinations in other joints/areas was poor.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicated that DECT should be the first choice for acute gouty arthritis in patients with ankle and foot involvement. Key Points • There is little data regarding DECT and US in detecting MSU crystals in the ankle and foot in patients with acute gouty arthritis. • The overall positivity of crystal deposition detected by DECT was higher than that by US, but the sensitivity of DECT and US was similar in the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP) and ankle areas. • Agreement between the two examinations in the ankle and first MTP was very strong; however, agreement between the two examinations in other joints/areas was poor.

Impact of Dual-Energy CT Postprocessing Protocol for the Detection of Gouty Arthritis and Quantification of Tophi in Patients Presenting With Podagra: Comparison With Ultrasound

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to compare ultrasound (US) tophus and monosodium urate (MSU) deposit detection and US tophus size in the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) 1 joint with dual-energy CT (DECT) using two DECT postprocessing protocols in patients presenting with podagra. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Seventy-five consecutive patients with podagra (66 men and nine women; mean age, 65.6 years; age range, 33-88 years) and 75 control subjects with MTP 1 joint osteoarthritis (49 men and 26 women; mean age, 63.0 years; age range, 35-87 years) prospectively underwent US and DECT between 2016 and 2018 to assess the MTP 1 joint. Two Syngovia postprocessing DECT protocols with different minimum attenuation thresholds of 150 HU (DECT 150 protocol) versus 120 HU (DECT 120 protocol) and the same maximum attenuation threshold (500 HU) and constant kilovoltage setting of tubes A and B at 80 and 140 kVp were evaluated. Interobserver variability of the two DECT protocols was calculated and compared with that of US. RESULTS. The postprocessing DECT 150 protocol was positive for tophus detection in 55 of 75 patients (73.3%) with podagra, whereas the postprocessing DECT 120 protocol detected MSU deposits in all 75 patients (100%). Tophus size assessed using the DECT 120 protocol showed an improved correlation with tophus size detected on US (p < 0.01). Interobserver variability of DECT was improved when using the DECT 120 protocol (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION. The postprocessing DECT 120 protocol enables improved visualization of MSU deposits and provides more accurate information about tophus size that better correlates with tophus size on US compared with the standard postprocessing DECT 150 protocol.