MR imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma

Breast Radiologists' Perceptions on the Detection and Management of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: Most Agree Imaging Beyond Mammography Is Warranted

OBJECTIVE

To determine breast radiologists' confidence in detecting invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) on mammography and the perceived need for additional imaging in screening and preoperative settings.

METHODS

A 16-item anonymized survey was developed, and IRB exemption obtained, by the Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) Patient Care and Delivery Committee and the Lobular Breast Cancer Alliance. The survey was emailed to 2946 radiologist SBI members on February 15, 2023. The survey recorded demographics, perceived modality-specific sensitivity for ILC to the nearest decile, and opinions on diagnosing ILC in screening and staging imaging. Five-point Likert scales were used (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree).

RESULTS

Response rate was 12.4% (366/2946). Perceived median (interquartile range) modality-specific sensitivities for ILC were MRI 90% (80-90), contrast-enhanced mammography 80% (70-90), molecular breast imaging 80% (60-90), digital breast tomosynthesis 70% (60-80), US 60% (50-80), and 2D mammography 50% (30-60). Only 25% (85/340) respondents were confident in detecting ILC on screening mammography in dense breasts, while 67% (229/343) were confident if breasts were nondense. Most agreed that supplemental screening is needed to detect ILC in women with dense breasts (272/344, 79%) or a personal history of ILC (248/341, 73%), with 34% (118/334) indicating that supplemental screening would also benefit women with nondense breasts. Most agreed that additional imaging is needed to evaluate extent of disease in women with newly diagnosed ILC, regardless of breast density (dense 320/329, 97%; nondense 263/329, 80%).

CONCLUSION

Most breast radiologists felt that additional imaging beyond mammography is needed to more confidently screen for and stage ILC.

Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: A Review of Imaging Modalities with Special Focus on Pathology Concordance

Invasive lobular cancer (ILC) is the second most common type of breast cancer. It is characterized by a unique growth pattern making it difficult to detect on conventional breast imaging. ILC can be multicentric, multifocal, and bilateral, with a high likelihood of incomplete excision after breast-conserving surgery. We reviewed the conventional as well as newly emerging imaging modalities for detecting and determining the extent of ILC- and compared the main advantages of MRI vs. contrast-enhanced mammogram (CEM). Our review of the literature finds that MRI and CEM clearly surpass conventional breast imaging in terms of sensitivity, specificity, ipsilateral and contralateral cancer detection, concordance, and estimation of tumor size for ILC. Both MRI and CEM have each been shown to enhance surgical outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed ILC that had one of these imaging modalities added to their preoperative workup.

Non-enhancing malignant lesions of the breast: A case report and review of literature

Due to the elusive nature of invasive lobular carcinoma, mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging have their limitations in early detection. A 67-year-old woman presented for mammography and found retraction of breast parenchyma of the right breast. Magnetic resonance imaging and contrast mammography showed no contrast uptake in the region in question. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound were found to be superior for the detection of invasive lobular carcinoma, with a sensitivity of more than 90%. On ultrasound examination, invasive lobular carcinoma may occur only with posterior acoustic shadowing. On breast magnetic resonance imaging, it is commonly described as an irregular mass and less commonly as non-mass enhancement. An additional advantage of magnetic resonance imaging is the higher detection rate of multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral breast lesions. The reason for no contrast enhancement in this particular tumor before neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by enhancement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is most likely at the molecular and histologic level and requires further investigation in similar cases.

MRI background parenchymal enhancement in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma: Endocrine hormonal treatment effect

OBJECTIVES

High background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) levels and asymmetric distribution could cause diagnostic uncertainty due to morphological similarity to breast cancer, especially invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). We investigated BPE in ILC patients, its association with the tumor hormonal profile, and the effect of endocrine treatment (ET).

METHODS

The analysis included all MRI examinations performed at our institution between 2010 and 2019 for ILC-diagnosed patients. Baseline study and the first follow-up study were reviewed. Digital medical records were reviewed to retrieve demographics/pathology results/treatment information. BPE and fibroglandular tissue were assessed qualitatively on the contralateral breast according to the criteria of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS).

RESULTS

The study included 129 patients. Most (91%) had pure ILC. All received ET; 12% also received chemotherapy; 90% had surgery first; 70% by breast conservation. On the baseline MRI, 70% had mild or moderate BPE; whereas, on the follow-up study, the majority (59%) had minimal BPE. Most BPE reductions were by 2 degrees. In the baseline study, additional biopsies were required in 59% of cases, and in 17%, a short-term follow-up was recommended. In the follow-up study, biopsies were recommended in 10%, and a short-term follow-up was requested in 16%. A correlation between progesterone receptor intensity index and baseline BPE level was observed (r = 0.3, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

ILC patients usually exhibit high BPE. ET decreases BPE, and therefore may decrease false-positive interpretations. Additional research is needed to explore whether study can be performed on ET without compromising sensitivity.

KEY POINTS

∙ High background parenchymal enhancement levels reduces breast MRI sensitivity, yielding high false positive rates especially when reporting cases of invasive lobular carcinoma [ILC].∙Treatment of ILC with endocrine therapy reduces background parenchymal enhancement and thus could decrease these false-positive interpretations.

Preoperative loco-regional staging of invasive lobular carcinoma with contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM)

The aim of our study was to assess the performance of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) in the preoperative loco-regional staging of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) patients, about the valuation of the extension of disease and in measurement of lesions. Then, we selected retrospectively, among the 1500 patients underwent to CEDM at the Breast Diagnostics Department of the Careggi University Hospital of Florence and the National Cancer Institute of Milan from September 2016 to November 2018, 31 women (mean age 57.1 aa; range 41-78 aa) with a definitive histological diagnosis of ILC. CEDM has proved to be a promising imaging technique, being characterized by a sensitivity of 100% in the detection of the index lesion, and of 84.2% in identifying any adjunctive lesions: It was the presence of a non-mass enhancement (NME) to lower the sensitivity of the technique (25% vs. 100% for mass-like enhancements or a mass closely associated with a NME). Specificity in the characterization of additional lesions was 66.7%, and the diagnosis of the extension of disease was correct in 77.4% of cases: NME also led to a decrease in diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of disease extension up to 40% versus 85% for masses and 80% for masses associated with NME (M/NME). Moreover, in 12/31 (38.7%), CEDM allowed to correctly identify lesions not shown by mammography + ultrasonography + tomosynthesis: In the half of these (6/12), there was a multicentricity, thus allowing an adequate surgical planning change. CEDM was also very accurate in analyzing the maximum diameter of the masses, while it was much less reliable in the case of the M/NME and pure NME. In conclusion, CEDM is a new promising imaging technique in the loco-regional preoperative staging and in the evaluation of disease extension for ILC, especially in case of mass enhancement lesions.

Preoperative breast cancer staging with multi-modality imaging and surgical outcomes

PURPOSE

To compare the rates of mastectomy and re-operation after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) among patients who had different pre-operative multi-modality imaging, hence identifying significant predictors of mastectomy and re-operations within each group.

METHOD

Retrospective study of consecutive patients with primary breast cancer treated January 2010 - December 2016, divided in 3 groups, undergoing pre-operative local staging respectively with conventional imaging modalities only (2D mammography, ultrasound (US)), conventional imaging and tomosynthesis (DBT) and/or MRI. The primary outcome was identification of significant predictors of surgical outcomes, within each group. Study variables examined in univariate analysis were age, lesion dimension, breast density, multifocality, tumor size, histology, and if associated with outcomes they were included in binary logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Amongst 1547 patients, patient and tumor characteristics differed across the three groups, as did mastectomy rates which were 18 % (102/562) for 2D + US, 36 % (154/428) for 2D + DBT + US, 45 % (250/557) for 2D+/-DBT + US + MRI(p < 0.001). Variables strongly associated with mastectomy were larger lesions and multifocality (as was multi-modality group). Re-operation rate showed an opposite trend: 12.2 % (56/459) for 2D + US, 8 % (22/272) for 2D + DBT + US, 6.5 % (20/306) for 2D+/-DBT + US + MRI. Re-operation rate for 2D+/-DBT + US + MRI was lower than for 2D + US (p = 0.01) but similar to 2D + DBT + US (p = 0.58). Patients who had 2D + US and re-operations had significantly larger lesions, more underestimation, higher proportion of invasive carcinoma with in-situ component than those who did not require re-operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had larger tumors and multifocal disease were more frequently staged by adding DBT and/or MRI to conventional imaging (mammography and US) which was associated with more extensive surgical treatment but lower reoperation rates.

Patterns of malignant non-mass enhancement on 3-T breast MRI help predict invasiveness: using the BI-RADS lexicon fifth edition

Background Non-mass enhancements (NME) with invasive components account for 10-42% of total malignant NMEs. The factors associated with invasiveness on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could be useful for clinical assessment and treatment. Purpose To evaluate the clinical significances of the distributions and internal enhancement patterns (IEP) of malignant NMEs on 3-T breast MRI. Material and Methods A total of 448 consecutive women with newly diagnosed breast cancer that had undergone preoperative MRI and surgery between February 2013 and March 2016 were identified. After exclusions, 72 malignant NMEs without a mass in 72 women (mean age = 51.5 years) were included. Two readers independently assessed distributions and IEPs of NME, according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon fifth edition. Collected data included the presence of invasion and histopathologic factors. Results A clustered ring IEP was significantly associated with invasive cancer (75.0%, P = 0.001, Reader1; 72.9%, P < 0.001, Reader 2), absence of necrosis (79.0%, P < 0.001; 72.1%, P < 0.001, respectively), and high Ki-67 expression (74.2%, P = 0.048; 74.2%, P = 0.003, respectively). A clumped IEP was related to ductal carcinoma in situ (33.3%, P = 0.025; 50.0%, P = 0.001, respectively), absence of lymph node metastasis (24.1%, P = 0.029; 31.5%, P = 0.030, respectively), and presence of necrosis (34.5%, P = 0.003; 44.8%, P = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion The presence of a clustered ring IEP in patients with breast cancer was found to be significantly associated with invasive breast cancer and high Ki-67 expression.

Recent Advances in Breast-Specific Imaging

Background

Imaging the breast is a vital component not only for breast cancer screening, but also for diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up of patients with breast cancer.

Methods

The author reviews recent advances and also provides her personal experience in describing the status of digital mammography, computer-aided detection, dedicated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron-emission mammography for evaluating the breast.

Results

Full-field digital mammography is superior to standard mammography in women under 50 years of age and in those with dense breasts. Computer-aided detection assists inexperienced mammographers and enhances detection of microcalcifications in dense breasts. Breast MRI is useful in preoperative evaluation, clarification of indeterminate mammograms, and follow-up of BRCA mutation carriers. The specificity of MRI remains problematic, however. Positron-emission mammography promises enhanced detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), even when not associated with microcalcifications, and should aid surgical planning.

Conclusions

These four significant advances in breast imaging have all improved the sensitivity of detecting breast abnormalities. Cost issues, however, may limit the widespread application of these advances.

No impact of breast magnetic resonance imaging on 15-year outcomes in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ or early-stage invasive breast cancer managed with breast conservation therapy

BACKGROUND

For women undergoing breast conservation therapy (BCT), the added value of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the time of initial diagnosis remains controversial. The current study was performed to determine long-term outcomes after BCT for women with and without pretreatment breast MRI.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 2001, a total of 755 women with ductal carcinoma in situ or early-stage invasive breast cancer underwent breast-conserving surgery (with axillary lymph node staging for invasive carcinoma) followed by definitive breast radiotherapy. Evaluation at the time of the initial diagnosis included conventional mammography in all subjects and breast MRI in 215 women (28%). Clinical, pathologic, and treatment characteristics were comparable for patients with and without breast MRI. Outcomes were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank method.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 13.8 years, there were 49 local failures (15 women with and 34 women without breast MRI, respectively). The 15-year local failure rates were 8% for women with and 8% for women without MRI (P = .59). There also were no differences noted between women with and without breast MRI with regard to 15-year rates of overall survival (77% vs 71%; P = .24), freedom from distant metastases (86% vs 90%; P = .08), and contralateral breast cancer (10% vs 8%; P = .10). Multivariate analysis demonstrated no significant impact of breast MRI on local failure (P = .96).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast MRI during the initial evaluation for BCT appears to have no significant impact on 15-year rates for local control, overall survival, freedom from distant metastases, or contralateral breast cancer. The routine use of pretreatment breast MRI is not indicated for patients undergoing BCT. Cancer 2017;123:1324-1332. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Shear-wave sonoelastographic features of invasive lobular breast cancers

Aim

To evaluate shear-wave elastographic (SWE) and related gray-scale features of pure invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC) and compare them with invasive ductal breast cancers (IDC).

Methods

Quantitative SWE features of mean (El-mean), maximum (El-max), minimum (El-min) elasticity values of the stiffest portion of the mass, and lesion-to-fat elasticity ratio (E-ratio) were measured in 40 patients with pure ILC and compared with 75 patients with IDC. Qualitative gray-scale features of lesion size, echogenicity, orientation, and presence of distal shadowing were determined and compared between the groups.

Results

ILC were significantly larger than IDC (P = 0.008) and exhibited significantly higher El-max (P = 0.015) and higher El-mean (P = 0.008) than IDC. ILC were significantly more often horizontally oriented, while IDC were significantly more often vertically oriented (P < 0.001); ILC were significantly more often hyperechoic than IDC (P < 0.001). Differences in stiffness between ILC and IDC determined by quantitative SWE parameters were present only in small tumors (≤1.5 cm in size), ie, small ILC had significantly higher El-max (P = 0.030), El-mean (P = 0.014), and El-min (P = 0.045) than small IDC, while tumors larger than 1.5 cm had almost equal stiffness, without significant differences between the groups.

Conclusion

Specific histopathologic features of ILC are translated into their qualitative sonographic and quantitative sonoelastographic appearance, with higher stiffness of small ILC compared to small IDC. Gray-scale and sonoelastographic features may help in diagnosing ILC.

Expanding the indications for MRI in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer: what is best practice?

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) now has an accepted place in screening younger women at high risk of breast cancer, and is increasingly used in a number of other settings including assessment of response to neo-adjuvant therapy and local staging of cancer. Although the evidence for its general use in these settings is very limited, in highly selected patients, especially where discordance with conventional measurements occurs, MRI can have a place in assessing extent of disease, both whether operable and how operable, and guiding surgery. These scenarios and future indications and alternative technologies are explored in this paper.

Practical dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in small animal models of cancer: data acquisition, data analysis, and interpretation

Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) consists of the continuous acquisition of images before, during, and after the injection of a contrast agent. DCE-MRI allows for noninvasive evaluation of tumor parameters related to vascular perfusion and permeability and tissue volume fractions, and is frequently employed in both preclinical and clinical investigations. However, the experimental and analytical subtleties of the technique are not frequently discussed in the literature, nor are its relationships to other commonly used quantitative imaging techniques. This review aims to provide practical information on the development, implementation, and validation of a DCE-MRI study in the context of a preclinical study (though we do frequently refer to clinical studies that are related to these topics).

Invasive ductolobular carcinoma of the breast: spectrum of mammographic, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging findings correlated with proportion of the lobular component

Purpose

The aim of this study was to describe the imaging features of patients with invasive ductolobular carcinoma of the breast in comparison with the proportion of the lobular component.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed mammographic, sonographic and MRI records of 113 patients with proven ductolobular carcinoma diagnosed between January 2008 and October 2012 according to the BI-RADS ® lexicon, and correlated these to the proportion of the lobular component.

Results

At mammography the most common finding (62.9%) for invasive ductolobular carcinoma was an irregular, spiculated and isodense mass. On ultrasound an irregular and hypoechoic mass, with spiculated margins and posterior acoustic shadowing was observed in 46.8% of cases. Isolated mass and mass associated with non-mass like enhancement (NMLE) were the most common findings by MRI (89.4%). Washout pattern in delayed phase was seen in 61.2% and plateau curve was more frequently observed in patients with larger lobular component. Additional malignant findings (multifocality, multicentricity and contralateral disease) did not correlate significantly with the proportion of the lobular component.

Conclusion

Invasive ductolobular carcinoma mainly presents as an irregular, spiculated mass, isodense on mammography and hypoechoic with posterior acoustic shadowing. On MRI it is usually seen as an isolated mass or as a dominant mass surrounded by smaller masses or NMLE. Washout is the most ordinary kinetic pattern of these tumors. In general, the imaging characteristics did not vary significantly with the proportion of the lobular component.

Prospective MRI assessment for invasive lobular breast cancer. Correlation with tumour size at histopathology and influence on surgical management

AIM

To evaluate the performance of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in determining the size of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) compared to histopathology, and its influence on breast surgical management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective evaluation was undertaken of standardized contrast-enhanced MRI images of 51 consecutive women over an 18 month period with pure ILC or with lobular features as the dominant subtype on breast core biopsy. Image interpretation was performed by one consultant radiologist (M.H.). The lesion size at MRI was compared with the size at final histopathology after surgical excision using a Bland-Altman agreement plot.

RESULTS

Of the 51 prospectively imaged consecutive women, seven were excluded as they had diffuse ILC. The remaining 44 patients had a mean histological tumour size of 34.9 mm (range 4-77 mm). MRI underestimated tumour size in 26 (59.1%) cases. In 21 (47.7%) patients, this discrepancy was small, ranging up to 16 mm. The largest underestimation occurred in five (11.4%) cases with a difference ranging between 31 and 48 mm. Fifteen (34.1%) tumours were overestimated by MRI where the discrepancy ranged up to 22 mm. In three (6.8%) patients MRI and histological size matched. The Bland-Altman agreement plot demonstrated that in 95% of cases the size at histopathology will be between 0.36 and 2.31 times the MRI size at extremes. MRI correlated better with histopathology in tumours up to T2 (<5 cm) size leading to a change in surgical management for nine of the 44 (20.5%) patients.

CONCLUSION

MRI enables surgical management decisions to be made with increased confidence in patients with ILC up to T2 size.

How to measure breast cancer tumoral size at MR imaging?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of different MR sequences to measure tumor size.

METHODS

Eighty-six women (mean age: 53 years (30-78)) who underwent preoperative MRI for breast cancer were included. Maximal diameters of the index tumor (IT) and of the whole extent of the tumor (WET) were measured on T2-weighted (T2W) sequences, on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) T1-weighted (T1W) sequences and on Maximal Intensity Projection (MIP) reconstructions. Agreements with pathological size were evaluated using concordance correlation coefficient (k).

RESULTS

Median pathological size of IT was 20mm (13-25 mm, interquartile range). Median pathological size of the WET was 29 mm (16-50mm, interquartile range). Measurement of IT showed a good concordance with pathological size, with best results using T2W (k = 0.690) compared to MIP (k = 0.667), early-subtracted DCE frame (k = 0.630) and early-native DCE frame (k = 0.588). IT was visible on T2W in 83.7% and accurately measured within 5mm in 69.9%. Measurement of WET was superior using early-subtracted DCE frame (k = 0.642) compared to late-native frame (k = 0.635), early-native frame (k = 0.631), late-subtracted frame (k = 0.620) and MIP (k = 0.565). However, even using early-subtracted frame, WET was accurately measured within 5mm only 39.3%.

CONCLUSION

If visible, IT size is best measured on T2W with a good accuracy (69%) whereas WET is best estimated on early-subtracted DCE frame. However, when adjacent additional sites exist around IT, suspected surrounding disease components need to be proved by pathological analysis.

Measurement of tumour size with mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance imaging as compared to histological tumour size in primary breast cancer

Background

Tumour size in breast cancer influences therapeutic decisions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate sizing of primary breast cancer using mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and thereby establish which imaging method most accurately corresponds with the size of the histological result.

Methods

Data from 121 patients with primary breast cancer were analysed in a retrospective study. The results were divided into the groups “ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)”, invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) + ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)”, “invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC)”, “invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC)” and “other tumours” (tubular, medullary, mucinous and papillary breast cancer). The largest tumour diameter was chosen as the sizing reference in each case. Bland-Altman analysis was used to determine to what extent the imaging tumour size correlated with the histopathological tumour sizes.

Results

Tumour size was found to be significantly underestimated with sonography, especially for the tumour groups IDC + DCIS, IDC and ILC. The greatest difference between sonographic sizing and actual histological tumour size was found with invasive lobular breast cancer. There was no significant difference between mammographic and histological sizing. MRI overestimated non-significantly the tumour size and is superior to the other imaging techniques in sizing of IDC + DCIS and ILC.

Conclusions

The histological subtype should be included in imaging interpretation for planning surgery in order to estimate the histological tumour size as accurately as possible.

Radiological and clinical features of adult non-puerperal mastitis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the radiological and clinical features of adult non-puerperal mastitis and to determine the most accurate method of preventing unnecessary surgical procedures.

METHODS

Clinical and imaging findings were retrospectively reviewed in 51 females with non-puerperal mastitis, which was confirmed by biopsy/surgical pathology. All 51 patients had pre-operative MRI; 45 patients also had sonograms and 25 also had mammograms, pre-operatively.

RESULTS

Of the 51 cases with non-puerperal mastitis, 94.1% (48/51) were confirmed as having acute or chronic inflammation, and the other 3 had plasma cell mastitis; areola papillaris inflammation was found in 39.2% (20/51) of the cases. Overall, 6 of the 25 cases that were examined with mammography and 2 of the 45 cases that were examined with sonography appeared normal, but all 51 lesions were positively identified on MRI. Asymmetrical density (12/25) on mammograms and solitary or separated/contiguous, clustered, hypoechoic mass-like lesions (31/45) on ultrasound were the most common signs of non-puerperal mastitis. On enhanced MRI, 90.2% (46/51) of patients showed non-mass-like enhanced lesions. Multiple regional enhancements in the pattern of distribution (32/46) and separated or contiguous, clustered, rim-like enhancements in the pattern of internal enhancement (29/46) were the most common manifestations in non-mass-like enhanced lesions. Of the 51 patients, mastitis Type 1 and Type 2 in the time-signal intensity curve were detected in 47.1% and 51.0% of the patients, respectively. The breast imaging reporting and data system categories with the highest number of patients were Category 0 (9/25) on mammography, Category 4a on sonography (18/45) and Category 4a on MRI (29/51).

CONCLUSION

The findings from mammography and ultrasound are non-specific; therefore, using MR can be helpful in the diagnosis, especially in the presence of non-mass-like enhancements that are multiple, regional, separated, or contiguous, clustered and rim-like.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Mastitis is often neglected because of the lack of typical clinical signs and symptoms. This study has assessed and described the clinical features and imaging findings of adult non-puerperal mastitis on mammograms, sonograms and MRI and found that MRI is more specific in the diagnosis of disease.

Are the imaging features of the pleomorphic variant of invasive lobular carcinoma different from classic ILC of the breast?

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pleomorphic invasive lobular carcinoma (PILC) is different from classic invasive lobular carcinoma (CILC) in terms of radiologic and clinicopathologic features. We compared the radiologic and clinicopathologic features of 22 surgically confirmed PILCs in 21 patients from 2004 to 2009 and 47 CILCs from 47 consecutive patients. For all cases, we reviewed the imaging findings, medical records and pathological results. PILC had a higher T stage, N stage, nuclear and histologic grade compared to CILC. PILC was more commonly negative for estrogen receptors and positive for HER2 than CILC (all p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in age, symptoms, tumor size, extensive intraductal component, lymphovascular invasion, triple negative profile, or multiplicity between the two groups. PILC was not detected on mammography in 1 (4.5%) of 22 cases, whereas CILC was not detected on mammography in 7 (14.9%) of 47 cases and on MRI in 2 (5.0%) of 40 (p = 0.42 and p = 1.000, respectively). MRI identified more frequent multiplicity than mammography for both PILC and CILC (p < 0.001), but was similar to US (p = 0.066). Most lesions showed a spiculated mass or architectural distortion with or without calcifications on mammography and ultrasound. No differences in mass and/or non-mass lesions or kinetics on MRI were observed between the two groups. PILC shows more pathologically aggressive features, but cannot be differentiated from CILC based on imaging findings.

Comparison of enhancement characteristics between invasive lobular carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To compare enhancement characteristics between invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) on contrast enhanced MRI of the breast and to observe the magnitude of eventual differences as these may impair the diagnostic value of breast MRI in ILC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed an analysis of enhancement characteristics on biphasic breast MRI in a series of 136 patients (103 IDC, 33 ILC) using an in-house developed application for pharmacokinetic modeling of contrast enhancement and a commercially available CAD application that evaluated the contrast-enhancement versus time curve.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the most enhancing voxels in IDC had significantly higher K(trans) -values than in ILC (P < 0.01). No difference in v(e) -values was noted between groups. Visual assessment of contrast-enhancement versus time curves revealed wash-out curves to be less common in ILC (48% versus 84%). However, when using the CAD-application to assess the most malignant looking curve, the difference was blotted out (76% versus 86%).

CONCLUSION

ILC enhances slower than IDC but peak enhancement is not significantly less. The use of a CAD-application may help to determine the most malignant looking contrast-enhancement versus time curve, and hence facilitates lesion classification.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for cancer diagnosis and staging

Gadolinium-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is optimally suited for the diagnosis and assessment of breast cancer. The complete breast MRI examination, which includes select nonenhanced sequences, yields abundant information about the nature and stage of disease. In this article, we will explore cancer diagnosis by examining the main imaging features of breast malignancy as well as the assessment of surrounding structures. We will then discuss current ideas in the use of breast MRI in breast cancer, including high-risk screening, evaluation of extent of disease, role in surgical planning, and the use of MRI in the patient receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast MRI plays an important role in the assessment of patients with breast malignancy-a role that is yet to be fully defined and used. By understanding the strengths and weakness of this imaging method in cancer evaluation, we hope to highlight the appropriate uses of the technique.

Imaging features of invasive lobular carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the imaging findings of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) compared to those of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included ILCs (n = 27) and IDCs (n = 85). Imaging findings were retrospectively evaluated, according to the BI-RADS lexicon. We compared the imaging findings, multiplicity, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detection accuracy of ILC with those of IDC.

RESULTS

At mammography, normal findings and mass lesions were more frequent with ILCs (14.8% and 59.2%, respectively) than with IDCs (1.2% and 44.7%, respectively) (P = 0.009). With ultrasonography (US), posterior acoustic shadowing was more frequently seen in ILCs (59.2%) than in IDCs (15.8%) (P < 0.001). With MRI, both ILCs and IDCs most commonly appeared as a heterogeneously enhancing, irregular mass with a spiculated border. Multifocality was more frequently associated with ILCs (40.7%) than with IDCs (14.1% 1% 0.002). However, multicentricity and bilaterality were not different between the two groups. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for the detection of multiplicity were 91.6% and 73.3%, respectively, for ILCs and 83.3% and 80.3%, respectively, for IDCs.

CONCLUSION

Normal findings, mass lesions on mammography, and posterior acoustic shadowing on US were more frequently associated with ILCs than with IDCs. Multifocality was more prevalent with ILCs than with IDCs.

MRI for breast cancer: Current indications

Mammography is the only imaging study that has been proven in multiple large randomized trials to decrease breast cancer mortality. Mammography, however, has its limitations and, as such, other modalities that can complement it are being studied. One of these is dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI, which has emerged as an important adjunctive modality and is at present the most sensitive modality that we have to evaluate the breast. The American College of Radiology, in its 2004 practice guidelines, has outlined the 12 current indications for breast MRI. This manuscript reviews and provides examples of each of these.

Breast magnetic resonance imaging: current clinical indications

Breast magnetic resonance (MR) is highly sensitive in the detection of invasive breast malignancies. As technology improves, as interpretations and reporting by radiologists become standardized through the development of guidelines by expert consortiums, and as scientific investigation continues, the indications and uses of breast MR as an adjunct to mammography continue to evolve. This article discusses the current clinical indications for breast MR including screening for breast cancer, diagnostic indications for breast MR, and MR guidance for interventional procedures.

High cancer yield and positive predictive value: outcomes at a center routinely using preoperative breast MRI for staging

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study is to report the outcomes at a center that routinely uses breast MRI for preoperative staging, regardless of lesion histology or patient characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five hundred ninety-two patients with recently diagnosed breast cancer who underwent staging with preoperative breast MRI between January 1, 2003, and April 30, 2007, were reviewed. Five hundred seventy patients comprised the analysis set. Patient age, breast density, index tumor histology, receptor status (ER, PR, and HER2), and lymph node status were recorded. Biopsy rates, positive predictive values (PPVs) of biopsy, and overall cancer yield were calculated and compared using the chi-square test across patient age, mammographic breast density, index tumor type, receptor status, and lymph node status.

RESULTS

Biopsy was recommended and performed for 152 of 570 (27%) patients found to have one or more suspicious lesions on MRI distinct from the index cancer. Sixty-seven of 152 women who underwent biopsy had additional cancers diagnosed, for a PPV of 44%. Overall, 12% (67/570) of women had otherwise occult cancers diagnosed by MRI, with 8% having additional sites or greater extent of ipsilateral disease and 4% having unsuspected contralateral cancer detected by MRI alone. No significant differences were found in the probability of detecting an occult cancer on the basis of patient age, breast density, index tumor characteristics, or lymph node status.

CONCLUSION

Breast MRI detects otherwise occult cancer with an overall added cancer yield of 12% and a high PPV of 44% when applied to a diverse population of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

The role of radiological-pathological correlation in diagnosing early breast cancer: the pathologist's perspective

Early breast carcinoma, defined as purely in situ cancer and invasive carcinomas < 15 mm, represents the most frequent category of breast carcinomas in diagnostic routine in a regularly screened population. These tumors are usually detected with mammography screening and are preoperatively characterized with radiological imaging. The role of pathology in preoperative settings is to help understand the subgross morphology and to confirm malignancy in biopsy material. Postoperatively, the pathologist needs to verify the size of the cancer (defined as the largest dimension of the largest invasive focus), the extent of the disease (defined as the area or the volume of the breast tissue containing all the malignant foci), the distribution of the in situ and invasive lesions (as unifocal, multifocal, or diffuse), and intratumoral and intertumoral heterogeneity (in addition to determining margin status, histologic tumor type, hormone receptor status, and other parameters). Despite their small size, early breast carcinomas often exhibit complex morphology as they are multifocal/diffuse in about 60% and extensive (occupying an area ≥ 4 cm) in 40% of the cases. Routine use of large-format histopathology technique is a prerequisite for detailed correlation of the radiologic and histopathologic findings and for the correct assessment of these parameters. Breast pathologists must be aware of the advantages and disadvantages of the different imaging modalities and have detailed information about the radiological findings before work-up of the operative specimen. Multidisciplinary preoperative and postoperative tumor board meetings are essential in guiding the pathologists and in confirming the radiological findings. Interdisciplinary diagnosis is inevitably becoming the new gold standard in the diagnosis and management of early breast carcinomas.

Role of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the extent of disease

Preoperative breast imaging evaluation can contribute useful clinical information to the management of the patient with known breast cancer. Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used as part of this imaging evaluation, and the ability of breast MRI to detect otherwise occult multifocal and multicentric disease has been demonstrated in multiple studies. The use of MRI for breast cancer staging remains under debate, however. This article reviews some of the current discussion regarding the use of breast MRI in this patient population. It is important to note that this discussion occurs in an evolving context of surgical and breast conservation therapies.

The utility of breast MRI in the management of breast cancer

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in the evaluation of breast cancer. The impact of this modality on patient management at a single institution is evaluated in this paper. A retrospective review was performed for 114 breast cancer patients who had breast MRI as part of their diagnostic evaluation. Clinical information, mammograms, breast ultrasounds and MRI scans were reviewed to determine whether the MRI findings led to a change in patient management. Outcomes as the result of breast MRI were stratified as favorable and unfavorable. Ninety-five patients who had complete clinical, radiologic, and pathologic data were identified. The indications for breast MRI included: high risk screening (n = 3), diagnostic evaluation of disease after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 24) or prior to re-excision (n = 8), extent of in situ ductal, infiltrating ductal or infiltrating lobular disease histology (DCIS n = 3, IDC n = 24, ILC n = 17), identification of unknown primary (n = 2), assessment of contralateral breast (n = 4), recurrence surveillance (n = 5), and other (n = 5). MRI was concordant with clinical findings and other modalities in 70.5% of cases. MRI altered planned clinical management in 28 of 95 patients (29.5%). Management changes were favorable in 21 patients (75%). Diagnostic evaluation of the breast by MRI alters patient management in 30% of cases depending upon the indications. Alteration in patient management is favorable in 75% of cases. Evaluation of the breast by MRI alters the clinical management of nearly one-third of patients. Changes are favorable for the majority of these cases. Patients undergoing evaluation for contralateral disease, invasive lobular carcinoma and assessment of chemotherapeutic response may derive a more meaningful benefit from MRI.

The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast

Re-excision rates after breast conserving surgery(BCS) of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) are high.Preoperative breast MRI has the potential to reduce re-excision rates, but may lead to an increased rate of mastectomies. Hence, we assessed the influence of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate and the rate of mastectomies. We performed a retrospective cohort study of a consecutive series of patients with ILC who presented in one of two dedicated tertiary cancer centers between 1993 and 2005. We assessed the initial type of surgery(BCS or mastectomy), the re-excision rate and the final type of surgery. Patients were stratified into two groups:those who received preoperative MRI (MR? group) and those who did not (MR- group). In the MR- group, 27%of the patients underwent a re-excision after initial BCS. In the MR? group, this rate was significantly lower at 9%.The odds ratio was 3.64 (95% CI: 1.30-10.20, P = 0.010).There was a trend towards a lower final mastectomy rate in the MR? group compared to the MR- group (48 vs. 59%,P = 0.098). In conclusion, preoperative MRI in patients with ILC can reduce re-excision rates without increasing the rate of mastectomies.

Characterization of breast cancer types by texture analysis of magnetic resonance images

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This novel study aims to investigate texture parameters in distinguishing healthy breast tissue and breast cancer in breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A specific aim was to identify possible differences in the texture characteristics of histological types (lobular and ductal) of invasive breast cancer and to determine the value of these differences for computer-assisted lesion classification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients (mean age 50.6 + or - SD 10.6; range 37-70 years), with histopathologically proven invasive breast cancer (10 lobular and 10 ductal) were included in this preliminary study. The median MRI lesion size was 25 mm (range, 7-60 mm). The selected T1-weighted precontrast, post-contrast, and subtracted images were analyzed and classified with texture analysis (TA) software MaZda and additional statistical tests were used for testing the parameters separability.

RESULTS

All classification methods employed were able to differentiate between cancer and healthy breast tissue and also invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma with classification accuracy varying between 80% and 100%, depending on the used imaging series and the type of region of interest. We found several parameters to be significantly different between the regions of interest studied. The co-occurrence matrix based parameters proved to be superior to other texture parameters used.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that MRI TA differentiates breast cancer from normal tissue and may be able to distinguish between two histological types of breast cancer providing more accurate characterization of breast lesions thereby offering a new tool for radiological analysis of breast MRI.

Clinicopathologic factors associated with involved margins after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Obtaining negative margins for patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) can be difficult because of the unique histologic pattern of ILC. Our goal was to determine whether any specific patient- or disease-related factors influenced margin status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 211 patients with ILC treated from 1994 through 2004 to determine if specific clinical and pathologic factors influenced the ability to obtain negative margins.

RESULTS

We identified 110 patients (52%) who underwent total mastectomy and 101 (48%) who underwent BCS. Among patients who underwent BCS, 50 (50%) had close or positive margins. Patients with close or positive margins were more likely to have architectural distortion on ultrasonography (vs. mass or calcifications; P = .049), to have undergone excisional biopsy (vs. core or fine-needle aspiration; P = .008), and to have associated ductal carcinoma in situ (P = .021). On multivariate analysis, only biopsy method retained significance (P = .006).

CONCLUSION

Core needle biopsy is the preferred method of diagnostic biopsy before surgical intervention. With appropriate patient selection, most patients with early-stage ILC can undergo successful BCS.

Correlation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammography

PURPOSE

We aimed to analyse the influence of mammographic breast density on background enhancement (BE) at magnetic resonance (MR) mammography in pre- and postmenopausal women. In addition, we questioned predictability of contrast-enhancement dynamics of normal fibroglandular tissue (NFT) at MR mammography according to mammographic breast density.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-six patients (mean age 51.54+/-11.5 years; range 37-79 years) who underwent both MR mammography and conventional mammography were included in this retrospective study. Fourteen patients were premenopausal and 12 were postmenopausal. The ethics committee of our institution approved the study. The mammograms were retrospectively reviewed for overall breast density according to the four-point scale (I-IV) of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification. Two radiologists, who were unaware of the clinical data, separately assessed the MR mammography images. Images were assessed for enhancement kinetic features (enhancement kinetic curve and the early-phase enhancement rate) and BE. MR mammography and conventional mammography findings were compared according to BI-RADS breast density category and menopausal status.

RESULTS

Percentage of increased signal intensity values during the first minute did not change according to mammographic breast density, and the mean early-phase enhancement rate scores were similar among breast density groups (p=0.942). There was no significant difference between pre- and postmenopausal groups. Enhancement kinetic features of the different groups based on BI-RADS breast density category and menopausal status were similar. There was no correlation between breast density and BE in either premenopausal (p=0.211) or in postmenopausal (p=0.735) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We determined no correlation between mammographic breast density and so-called BE in MR mammography in either premenopausal or postmenopausal women. NFT at MR mammography cannot be predicted on the basis of mammographic breast density.

Medullary carcinoma of the breast: Role of contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of multiple breast lesions

Medullary carcinoma is a rare breast carcinoma with a syncytial growth pattern and high-grade cytology. It can be difficult to diagnose and may be missed on conventional imaging as the findings may overlap with benign lesions i.e. fibroadenomas. The authors report a case of a 25-year-old female who presented with multifocal breast lumps diagnosed with medullary carcinoma and fibroadenomas. Imaging and pathological correlation with contrast-enhanced MRI are presented in the diagnosis of these lesions.