Stenting as first option for endovascular treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome

Safety and efficacy of large-bore uncovered stents for treating malignant superior vena cava syndrome

PURPOSE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of large-bore uncovered stents for treating malignant superior vena cava syndrome.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 115 patients (89 men, 26 women; mean age 63.2 years; range 21-83 years) who underwent endovascular large-bore (≥18 mm in diameter) uncovered stent placement between August 2015 and July 2022. One patient was lost to follow-up. Therefore, 114 patients were available for follow-up.

RESULTS

Stent placement was technically successful in all 115 patients. Minor procedure-related complications occurred in nine (7.8 %) patients. One hundred eight (93.9 %) patients experienced complete or marked symptomatic relief (Kishi score ≤ 2) at a mean of 3 days after procedure. The cumulative stent patency rates were 98.2 %, 95 %, 93.7 %, 91.5 %, 83.5 %, and 83.5 % at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. Stent occlusion occurred in ten (8.8 %) of 114 patients at a mean of 215 days (range 1-732 days) due to thrombosis (n = 7) and tumor ingrowth (n = 3). Stent occlusion did not occur in 21 patients who underwent subsequent central venous catheter insertion. The median patient survival time was 159 days (95 % confidence interval 102-216 days). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed adjuvant anticancer treatment (p = 0.001) and tumor response (p < 0.001) as independent predictors of patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular placement of large-bore uncovered stents was a safe and effective treatment for malignant superior vena cava syndrome. Large-bore stent placement can effectively prevent stent occlusion by tumor ingrowth in most cases, and it can provide a sufficient diameter for subsequent insertion of central venous catheters.

Catheter-directed thrombectomy with the JETi8 in the treatment of acute superior vena cava syndrome

Superior vena cava syndrome can lead to significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in acute settings. We report a case of an acute Port-a-Cath-associated thrombosis of the superior vena cava. Percutaneous catheter-directed thrombectomy was performed using the JETi8 thrombectomy device with additional angioplasty and stenting, allowing rapid flow restoration and rapid clinical recovery. Postoperative anticoagulation was initiated and pursued lifelong. This report is unique in illustrating how JETi8 thrombectomy seems to be a safe and effective therapy, allowing rapid flow restoration, rapid clinical improvement, and persistent patency at 6 months.

Current trends in image-guided chest interventions

Interventional radiology (IR) is a rapidly expanding medical subspecialty and refers to a range of image‐guided procedural techniques. The image guidance allows real‐time visualization and precision placement of a needle, catheter, wire and device to deep body structures through small incisions. Advantages include reduced risks, faster recovery and shorter hospital stays, lower costs and less patient discomfort. The range of chest interventional procedures keeps on expanding due to improved imaging facilities, better percutaneous assess devices and advancing ablation and embolization techniques. These advances permit procedures to be undertaken safely, simultaneously and effectively, hence escalating the role of IR in the treatment of chest disorders. This review article aims to cover the latest developments in some image‐guided techniques of the chest, including thermal ablation therapy of lung malignancy, targeted therapy of pulmonary embolism, angioplasty and stenting of mediastinal venous/superior vena cava occlusion, pulmonary arteriovenous malformation treatment and bronchial artery embolization for haemoptysis.

Literature Review of Percutaneous Stenting for Palliative Treatment of Malignant Superior Vena Cava Syndrome (SVCS)

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous stenting for the palliative treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Literature review of retrospective studies was performed regarding direct procedural complications (fatal and non-fatal), clinical effectiveness, and patency rates (primary and secondary) of percutaneous transluminal stenting for the palliative treatment of malignant SVCS. Pooled rates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for fatal complications, non-fatal complications, clinical effectiveness, primary patency, and secondary patency. Pooled rates were presented overall and by stent types (Wallstent, Nitinol stents, Steel stents and Stent Graft). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to compare rates by stent type.

RESULTS

Overall fatal complications rate was 1.46%, 95% CI [0.91 -2.23], non-fatal complications rate was 8.28%, 95% CI [6.91 -9.83], clinical effectiveness was 90.50%, 95% CI [88.86 -91.97], primary patency rate was 86.18%, 95% CI [84.06-88.12], secondary patency rate was 94.05 %, 95% CI [91.82 -95.82]. Primary patency rate of the Wallstent group was 83.38%, 95% CI [79.34 -86.90], and significantly higher for the Nitinol group 94.87%, 95% CI [87.40 -98.60], OR = 3.67, p = 0.01, and for the Stent Graft group 96.10%, 95% CI [89.00 -99.20], OR = 4.92, p = 0.01. Secondary patency rate for the Wallstent group was 93.33%, 95% CI [88.87 -96.40] and significantly lower for the Steel group 77.42%, 95% CI [58.90 -90.41], OR = 0.25, p = 0.01.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous stenting is a safe option for palliative treatment of patients with malignant SVCS with greater than 90% of patients experiencing immediate relief of symptoms, low rates of fatal complications (1.46%) and high patency rates (86.18% primary patency and 94.05% secondary patency).

Application of kissing technique for the treatment of superior vena cava syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Superior vena cava syndrome is a series of symptoms caused by compression of the superior vena cava and its main branches. Endovascular therapy is now widely accepted because it offers rapid, safe and effective relief of clinical symptoms. Few reports have described the application of kissing technique for the treatment of superior vena cava syndrome. In this report, we review a series of cases in which superior vena cava syndrome was treated by kissing technique and we share our experience.

METHODS

Our institute treated 22 patients with SVCS by endovascular intervention from November 2016 to June 2021; among them, the kissing technique was used in 10 cases and achieved satisfactory results. This is a retrospective evaluation and analysis of 10 patients with superior vena cava syndrome who were treated by endovascular intervention using the kissing technique from May 2018 to April 2021 in Hwa Mei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Based on literatures, we summarize the diagnosis, treatment, and surgical experience.

RESULTS

All patients underwent the implantation of the kissing stents, and the technical success rate was 100%. The symptoms and signs of intravenous obstruction in all patients were alleviated or disappeared within one to three days after the procedure. During the follow-up period, nine patients remained free from any clinical signs or symptoms, and one patient died one month after the procedure due to the progression of malignant tumors.

CONCLUSION

As a palliative intervention, the kissing technique for the treatment of superior vena cava syndrome caused by malignant tumors is safe, rapid, and effective. Successful endovascular therapy can quickly relieve symptoms, improve the patient's quality of life, and provide more opportunities for subsequent anti-tumor treatment.

Endovascular Stenting in Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Endovascular stenting has been used to manage superior vena cava syndrome for several decades and has become standard firstline practice. This study aims to investigate the outcomes of endovascular stenting in the management of superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS).

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and PUBMED online databases were searched, with studies involving more than ten adult patients included. Studies identified spanned 27 years, from 1993 to 2020. Meta-analyses were performed based on Clopper-Pearson estimation.

RESULTS

Fifty-four studies were identified, for a total of 2249 patients, of which 2015 had malignant SVCS and 222 benign SVCS. Pooled technical success and clinical success rates were 96.8% (95% CI 96.0-97.5%) and 92.8% (95% CI 91.7-93.8%). Technical success and clinical success rates for studies investigating benign SVCS alone were identical at 88.8% (95% CI 83.0-93.1%). Pooled patency remained above 90% for the first year. Average complication and re-intervention rates were 5.78% (SD = 9.3182) and 9.11% (SD = 11.190).

CONCLUSIONS

This review confirms the effectiveness of endovascular stenting in managing SVCS. Further directions of research may include specific outcomes of endovascular stenting in benign SVCS, and the impact of procedural characteristics, such as the use of anticoagulation and type of stent used, on outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review of retrospective cohort studies.

Percutaneous Endovascular Stent Placement for Treatment of Malignant Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Retrospective Review

BACKGROUND

We assessed the safety as well as the efficacy of self-expanding stent placement for the treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS), besides identifying the predictable probable factors for the clinical improvement of endovascular stent treatment in SVCS.

METHODS

The study reviewed 112 patients (92 men) with malignant SVCS retrospectively from January 2015 to December 2020.

RESULTS

Out of total 112 patients, 106 stents were successfully placed in 102 patients, however 4 patient's occlusions could not be passed and 6 patient's procedure was abandoned due to intraluminal thrombus as detected in venography. In 92 patients, complete resolution of syndrome was observed within 72 hrs but 10 patients did not to intervention. In 102 patients, procedure-related 8 complications were noted including stent migrations (n = 4), pulmonary embolism (n = 2), and pulmonary edemas (n = 2). Besides after stenting, 3 hemorrhages with anticoagulation therapy were observed with 4 recurrences at 22, 36, 51 and day 58 in 6 months. The pressure gradient across the lesion (≥ 20mmHg) was used as a predictor for clinical efficacy of stent therapy for SVCS.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular stent insertion is a safe and effective intervention for malignant SVCS, especially for those with pressure gradient across the lesions ≥ 20mmHg.

Endovascular therapy for superior vena cava syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is caused by the obstruction of the SVC and can result in significant morbidity and mortality. In contemporary practice, endovascular therapy (ET) has become the standard of care for a majority of these patients. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature to assess technical success, restenosis, and recurrence of SVC syndrome following endovascular intervention.

METHODS

For this meta-analysis, we conducted a systematic literature review of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from inception to April 14, 2021 for studies on ET for SVC syndrome. Studies included full-length journal articles on the use of ET among adults with SVC syndrome. Case reports or case series with fewer than 20 patients were excluded. We evaluated the endpoints of technical success rate, restenosis rate, and recurrence rates in SVC syndrome patients after endovascular stenting. The results of this study were calculated using random-effects models.

FINDINGS

We identified 6,012 reports, of which 39 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. A total of 2200 patients received ET for SVC syndrome. The weighted technical success rate was 98.8% (95% CI 98.2-99.3) with low heterogeneity (I²=17.4%, p = 0.185), restenosis rate was 10.5% (95% CI 8.4-12.6) with moderate heterogeneity (I²=53.5%, p<0.001), and recurrence rate was 10.8% (95% CI 8.1-13.5) with high heterogeneity (I²=75.8%, p<0.001). Total complication rate was 8.6% (95% CI 7.3%-9.9%) with a mean complication rate of 7.5% (95% CI 4.7%-10.3%).

INTERPRETATION

Our systematic review revealed high technical success, low restenosis, and low recurrence rates following ET. Collectively, these results support the paradigm of ET as an effective and safe treatment for patients with SVC syndrome.

FUNDING

None.

Superior vena cava stenosis presenting with bendopnea

Bendopnea, or dyspnoea with bending forward, is a recently described symptom of heart failure that is associated with elevated ventricular filling pressures. Here, we describe a case of superior vena cava (SVC) stenosis that presented with bendopnea and resolved with SVC recanalisation. We suggest that SVC stenosis be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients who experience bendopnea.

Percutaneous transluminal stenting for superior vena cava syndrome caused by malignant tumors: a single-center retrospective study

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous stent placement in the treatment of superior vena cava syndrome caused by malignant tumors.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 32 patients with superior vena cava syndrome who underwent percutaneous endovascular stent treatment in our department from 2015 to 2019 due to malignant tumors and summarized the patient’s sex, age, tumor type, endovascular treatment plan, complications and postoperative follow-up.

Results

All patients successfully underwent percutaneous intraluminal stent placement with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Thirty-seven endovascular stents were implanted in 32 patients, including 21 Eluminexx stents, 12 Wallstent stents and 4 covered stents. The technical success rate was 100%, and there were no serious surgery-related complications. The remission rate of clinical symptoms was 53.1% (17/32) at 24 h and 84.4% (27/32) at 48 h. After 48 h, the symptoms of the remaining patients were slowly relieved, and the symptom relief rate was 100% at 7 days. The follow-up period was 1.5–24 months, with an average follow-up period of 6.5 months. During the follow-up, 3 patients had restenosis and 1 patient had secondary thrombosis in the stent. Their symptoms were relieved after the second treatment.

Conclusion

For superior vena cava syndrome caused by malignant tumors, percutaneous endoluminal stent therapy can quickly and effectively relieve the clinical symptoms of patients, and the incidence of complications is low.

Endovascular Treatment of Malignant Superior Vena Cava Syndrome through Upper-Limb Access: A Comparison between Venous-Dedicated and Conventional Stents

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate the technical and clinical outcomes of superior vena cava (SVC) stent placement through upper-limb venous access in malignant SVC syndrome (SVCS) and compare the efficacy of different nitinol stent types.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2006 and 2018, 156 patients (132 male; mean age, 62 y; age range, 33-81 y) underwent SVC stent placement for malignant obstructions through upper-limb venous access with 1 of 3 types of nitinol stent: 1 venous-dedicated (Sinus-XL stent) and 2 non-venous-dedicated (E-Luminexx Vascular Stent and Protégé GPS). Cases of common femoral vein access or non-nitinol stents were excluded from further analysis. The mean duration of follow-up was 8 mo.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 99.3% of cases. One patient died during the procedure as a result of cardiac tamponade. Balloon predilation was performed in 10 patients and postdilation in 126. Mean procedural time was 34.4 min (range, 18-80 min). Overall survival rates were 92.3%, 57.3%, and 26.8%, and overall primary patency rates were 94.5%, 84.8% and 79.6%, at 1, 6, and 12 mo, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in primary patency rates between venous- and non-venous-dedicated stents or among different Stanford SVCS grading groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

SVC stent placement through an upper-limb approach is a safe, fast, and effective technique. There is no evident benefit of venous-dedicated vs non-venous-dedicated stents in the treatment of malignant SVCS.

Inferior Vena Cava Reconstruction in Symptomatic Patients Using Palmaz Stents: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

The use of stents for treating central venous occlusion is well described. Limited evidence exists related to Palmaz balloon-expandable stent use in inferior vena cava (IVC) reconstruction. We analyzed patency and complication rates after IVC reconstruction using Palmaz stents.

METHODS

From 2002 to 2019, 37 patients (mean age: 51 year) underwent IVC reconstruction with 68 Palmaz stents. Indications were symptomatic chronic venous obstruction in the infrarenal (n = 25) and intrahepatic (n = 12) IVC. Demographic, operative, and imaging data were evaluated. Clinical data, abdominal CT, and/or duplex ultrasound were used to determine patency at follow-up.

RESULTS

Restoration of caval patency was achieved in all patients, with complications in 2/37 (5.4%) patients (thrombus formation within the stent; stent embolization eight days after placement). Follow-up data were available for 27 patients. Primary patency was maintained through last follow-up in 19/27 (70%) patients (mean: 1.1 year), with successful stent redilation performed in 6 patients. Mean duration of primary-assisted patency (n = 5) was 1.2 year. Late lumen loss was (n = 13) was 40% during a mean time to follow-up of 2.0 years. Primary patency in patients with occlusion secondary to malignancy was 109 day (range: 1 day-1.0 year), whereas primary patency in patients with occlusion from other etiologies was 1.1 year (range: 2 day-5.9 year). The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated primary and primary-assisted patency of 66% and 84%, respectively, at 24 and 48 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Palmaz balloon-expandable stents for IVC reconstruction is feasible and effective for symptomatic IVC occlusion. Risk of stent migration was low.

A transudative chylothorax associated with superior vena cava syndrome

The chylothorax is a lymphocyte predominant protein-discordant exudative pleural effusions with low lactate dehydrogenase and elevated triglyceride levels. Transudative chylothoraces associated with Superior Cava syndrome (SVC) are an extremely rare clinical entity. In this manuscript, we describe a case of transudative chylothorax due to SVC obstruction secondary to thrombosis of a peripheral inserted central venous catheter, which ultimately resolved after endovascular intervention. In our review of the literature, only five cases of transudative chylothorax associated with SVC syndrome were identified with 60% of cases associated with thrombosis and complications due to catheters in the central venous circulation. Treatment of the underlying cause is key to resolution of the chylothorax. Thoracentesis is an initial intervention for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Endovascular intervention is the primary mode of treatment for SVC thrombosis and stenting is preferred for malignant causes, however anticoagulation alone has been reported in the resolution of chylothorax. In patients with recurrent chylothorax despite of relief of SVC obstruction, a medium-chain triglyceride diet and octreotide can be prescribed in order to decrease the chyle flow in the thoracic duct. Surgical ligation of the thoracic duct can be considered if medical management and endovascular treatment fails.

Phrenic nerve palsy as a complication of superior vena caval stenting

Superior vena cava obstruction typically results from either primary pulmonary malignancies, lymphoma, or fibrosis related to central catheters. Endovascular stenting of superior vena caval obstruction is a common first approach, due to the rapid clinical improvement typically seen. The commonest complications are recurrence of obstruction and stent migration. We present herein the case of a phrenic nerve palsy secondary to endovascular stenting in a patient with superior vena cava obstruction due to primary small cell lung cancer.

Comparison of Covered Versus Uncovered Stents for Benign Superior Vena Cava (SVC) Obstruction

PURPOSE

To identify whether long-term symptom relief and stent patency vary with the use of covered versus uncovered stents for the treatment of benign SVC obstruction.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively identified all patients with benign SVC syndrome treated to stent placement between January 2003 and December 2015 (n = 59). Only cases with both clinical and imaging follow-up were included (n = 47). In 33 (70%) of the patients, the obstruction was due to a central line or pacemaker wires, and in 14 (30%), the cause was fibrosing mediastinitis. Covered stents were placed in 17 (36%) of the patients, and 30 (64%) patients had an uncovered stent. Clinical and treatment outcomes, complications, and the percent stenosis of each stent were evaluated.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in all cases at first attempt. Average clinical and imaging follow-up in years was 2.7 (range 0.1-11.1) (covered) and 1.7 (range 0.2-10.5) (uncovered), respectively. There was a significant difference (p = 0.044) in the number of patients who reported a return of symptoms between the covered (5/17 or 29.4%) and uncovered (18/30 or 60%) groups. There was also a significant difference (p = < 0.001) in the mean percent stenosis after stent placement between the covered [17.9% (range 0-100) ± 26.2] and uncovered [48.3% (range 6.8-100) ± 33.5] groups. No significant difference (p = 0.227) was found in the time (days) between the date of the procedure and the date of clinical follow-up where a return of symptoms was reported [covered: 426.6 (range 28-1554) ± 633.9 and uncovered 778.1 (range 23-3851) ± 1066.8]. One patient in the uncovered group had non-endovascular surgical intervention (innominate to right atrial bypass), while none in the covered group required surgical intervention. One major complication (SIR grade C) occurred that consisted of a pericardial hemorrhagic effusion after angioplasty that required covered stent placement. There were no procedure-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

Both covered and uncovered stents can be used for treating benign SVC syndrome. Covered stents, however, may be a more effective option at providing symptom relief and maintaining stent patency if validated by further studies.

Superior Vena Cava (SVC) Endovascular Reconstruction with Implanted Central Venous Catheter Repositioning for Treatment of Malignant SVC Obstruction

Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is a group of clinical signs caused by the obstruction or compression of SVC and characterized by edema of the head, neck, and upper extremities, shortness of breath, and headaches. The syndrome may be caused by benign causes but most of the cases are caused by lung or mediastinal malignant tumors. Stenting of SVC has become widely accepted as the palliative treatment for this condition in malignant diseases, as it offers rapid relief of symptoms and improves the quality of life. Preserving previously placed central venous catheters (CVCs) is a major issue in this population. We report the case of a patient with SVC syndrome caused by tumoral obstruction due to central small-cell lung cancer who had right subclavian implanted CVC and a preferential head and neck venous drainage through the left internal jugular and brachiocephalic vein (BCV). We describe a complex procedure of SVC reconstruction with two different objectives: left recanalization and stent placement to ensure head and neck venous drainage and right BCV stenting for CVC repositioning and subsequent replacement. We also review published cases of SVC obstructions stenting with catheter repositioning. The patient experienced quick relief of symptoms after treatment. Chemotherapy was rapidly delivered through the preserved implanted CVC access. A 3-month follow-up computed tomography showed stents patency.

Endovascular stent-based revascularization of malignant superior vena cava syndrome with concomitant implantation of a port device using a dual venous approach

PURPOSE

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular revascularization of malignant superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) and simultaneous implantation of a totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) using a dual venous approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively, 31 patients (mean age 67 ± 8 years) with malignant CVO who had undergone revascularization by implantation of a self-expanding stent into the superior vena cava (SVC) (Sinus XL®, OptiMed, Germany; n = 11 [Group1] and Protégé ™ EverFlex, Covidien, Ireland; n = 20 [Group 2]) via a transfemoral access were identified. Simultaneously, percutaneous access via a subclavian vein was used to (a) probe the lesion from above, (b) facilitate a through-and-through maneuver, and (c) implant a TIVAP. Primary endpoints with regard to the SVC syndrome were technical (residual stenosis < 30%) and clinical (relief of symptoms) success; with regard to TIVAP implantation technical success was defined as positioning of the functional catheter within the SVC. Secondary endpoints were complications as well as stent and TIVAP patency.

RESULTS

Technical and clinical success rate were 100% for revascularization of the SVS and 100% for implantation of the TIVAP. One access site hematoma (minor complication, day 2) and one port-catheter-associated sepsis (major complication, day 18) were identified. Mean catheter days were 313 ± 370 days. Mean imaging follow-up was 184 ± 172 days. Estimated patency rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 100% in Group 1 and 84, 84, and 56% in Group 2 (p = 0.338).

CONCLUSION

Stent-based revascularization of malignant SVCS with concomitant implantation of a port device using a dual venous approach appears to be safe and effective.

Endovascular treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome secondary to lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Superior Vena Cava obstruction results in severe oedema of the upper thorax. Endovascular treatment allows a rapid restoration of the blood flow with a rapid resolution of symptoms. We retrospectively report a single institution's experience in stent placement for malignant Superior Vena Cava Syndrome (SVCS) caused by lung cancer.

METHODS

Thirty-three consecutive patients (23 men, 10 women; median age, 57.6 years; range 34-71 years) who underwent endovascular SVCS palliative treatment were enrolled between August 2002 and June 2015. All patients presented SVCS secondary to lung cancer. Signs and symptoms of SVCS were scored.

RESULTS

All procedures were successfully completed (100% technical success rate). Twenty-eight patients showed a progressive clinical improvement after endovascular treatment of SVCS (84.8% clinical success rate) within 48 hours, there were five clinical failures which improved progressively with posterior radiotherapy. During follow-up, three patients (9%) suffered intra or post-procedural complications (1 cardiac arrhythmia, 2 stent thrombosis).

CONCLUSIONS

Stent placement in malignant SVCS seems to be an effective and rapid treatment for the relief of symptoms and quality of life improvement with a relatively low complications rate with a rapid resolution of symptoms. Therefore, it should be seriously considered as the first option in the SVC obstruction treatment.

Case report of fatal complication of superior vena cava tear from balloon dilatation of iatrogenic superior vena cava narrowing

The treatment options for superior vena cava (SVC) obstruction depends on the cause and severity of SVC narrowing. It ranges from conservative medical management to more elaborate endovascular and surgical repair of obstruction. There has always been a concern regarding the possibility of rupture of SVC during balloon dilatation, if the obstruction is secondary to the surgical cause. Very few cases are reported in the literature. We report a case of fatal complication of SVC tear in a 2-month-old child who had iatrogenic SVC narrowing.

Endovascular Treatment of Malignant Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: Is Bilateral Wallstent Placement Superior to Unilateral Placement?

Purpose:

To report our experience with unilateral versus bilateral stent placement in the treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS).

Methods:

The records and films of 84 consecutive patients (69 men; mean age 64±10 years, range 39–79) referred for stent placement in malignant SVCS were reviewed for venous compromise, technical and clinical success, complications, and reocclusions. Wallstents were placed covering the SVC and both (bilateral technique) brachiocephalic veins (BCV) preferentially; unilateral stenting of only one BCV in addition to the SVC was performed based on operator preference or inability to access both sides. Technical success was defined as the ability to stent the SVC and at least one BCV; clinical success was the elimination of SVCS symptoms.

Results:

Technical success was achieved in 83 (99%) patients, using the unilateral technique in 22 and bilateral stenting in 61 patients. The groups did not differ with regard to age, sex, underlying diseases, or location and extent of venous compromise. Immediate clinical success was achieved in 20 (91%) of 22 patients in the unilateral group and 55 (90%) of 61 patients in the bilateral group. Two patients suffered late occlusion in the unilateral group, while in the bilateral group, 8 patients had early occlusion and 9 had late occlusion. Thus, the total occlusion rate was significantly (p<0.05) lower in the unilateral group. There was 1 other complication (pericardial tamponade) in the bilateral group, for a 28% total complication rate, which was significantly higher (p = 0.039) than the 9% in the unilateral group. The 1, 3, 6, and 12-month primary stent patency rates were 90%, 81%, 76%, and 69%, respectively. Patency tended to last longer in the unilateral group, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.11).

Conclusions:

Although bilateral Wallstent placement achieved equal technical and clinical success, it tended to confer shorter-lived patency and caused more complications.

Endovascular stenting in malignant obstruction of superior vena cava

INTRODUCTION

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is obstruction of blood flow through the SVC. It is a medical emergency and most often manifests in patients with a malignant disease process within the thorax. A patient with SVCS requires immediate diagnostic evaluation and therapy.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 33-years-old woman presented with complaints of dyspnoea and chest pain. Computer tomography revealed a large mass in the anterior mediastinum. This mass compressed surrounding structures. Stenting was indicated for early symptoms of SVCS. The diagnosis of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) was confirmed with biopsy. The patient's stage II HL has been subsequently treated with six cycles of chemotherapy with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD), followed by radiotherapy. Presently she is doing well.

DISCUSSION

Although lymphomas are a common cause of SVCS but almost always SVCS is caused by non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). HL despite its common presentation with mediastinal lymphadenopathy rarely causes SVCS.

CONCLUSION

Lymphomas are a common cause of SVCS in young age. HL may present as SVCS. Pathological confirmation of diagnosis should be done before initiating therapy while dealing with a case of SVCS. SVC stenting is effective and has few complications in patients with SVCS.

Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: Role of the Interventionalist

Superior vena cava syndrome results from the obstruction of blood flow through the superior vena cava and is most often due to thoracic malignancy. However, benign etiologies are on the rise secondary to more frequent use of intravascular devices such as central venous catheters and pacemakers. Although rarely a medical emergency, the symptoms can be alarming, particularly to the patient. Traditionally, superior vena cava syndrome has been managed with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. But interventional endovascular techniques have made inroads that offer a safe, rapid, and durable response. In many cases, it may be the only reasonable treatment. Because of this, an approach to endovascular treatment of this condition must be in the armamentarium of the interventional radiologist. This review will provide the reader with an insight into the etiology, pathophysiology, and various management principles of superior vena cava syndrome. The focus will be on understanding the techniques used during various endovascular interventions, including angioplasty, stenting, and pharmacomechanical thrombolysis. Discussion will also be centred on possible complications and current evidence as well as controversies regarding these approaches.

Radiation-induced SVC syndrome

A 69-year-old woman with a history of Hodgkin's lymphoma at age 17 was admitted to our hospital with 3 weeks of progressive dyspnoea on exertion. Her medical history and physical exam were concerning for superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome and while her workup did indeed reveal such, its aetiology was not due to a compressive mass associated with malignancy. Rather, she developed chronic thromboses in the setting of radiation-induced venous fibrosis. This case report details her case and explains the key clinical concerns, pathophysiology and incidence of radiation-induced SVC syndrome.

Successful treatment of central venous catheter induced superior vena cava syndrome with ultrasound accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis

Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome results from obstruction of flow through the vessel either by external compression or thrombosis. External compression by intrathoracic neoplasms is the most common etiology, especially lung cancer and lymphoma. Thrombosis is becoming increasingly common due to the use of indwelling catheters and implantable central venous access devices. Most patients are unresponsive to anticoagulation alone which appears to be effective only in the mildest cases. However, recent advances in catheter-based interventions have led to the development of a variety of minimally invasive endovascular strategies to remove venous thrombus and accepted as an important first-line treatment given its high overall success rate and low morbidity as compared with medical and surgical treatments. Ultrasound accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis (UACDT) has been developed to rapidly and completely resolve the existing thrombus. This technique integrates high frequency, low intensity ultrasound (US) with standard CDT in order to accelerate clot dissolution, reducing treatment time and the incidence of thrombolysis-related complications. An US wave enhances drug permeation through thrombus by disaggregating the fibrin matrix, exposing additional plasminogen receptor sites to the thrombolytic agent. The US energy affects thrombus in the entire venous segment, increasing the probability of complete thrombus clearing. We report the case of a 56-year-old man who presented with a 5 days history of SVC syndrome symptoms who had been receiving chemotherapy for colon cancer through a right subclavian vein port catheter. The patient successfully treated with UACDT with EkoSonic(®) Mach4e Endovascular device with an overnight infusion. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[Effectiveness of endovascular prostheses as initial treatment for superior vena cava syndrome of malignant cause]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is caused by venous return obstruction often originated by an invading mediastinal tumour. Our objective was to evaluate the usefulness of stents as initial treatment for SVCS of malignant origin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 1996 to August 2010, 120 patients with SVCS were referred for percutaneous treatment. Seventy-six were under oncological follow-up cases and in 44 cases the tumour was unknown. A non-concurrent prospective study was made of 113 patients without prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy, who opted for endovascular treatment as first option.

RESULTS

One hundred and two men and 11 women were treated, mean age 61.18 years old (range 45-85). SVCS causes included lung cancer (100), lung metastases (6), compression by enlarged lymph nodes (6), and an embryonic tumour. One hundred and fifty-five prostheses were implanted. One stent was enough in 75 patients, 2 stents in 34, and 3 in 4. Technical success rate was 98.2%. Symptoms disappeared completely in 97 patients and partially in 13. Complications were stent migration (5), epistaxis (1), and post-procedure groin hematoma (1). Seventy-three asymptomatic patients had a mean survival of 210 days (75% primary permeability and 52.9% secondary permeability).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of stents in malignant SVCS is a safe and effective procedure for venous obstruction, leading to the immediate disappearance of symptoms, allowing the underlying tumour staging, facilitating the establishment of the best treatment and improving life quality.

Endoluminal treatment for venous vascular complications of malignant tumors

The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of interventional treatment for venous vascular complications of malignant tumors. Sixty-one patients with venous vascular complications of malignant tumors were treated from May 2002 to May 2009; 37 men and 24 women with mean age 57.8 years (33-82 years). Lesions included acute deep vein thrombosis (n=18); venous stenosis or occlusion (n=32); tumor embolus in vein (n=11). The interventional therapeutic operations included vena cava filter implantation, trans-catheter thrombolytic therapy, recanalization, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting. The success rate of thrombolysis and stent implantation, the clinical success rate, complications, recurrence rate of the treated region and survival duration were recorded. Eighteen patients accepted filter and thrombolytic therapy with a success rate of 100%; total urokinase dosage was 7.42±1.49 (4.5-10) million units. Symptoms disappeared (n=15), were palliated (n=3) and thrombi were completely dissolved (n=2), almost completely dissolved (n=8, >90%), partially dissolved (n=6, 50-90%) and not dissolved (n=2, <50%). No pulmonary embolism emerged after the operation. Forty-three patients accepted recanalization, PTA and stent therapy with a success rate of 95.3% (41/43). Symptoms disappeared (n=25), were palliated (n=16) and did not change (n=2) 3 days following the operation. There were no severe complications during the procedure. During follow-up, 12 patients again suffered symptoms of venous occlusion and 47 patients died of tumor aggravation without symptom recurrence. As a result, interventional therapy has advantages including smaller injuries, well tolerance, high success rate, quick palliation of symptoms and superior clinical efficacy in the treatment of venous vascular complications for malignant tumors.

Acute Pericardial Effusion during Endovascular Intervention for Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: Case Series and Review

We describe three cases of acute pericardial effusion during endovascular treatment of superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome, one of which resulted in fatal pericardial tamponade. SVC syndrome results from impaired venous return from the head and upper extremities to the right atrium. Malignancy and catheter-induced SVC stenosis accounts for the majority of cases of SVC syndrome. Endovascular therapy is the treatment of choice for SVC syndrome due to its rapid relief of symptoms and low morbidity. Acute pericardial effusion and pericardial tamponade may result from inadvertent extraluminal traversal of the SVC in the so-called danger zone above the right atrium, as well as secondary to dissection of wires in a location where fascial planes have been altered by neoplasia or inflammation.

Endovascular therapy for palliative care of cancer patients

Interventional radiology procedures often play an integral role in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with cancer. In the latter stages of cancer treatment, palliative care therapies may be sought for improvement in the quality of remaining life for oncology patients. Increased awareness among interventionalists and referring oncologists regarding minimally invasive treatments for palliation is desirable to provide additional options for patients. In particular, endovascular therapies can provide control of symptoms and complications related to incurable malignancies.

Palliative care in lung cancer

Advancements in the surgical and medical treatment of lung cancer have resulted in more favorable short-term survival outcomes. After initial treatment, lung cancer requires continued surveillance and follow-up for long-term side effects and possible recurrence. The integration of quality palliative care into routine clinical care of patients with lung cancer after surgical intervention is essential in preserving function and optimizing quality of life through survivorship. An interdisciplinary palliative care model can effectively link patients to the appropriate supportive care services in a timely fashion. This article describes the role of palliative care for patients with lung cancer.

The Role of Stenting the Superior Vena Cava Syndrome in Patients With Malignant Disease

Superior vena cava (SVC) obstruction occurs in patients with intrathoracic malignancies. Clinical symptoms can be distressing but presentation is insidious. We investigated the outcome of endovascular management for patients with SVC syndrome. We retrospectively reviewed the case histories of 17 patients (9 men) from January 2003 to June 2009. All patients had malignant disease. There were 24 interventions (2 patients with 2 interventions and 2 patients with 3 interventions). All had SVC stenosis over 90%. All patients were treated with intrathoracic angioplasty and stenting. All procedures were technically successful, and all patients had insertion of 10 to 18 mm diameter stents with symptom resolution in 16 patients. There were 2 occlusions at 1 and 6 weeks and 2 patients with restenosis (3 and 7 months). Endovascular intervention is technically feasible for SVC occlusion, relieves symptoms, and is a useful palliation measure.

Oncologic emergencies

Oncologic emergencies represent a wide variety of conditions that can occur at any time during the course of a malignancy, from an initial presenting manifestation in someone with an undiagnosed cancer, to end-stage incurable metastatic disease. Emergent conditions can also arise after a malignancy has been in remission for many years, even decades, so clinicians must be aware of any prior history of cancer in patients. Oncologic emergencies include conditions caused by the cancer itself or side effects of therapy. Emergent conditions include metabolic, cardiac, neurologic, or infectious disorders. Many of these emergencies are imminently life-threatening, and can occur in patients with curable disease (such as lymphomas or leukemias); however, many also present in patients with incurable advanced disease. Prompt recognition and treatment of these conditions can lead to markedly improved quality and quantity of life.

Endovascular treatment of peripheral vascular disease

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects about 27 million people in North America and Europe, accounting for up to 413,000 hospitalizations per year with 88,000 hospitalizations involving the lower extremities and 28,000 involving embolectomy or thrombectomy of lower limb arteries. Many patients are asymptomatic and, among symptomatic patients, atypical symptoms are more common than classic claudication. Peripheral arterial disease also correlates strongly with risk of major cardiovascular events, and patients with PAD have a high prevalence of coexistent coronary and cerebrovascular disease. Because the prevalence of PAD increases progressively with age, PAD is a growing clinical problem due to the increasingly aged population in the United States and other developed countries. Until recently, vascular surgical procedures were the only alternative to medical therapy in such patients. Today, endovascular practice, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting, is used far more frequently for all types of lower extremity occlusive lesions, reflecting the continuing advances in imaging techniques, angioplasty equipment, and endovascular expertise. The role of endovascular intervention in the treatment of limb-threatening ischemia is also expanding, and its promise of limb salvage and symptom relief with reduced morbidity and mortality makes percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stenting an attractive alternative to surgery and, as most endovascular interventions are performed on an outpatient basis, hospital costs are cut considerably. In this monograph we discuss current endovascular intervention for treatment of occlusive PAD, aneurysmal arterial disease, and venous occlusive disease.

[Stenting for superior vena cava obstruction associated with lung cancer: monocentric study]

INTRODUCTION

Superior vena cava obstruction is an urgent complication of lung cancer. Superior vena cava stent insertion can be considered to provide rapid relief of the symptoms.

METHODS

To estimate the efficiency and the complications of this procedure, we retrospectively analyzed 41 consecutive patients treated during the last 5 years by self-expanding nitinol stent insertion for superior vena cava obstruction due to lung cancer. It was combined with anticoagulation and corticosteroids.

RESULTS

41 patients benefited from this treatment (30 men and 11 women) with an average age of 59 years. Etiologies of the vena cava obstruction were: small cell carcinoma (11), adenocarcinoma (8), squamous cell carcinoma (9), large cell carcinoma (9) and others (4). All patients were symptomatic. The average period between the onset of symptoms and the vascular stenting was 14 days. Specific treatment was chemotherapy (18 patients), radiotherapy (1 patient), or both (14 patients), and no specific treatment for 6 patients. The procedure consisted of the insertion of 1 (73%) or 2 (27%) stents, with an average length and caliber of 7.5 cm and 14 mm respectively. No major complication was reported in short and long-term follow up. Symptomatic improvement was observed for all the patients within 48 hours. Median survival after the stenting was of 6.7 months.

CONCLUSION

In our study, vascular stenting for malignant superior cava vena obstruction allows a rapid improvement of the symptoms with very few complications, suggesting a possible role as first line treatment for chemo or radio-resistant tumours.

Endovascular stenting as the first step in the overall management of malignant superior vena cava syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Self-expandable metal stents were inserted in cancer patients with superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome to assess their effectiveness as a primary treatment for symptom relief.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Between January 1993 and June 2008, Wallstent prostheses (n = 208) were inserted in 149 cancer patients (137 men, 12 women; median age, 65 years; age range, 44-84 years) diagnosed as having SVC syndrome. A single stent was sufficient to restore vessel patency in 102 patients, two stents in 36, three stents in 10, and four stents in one. Survival data were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate analysis using the Cox regression method.

RESULTS

Complete resolution of symptoms was achieved in 123 patients within 72 hours, partial resolution in 22 patients, and no response in only four patients. At follow-up, 30 complications were noted: 16 obstructions, four cases of thrombosis, one partial stent migration to the right atrium, two cases of incorrect stent placement, six stent "shortenings," and one case in which stent expansion was insufficient. All complications except two were successfully resolved by repeat stenting or by angioplasty. The median symptom-free survival was 6 months (range, 2 days-43 months). As of June 2008, eight patients were alive with patent stents.

CONCLUSION

The Wallstent vascular endoprosthesis is an effective initial treatment in patients with SVC syndrome of neoplastic origin: Morbidity and complications are minimal, and clinical relief of symptoms is very rapid. Because the clinical decision for subsequent elective chemotherapy or radiation therapy is not prejudiced, stenting is a very effective initial step in the overall palliative treatment of patients with SVC syndrome.

Sequential Treatment of Superior Vena Cava Syndrome Caused by of Non-small Cell Carcinoma Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Vascular Stenting and Iodine-125 Implantation

Feasibility and efficacy of sequentially performed endovascular stenting and Iodine-125 brachytherapy for malignant superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) were evaluated. Thirty-four patients with malignant SVCS caused by NSCLC underwent sequential treatment of endovascular stenting and Iodine-125 brachytherapy. SVCS was diagnosed in all patients by CT images or vena-cavography. Pathology diagnosis was acquired by image guided biopsy. Endovascular stent placement was performed as first-line treatment for symptom relief. CT-guided Iodine-125 seed implantation performed 24hr after stenting. Clinical end points were resolution of symptoms and local efficacy of primary malignancy regression. Symptom relief rate was >90% after 24hr and 97% after 3 months. No migration of seeds or restenosis occurred in any patient. The local efficacy (defined as either partial or complete response) was 53%, 79%, 88% and 74% after 1, 3, 6 and 12months, respectively. Mean SVCS-free survival time was 305 days (range 120–960 days). Two patients were still alive at the time of this writing, Thirty-one died from progression and one died from acute heart disease. Sequentially performed endovascular stenting and Iodine-125 brachytherapy provides a safe and effective alternative for malignant SVCS caused by NSCLC.

[Endovascular treatment of SVC syndrome from neoplastic origin: a review of 34 cases]

PURPOSE

To report our experience with the treatment of 34 patients with SVC syndrome from neoplastic origin using the Wallstent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients were treated between January 2000 and February 2007: 21 males and 13 females, aged 44-81 years, with non-small-cell lung carcinoma in 27 cases (79%), small-cell lung carcinoma in 5 cases (15%) and metastatic breast adenocarcinoma to the mediastinum in 2 cases (6%). All patients were treated using the stainless steel self-expanding Wallstent. A dual brachial-femoral access was used in all cases.

RESULTS

Stent placement was possible in all cases. Per procedure acute respiratory distress occurred in 2 cases: 1 case of acute pulmonary edema and 1 case of tamponade. Symptoms resolved within 24 hours. Twenty-six patients died from disease progression, 8 during the first month, and 16 within 32-545 days post-procedure (mean: 213.4 days). Five patients with recurrent SVC syndrome underwent repeat treatment (restenosis in 3 cases, fracture in 1 case, thrombosis in 1 case), for primary and secondary patency rates of 81% and 100%.

CONCLUSION

Palliative stent treatment of neoplastic SVC syndrome is reliable, safe and provides long-standing improvement in quality of life.

Endovascular stenting to treat obstruction of the superior vena cava

This article discusses the use of image guided endovascular stenting to treat obstruction of the superior vena cava