Cost-Minimization Analysis of Multidose and Single-Dose Packaging of Contrast Media for Contrast-Enhanced CT: Results From Real-World Data in China

Lean body weight-based contrast injection protocol in liver CT: optimization of contrast medium dose

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate liver enhancement and image quality of abdominal CECT examinations acquired with multiple LBW-based contrast medium injection protocols.

MATERIAL & METHODS

One hundred fifty patients who underwent a clinically indicated CECT examination were prospectively and randomly assigned to one of the following contrast medium injection protocol groups: A, 700 mg iodine(I)/kg of LBW; B, 650 mgI/kg of LBW; and C, 600 mgI/kg of LBW. Liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and magnitude of contrast enhancement (ΔHU) were calculated. Subjective image quality was assessed with 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

The final population included 145 patients (64 females), with 50, 48, and 47 in group A, B, and C, respectively. Group A showed significantly higher SNR, CNR and ΔHU than group B (p = .018, p = .004, and p = .031, respectively) and group C (p = .024, p = .043, and p = .004). Group B had similar SNR, CNR, and ΔHU to group C (all p = 1). ΔHU was < 50 HU in 2, 7, and 11 patients in group A (48.2 ± 0.1), B (43.7 ± 5), and C (44.4 ± 5), respectively. Group A achieved the highest scores in terms of overall image quality, artifacts, and diagnostic confidence (both scores: 4; IQRs: 4-5) compared to group B (both scores: 3; IQRs: 3-5; p ≥ .037) and group C (overall image quality score: 3; IQR: 2-5; p = .011. Artifact and diagnostic confidence score: 3; IQR: 1-4; p ≥ .009).

CONCLUSIONS

A dosage of 700 mgI/kg of LBW yields optimal liver enhancement and grants higher image quality compared to lower contrast medium dosages.

The Environmental Impact of Iodinated Contrast Media: Strategies for Optimized Use and Recycling

ABSTRACT

Iodinated contrast media (ICM) is an integral and ubiquitous component of modern diagnostic imaging. Although most radiology practices are familiar with ICM administration and physiological excretion, they may be less aware of how much ICM is wasted on a per exam basis. Furthermore, radiologists may not recognize the environmental fate of discarded ICM waste. In an evolving world where medical practices are increasingly cognizant of their environmental footprint and radiology practices are considered high consumers of resources, it behooves the radiology community to understand the ICM lifecycle and ways to mitigate unnecessary waste. This review article explains the origin and environmental fate of discarded ICM, with special focus on wastewater contamination. Secondly, the article focuses on feasible options to both optimize use and decrease consumable waste. Specifically, the article addresses ICM vial size inventory diversification, multi-use ICM vials, syringeless contrast injectors, and the potential for using multi-energy imaging (dual-energy or photon counting CT) to accomplish these goals. Finally, the authors share their institutional experience participating in an ICM recycling program and its current departmental impact.

Reduced Intravenous Contrast Dose Portal Venous Phase Photon-Counting Computed Tomography Compared With Conventional Energy-Integrating Detector Portal Venous Phase Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare portal venous phase photon-counting CT (PCCT) using 20 cc less than weight-based contrast dosing with energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) using weight-based dosing by quantitative and qualitative analysis.

METHODS

Fifty adult patients who underwent a reduced intravenous contrast dose portal venous phase PCCT from May 1, 2023, to August 10, 2023, and a prior portal-venous EID-CT with weight-based contrast dosing were retrospectively identified. Hounsfield units (HU) and noise (SD of HU) were obtained from region-of-interest measurements on 70-keV PCCT and EID-CT in 4 hepatic segments, the main and right portal vein, and both paraspinal muscles. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were computed. Three abdominal radiologists qualitatively assessed overall image quality, hepatic enhancement, and confidence for metastasis identification on 5-point Likert scales. Readers also recorded the presence/absence of hepatic metastases. Quantitative variables were compared with paired t tests, and multiple comparisons were accounted for with a Bonferroni-adjusted α level of .0016. Ordinal logistic regression was used to evaluate qualitative assessments. Interreader agreement for hepatic metastases was calculated using Fleiss' κ.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (32 women; mean [SD] age, 64 [13] years) were included. There was no significant difference in hepatic HU, portal vein HU, noise, and signal-to-noise or contrast-to-noise ratio between reduced contrast dose portal venous phase PCCT versus EID-CT (all P s > 0.0016). Image quality, degree of hepatic enhancement, and confidence for metastasis identification were not different for reduced dose PCCT 70-keV images and EID-CT ( P = 0.06-0.69). κ Value for metastasis identification was 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.00) with PCCT and 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.98) with EID-CT.

CONCLUSION

Reduced intravenous contrast portal venous phase PCCT 70-keV images had similar attenuation and image quality as EID-CT with weight-based dosing. Metastases were identified with near-perfect agreement in reduced dose PCCT 70-keV images.

More sustainable use of iodinated contrast media - Why?

OBJECTIVES

Based on a narrative review of the literature to 1) assess the need for and 2) report methods to help deliver a sustainable approach to iodinated contrast media (ICM) administration.

KEY FINDINGS

Acute ICM shortages have been noted in the literature. As demand for contrast-enhanced imaging continues to increase and access to raw materials becomes more limited, such events may increase. Evidence from the literature has documented a range of iodinated contrast reduction strategies. These include individualised contrast-media dosing, multi-dose bulk ICM vials, switching to alternative modalities or the increased use of non-contrast examinations. The optimisation of imaging parameters, the use of saline chasers, and alternative contrast agents should be further considered. Given the rising concerns regarding the presence and effects of ICMs in waste and drinking water, further consideration of strategies for managing waste and excreted ICMs are starting to emerge.

CONCLUSIONS

Sustainable ICM practices are needed to help avoid supply shortages and to help protect our environment. Such practices must be led and supported locally, nationally, and internationally. Sustainable ICM practices must be reflected within professional Standards of Proficiencies and be adopted by all members of the multidisciplinary team.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Changes to working practices surrounding the sustainable use of ICMs will likely become commonplace. New methods to ensure optimised ICM dosage with minimal wastage will be more heavily featured in departmental practices. Correct disposal of waste and excreted ICMs will also form part of future changes to practice.

Approaches to reduce medical imaging departments' environmental impact: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Global warming stands as a paramount public health issue of our time, and it is fundamental to explore approaches to green medical imaging departments/(MID). This study aims to map the existing actions in the literature that promote sustainable development in MID towards the promotion of environmental impact reduction.

METHODS

Following the JBI methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), this literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL to encompass studies published after 2013. Combinations of keywords and relevant terms related to environmental sustainability, recycling, medical waste, and greening radiology were applied for this review. Three independent reviewers screened abstracts, titles, and eligible full-text. Disagreement was solved through consensus.

RESULTS

38 out of 4630 articles met all inclusion criteria, and four additional articles were identified and added through reference search. A third of the studies included were published after 2022, and most were conducted in developed countries (36/41). Articles focused on computed tomography (9/41), magnetic resonance imaging (6/41), interventional radiology (4/41), conventional radiography (4/41), ultrasound (2/41), mixed modalities (10/41), or not applicable to an imaging modality (6/41). Four principal categories were identified to decrease ecological footprint: energy consumption, waste management, justification and environmental pollution.

CONCLUSION

To minimise the environmental impact of MIDs raising awareness and promoting education is fundamental. Examinations must be justified adequately, energy consumption must be reduced, and waste management practices need to be implemented. Further studies are required to prioritise the most effective strategies, supporting decision-making among stakeholders.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Several strategies are already possible to implement to reduce the environmental impact of MIDs and improve the healthcare outcomes for patients.

Consumable Material Waste and Workflow Efficiency Comparison Between Multi-use Syringeless and Single-use Syringe-Based Injectors in Computed Tomography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Syringeless power injectors obviate the need for reloading iodinated contrast media (ICM) and plastic consumable pistons between exams. This study evaluates the potential time and material waste (ICM, plastic, saline, and total) saved using a multi-use syringeless injector (MUSI) compared to a single-use syringe-based injector (SUSI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two observers recorded technologist time spent using a SUSI and a MUSI over three clinical workdays. CT technologists (n = 15) were polled on their experience between the systems using a 5-point Likert scale survey. ICM, plastic, and saline waste data from each system were collected. A mathematical model was created to estimate total and categorical waste from each injector system over a 16-week period.

RESULTS

On average, CT technologists spent 40.5 seconds less per exam with MUSI compared to SUSI (p < .001). Technologists rated MUSI work efficiency, user-friendliness, and overall satisfaction (strongly or somewhat improved) higher relative to SUSI (p < .05). Iodine waste was 31.3 L and 0.0 L for SUSI and MUSI, respectively. Plastic waste was 467.7 kg and 71.9 kg for SUSI and MUSI, respectively. Saline waste was 43.3 L and 52.5 L for SUSI and MUSI, respectively. Total waste was 555.0 kg and 124.4 kg for SUSI and MUSI respectively.

CONCLUSION

Switching from SUSI to MUSI resulted in a 100%, 84.6%, and 77.6% reduction in ICM, plastic, and total waste. This system may fortify institutional endeavors toward green radiology initiatives. The potential time saved administering contrast using MUSI may improve CT technologist efficiency.

Modeling the Environmental and Financial Impact of Multi-dose vs. Single-dose Iodinated Contrast Media Packaging and Delivery Systems

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Iodinated contrast media (ICM) is used in computed tomography (CT) imaging to better visualize pathophysiology. ICM is commonly sold in "single-dose" bottles that require any unused volume to be discarded. Multi-dose bottles have been developed as an alternative packaging method. The objective of this study was to compare ICM waste, plastic waste, and the associated financial costs for both the single-dose and multi-dose ICM delivery systems.

METHODS

Institutional data was used to estimate the average ICM administered per CT scan, average ICM wasted per CT scan, and the total ICM volume wasted annually. Waste estimates for the multi-dose bottles were generated by applying the average ICM administered per CT scan to the larger, multi-dose bottle volumes. Single-dose bottles, multi-dose bottles and injection syringes were weighed and used to calculate plastic waste generated by both packaging methods. Financial analysis was performed to compare the cost of supplies for single-dose and multi-dose ICM delivery systems.

RESULTS

We found that 100 mL single-dose ICM bottles waste an average of 19.7 mL per CT scan, representing over 964 L of ICM wasted per year. The multi-dose ICM delivery system was projected to decrease pharmaceutical waste by at least 73% and reduce plastic waste by approximately 93%. We also estimate $494,000 in annual savings using the multi-dose ICM delivery method at our institution.

CONCLUSION

Multi-dose ICM packaging can help conserve ICM, an important pharmaceutical that was only recently severely affected supply chain disruptions. The multi-dose delivery system can also reduce plastic waste and generate substantial financial savings to offset capital investment.

Comparative Effect of Multi-Dose Contrast Median on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Workflow of Nurses and Hospital Efficiency: A Multi-CenterReal-World Prospective Observational Study in China

Objective

This study aims to evaluate and compare computed tomography (CT)-contrast operational workflow and hospital imaging efficiency when using a multi-dose bulk IV contrast delivery system and when using a single-dose packaging contrast.

Materials and Methods

A multi-center prospective observational study was conducted in six regions in China. The operating time and workflow of radiology nursing staff were evaluated and observed using an investigational tool and recorded by the investigators using a stopwatch. Nursing staff's knowledge and the imaging capabilities of hospitals were collected using a questionnaire. Rate, t-test, χ ² test, and partial correlation analysis were used to describe the knowledge of nursing staff. The operation time and frequency of the two contrast agent packages were further compared using the Stata 15.0 software.

Results

A total of 42 radiology nurses and 1,167 CT contrast-operating procedures in six provinces in China were evaluated. The total operating times for the 100 ml contrast agent versus the 200 ml contrast agent were 80.67 s and 63.81 s, respectively (P < 0.01). According to the average annual hospital CT scans (49,807 scans) and the power injector (PI) market share, approximately 233 h yearly could be saved in a hospital. Regarding CT contrast knowledge, approximately 57.14% nurses expressed their willingness to use multi-dose packaging contrast agents.

Conclusion

Through difference and correlation analysis on real-world data, this study suggests that, considering safety, the use of a multi-dose bulk IV contrast agent is more time-saving and efficient for Chinese nurses and medical institutions compared with that of a single-dose package.