1
|
Neuman HB, Wilke LG, Bozzuto LM, Stelle L, Melnick D, Elezaby M, Woods RW, Chase P, McGregor S, Harter J, Weissman P, Greenberg CC, Burnside E, Fowler AM, DeMartini WB, Salkowski LR, Strigel RM. Engaging Multidisciplinary Teams to Develop Pragmatic Clinical Practice Guidelines to Support Management of Patients With High-Risk Breast Lesions. Clin Breast Cancer 2025; 25:56-64. [PMID: 39523128 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2024] [Accepted: 10/03/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We sought to develop clinical guidelines within our multidisciplinary Breast Center to support decision-making for managing high-risk breast lesions. The objective is to describe the process used to develop these guidelines and assess perceived acceptability. METHODS We recruited clinical stakeholders to identify key "high-risk" topics. Stakeholder groups (surgery, radiology, pathology) met separately to review the topics, leveraging existing literature reviews and best available evidence. Guidelines were initially developed in 2015 and updated in 2019. We surveyed breast clinical team members in 2023 regarding the perceived acceptability of the guidelines and summarized the data. RESULTS We created clinical guidelines to address the management of atypical ductal hyperplasia, flat epithelial atypia, atypical lobular hyperplasia/lobular carcinoma in situ, radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion, and papillomas. Key guideline components included process for radiologic-pathologic correlation, patient disposition after biopsy (surgical referral needed, follow-up imaging recommended), recommendation for the role of surgical excision, and recommendation regarding imaging follow-up if excision not performed. Forty clinical team members (66% [40/60] response rate) completed the acceptability survey from varied disciplines. Most (78%) were aware of the guidelines. Respondents rated the recommendations for disposition after biopsy, surgical management, and follow-up imaging as the most helpful components. Most (> 80%) rated them to be very/extremely useful. CONCLUSION We leveraged input from key stakeholders to develop clinical guidelines to support the multidisciplinary management of patients with high-risk breast lesions. Our guidelines have been successfully implemented across our academic and community practice. Future steps will assess the impact of implementation on clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather B Neuman
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
| | - Lee G Wilke
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | | | - Lacey Stelle
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - David Melnick
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Mai Elezaby
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Ryan W Woods
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Peter Chase
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Stephanie McGregor
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Jo Harter
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Paul Weissman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | | | - Elizabeth Burnside
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Amy M Fowler
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Wendy B DeMartini
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
| | | | - Roberta M Strigel
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heller SL, Gao Y. Update on Lobular Neoplasia. Radiographics 2023; 43:e220188. [PMID: 37676825 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
Lobular neoplasia (LN) is a histopathologic entity that encompasses both lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH). Management of LN is known to be variable and institutionally dependent. The variability in approach after a diagnosis of LN at percutaneous breast biopsy derives in part from heterogeneity in the literature, resulting in a range of reported upgrade rates to malignancy after initial identification at percutaneous biopsy, and also from historical shifts in understanding of the natural history of LN. It has become increasingly recognized that not all LN is the same and that distinct variants of LN such as pleomorphic LCIS and florid LCIS have distinct natural histories and distinct likelihoods of upgrade to malignancy. In addition, it is also increasingly understood that appropriate management of LN relies on scrupulous radiologic-pathologic correlation. This review details the imaging features and histopathologic nature of ALH, classic-type LCIS, and the LCIS variants; addresses changes in the historical understanding of this entity contributing to confusion regarding its management; and discusses the importance of performing radiologic-pathologic correlation after percutaneous biopsy to help guide appropriate management steps when LN is encountered. In addition to the short-term implications of an LN diagnosis in terms of upgrade and surgical outcomes, the long-term implications of an LN diagnosis regarding risk of developing a later breast cancer are examined. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha L Heller
- From the NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 160 E 34th St, New York, NY 10016
| | - Yiming Gao
- From the NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 160 E 34th St, New York, NY 10016
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Horvat JV. High-Risk Lesion Management. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2023; 44:46-55. [PMID: 36792273 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2022.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
High-risk lesions or lesions of uncertain malignant potential are frequent findings on image-guided needle biopsy of the breast and comprise a number of distinct entities. These lesions are known for having risk of underlying malignancy and are usually associated with an increased lifetime risk for breast cancer. Surgical excision was traditionally recommended for all high-risk lesions but recent studies have demonstrated that vacuum-assisted excision or surveillance may be adequate for some lesions. While management of high-risk lesion varies among institutions, this chapter describes the management recommendations based on recent literature of the most frequent types of lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joao V Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|