2
|
O'Brien SR, Medrano D, Birnbaum J, McDonald ES, Conant EF, Weinstein SP, Fayanju OM, Zuckerman SP, Edmonds CE. Feasibility and Accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Nipple Lesions: A Pilot Study. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2024; 6:485-492. [PMID: 39110500 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbae033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to the superficial location, suspicious findings of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) are not amenable to stereotactic or MRI-guided sampling and have historically necessitated surgical biopsy or skin-punch biopsy. There are limited reports of US-guided core biopsy of the nipple (US-CBN). OBJECTIVE We report our nearly 3-year pilot experience with US-CBN at an academic breast imaging center. METHODS An institutional review board-exempt and HIPAA-compliant retrospective review was performed. We assessed patient demographics, breast imaging characteristics, procedural data, pathology, and outcomes. RESULTS Nine female patients aged 27 to 64 underwent US-CBN from January 2021 to October 2023. Initial imaging abnormalities included abnormal MRI enhancement, mammographic calcifications, and sonographic masses. After initial or second-look US, all imaging findings had sonographic correlates for biopsy specimens, the majority of which were sonographic masses (8/9). US-CBN was performed by 6 breast radiologists using a variety of devices. All biopsy specimen results were concordant with sonographic abnormalities, although 1 was considered discordant from the initial abnormality seen on MRI. There were no complications, and discomfort during the procedure was well-treated. Two patients (22%, 2/9) were diagnosed with malignancy. CONCLUSION This pilot study demonstrated that US-CBN can be performed by a breast radiologist for definitive diagnosis of suspicious nipple abnormalities seen on breast imaging, avoiding surgery, and maintaining nipple integrity. In our population, 22% (2/9) of US-CBNs revealed malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia R O'Brien
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Damien Medrano
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Julia Birnbaum
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Emily F Conant
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Susan P Weinstein
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Samantha P Zuckerman
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christine E Edmonds
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guirguis MS, Arribas EM, Kapoor MM, Patel MM, Perez F, Nia ES, Ding Q, Moseley TW, Adrada BE. Multimodality Imaging of Benign and Malignant Diseases of the Nipple-Areolar Complex. Radiographics 2024; 44:e230113. [PMID: 38483829 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
The nipple-areolar complex (NAC), a unique anatomic structure of the breast, encompasses the terminal intramammary ducts and skin appendages. Several benign and malignant diseases can arise within the NAC. As several conditions have overlapping symptoms and imaging findings, understanding the distinctive nipple anatomy, as well as the clinical and imaging features of each NAC disease process, is essential. A multimodality imaging approach is optimal in the presence or absence of clinical symptoms. The authors review the ductal anatomy and anomalies, including congenital abnormalities and nipple retraction. They then discuss the causes of nipple discharge and highlight best practices for the imaging workup of pathologic nipple discharge, a common condition that can pose a diagnostic challenge and may be the presenting symptom of breast cancer. The imaging modalities used to evaluate and differentiate benign conditions (eg, dermatologic conditions, epidermal inclusion cyst, mammary ductal ectasia, periductal mastitis, and nonpuerperal abscess), benign tumors (eg, papilloma, nipple adenoma, and syringomatous tumor of the nipple), and malignant conditions (eg, breast cancer and Paget disease of the breast) are reviewed. Breast MRI is the current preferred imaging modality used to evaluate for NAC involvement by breast cancer and select suitable candidates for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Different biopsy techniques (US -guided biopsy and stereotactic biopsy) for sampling NAC masses and calcifications are described. This multimodality imaging approach ensures an accurate diagnosis, enabling optimal clinical management and patient outcomes. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary S Guirguis
- From the Departments of Breast Imaging (M.S.G., E.M.A., M.M.K., M.M.P., F.P., E.S.N., T.W.M., B.E.A.), Pathology-Anatomical (Q.D.), and Breast Surgical Oncology (T.W.M.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1350, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Elsa M Arribas
- From the Departments of Breast Imaging (M.S.G., E.M.A., M.M.K., M.M.P., F.P., E.S.N., T.W.M., B.E.A.), Pathology-Anatomical (Q.D.), and Breast Surgical Oncology (T.W.M.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1350, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Megha M Kapoor
- From the Departments of Breast Imaging (M.S.G., E.M.A., M.M.K., M.M.P., F.P., E.S.N., T.W.M., B.E.A.), Pathology-Anatomical (Q.D.), and Breast Surgical Oncology (T.W.M.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1350, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Miral M Patel
- From the Departments of Breast Imaging (M.S.G., E.M.A., M.M.K., M.M.P., F.P., E.S.N., T.W.M., B.E.A.), Pathology-Anatomical (Q.D.), and Breast Surgical Oncology (T.W.M.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1350, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Frances Perez
- From the Departments of Breast Imaging (M.S.G., E.M.A., M.M.K., M.M.P., F.P., E.S.N., T.W.M., B.E.A.), Pathology-Anatomical (Q.D.), and Breast Surgical Oncology (T.W.M.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1350, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Emily S Nia
- From the Departments of Breast Imaging (M.S.G., E.M.A., M.M.K., M.M.P., F.P., E.S.N., T.W.M., B.E.A.), Pathology-Anatomical (Q.D.), and Breast Surgical Oncology (T.W.M.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1350, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Qingqing Ding
- From the Departments of Breast Imaging (M.S.G., E.M.A., M.M.K., M.M.P., F.P., E.S.N., T.W.M., B.E.A.), Pathology-Anatomical (Q.D.), and Breast Surgical Oncology (T.W.M.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1350, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Tanya W Moseley
- From the Departments of Breast Imaging (M.S.G., E.M.A., M.M.K., M.M.P., F.P., E.S.N., T.W.M., B.E.A.), Pathology-Anatomical (Q.D.), and Breast Surgical Oncology (T.W.M.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1350, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Beatriz E Adrada
- From the Departments of Breast Imaging (M.S.G., E.M.A., M.M.K., M.M.P., F.P., E.S.N., T.W.M., B.E.A.), Pathology-Anatomical (Q.D.), and Breast Surgical Oncology (T.W.M.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1350, Houston, TX 77030
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee SC, Mendez-Broomberg K, Eacobacci K, Vincoff NS, Gupta E, McElligott SE. Nipple-sparing Mastectomy: What the Radiologist Should Know. Radiographics 2022; 42:321-339. [PMID: 35179983 DOI: 10.1148/rg.210136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is increasingly offered to patients undergoing treatment of breast cancer and prophylaxis treatment for reduction of breast cancer risk. NSM is considered oncologically safe for appropriately selected patients and is associated with improved cosmetic outcomes and quality of life. Accepted indications for NSM have expanded in recent years, and currently only inflammatory breast cancer or malignancy involving the nipple is considered an absolute contraindication. Neoplasms close to and involving the nipple areolar complex are common, and cancer of the lactiferous ducts can spread to the nipple. Therefore, accurate determination of nipple involvement at imaging examinations is critical to identifying appropriate candidates for NSM and preventing local recurrence. Multiple imaging features have been described as predictors of nipple involvement, with tumor to nipple distance, enhancement between the index malignancy and the nipple, and nipple retraction demonstrating the highest predictive values. These features can be assessed at multimodality breast imaging, particularly at breast MRI, which demonstrates high specificity and negative predictive value for determining nipple involvement in malignancy. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha C Lee
- From the Department of Radiology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University/Northwell Health System, 300 Community Dr, Manhasset, NY 11030
| | - Karen Mendez-Broomberg
- From the Department of Radiology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University/Northwell Health System, 300 Community Dr, Manhasset, NY 11030
| | - Katherine Eacobacci
- From the Department of Radiology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University/Northwell Health System, 300 Community Dr, Manhasset, NY 11030
| | - Nina S Vincoff
- From the Department of Radiology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University/Northwell Health System, 300 Community Dr, Manhasset, NY 11030
| | - Ekta Gupta
- From the Department of Radiology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University/Northwell Health System, 300 Community Dr, Manhasset, NY 11030
| | - Suzanne E McElligott
- From the Department of Radiology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University/Northwell Health System, 300 Community Dr, Manhasset, NY 11030
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Goudreau SH, Woughter MA, Seiler SJ. Multimodality Review of Imaging Features Following Breast Reduction Surgery. Eur J Breast Health 2021; 17:206-213. [PMID: 34263147 DOI: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-1-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Reduction mammoplasty is a common surgical procedure that removes a significant portion of the breast, and the resulting changes to the breast parenchyma are frequently seen on breast imaging studies. Any radiologist who interprets breast imaging studies must be able to recognize these changes in order to avoid unnecessary recall from screening and/or breast biopsy. The surgical techniques used in reduction mammoplasty are discussed in order to provide relevant background information for understanding the resulting imaging features. These imaging characteristics are presented for the most common breast imaging modalities, including mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging. Additionally, tips for distinguishing malignancy from postsurgical change are provided, as are potential pitfalls in imaging interpretation. To avoid unnecessary patient morbidity, it is critical to differentiate between the classic, benign imaging appearance of the breast after reduction mammoplasty and findings that indicate a potential malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally H Goudreau
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Texas, USA
| | | | - Stephen J Seiler
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|