Volume Doubling Times of Pulmonary Metastases in Patients With Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Associations With Subsequent New Metastases and Survival After Metastasectomy

Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Melanoma

Early-stage melanoma has a favorable prognosis with a 94% 5-year survival rate, but survival declines significantly with metastasis. Traditional treatments like metastasectomy have evolved due to advancements in targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, improving 5-year survival rates from 18% in 2009 to 52% in 2018. The lung is the most common site for metastasis, and the criteria for pulmonary metastasectomy have changed, allowing for surgical intervention even with extrapulmonary metastasis if complete resection is possible. This highlights the role of thoracic surgeons in selecting ideal candidates for surgery, emphasizing a multidisciplinary approach and minimally invasive techniques.

Update on Percutaneous Ablation for Sarcoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update on the current state of percutaneous thermal ablation in the treatment of sarcoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data continue to accrue in support of ablation for local control and palliation of specific sarcoma subtypes such as extra-abdominal desmoid fibromatosis and for broader indications such as the treatment of oligometastatic disease. The synergistic possibilities of various combination therapies such as cryoablation and immunotherapy represent intriguing areas of active investigation. Histotripsy is an emerging non-invasive, non-thermal ablative modality that may further expand the therapeutic arsenal for sarcoma treatment. Percutaneous thermal ablation is a valuable tool in the multidisciplinary management of sarcoma, offering a minimally invasive adjunct to surgery and radiation therapy. Although there remains a paucity of high-level evidence specific to sarcomas, ablation techniques are demonstrably safe and effective for achieving local tumor control and providing pain relief in select patients and are of particular benefit in those with metastatic disease or requiring palliative care.

Improved local control following dose-escalated stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) for metastatic sarcomas: An international multi-institutional experience

BACKGROUND

We aimed to characterize local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) following stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) for extracranial sarcoma metastases.

METHODS

A prospectively-maintained institutional registry was queried for patients with metastases from sarcoma primaries managed with SABR. Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized for univariate analyses to assess potential prognostic factors regarding LC and OS. A Cox proportional hazards multivariate (MVA) model was employed to further assess initially identified independent variables.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients with 118 lesions with LC information were identified. Common metastatic sites treated were lung (77), non-spinal bone (15), and spine (10). The median biologically effective dose (BED4) was 175 Gy4 (range56.3 Gy4-360 Gy4) with a median dose/fractionation schedule of 50 Gy/5 fractions. One- and 2-year OS rates were 81.3 % (95 % CI: 71.2-88.1 %6) and 50.5 % (95 % CI: 38.6-61.3 %, respectively. On Cox MVA, advanced age and non-lung metastases were associated with inferior OS (p < 0.03) with patients with 0-2 of these risk factors having estimated 2-year OS of 65.1 %, 38.9 %, and N/A, respectively. One- and 2-year LC rates were 85.3 % (95 % CI: 77.7-90.9 %) and 78.2 % (95 % CI: 67.9-85.6 %), respectively. On MVA, only BED4 < 175 Gy was associated with inferior LC (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.33; p = 0.01). Ten of 118 treated lesions had treatment-related toxicities (all Grade 1-2).

CONCLUSION

Age and lung vs. non-lung metastases were prognostic of OS and should be considered in patient selection for SABR. Dose escalation when feasible with BED4 ≥ 175 Gy is recommended given durable LC achieved without a subsequent increase in toxicity.

Factors influencing the outcome of volumetry tools for pulmonary nodule analysis: a systematic review and attempted meta-analysis

Health systems worldwide are implementing lung cancer screening programmes to identify early-stage lung cancer and maximise patient survival. Volumetry is recommended for follow-up of pulmonary nodules and outperforms other measurement methods. However, volumetry is known to be influenced by multiple factors. The objectives of this systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42022370233) are to summarise the current knowledge regarding factors that influence volumetry tools used in the analysis of pulmonary nodules, assess for significant clinical impact, identify gaps in current knowledge and suggest future research. Five databases (Medline, Scopus, Journals@Ovid, Embase and Emcare) were searched on the 21st of September, 2022, and 137 original research studies were included, explicitly testing the potential impact of influencing factors on the outcome of volumetry tools. The summary of these studies is tabulated, and a narrative review is provided. A subset of studies (n = 16) reporting clinical significance were selected, and their results were combined, if appropriate, using meta-analysis. Factors with clinical significance include the segmentation algorithm, quality of the segmentation, slice thickness, the level of inspiration for solid nodules, and the reconstruction algorithm and kernel in subsolid nodules. Although there is a large body of evidence in this field, it is unclear how to apply the results from these studies in clinical practice as most studies do not test for clinical relevance. The meta-analysis did not improve our understanding due to the small number and heterogeneity of studies testing for clinical significance. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Many studies have investigated the influencing factors of pulmonary nodule volumetry, but only 11% of these questioned their clinical relevance in their management. The heterogeneity among these studies presents a challenge in consolidating results and clinical application of the evidence. KEY POINTS: • Factors influencing the volumetry of pulmonary nodules have been extensively investigated. • Just 11% of studies test clinical significance (wrongly diagnosing growth). • Nodule size interacts with most other influencing factors (especially for smaller nodules). • Heterogeneity among studies makes comparison and consolidation of results challenging. • Future research should focus on clinical applicability, screening, and updated technology.

Improving survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for sarcoma: analysis of prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

Metastatic sarcoma confers a grave prognosis to patients and poses a management dilemma for clinicians. Pulmonary metastasectomy is frequently performed for the recurrence of sarcomatous tumours in the lung, but the evidence-base is poor. No guidelines exist to inform clinicians on appropriate patient selection and surgical technique.

AIM

This review aims to establish and analyse the most important prognostic factors for survival post pulmonary metastasectomy for recurrent sarcoma. We summarise the key tumour, peri-operative and patient characteristics that should guide surgical management.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the literature utilising OVID Medline and PubMed databases was conducted to identify all relevant research within the past 15 years. We evaluated all articles that specifically studied sarcoma patients (both bone and soft tissue).

CONCLUSION

Disease-free interval and tumour burden remain important prognostic factors, while tumour grade is likely not significant. VATS is a safe and viable alternative to thoracotomy without sacrificing survival outcomes. No single peri-operative characteristic provides useful prognostic information in isolation.