Usability Testing of a Sick-Day Protocol in CKD

Sick day management in people with chronic kidney disease: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Use of certain medications during an acute illness may put patients at an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at higher risk of developing superimposed AKI. The aim of this scoping review is to collate and characterise existing evidence on sick day management considerations and practices during acute illness in people with CKD.

METHODS

We searched Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstract, Scopus, Google Scholar and grey literature sources. We followed the methodological framework for scoping reviews, while information was extracted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Findings are presented thematically.

RESULTS

Ten studies and seven guidelines met the inclusion criteria. Studies were targeted at patients, general practitioners, pharmacists, and nurses. The major themes identified included development and feasibility testing of a sick day management protocol, current practice of temporary medication discontinuation, and outcomes. Most guidelines provided recommendations for sick day management largely based on expert consensus. A digital intervention was deemed highly acceptable and easy to use, whereas patient handouts were more effective when provided along with dialogue with a health professional. While there is little evidence on the impact of sick day protocols on outcomes, a single randomised trial reported no significant association between sick day protocols and change in kidney function, AKI incidents or risk of hospitalisation.

CONCLUSION

The nascent literature on sick day management in patients with CKD revealed the limited available evidence to provide guidance on implementation and on outcomes. Future research needs to clarify sick day recommendations and assess their impact on clinical outcomes including prevention of superimposed AKI or hospitalisations, as well as to address barriers to implementation.

Consensus Recommendations for Sick Day Medication Guidance for People With Diabetes, Kidney, or Cardiovascular Disease: A Modified Delphi Process

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Sick day medication guidance (SDMG) involves withholding or adjusting specific medications in the setting of acute illnesses that could contribute to complications such as hypotension, acute kidney injury (AKI), or hypoglycemia. We sought to achieve consensus among clinical experts on recommendations for SDMG that could be studied in future intervention studies.

STUDY DESIGN

A modified Delphi process following guidelines for conducting and reporting Delphi studies.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

An international group of clinicians with expertise relevant to SDMG was recruited through purposive and snowball sampling. A scoping review of the literature was presented, followed by 3 sequential rounds of development, refinement, and voting on recommendations. Meetings were held virtually and structured to allow the participants to provide their input and rapidly prioritize and refine ideas.

OUTCOME

Opinions of participants were measured as the percentage who agreed with each recommendation, whereas consensus was defined as >75% agreement.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Quantitative data were summarized using counts and percentages. A qualitative content analysis was performed to capture the context of the discussion around recommendations and any additional considerations brought forward by participants.

RESULTS

The final panel included 26 clinician participants from 4 countries and 10 clinical disciplines. Participants reached a consensus on 42 specific recommendations: 5 regarding the signs and symptoms accompanying volume depletion that should trigger SDMG; 6 regarding signs that should prompt urgent contact with a health care provider (including a reduced level of consciousness, severe vomiting, low blood pressure, presence of ketones, tachycardia, and fever); and 14 related to scenarios and strategies for patient self-management (including frequent glucose monitoring, checking ketones, fluid intake, and consumption of food to prevent hypoglycemia). There was consensus that renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, diuretics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and metformin should be temporarily stopped. Participants recommended that insulin, sulfonylureas, and meglitinides be held only if blood glucose was low and that basal and bolus insulin be increased by 10%-20% if blood glucose was elevated. There was consensus on 6 recommendations related to the resumption of medications within 24-48 hours of the resolution of symptoms and the presence of normal patterns of eating and drinking.

LIMITATIONS

Participants were from high-income countries, predominantly Canada. Findings may not be generalizable to implementation in other settings.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary panel of clinicians reached a consensus on recommendations for SDMG in the presence of signs and symptoms of volume depletion, as well as self-management strategies and medication instructions in this setting. These recommendations may inform the design of future trials of SDMG strategies.

Medication Holds in CKD During Acute Volume-Depleting Illnesses: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a "Sick-Day" Protocol

Rationale & Objective

Some drugs prescribed for chronic kidney disease (CKD) may become hazardous on sick days with volume depletion by increasing the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and kidney function loss; however, the risks and benefits of their use during intercurrent illness is unknown.

Study Design

6-month pragmatic trial examining a sick-day protocol to determine if withholding prespecified drugs during a volume-depleting illness reduces the incidence AKI or kidney function loss in CKD.

Setting & Participants

315 veterans with stage 3-5 CKD, treated with a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitor blocker, diuretic, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, or metformin were randomized into the study with n = 159 and n = 156 in sick-day protocol and usual care groups, respectively.

Intervention

Sick-day protocol administered via interactive voice response system (IVRS) or usual care with 6-month follow-up.

Outcomes

The outcomes of the study are as follows: (1) Change in kidney function, (2) incidence of AKI based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes and ambulatory laboratory testing, (3) urgent service utilizations, and (4) sick days.

Results

The mean age was 70.1 ± 7.4 and 69.2 ± 8.1 years, with a mean baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 43.1 ± 13.1 and 43.8 ± 13.0 mL/min/1.73 m2, and 112 (70%) and 100 (64%) of participants with diabetes in the sick-day protocol and usual care groups, respectively. The mean change in GFR in the sick-day protocol and usual care groups from baseline to 6-month follow-up, adjusting for baseline GFR, was -0.71 (95% CI, -2.11 to 0.69) and -0.72 (95% CI, -2.12 to 0.68), respectively, with no significant difference, P = 0.99. Hospitalizations in the sick-day protocol and usual care groups were 11.5/100 and 8.4/100 events per person-months, respectively, with the adjusted rate ratio not significantly increased (prevalence ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.96-1.76). Participants interacted with the IVRS in 81% of expected weeks and 19 had one or more qualifying events. In 33 true sick days, participants correctly followed the protocol in only 14.

Limitations

Low incidence of sick days over the 6-month period of the study.

Conclusions

The sick-day protocol was not associated with a significant reduction in AKI episodes or kidney function loss in a high-risk CKD population. Engagement with the IVRS was high, but successful implementation of the sick-day protocol was not optimal.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03141905.

Sick Day Medication Guidance for People With Diabetes, Kidney, or Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Scoping Review

Rationale & Objective

Sick day medication guidance has been promoted to prevent adverse events for people with chronic conditions. Our aim was to summarize the existing sick day medication guidance and the evidence base for the effectiveness of interventions for implementing this guidance.

Study Design

Scoping review of quantitative and qualitative studies.

Setting & Population

Sick day medication guidance for people with chronic conditions including diabetes mellitus, kidney diseases, and cardiovascular diseases.

Selection Criteria for Studies

A search of 6 bibliographic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Library [via Wiley]) and a comprehensive gray literature search were completed in June 2021.

Data Extraction

Intervention and study characteristics were extracted using standardized tools.

Analytical Approach

Data were summarized descriptively, and our approach observed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews.

Results

The literature search identified 2,308 documents, which were screened against the eligibility criteria, leading to 74 documents that were included. The majority of the identified documents (n = 55) were guidelines or educational resources. Of the 19 primary research studies identified, 10 studies described an intervention, with only 2 examining the effect of sick day medication guidance interventions within clinical care and no studies reporting beneficial effects on clinical outcomes. Most documents (n = 58) included guidance specific to patients with diabetes mellitus, with fewer including guidance for patients with chronic kidney disease (n = 9) or heart failure (n = 2).

Limitations

Risk of bias was not assessed.

Conclusions

Many resources promoting sick day medication guidance have been developed; however, there is very little empirical evidence for the effectiveness of current approaches in implementing sick day medication guidance into practice. Recommendations for the use of sick day medication guidance will require further research to develop consistent, understandable, and usable approaches for its implementation within self-management strategies as well as empirical studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of these interventions.

Nephrologist Follow-Up versus Usual Care after an Acute Kidney Injury Hospitalization (FUSION): A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Survivors of AKI are at higher risk of CKD and death, but few patients see a nephrologist after hospital discharge. Our objectives during this 2-year vanguard phase trial were to determine the feasibility of randomizing survivors of AKI to early follow-up with a nephrologist or usual care, and to collect data on care processes and outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We performed a randomized controlled trial in patients hospitalized with Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage 2-3 AKI at four hospitals in Toronto, Canada. We randomized patients to early nephrologist follow-up (standardized basket of care that emphasized BP control, cardiovascular risk reduction, and medication safety) or usual care from July 2015 to June 2017. Feasibility outcomes included the proportion of eligible patients enrolled, seen by a nephrologist, and followed to 1 year. The primary clinical outcome was a major adverse kidney event at 1 year, defined as death, maintenance dialysis, or incident/progressive CKD.

RESULTS

We screened 3687 participants from July 2015 to June 2017, of whom 269 were eligible. We randomized 71 (26%) patients (34 to nephrology follow-up and 37 to usual care). The primary reason stated for declining enrollment included hospitalization-related fatigue (n=65), reluctance to add more doctors to the health care team (n=59), and long travel times (n=40). Nephrologist visits occurred in 24 of 34 (71%) intervention participants, compared with three of 37 (8%) participants randomized to usual care. The primary clinical outcome occurred in 15 of 34 (44%) patients in the nephrologist follow-up arm, and 16 of 37 (43%) patients in the usual care arm (relative risk, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 1.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Major adverse kidney events are common in AKI survivors, but we found the in-person model of follow-up posed a variety of barriers that was not acceptable to many patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

Nephrologist Follow-up versus Usual Care after an Acute Kidney Injury Hospitalization (FUSION), NCT02483039 CJASN 16: 1005-1014, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.17331120.

Demonstrating the value of community pharmacists in New Zealand educating a targeted group of people to temporarily discontinue medicines when they are unwell to reduce the risk of acute kidney injury

OBJECTIVE

Acute kidney injury (AKI) prevention strategies for community-acquired AKI associated with severe acute illness have received attention in recent years. The objective of this study was to evaluate a community pharmacist AKI education programme aimed at patient self-management during acute dehydrating illnesses.

METHODS

This was a multimethod study. Potential participants were identified by community pharmacists when they presented a prescription containing a study medicine. The intervention consisted of completion of a short demographic questionnaire and a pharmacist providing verbal AKI information and advice on self-management during acute dehydrating illness, including medicine withholding. This information was supported with take-home information. Participants were telephoned between 4 and 11 months later and invited to participate in a structured telephone interview. Descriptive statistics were generated from questionnaire responses, and interview data were analysed using manifest content analysis.

KEY FINDINGS

One hundred and thirteen adults were recruited and 93 (82%) interviewed. Fifty-four (58%) interviewees remembered the pharmacist's education, and 51 (55%) had retained the information sheet. Fifty-eight (62%) would temporarily withhold medicines during acute dehydrating illnesses. Thirty-nine were comfortable they knew when to restart their medicines; 15 (38%) indicated this was once symptom-free for 48 h. Forty-six interviewees were comfortable about contacting their general practice; 16 (35%) would do this after 24 h of illness. Participants found the educational content and pharmacist approach acceptable.

CONCLUSION

A majority of participants accepted and remembered the information provided by their community pharmacist and felt comfortable to self-manage during acute dehydrating illness. A caveat is participant actions in practice may not be consistent with stated intentions.

A Patient Safety Educational Tool for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Development and Usability Study

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a health condition that threatens patient safety; however, few interventions provide patient-centered education about kidney-specific safety hazards.

Objective

We sought to develop and test the usability of a mobile tablet–based educational tool designed to promote patient awareness of relevant safety topics in CKD.

Methods

We used plain language principles to develop content for the educational tool, targeting four patient-actionable safety objectives that are relevant for individuals with CKD. These four objectives included avoidance of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); hypoglycemia awareness (among individuals with diabetes); temporary cessation of certain medications during acute volume depletion to prevent acute kidney injury (ie, “sick day protocol”); and contrast dye risk awareness. Our teaching strategies optimized human-computer interaction and content retention using audio, animation, and clinical vignettes to reinforce themes. For example, using a vignette of a patient with CKD with pain and pictures of common NSAIDs, participants were asked “Which of the following pain medicines are safe for Mr. Smith to take for his belly pain?” Assessment methods consisted of preknowledge and postknowledge surveys, with provision of correct responses and explanations. Usability testing of the tablet-based tool was performed among 12 patients with any stage of CKD, and program tasks were rated upon completion as no error, noncritical error (self-corrected), or critical error (needing assistance).

Results

The 12 participants in this usability study were predominantly 65 years of age or older (n=7, 58%) and female (n=7, 58%); all participants owned a mobile device and used it daily. Among the 725 total tasks that the participants completed, there were 31 noncritical errors (4.3%) and 15 critical errors (2.1%); 1 participant accounted for 30 of the total errors. Of the 12 participants, 10 (83%) easily completed 90% or more of their tasks. Most participants rated the use of the tablet as very easy (n=7, 58%), the activity length as “just right” (rather than too long or too short) (n=10, 83%), and the use of clinical vignettes as helpful (n=10, 83%); all participants stated that they would recommend this activity to others. The median rating of the activity was 8 on a scale of 1 to 10 (where 10 is best). We incorporated all participant recommendations into the final version of the educational tool.

Conclusions

A tablet-based patient safety educational tool is acceptable and usable by individuals with CKD. Future studies leveraging iterations of this educational tool will explore its impact on health outcomes in this high-risk population.

Community Health Care Quality Standards to Prevent Acute Kidney Injury and Its Consequences

As the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) increases, prevention strategies are needed across the health care continuum, which begins in the community. Recognizing this knowledge gap, the 22nd Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) was tasked to discuss the evidence for quality-of-care measurement and care processes to prevent AKI and its consequences in the community. Using a modified Delphi process, an international and interdisciplinary group provided a framework to identify and monitor patients with AKI in the community. The recommendations propose that risk stratification involve both susceptibilities (eg, chronic kidney disease) and exposures (eg, coronary angiography), with the latter triggering a Kidney Health Assessment. This assessment should include blood pressure, serum creatinine, and urine dipstick, followed by a Kidney Health Response to prevent AKI that encompasses cessation of unnecessary medications, minimization of nephrotoxins, patient education, and ongoing monitoring until the exposure resolves. These recommendations give community health care providers and health systems a starting point for quality improvement initiatives to prevent AKI and its consequences in the community.

Long-term outcomes of acute kidney injury and strategies for improved care

Acute kidney injury (AKI), once viewed predominantly as a self-limited and reversible condition, is now recognized as a growing problem associated with significant risks of adverse long-term health outcomes. Many cohort studies have established important relationships between AKI and subsequent risks of recurrent AKI, hospital re-admission, morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease and cancer, as well as the development of chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease. In both high-income countries (HICs) and low-income or middle-income countries (LMICs), several challenges exist in providing high-quality, patient-centered care following AKI. Despite advances in our understanding about the long-term risks following AKI, large gaps in knowledge remain about effective interventions that can improve the outcomes of patients. Therapies for high blood pressure, glycaemic control (for patients with diabetes), renin-angiotensin inhibition and statins might be important in improving long-term cardiovascular and kidney outcomes after AKI. Novel strategies that incorporate risk stratification approaches, educational interventions and new models of ambulatory care following AKI have been described, and some of these are now being implemented and evaluated in clinical studies in HICs. Care for AKI in LMICs must overcome additional barriers due to limited resources for diagnosis and management.

Hypertension in Cancer Patients and Survivors: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management

Cancer patients and survivors of cancer have a greater burden of cardiovascular disease compared to the general population. Much of the elevated cardiovascular risk in these individuals is likely attributable to hypertension, as individuals with cancer have a particularly high incidence of hypertension following cancer diagnosis. Treatment with chemotherapy is an independent risk factor for hypertension due to direct effects of many agents on endothelial function, sympathetic activity, and renin-angiotensin system activity as well as nephrotoxicity. Diagnosis and management of hypertension in cancer patients requires accurate blood pressure measurement and consideration of potential confounding factors, such as adjuvant treatments and acute pain, that can temporarily elevate blood pressure readings. Home blood pressure monitoring can be a useful tool to facilitate longitudinal blood pressure monitoring for titration of antihypertensive medications. Selection of antihypertensive agents in cancer patients should account for treatment-specific morbidities and target organ injury.