1
|
Loban K, Milland T, Hales L, Lam NN, Dipchand C, Sandal S. Understanding the Healthcare Needs of Living Kidney Donors Using the Picker Principles of Patient-centered Care: A Scoping Review. Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00770. [PMID: 38773835 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Abstract
Living kidney donors (LKDs) undertake a complex and multifaceted journey when pursuing donation and have several unmet healthcare needs. A comprehensive understanding of these needs across their entire donation trajectory can help develop a patient-centered care model. We conducted a scoping review to synthesize empirical evidence, published since 2000, on LKDs' experiences with healthcare from when they decided to pursue donation to postdonation care, and what they reported as their care needs. We categorized them according to the 8 Picker principles of patient-centered care. Of the 4514 articles screened, 47 were included. Ample literature highlighted the need for (1) holistic, adaptable, and linguistically appropriate approaches to education and information; (2) systematic, consistent, and proactive coordination and integration of care; and (3) self-management and preparation to optimize perioperative physical comfort. Some literature highlighted the need for (4) better continuity and transition of care postdonation. Two key unmet needs were the lack of (5) a holistic psychosocial evaluation predonation and predischarge to provide emotional support and alleviation of fear and anxiety; and (6) access to specialty and psychosocial services postdonation especially when adverse events occurred. Limited literature explored the principles of (7) respect for patients' values, preferences, and expressed needs; and (8) involvement of family and friends as caregivers. We summarize several unmet healthcare needs of LKDs throughout their donation journey and highlight knowledge gaps. Addressing them can improve their well-being and experiences, and potentially address inequities in living kidney donation and increase living donor kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katya Loban
- MEDIC, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Thea Milland
- MEDIC, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lindsay Hales
- Library Services, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ngan N Lam
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Christine Dipchand
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Shaifali Sandal
- MEDIC, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maradit Kremers H, Grossardt BR, Miller AR, Kasiske BL, Matas AJ, Khosla S, Kremers WK, Amer H, Kumar R. Fracture Risk Among Living Kidney Donors 25 Years After Donation. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2353005. [PMID: 38265798 PMCID: PMC10809017 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.53005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Living kidney donors may have an increased risk of fractures due to reductions in kidney mass, lower concentrations of serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and secondary increases in serum parathyroid hormone. Objective To compare the overall and site-specific risk of fractures among living kidney donors with strictly matched controls from the general population who would have been eligible to donate a kidney but did not do so. Design, Setting, and Participants This survey study was conducted between December 1, 2021, and July 31, 2023. A total of 5065 living kidney donors from 3 large transplant centers in Minnesota were invited to complete a survey about their bone health and history of fractures, and 16 156 population-based nondonor controls without a history of comorbidities that would have precluded kidney donation were identified from the Rochester Epidemiology Project and completed the same survey. A total of 2132 living kidney donors and 2014 nondonor controls responded to the survey. Statistical analyses were performed from May to August 2023. Exposure Living kidney donation. Main Outcomes and Measures The rates of overall and site-specific fractures were compared between living kidney donors and controls using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). Results At the time of survey, the 2132 living kidney donors had a mean (SD) age of 67.1 (8.9) years and included 1245 women (58.4%), and the 2014 controls had a mean (SD) age of 68.6 (7.9) years and included 1140 women (56.6%). The mean (SD) time between donation or index date and survey date was 24.2 (10.4) years for donors and 27.6 (10.7) years for controls. The overall rate of fractures among living kidney donors was significantly lower than among controls (SIR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.97). However, there were significantly more vertebral fractures among living kidney donors than among controls (SIR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.05-1.83). Conclusions and Relevance This survey study found a reduced rate of overall fractures but an excess of vertebral fractures among living kidney donors compared with controls after a mean follow-up of 25 years. Treatment of excess vertebral fractures with dietary supplements such as vitamin D3 may reduce the numbers of vertebral fractures and patient morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilal Maradit Kremers
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Brandon R. Grossardt
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Adam R. Miller
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bertram L. Kasiske
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Arthur J. Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Sundeep Khosla
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine and Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Walter K. Kremers
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Hatem Amer
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Nephrology Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rajiv Kumar
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Nephrology Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Skaczkowski G, Barrett A, Olver I, Dollman J, Gunn KM. 'It is a life changing experience': The experiences of living kidney donors who live in rural Australia. Aust J Rural Health 2023; 31:866-877. [PMID: 37335838 DOI: 10.1111/ajr.13008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Revised: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A growing body of research has examined the physical, psychological, social and financial impacts of living kidney donation. However, little is known about the unique experiences or additional burdens faced by living donors from regional or remote locations. OBJECTIVE To explore the experiences of living kidney donors who live outside metropolitan centres and to determine how support services could be orientated to better meet their unique needs. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Seventeen living kidney donors participated in semistructured telephone interviews. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. FINDINGS Eight themes were identified: (1) donor's emotional well-being is influenced by the recipient's outcome, (2) varied levels of access to medical support and other important services in rural areas, (3) travel takes a toll on time, finances and well-being, (4) varied level of financial impact, (5) medical, emotional and social challenges, (6) both lay and health professional support is valued, (7) varied levels of knowledge and experiences accessing information and (8) a worthwhile experience overall. CONCLUSION Despite many challenges, and travel adding to the complexity, rural living kidney donors generally consider it to be a worthwhile experience. The provision of additional emotional, practical and educational support would be welcomed by this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Skaczkowski
- Department of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Alison Barrett
- Department of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ian Olver
- School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - James Dollman
- Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kate M Gunn
- Department of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vock DM, Helgeson ES, Mullan AF, Issa NS, Sanka S, Saiki AC, Mathson K, Chamberlain AM, Rule AD, Matas AJ. The Minnesota attributable risk of kidney donation (MARKD) study: a retrospective cohort study of long-term (> 50 year) outcomes after kidney donation compared to well-matched healthy controls. BMC Nephrol 2023; 24:121. [PMID: 37127560 PMCID: PMC10152793 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-023-03149-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is uncertainty about the long-term risks of living kidney donation. Well-designed studies with controls well-matched on risk factors for kidney disease are needed to understand the attributable risks of kidney donation. METHODS The goal of the Minnesota Attributable Risk of Kidney Donation (MARKD) study is to compare the long-term (> 50 years) outcomes of living donors (LDs) to contemporary and geographically similar controls that are well-matched on health status. University of Minnesota (n = 4022; 1st transplant: 1963) and Mayo Clinic LDs (n = 3035; 1st transplant: 1963) will be matched to Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) controls (approximately 4 controls to 1 donor) on the basis of age, sex, and race/ethnicity. The REP controls are a well-defined population, with detailed medical record data linked between all providers in Olmsted and surrounding counties, that come from the same geographic region and era (early 1960s to present) as the donors. Controls will be carefully selected to have health status acceptable for donation on the index date (date their matched donor donated). Further refinement of the control group will include confirmed kidney health (e.g., normal serum creatinine and/or no proteinuria) and matching (on index date) of body mass index, smoking history, family history of chronic kidney disease, and blood pressure. Outcomes will be ascertained from national registries (National Death Index and United States Renal Data System) and a new survey administered to both donors and controls; the data will be supplemented by prior surveys and medical record review of donors and REP controls. The outcomes to be compared are all-cause mortality, end-stage kidney disease, cardiovascular disease and mortality, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) trajectory and chronic kidney disease, pregnancy risks, and development of diseases that frequently lead to chronic kidney disease (e.g. hypertension, diabetes, and obesity). We will additionally evaluate whether the risk of donation differs based on baseline characteristics. DISCUSSION Our study will provide a comprehensive assessment of long-term living donor risk to inform candidate living donors, and to inform the follow-up and care of current living donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Vock
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 2221 University Ave SE, Room 200, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, USA
| | - Erika S Helgeson
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 2221 University Ave SE, Room 200, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, USA.
| | - Aidan F Mullan
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Naim S Issa
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sujana Sanka
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alison C Saiki
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kristin Mathson
- Surgery Clinical Trials Office, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Alanna M Chamberlain
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Andrew D Rule
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Di Bella C, Capovilla G, Rosso E, Di Bello M, Tuci F, Contarini E, Simioni A, Baldan N, Silvestre C, Rigotti P, Furian L. How Long Does It Take to Acquire Mastery of Performance in Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy? A Center-Based and Surgeon-Based Operative Time CUSUM Analysis. Transplant Proc 2023; 55:554-561. [PMID: 36948957 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.02.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safety of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) has been widely documented, but its challenging learning curve (LC) requires an insightful assessment to expand its application. The aim of this study was to evaluate LC of LDN in a high-volume transplant center. METHODS Three hundred forty-three LDNs performed from 2001 to 2018 were evaluated. CUSUM analysis based on the operative time was used to assess the number of cases required to reach mastery in the technique for both the entire surgical team and for the 3 main surgeons considered separately. Analysis of association between demographics, perioperative characteristics, and complications within the different LC phases was conducted. RESULTS Mean operative time was 228.9 minutes. Mean length of stay was 3.8 days and mean warm ischemia time (WIT) was 170.8 seconds. Surgical and medical complication rates were 7.3% and 6.4%, respectively. The CUSUM-LC showed a requirement of 157 cases (for surgical team) and 75 cases (for single surgeons) to reach competence in the procedure. Patient baseline characteristic showed no differences among the LC phases. Compared with the initial LC phase, hospital stay was significantly lower at the end of the LC whereas WIT results were longer in the LC descendent phase. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms the safety and efficacy of LDN, with a low rate of complications. This analysis suggests that about 75 procedures are required to reach competence and 93 cases to achieve mastery level of skill for a single surgeon. It can be hypothesized that, in a high-volume transplant enter, the time to guarantee training in LDN is compatible with the duration of a clinical fellowship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Di Bella
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
| | - Giovanni Capovilla
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Eugenia Rosso
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Marianna Di Bello
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Francesco Tuci
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Simioni
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nicola Baldan
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Cristina Silvestre
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Paolo Rigotti
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Furian
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lagging E, Wadström J, Krekula LG, Tibell A. Red Flags in the Living Kidney Donor Process. Transplant Proc 2023; 55:279-287. [PMID: 36797163 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ideally, no live kidney donor should regret their decision or feel they were not fully prepared for the process. Unfortunately, this is not a reality for all donors. The aim of our study is to identify areas for improvement, focusing on factors (red flags) that predict less favorable outcomes from a donor perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 171 living kidney donors responded to a questionnaire with 24 multiple-choice questions and space for comments. Less favorable outcomes were defined as lower satisfaction, extended physical recovery period, long-term fatigue, and longer sick leave. RESULTS Ten red flags were identified. Of these factors, more fatigue (range, P = .000-0.040) or pain (range, P = .005-0.008) than expected while still in hospital, the actual experience being harder or different than expected (range, P = .001-0.010), and the donor wishing to have had but not having been offered a previous donor as mentor (range, P = .008-.040) correlated significantly with at least 3 of the 4 less favorable outcomes. Another significant red flag was keeping existential issues to oneself (P = .006). CONCLUSION We identified several factors indicating that a donor could be at an increased risk for a less favorable outcome after donation. Four of these factors have, to our knowledge, not been described earlier: more early fatigue than expected, more postoperative pain than anticipated, not having been offered a mentor at an early stage, and keeping existential issues to oneself. Attention to these red flags already during the donation process could help health care professionals to act early to avoid unfavorable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Lagging
- Center for Health Care Ethics, LIME, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Regional Donation Center Stockholm-Gotland, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Jonas Wadström
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Linda Gyllström Krekula
- Center for Health Care Ethics, LIME, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Regional Donation Center Stockholm-Gotland, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Annika Tibell
- Center for Health Care Ethics, LIME, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Research, Education and Innovation, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Frutos MÁ, Crespo M, Valentín MDLO, Alonso-Melgar Á, Alonso J, Fernández C, García-Erauzkin G, González E, González-Rinne AM, Guirado L, Gutiérrez-Dalmau A, Huguet J, Moral JLLD, Musquera M, Paredes D, Redondo D, Revuelta I, Hofstadt CJVD, Alcaraz A, Alonso-Hernández Á, Alonso M, Bernabeu P, Bernal G, Breda A, Cabello M, Caro-Oleas JL, Cid J, Diekmann F, Espinosa L, Facundo C, García M, Gil-Vernet S, Lozano M, Mahillo B, Martínez MJ, Miranda B, Oppenheimer F, Palou E, Pérez-Saez MJ, Peri L, Rodríguez O, Santiago C, Tabernero G, Hernández D, Domínguez-Gil B, Pascual J. Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation. Nefrologia 2022; 42 Suppl 2:5-132. [PMID: 36503720 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marta Crespo
- Nephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Juana Alonso
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | | | - Esther González
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Spain
| | | | - Lluis Guirado
- Nephrology Department, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jorge Huguet
- RT Surgical Team, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Mireia Musquera
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Paredes
- Donation and Transplantation Coordination Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Nephrology and RT Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Antonio Alcaraz
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Manuel Alonso
- Regional Transplantation Coordination, Seville, Spain
| | | | - Gabriel Bernal
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - Alberto Breda
- RT Surgical Team, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mercedes Cabello
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Joan Cid
- Apheresis and Cell Therapy Unit, Haemotherapy and Haemostasis Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Nephrology and RT Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Espinosa
- Paediatric Nephrology Department, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carme Facundo
- Nephrology Department, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Miquel Lozano
- Apheresis and Cell Therapy Unit, Haemotherapy and Haemostasis Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Eduard Palou
- Immunology Department, Hospital Clinic i Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Lluis Peri
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Domingo Hernández
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Julio Pascual
- Nephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Katvan E, Cohen J, Rahamimov R, Ashkenazi T. A Comparison of Recalled Pain Memory Following Living Kidney Donation Between Directed and non-Directed, Altruistic Donors. Prog Transplant 2022; 32:285-291. [PMID: 36039525 DOI: 10.1177/15269248221122897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Pain following donor nephrectomy for living kidney donation is common. In Israel, non-directed, altruistic donations account for 45% of all kidney transplants. Design: This cross-sectional, retrospective survey included 2 groups of donors derived from the data of Israel Transplant, namely directed and non-directed, altruistic donors, who donated between 2015 to 2018. The degree of recalled pain memory post-surgery was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale at 5 time points: immediately post-surgery, after 1 week, 1 month and 3 months post-surgery and in the month preceding completion of the questionnaire. In addition, continued requirement for analgesics for more than one-month post-surgery, the degree of interference with daily activities in the month preceding the questionnaire and the recalled time to return to full-time employment were also noted. Results: In total, 246 (131 directed and 115 non-directed, altruistic) donors were included in the study. Non-directed, altruistic donors reported statistically significantly lower degrees of recalled pain memory at all time points, a lower requirement for prolonged analgesic use and less recalled interference with daily activities due to pain. In addition, these donors recalled returning significantly earlier to full-time employment. Finally, no significant differences in the degree of recalled pain memory were noted for directed donors according to their relation to the recipient, apart from donation to a spouse. Conclusion: These unique findings, if validated in a prospective study, could provide important information to potential non-directed, altruistic donors regarding the expected level of post-surgical pain and their return to full-time employment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eyal Katvan
- Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel, and Peres Academic Center, Rehovot, Israel.,Israel Transplant, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Ruth Rahamimov
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Department of Organ Transplantation, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Matas AJ, Rule AD. Long-term Medical Outcomes of Living Kidney Donors. Mayo Clin Proc 2022; 97:2107-2122. [PMID: 36216599 PMCID: PMC9747133 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Historically, to minimize risks, living kidney donors have been highly selected and healthy. Operative risks are well-defined, yet concern remains about long-term risks. In the general population, even a mild reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is associated with cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, reduction in GFR in the general population is due to kidney or systemic disease. Retrospective studies comparing donors with matched general population controls have found no increased donor risk. Prospective studies comparing donors with controls (maximum follow-up, 9 years) have reported that donor GFR is stable or increases slightly, whereas GFR decreases in controls. However, these same studies identified metabolic and vascular donor abnormalities. There are a few retrospective studies comparing donors with controls. Each has limitations in selection of the control group, statistical analyses, and/or length of follow-up. One such study reported increased donor mortality; 2 reported a small increase in absolute risk of ESKD. Risk factors for donor ESKD are similar to those in the general population. Postdonation pregnancies are also associated with increased risk of hypertension and preeclampsia. There is a critical need for long-term follow-up studies comparing donors with controls from the same era, geographic area, and socioeconomic status who are healthy, with normal renal function on the date matching the date of donation, and are matched on demographic characteristics with the donors. These data are needed to optimize donor candidate counseling and informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J Matas
- Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
| | - Andrew D Rule
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Azuri P, Tarabeih M. Religious Worldviews Affecting Organ Donation in Israel. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:2047-2056. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.08.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
11
|
Kang E, Lee J, Park S, Kim Y, Kim HJ, Kim YC, Kim DK, Joo KW, Kim YS, Choi I, Lee H. Perception regarding live kidney donation in the general population of South Korea. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0272495. [PMID: 35925947 PMCID: PMC9352025 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to know how the general population recognizes live kidney donation in Korea. Participants were randomly selected from the general population after proportional allocation by region, sex, and age. Selected participants received a questionnaire that included demographic information, socioeconomic and marital statuses, prior recognition of live donor kidney transplantation, expected changes after donation, and the need for support after donor nephrectomy. Among the 1,000 participants from the web-based survey, 83.8% answered they fully understood living donor kidney transplantation, 81.1% knew about them, and 51.1% were willing to donate. Various complications after nephrectomy and deterioration in health after donation were the most significant reasons for those reluctant to donate. Most agreed that the government should provide social and economic support to living kidney donors, especially after exposure to the description of donor nephrectomy. Financial support, including surgery and regular medical check-up costs, was the most preferred government support. The Korean general population seemed aware of the value and safety of kidney donation, although only half of them were willing to donate due to concerns about possible complications. Most participants agreed on social and economic support for living kidney donors, especially surgery-related costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunjeong Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jangwook Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sehoon Park
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yaerim Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Hyo Jeong Kim
- Division of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Chul Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Ki Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwon Wook Joo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yon Su Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Insun Choi
- Division of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hajeong Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Prasad GVR, Sahay M, Kit-Chung Ng J. The Role of Registries in Kidney Transplantation Across International Boundaries. Semin Nephrol 2022; 42:151267. [PMID: 36577647 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Transplant professionals strive to improve domestic kidney transplantation rates safely, cost efficiently, and ethically, but to increase rates further may wish to allow their recipients and donors to traverse international boundaries. Travel for transplantation presents significant challenges to the practice of transplantation medicine and donor medicine, but can be enhanced if sustainable international registries develop to include low- and low-middle income countries. Robust data collection and sharing across registries, linking pretransplant information to post-transplant information, linking donor to recipient information, increasing living donor transplant activity through paired exchange, and ongoing reporting of results to permit flexibility and adaptability to changing clinical environments, will all serve to enhance kidney transplantation across international boundaries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G V Ramesh Prasad
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Manisha Sahay
- Department of Nephrology, Osmania General Hospital, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Jack Kit-Chung Ng
- Carol and Richard Yu Peritoneal Dialysis Research Center, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Benavides X, Rogers RT, Tan EK, Merzkani MA, Thirunavukkarasu S, Yigitbilek F, Smith BH, Rule AD, Kukla A, Chow GK, Heimbach JK, Taner T, Dean PG, Prieto M, Stegall MD. Complications After Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy. Mayo Clin Proc 2022; 97:894-904. [PMID: 35483987 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the complications of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (HALLDN) with an emphasis on complications occurring early after hospital discharge up to 120 days after surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively categorized complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification in 3002 HALLDNs performed at 1 center from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2019. In addition to overall summaries, modeling was used to identify correlates of complications before and after living donation. RESULTS Of these donors, 87% were White, 59% were female, the mean age was 45 years (range, 18-77 years), 30.3% had a body mass index of at least 30, and 36.3% had previous abdominopelvic surgery. There were no deaths related to the surgery. The incidence of major complications (intraoperative complications plus Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III postoperatively) was 2.5% (n=74). The overall complication rate was 12.4% (n=371), including 15 intraoperative, 76 postoperative before discharge, and 280 after discharge to 120 days. Reoperation was required in 1.8% of patients (n=54), and all but 1 of these were incision-related problems. Seventy-six percent of all complications occurred after discharge, including 85% of the reoperations. For major complications, no risk factor was found. Risk factors for any complication included paramedian incision (hazard ratio [HR], 2.54; 95% CI, 1.49 to 4.34; P<.001); a history of abdominopelvic surgery (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.76; P=.01), male sex (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.76; P=.01), non-White race (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.88; P=.02), and early era of the experience. CONCLUSION Most major complications of HALLDN occur after discharge, suggesting that close follow-up is warranted and that the current literature may underestimate the true incidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiomara Benavides
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Richard T Rogers
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Ek Khoon Tan
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Massini A Merzkani
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Furkan Yigitbilek
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Byron H Smith
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Andrew D Rule
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Aleksandra Kukla
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Julie K Heimbach
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Timucin Taner
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Patrick G Dean
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mikel Prieto
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mark D Stegall
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Recomendaciones para el trasplante renal de donante vivo. Nefrologia 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
15
|
Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Patient-facing Educational Video About Live Kidney Donor Surgical Complications. Transplant Direct 2021; 7:e744. [PMID: 34386581 PMCID: PMC8352607 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Living kidney donation (LKD) improves transplant access; however, its use is compromised, in part, by individuals’ unaddressed concerns about perioperative complications. Methods. We developed an animated, patient-centered educational video about LKD surgical complications, with input from experts in transplantation, communication, and anthropology, 35 patients/care partners (5 LKD candidates, 5 prior LKDs, 10 kidney transplant recipients, 10 kidney transplant candidates, 5 care partners), and 1 community advocate. We then conducted an online pre-post study with 24 potential kidney donors and recipients to measure the video’s acceptability and feasibility to improve donation complication knowledge and concerns. Results. Knowledge of LKD surgical complications increased 23% (mean 5.7 to 7.0, P < 0.01) from pre- to post- animation viewing. Large knowledge effect size increases were observed for different levels of age, race, health literacy, and technology access. The frequency of positive responses about donation safety increased from 88% preanimation to 96% postanimation. Concerns about surgical complications remained at 17% before and after exposure. After viewing the animation, over 90% indicated positive ratings on ease of watching, understanding, and engaging. Conclusions. An animated educational video about LKD surgical complications was developed in collaboration with multiple stakeholders. The video was well received and promised to positively impact individuals’ knowledge and concerns.
Collapse
|
16
|
Schick-Makaroff K, Hays RE, Hunt J, Taylor LA, Rudow DL. Education Priorities and What Matters to Those Considering Living Kidney Donation. Prog Transplant 2020; 31:32-39. [PMID: 33297879 DOI: 10.1177/1526924820978599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although informed consent content elements are prescribed in detailed regulatory guidance, many live kidney donors describe feeling underprepared and under informed. The goal of this pilot study was to explore the educational components needed to support an informed decision-making process for living kidney donors. METHODS/APPROACH A qualitative description design was conducted with thematic analysis of 5 focus groups with 2 cohorts: living kidney donor candidates (n = 11) and living kidney donors (n = 8). FINDINGS The educational components needed to engage in an informed decision-making process were: 1) contingent upon, and motivated by, personal circumstances; 2) supported through explanation of risks and benefits; 3) enhanced by understanding the overall donation experience; and 4) personalized by talking to another donor. DISCUSSION Tailoring education to meet the needs for fully informed decision-making is essential. Current education requirements, as defined by regulatory bodies, remain challenging to transplant teams attempting to ensure fully informed consent of living kidney donor candidates. Information on the emotional, financial, and overall life impact is needed, along with acknowledgement of relational ties driving donor motivations and the hoped-for recipient outcomes. Discussion of care practices, and access to peer mentoring may further strengthen the informed decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rebecca E Hays
- 5229University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Julia Hunt
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, 5944Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laura A Taylor
- 1865Uniformed Services University of the Health Science/Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of Nursing, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Dianne LaPointe Rudow
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, 5944Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Although the first successful kidney transplantation 65 years ago was performed with a living donor kidney, the number of living donor kidney transplantations has increased especially during the last 2 decades. The enlargement of living donor programs was made possible by new modes of living donation and by expansion of the living donor pool. At the same time, the long-term risks of kidney donation have been better delineated. In this review, the latest developments on these topics are summarized. RECENT FINDINGS While the results of ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation are superior to those of deceased donor transplantation, recent meta-analyses show a reduced patient and graft survival as compared with ABO compatible transplantation as well as increased risk of severe infection and bleeding. Kidney paired donation programs can be extended by including compatible couples and by advanced donation, although the latter raises ethical concerns. Living donors appear to have a higher risk of end-stage renal disease and this is especially true for obese donors and probably also for black donors with an APOL1 high-risk genotype. The importance of psychosocial outcomes after living kidney donation is increasingly recognized. SUMMARY Living donor kidney transplantation remains the optimal treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease. To increase the donor pool, a well developed paired kidney donation program and sufficient reimbursement of costs associated with donation are essential ingredients. Other ways of expanding the donor pool, such as ABO-incompatible transplantation, use of higher risk donors, providing donors with financial incentives and advanced donation are associated with medical, ethical and logistical complications. There should be a careful selection and follow-up of living kidney donors with attention for medical consequences as well as for psychosocial outcomes.
Collapse
|
18
|
Fleishman A, Khwaja K, Schold JD, Comer CD, Morrissey P, Whiting J, Vella J, Kayler LK, Katz D, Jones J, Kaplan B, Pavlakis M, Mandelbrot DA, Rodrigue JR. Pain expectancy, prevalence, severity, and patterns following donor nephrectomy: Findings from the KDOC Study. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:2522-2529. [PMID: 32185880 PMCID: PMC7483675 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Postoperative pain is an outcome of importance to potential living kidney donors (LKDs). We prospectively characterized the prevalence, severity, and patterns of acute or chronic postoperative pain in 193 LKDs at six transplant programs. Three pain measurements were obtained from donors on postoperative Day (POD) 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 41, 49, and 56. The median pain rating total was highest on POD1 and declined from each assessment to the next until reaching a median pain-free score of 0 on POD49. In generalized linear mixed-model analysis, the mean pain score decreased at each pain assessment compared to the POD3 assessment. Pre-donation history of mood disorder (adjusted ratio of means [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.40 [0.99, 1.98]), reporting "severe" on any POD1 pain descriptors (adjusted ratio of means [95% CI]: 1.47 [1.12, 1.93]) and open nephrectomy (adjusted ratio of means [95% CI]: 2.61 [1.03, 6.62]) were associated with higher pain scores across time. Of the 179 LKDs who completed the final pain assessment, 74 (41%) met criteria for chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP), that is, any donation-related pain on POD56. Study findings have potential implications for LKD education, surgical consent, postdonation care, and outcome measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Fleishman
- The Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - K Khwaja
- The Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - JD Schold
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - CD Comer
- The Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - P Morrissey
- Transplant Center, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
| | - J Whiting
- Maine Transplant Center, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME
| | - J Vella
- Maine Transplant Center, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME
| | - LK Kayler
- Montefiore Einstein Center for Transplantation, Bronx, NY,Regional Center of Excellence for Transplantation & Kidney Care, Erie County Medical Center, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
| | - D Katz
- Organ Transplantation Program, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA
| | - J Jones
- Organ Transplantation Program, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA
| | - B Kaplan
- Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, TX
| | - M Pavlakis
- The Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - DA Mandelbrot
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - JR Rodrigue
- The Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Challenges, Innovations, and Next Steps in Achieving Financial Neutrality for Living Donors. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-020-00291-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
20
|
Lam NN, Dipchand C, Fortin MC, Foster BJ, Ghanekar A, Houde I, Kiberd B, Klarenbach S, Knoll GA, Landsberg D, Luke PP, Mainra R, Singh SK, Storsley L, Gill J. Canadian Society of Transplantation and Canadian Society of Nephrology Commentary on the 2017 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2020; 7:2054358120918457. [PMID: 32577294 PMCID: PMC7288834 DOI: 10.1177/2054358120918457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose of review: To review an international guideline on the evaluation and care of living
kidney donors and provide a commentary on the applicability of the
recommendations to the Canadian donor population. Sources of information: We reviewed the 2017 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)
Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney
Donors and compared this guideline to the Canadian 2014 Kidney Paired
Donation (KPD) Protocol for Participating Donors. Methods: A working group was formed consisting of members from the Canadian Society of
Transplantation and the Canadian Society of Nephrology. Members were
selected to have representation from across Canada and in various
subspecialties related to living kidney donation, including nephrology,
surgery, transplantation, pediatrics, and ethics. Key findings: Many of the KDIGO Guideline recommendations align with the KPD Protocol
recommendations. Canadian researchers have contributed to much of the
evidence on donor evaluation and outcomes used to support the KDIGO
Guideline recommendations. Limitations: Certain outcomes and risk assessment tools have yet to be validated in the
Canadian donor population. Implications: Living kidney donors should be counseled on the risks of postdonation
outcomes given recent evidence, understanding the limitations of the
literature with respect to its generalizability to the Canadian donor
population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ngan N Lam
- Division of Nephrology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | | | - Bethany J Foster
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Anand Ghanekar
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Isabelle Houde
- Division of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Québec, Québec City, Canada
| | - Bryce Kiberd
- Division of Nephrology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | - Greg A Knoll
- Division of Nephrology, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - David Landsberg
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Patrick P Luke
- Division of Urology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Rahul Mainra
- Division of Nephrology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Sunita K Singh
- Division of Nephrology, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Leroy Storsley
- Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Jagbir Gill
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The safety of living donor nephrectomy is essential to the continued success, growth, and sustainability of the clinical practice of living donor kidney transplantation. This review summarizes recent advances in our understanding of the perioperative and long-term risks faced by living kidney donors. RECENT FINDINGS Although adverse perioperative complications are extremely rare, donors particularly men, Black, or obese, frequently experience minor complications that result in delayed return to normal duties at home and work. Similarly, although long-term complications such as end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are rare, recent studies suggest a relative increase in risk of ESRD that is attributable to donation. Several risk calculators have been developed to help donors and their care providers quantify the baseline and postdonation risk of ESRD based on demographic and health characteristics. Thresholds of risk may help define what is an acceptable level of risk to the donor and the transplant center. SUMMARY Individualized risk calculators now allow care providers and potential donors to objectively and transparently participate in shared decision-making about the safety of living kidney donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luckmini Liyanage
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Abimerki Muzaale
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Macey Henderson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Acute and Chronic Care, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
|
24
|
Ralph AF, Butow P, Craig JC, Wong G, Chadban SJ, Luxton G, Gutman T, Hanson CS, Ju A, Tong A. Living kidney donor and recipient perspectives on their relationship: longitudinal semi-structured interviews. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026629. [PMID: 30948607 PMCID: PMC6500358 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Many donors and recipients report an improved bond posttransplantation; however, unexpected conflicts and tension may also occur. Insights into the lived experiences of the donor-recipient relationship can inform strategies for interventions and support. We aimed to describe donor and recipient expectations and experiences of their relationship before and after living kidney donor transplantation. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Semistructured interviews were conducted with 16 donor-recipient pairs before the transplant and 11-14 months post-transplant. Transcripts were analysed thematically. RESULTS We identified seven themes (with respective subthemes): donation as enacting familial responsibility for care; analytical decision making to mitigate regret (avoiding anticipated regret and maintaining control, removing emotional impulsivity); strengthened interpersonal ties (gaining a deeper appreciation among family members, stronger empathy for each other, improving social participation); instability of relational impacts (anger and aggression threatening dynamics, unanticipated stress and emotional lability, triggering familial tension); renegotiating social roles (unexpected continuation of caregiving responsibilities, inability to relinquish the caregiving role, disappointment with unfulfilled renewal of intimacy, dissatisfaction over discrepant energy levels); guilt over unmet expectations and inevitability of the gift relationship (vague and transient indebtedness, expectation of reciprocity, transferring kidney ownership). CONCLUSIONS Donor-recipient relationships may be improved through increased empathy, appreciation, and ability to participate in life together; however, unfulfilled expectations and behavioural and emotional changes in recipients (a side effect related to immunosuppression) remain unresolved consequences of living kidney donor transplantation. Education and counselling to help donors and recipients adjust to potential changes in relationship dynamics may help protect and foster relational stability postdonation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelique F Ralph
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Germaine Wong
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Steve J Chadban
- Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Transplantation Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Grant Luxton
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Talia Gutman
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Camilla S Hanson
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Angela Ju
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lentine KL, Lam NN, Segev DL. Risks of Living Kidney Donation: Current State of Knowledge on Outcomes Important to Donors. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 14:597-608. [PMID: 30858158 PMCID: PMC6450354 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.11220918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
In the past decade, there have been increasing efforts to better define and quantify the short- and long-term risks of living kidney donation. Recent studies have expanded upon the previous literature by focusing on outcomes that are important to potential and previous donors, applying unique databases and/or registries to follow large cohorts of donors for longer periods of time, and comparing outcomes with healthy nondonor controls to estimate attributable risks of donation. Leading outcomes important to living kidney donors include kidney health, surgical risks, and psychosocial effects of donation. Recent data support that living donors may experience a small increased risk of severe CKD and ESKD compared with healthy nondonors. For most donors, the 15-year risk of kidney failure is <1%, but for certain populations, such as young, black men, this risk may be higher. New risk prediction tools that combine the effects of demographic and health factors, and innovations in genetic risk markers are improving kidney risk stratification. Minor perioperative complications occur in 10%-20% of donor nephrectomy cases, but major complications occur in <3%, and the risk of perioperative death is <0.03%. Generally, living kidney donors have similar or improved psychosocial outcomes, such as quality of life, after donation compared with before donation and compared with nondonors. Although the donation process should be financially neutral, living kidney donors may experience out-of-pocket expenses and lost wages that may or may not be completely covered through regional or national reimbursement programs, and may face difficulties arranging subsequent life and health insurance. Living kidney donors should be fully informed of the perioperative and long-term risks before making their decision to donate. Follow-up care allows for preventative care measures to mitigate risk and ongoing surveillance and reporting of donor outcomes to inform prior and future living kidney donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista L Lentine
- Saint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St. Louis, Missouri; .,Department of Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ngan N Lam
- Division of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; and
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery and .,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Informative for Decision Making? The Spectrum and Consistency of Outcomes After Living Kidney Donation Reported in Trials and Observational Studies. Transplantation 2019; 103:284-290. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
27
|
Díaz-González de Ferris ME, Díaz-González LM, Ferris MT. Living Donation: The Donors and Recipient Perspectives. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 13:823-824. [PMID: 29853614 PMCID: PMC5989675 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.05520518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria E. Díaz-González de Ferris
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Saunders MR, Josephson MA. Donor Outcomes: Why We Need to Listen. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 13:831-832. [PMID: 29853615 PMCID: PMC5989681 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.05000418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Milda R. Saunders
- Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; and
| | | |
Collapse
|