Two-Year Observational Study of Bloodstream Infection Rates in Hemodialysis Facility Patients with and without Catheters

Blood stream Infections in chronic hemodialysis patients - characteristics and outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Bloodstream Infections (BSI) are a major cause of death and hospitalization among hemodialysis (HD) patients. The rates of BSI among HD patients vary and are influenced by local patient and pathogen characteristics. Modifications in local infection prevention protocols in light of active surveillance of BSI has been shown to improve clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to further explore factors associated with BSI in a contemporary cohort of HD patients at a public teaching hospital dialysis center in Israel.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of HD patients with a BSI in the years 2014 to 2018. The primary outcome was the occurrence of BSI. Secondary outcomes were to describe the causative pathogens of BSI, and to assess for risk factors for BSI, and mortality.

RESULTS

Included were 251 patients. The mean age was 68.5 ± 13.4 years, 66.9% were male. The mean time from initiation of dialysis was 34.76 ± 40.77 months, interquartile range (IQR) 1-47.5 months and the follow up period of the cohort was 25.17 ± 15.9 months. During the observation period, 44 patients (17.5%) developed 54 BSI events, while 10 of them (3.9% of the whole cohort) developed recurrent BSI events. Gram-negative microorganisms caused 46.3% of all BSI events. 31.4% of these BSI were caused by resistant bacteria. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, patients receiving dialysis through a central line had a significantly increased risk for BSI adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 3.907, p = 0.005, whereas patients' weight was mildly protective (aOR 0.971, p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

We noted an increased prevalence of gram-negative pathogens in the etiology of BSI in HD patients. Based on our findings, additional empirical antibiotics addressing gram negative bacteria have been added to our empirical treatment protocol. Our findings highlight the need to follow local epidemiology for implementing appropriate preventative measures and for tailoring appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy.

Compliance with good practice guidelines for the prevention of vascular access infections: the multi-centre PHYDEL survey in French haemodialysis units

BACKGROUND

French guidelines for the prevention of vascular access infections in a haemodialysis setting were released in 2005. Compliance with these guidelines is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to assess compliance with the guidelines for vascular access infection prevention in French haemodialysis units, and to describe the difficulties reported.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted between March and December 2019 in 200 haemodialysis units in France, selected at random. Data were collected via questionnaire, completed by telephone interview with an infection control practitioner. A practice was deemed compliant when >85% of units declared that they always complied with the guidelines.

RESULTS

In total, 103 units (51.5%) agreed to participate. Most practices complied with the guidelines; however, some practices did not reach the 85% compliance threshold for working in pairs when connecting central venous catheter (CVC) lines, performing hand hygiene before disconnecting lines, rinsing antiseptic soap before painting CVC exit site or arteriovenous fistula (AVF) puncture site, allowing antiseptic paint to dry, handling CVC branches with antiseptic impregnated gauze, performing hand hygiene after AVF compression with gloves, wearing protective eyewear when connecting/disconnecting CVC or when puncturing AVF, and wearing a gown when puncturing AVF. The most frequently reported difficulties were understaffing, difficulties with skin preparation because of exit site skin damage, and lack of buttonhole technical expertise.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite good overall compliance, this survey highlights some shortcomings in compliance with infection prevention guidelines, which could be associated with either higher risk of vascular access infection or increased blood-borne virus transmission.

The impact of anatomical variables on haemodialysis tunnelled catheter replacement without fluoroscopy

AIM

Tunnelled haemodialysis (HD) catheters can be used instantly, but there are several anatomical variables that could impact it survival. This study aimed to examine the impact of different novel anatomic variables, with catheter replacement.

METHODS

In a single-centre a prospective cohort in chronic kidney disease G5 patients were conducted. The primary outcome was to determine the factors associated with catheter replacement during the first 6-month of follow-up. All procedures were performed without fluoroscopy. Three anatomic regions for catheter tip position were established: considered as superior vena cava (SVC), cavo-atrial junction (CAJ) and mid-to deep atrium (MDA). Many other anatomical variables were measured. Catheter-related bloodstream infection was also included.

RESULTS

Between January 2019 and January 2020 a total of 75 patients with tunnelled catheter insertion were analysed. Catheter replacement at 6-month occur in 10 (13.3%) patients. By multivariate analysis, the incorrect catheter tip position (SVC) (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.07-1.42, p <.004), the presence of extrasystoles during the procedure (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.98, p = .03), incorrect catheter tug (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.10-1.55, p = .003), incorrect catheter top position (kinking; OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.04-1.88, p = .02) and catheter-related bloodstream infection (OR 2.60, 95% CI 2.09-3.25, p <.001) were the only variables associated with catheter replacement at 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The risk of catheter replacement at 6-month follow-up could be attenuated by avoiding incorrect catheter tug and top position, and by placing the vascular catheter tip in the CAJ and MDA.

Epidemiology of bloodstream infections in a Scottish haemodialysis population with focus on vascular access method

BACKGROUND

Infection is the second highest cause of mortality in end-stage renal disease, with a significant proportion relating to haemodialysis (HD) vascular access-related infection (VARI).

AIM

To report the rate and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of all-source bloodstream infections (BSIs) by vascular access type in a Scottish HD cohort.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was undertaken of data on adult patients attending seven HD units during 2017. Total HD days for each vascular access type were calculated. BSIs were analysed with rates expressed per 1000 HD days. AMR was verified using health board microbiology databases.

FINDINGS

Excluding contaminant organisms, there was an overall BSI rate of 0.57 per 1000 HD days. The highest all-source and vascular access-related infection (VARI) BSI rates per 1000 HD days were in the non-tunnelled central venous catheter (CVC) group (3.11 and 2.07 respectively), followed by tunnelled CVC (1.10 and 0.67), arteriovenous graft (0.51 and 0.31), and finally arteriovenous fistula (0.29 and 0.02). The non-VARI BSI rates were lowest in the arteriovenous graft group. Staphylococci comprised the majority of events, with Staphylococcus aureus implicated in 29%. Gram-negative BSIs were prevalent, particularly in CVC groups, and associated with higher mortality. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) S. aureus and carbapenem resistance were relatively low. MDR Gram-negatives were high compared with the Scottish population.

CONCLUSION

Arteriovenous fistula access is confirmed as having lowest all-source and VARI BSI rates, and arteriovenous graft access the lowest non-VARI BSI rates. Staphylococci remain the prevailing genus; however, the contributions of Gram-negative BSIs, the higher mortality, and proportion of MDR organisms in this group are notable.

How To Build a Successful Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis Program

In-center hemodialysis (HD) remains the predominant dialysis therapy in patients with ESKD. Many patients with ESKD present in late stage, requiring urgent dialysis initiation, and the majority start HD with central venous catheters (CVCs), which are associated with poor outcomes and high cost of care. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters can be safely placed in such patients with late-presenting ESKD, obviating the need for CVCs. PD can begin almost immediately in the recumbent position, using low fill volumes. Such PD initiations, commencing within 2 weeks of the catheter placement, are termed urgent-start PD (USPD). Most patients with an intact peritoneal cavity and stable home situation are eligible for USPD. Although there is a small risk of PD catheter–related mechanical complications, most can be managed conservatively. Moreover, overall outcomes of USPD are comparable to those with planned PD initiations, in contrast to the high rate of catheter-related infections and bacteremia associated with urgent-start HD. The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has further exposed the vulnerability of patients with ESKD getting in-center HD. PD can mitigate the risk of infection by reducing environmental exposure to the virus. Thus, USPD is a safe and cost-effective option for unplanned dialysis initiation in patients with late-presenting ESKD. To develop a successful USPD program, a strong infrastructure with clear pathways is essential. Coordination of care between nephrologists, surgeons or interventionalists, and hospital and PD center staff is imperative so that patient education, home visits, PD catheter placements, and urgent PD initiations are accomplished expeditiously. Implementation of urgent-start PD will help to increase PD use, reduce cost, and improve patient outcomes, and will be a step forward in fostering the goal set by the Advancing American Kidney Health initiative.

Catheter-related bloodstream infections in a nephrology unit: Analysis of patient- and catheter-associated risk factors

BACKGROUND

Central venous catheter use is rising in chronic and acute hemodialysis. Catheter-related bloodstream infections are a major complication of central venous catheter use. This article examines clinical factors associated with catheter-related bloodstream infections incidence.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center study, 413 patients undergoing extracorporeal treatments between 1 February 2014 and 31 January 2017 with 560 central venous catheters were recruited. Clinical parameters, such as gender, age, kidney disease status, diabetes, immunosuppression, and vintage dialysis, were collected at study entry. An incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval) was calculated to assess the association between catheter-related bloodstream infections incidence rate and each clinical variable/central venous catheter type. Significant associations at the univariate analyses were investigated with multivariate Cox models.

RESULTS

During a cumulative time of 66,686 catheter-days, 54 catheter-related bloodstream infections (incidence rate: 0.81) events occurred. Gram negative bacteria were more frequent in patients with age < 80 years (16 (36%) vs. 0, p = 0.02). At the univariate analyses, male sex (incidence rate ratio: 1.9 (1.1-3.5), p = 0.03), age < 80 years (incidence rate ratio: 2.4 (1.1-5.5), p = 0.016) and acute kidney injury (incidence rate ratio: 5.6 (3.1-10), p < 0.0001) were associated with higher catheter-related bloodstream infections incidence rate. Compared with tunneled jugular central venous catheter, higher catheter-related bloodstream infections incidence rate was associated with non-tunneled jugular (incidence rate ratio: 6.45 (2.99-13.56), p < 0.0001) and non-tunneled femoral (incidence rate ratio: 12.90 (5.87-27.61), p < 0.0001) central venous catheter use; tunneled femoral central venous catheter was associated with higher non-significant incidence rate (incidence rate ratio: 2.45 (0.93-5.85), p = 0.07). The multivariate analyses showed that acute kidney injury (hazard ratio: 3.03 (1.38-6.67), p = 0.006), non-tunneled (hazard ratio: 3.11 (1.30-7.41), p = 0.01) and femoral (hazard ratio: 2.63 (1.36-5.07), p = 0.004) central venous catheter were associated with higher catheter-related bloodstream infections incidence rate.

CONCLUSION

Central venous catheter characteristics and acute kidney injury are independently associated with higher catheter-related bloodstream infections rate.

Prevention of Bloodstream Infections in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis

Bloodstream infections are an important cause of hospitalizations, morbidity, and mortality in patients receiving hemodialysis. Eliminating bloodstream infections in the hemodialysis setting has been the focus of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Making Dialysis Safer for Patients Coalition and, more recently, the CDC's partnership with the American Society of Nephrology's Nephrologists Transforming Dialysis Safety Initiative. The majority of vascular access-associated bloodstream infections occur in patients dialyzing with central vein catheters. The CDC's core interventions for bloodstream infection prevention are the gold standard for catheter care in the hemodialysis setting and have been proven to be effective in reducing catheter-associated bloodstream infection. However, in the United States hemodialysis catheter-associated bloodstream infections continue to occur at unacceptable rates, possibly because of lapses in adherence to strict aseptic technique, or additional factors not addressed by the CDC's core interventions. There is a clear need for novel prophylactic therapies. This review highlights the recent advances and includes a discussion about the potential limitations and adverse effects associated with each option.