Diagnostic Performance of Fractional Excretion of Sodium for the Differential Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Flow-Cytometric Quantification of Urine Kidney Epithelial Cells Specifically Reflects Tubular Damage in Acute Kidney Diseases

Introduction

Tubular injury is one of the main mechanisms driving acute kidney injury (AKI); however, clinicians still have a limited diagnostic repertoire to precisely monitor damage to tubular epithelial cells (TECs). In our previous study, we used single-cell sequencing to identify TEC subsets as the main components of the urine signature of AKI. This study aimed to establish TECs as clinical markers of tubular damage.

Methods

A total of 243 patients were analyzed. For sequencing, we collected 8 urine samples from patients with AKI and glomerular disease. We developed a protocol for the flow cytometric quantification of CD10/CD13+ proximal TECs (PTECs) and CD227/CD326+ distal TECs (DTECs) in urine by aligning urinary single-cell transcriptomes and TEC surface proteins using Cellular Indexing of Transcriptome and Epitope Sequencing (CITE-Seq). Marker combinations were confirmed in kidney biopsies. We validated our approach in 4 cohorts of 235 patients as follows: patients with AKI (n = 63), COVID-19 infection (n = 47), antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) with active disease or stable remission (n = 110), and healthy controls (n = 15).

Results

Our findings demonstrated that CD10/CD13 and CD227/CD326 adequately identified PTECs and DTECs, respectively. Distal urinary TEC counts correlate with the severity of AKI based on Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage and acute estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) loss in 2 separate cohorts and can successfully discriminate AKI from healthy controls and glomerular disease.

Conclusion

We propose that urinary CD227/CD326+ TEC count is a specific, noninvasive marker for tubular injury in AKI. Our protocol provides a basis for a deeper phenotypic analysis of urinary TECs.

The role of the clinical laboratory in diagnosing hyponatremia disorders

In clinical medicine, hyponatremia is highly prevalent and frequently misdiagnosed, leading to substantial mismanagement and iatrogenic morbidity. Its differential diagnosis includes numerous diseases with diverse etiologies, making accurate assessment challenging. Despite extensive literature and guidelines on hyponatremia, most patients do not receive adequate evaluation due to the limitations of diagnostic algorithms, which rely on low-value clinical signs and are unable to identify concurrent conditions. In this review, we examine the range of laboratory tests available for hyponatremia assessment. Understanding renal mechanisms of solute and water exchange (e.g., fractional excretion) is essential for selecting appropriate tests and interpreting their diagnostic value. Additionally, detailed electrolyte and acid-base assessments remain critical for establishing a definitive diagnosis. We comprehensively discuss the selection of laboratory tests for specific differential diagnoses of hyponatremia. Importantly, in cases of acute hyponatremia, rapid correction should take precedence over a complete diagnostic workup. Ultimately, a thorough understanding of laboratory evaluation is crucial for accurately diagnosing hyponatremia. This paper critically reviews the available literature and explores relevant diseases in the context of associated laboratory parameters.

Utility of fractional excretion of urea in acute kidney injury with comparison to fractional excretion of sodium: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Differentiating between intrinsic and prerenal acute kidney injury (AKI) presents a challenge. Here, we assessed the performance of the fractional excretion of urea (FEUrea) and compared it to the fractional excretion of sodium (FENa) in distinguishing intrinsic from prerenal AKI.

METHODS

A thorough search was conducted in several databases until January 16, 2024. We included studies evaluating FEUrea, with or without FENa, for differentiating AKI etiologies in adults. We assessed the methodological quality using the QUADAS-2 and QUADAS-C tools. We performed a meta-analysis using the bivariate random effects model, with subgroup analyses to explore the impact of diuretic therapy on FEUrea, and direct statistical comparisons between FEUrea and FENa involving the subgroups with and without diuretics.

RESULTS

We included 11 studies with 1108 hospitalized patients. Among eight studies (915 patients) evaluating FEUrea >35% for distinguishing intrinsic from prerenal AKI, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 66% (95% CI, 49%-79%) and 75% (95% CI, 60%-85%), respectively. In a subset of six studies (302 patients) comparing FEUrea at 35% to FENa at 1% in patients not receiving diuretics, there were no significant differences in sensitivity (77% versus 89%, P = 0.410) or specificity (80% versus 79%, P = 0.956). In four studies, 244 patients on diuretics, FEUrea demonstrated lower sensitivity (52% versus 92%, P < 0.001) but higher specificity (82% versus 44%, P < 0.001) compared to FENa for the diagnosis of intrinsic AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

FEUrea has limited utility in differentiating intrinsic from prerenal AKI. FEUrea does not provide a superior alternative to FENa, even in patients receiving diuretics.

Pharmacotherapy considerations in patients who develop acute kidney injury during anti-cancer therapy

INTRODUCTION

Acute kidney injury (AKI) frequently develops in patients receiving cancer therapy and requires a wide differential diagnosis due to possible role of unique cancer and drug-related factors, in addition to common pre- and post-renal causes. Rapid development of new molecular targeted anti-cancer drugs and immunotherapies has opened unprecedented possibilities of treatment at the price of an increased spectrum of renal side effects.

AREAS COVERED

The present review aims at providing a state-of-the-art picture of AKI in cancer patient (PubMed and Embase libraries were searched from inception to January 2024), with a focus on differential diagnosis and management of diverse clinical settings. Reports of parenchymal AKI due to glomerular, microvascular, tubular and interstitial damage have been constantly increasing. Complex electrolyte and acid-base disorders can coexist. The role of renal biopsy and possible therapeutic approaches are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Onconephrology has become an important subspecialty of clinical nephrology, requiring constantly updated skills and a high degree of interdisciplinary integration to tackle diagnostic challenges and even therapeutic and ethical dilemmas. Integrated onconephrological guidelines and availability of biomarkers may provide new tools for management of this unique type of patients in the near future.

Therapeutic effects of the alkaline extract of leaves of Sasa sp. and elucidation of its mechanism in acute kidney injury

Acute kidney injury (AKI), a common complication in hospitalized patients, is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. However, there are currently no approved or effective therapeutics for AKI. AKI is primarily caused by ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, with oxidative stress from reactive oxygen species (ROS) being a major contributor. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of an alkaline extract of the leaves of Sasa sp. (SE) using mouse renal I/R injury and hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) models in NRK-52E cells. Renal function parameters were measured, and histopathological evaluations were performed to assess the efficacy of SE. In addition, to determine the mechanisms underlying the effects of SE on renal I/R injury, its effects on malondialdehyde (MDA) of oxidative stress and interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-1β of inflammatory cytokines were evaluated. SE (0.03, 0.3, and 3 g/kg) improved renal function in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, SE ameliorated tubular injury and, reduced IL-6, IL-1β and MDA. Also, SE ameliorated cell death, ROS production, and inflammatory cytokine production in H/R-exposed NRK-52E cells. SE showed antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities in the AKI. These results indicate the potential of SE as a medicinal compound for the prevention and treatment of AKI.

Evaluation of simple diagnostic parameters in acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients-diagnostic recommendations for non-nephrologists

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is very common in hospitalized patients, affecting patient's mortality and morbidity. Major causes are prerenal AKI and acute tubular necrosis (ATN). Even though a variety of parameters/indices exist, their reliability and practicability are controversial: in fact, there is a need for a simple diagnostic approach for AKI in in-patients with parameters easily obtained in any hospital. The objective of the study was: (1) to assess reliability of simple laboratory parameters/indices to differentiate pre-/intrarenal AKI; (2) to evaluate the most reliable and feasible parameters/indices; and (3) to identify the possible impact of confounding factors. Retrospectively, in-patients with AKI hospitalized in 2020 in a university nephrology department were included. Spot urine and 24-h collection urine was analyzed with urine sodium (UNa), urine specific gravity (USG), fractional excretion of sodium (FENa), fractional excretion of urea (FEUrea), urine osmolality (UOsm), urine to plasma creatinine ratio (UCr/PCr) and renal failure index (RFI). Overall, 431 patients were included. UNa, UOsm, USG and RFI showed high specificity > 85% for prerenal AKI, UNa and RFI provided good specificity for ATN. Loop diuretics, ACE inhibitors/AT1 blockers or pre-existing chronic kidney disease had no impact. In patients with AKI, UNa, USG and RFI: (1) proved to be very specific for prerenal AKI and showed high sensitivity for ATN; (2) can be easily determined using serum and spot urine; and (3) are not confounded by medication or comorbidities. These parameters/indices are helpful to identify the aetiology of AKI and to guide therapy, thereby improving patients' safety and outcome.

The Role of Ketone Bodies in Various Animal Models of Kidney Disease

The kidney is a vital organ that carries out significant metabolic functions in our body. Due to the complexity of its role, the kidney is also susceptible to many disease conditions, such as acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Despite the prevalence and our increased understanding of the pathophysiology of both AKI and CKD as well as the transition of AKI to CKD, no well-established therapeutics have been applied clinically to these conditions, rendering an urgent need for a novel potential therapeutic target to be developed. In this article, we reviewed the function of ketone bodies in some common kidney conditions, such as drug-induced nephrotoxicity, ischemia and reperfusion injury, fibrosis development, diabetic kidney disease, kidney aging, hypertension, and CKD progression. All the selected studies reviewed were performed in animal models by primarily utilizing rodents, which also provide invaluable sources for future clinical applications. Ketone bodies have shown significant renal protective properties via attenuation of oxidative stress, increased expression of anti-inflammatory proteins, gene regulation, and a reduction of apoptosis of renal cells. A physiological level of ketone bodies could be achieved by fasting, a ketogenic diet, and an exogenous ketone supplement. Finally, the limitations of the long-term ketogenic diet were also discussed.

Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: consensus report of the 28th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroup

Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) is common in critically ill patients and is strongly associated with adverse outcomes, including an increased risk of chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular events and death. The pathophysiology of SA-AKI remains elusive, although microcirculatory dysfunction, cellular metabolic reprogramming and dysregulated inflammatory responses have been implicated in preclinical studies. SA-AKI is best defined as the occurrence of AKI within 7 days of sepsis onset (diagnosed according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome criteria and Sepsis 3 criteria, respectively). Improving outcomes in SA-AKI is challenging, as patients can present with either clinical or subclinical AKI. Early identification of patients at risk of AKI, or at risk of progressing to severe and/or persistent AKI, is crucial to the timely initiation of adequate supportive measures, including limiting further insults to the kidney. Accordingly, the discovery of biomarkers associated with AKI that can aid in early diagnosis is an area of intensive investigation. Additionally, high-quality evidence on best-practice care of patients with AKI, sepsis and SA-AKI has continued to accrue. Although specific therapeutic options are limited, several clinical trials have evaluated the use of care bundles and extracorporeal techniques as potential therapeutic approaches. Here we provide graded recommendations for managing SA-AKI and highlight priorities for future research.