Opportunities and challenges for the discovery and validation of proteomic biomarkers for common arthritic diseases

The activation fragment of PAR2 is elevated in serum from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and reduced in response to anti-IL6R treatment

Osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are serious and painful diseases. Protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR2) is involved in the pathology of both OA and RA including roles in synovial hyperplasia, cartilage destruction, osteophyogenesis and pain. PAR2 is activated via cleavage of its N-terminus by serine proteases. In this study a competitive ELISA assay was developed targeting the 36-amino acid peptide that is cleaved and released after PAR2 activation (PRO-PAR2). Technical assay parameters including antibody specificity, intra- and inter-assay variation (CV%), linearity, accuracy, analyte stability and interference were evaluated. PRO-PAR2 release was confirmed after in vitro cleavage of PAR2 recombinant protein and treatment of human synovial explants with matriptase. Serum levels of 22 healthy individuals, 23 OA patients and 15 RA patients as well as a subset of RA patients treated with tocilizumab were evaluated. The PRO-PAR2 antibody was specific for the neo-epitope and intra-inter assay CV% were 6.4% and 5.8% respectively. In vitro cleavage and matriptase treated explants showed increased PRO-PAR2 levels compared to controls. In serum, PRO-PAR2 levels were increased in RA patients and decreased in RA patients treated with tocilizumab. In conclusion, PRO-PAR2 may be a potential biomarker for monitoring RA disease and pharmacodynamics of treatment.

Objective and noninvasive biochemical markers in rheumatoid arthritis: where are we and where are we going?

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that affects approximately 1% of the adult population. RA is multi-factorial, and as such our understanding of the molecular pathways involved in the disease is currently limited. An increasing number of studies have suggested that several molecular phenotypes (i.e. endotypes) of RA exist, and that different endotypes respond differently to various treatments. Biochemical markers may be an attractive means for achieving precision medicine, as they are objective and easily obtainable.

AREAS COVERED

We searched recent publications on biochemical markers in RA as either diagnostic or prognostic markers, or as markers of disease activity. Here, we provide a narrative overview of different classes of markers, such as autoantibodies, citrulline products, markers of tissue turnover and cytokines, that have been tested in clinical cohorts or trials including RA patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Although many biochemical markers have been identified and tested, few are currently being used in clinical practice. As more treatment options are becoming available, the need for precision medicine tools that can aid physicians and patients in choosing the right treatment is growing.

[Biochemical predictors of cartilaginous tissue metabolic disorders for early osteoarthrosis evidence diagnostics.]

The complete laboratory and clinical instrumental examination was conducted, it included serum COMP test, circadian excretion of type II collagen C-terminal telopeptides Urine CartiLaps (СТХ II) and Т2 relaxometry in 29 patients of both sexes of the main group with early (0-I) X-ray osteoarthrosis stages, 30 subjects of comparison group with no X-ray osteoarthrosis evidences aged 44.7±5.9 years and 25 healthy subjects aged 26.3±2.6 years of the control group. The increase (р<0,05) of COMP and Urine CartiLaps levels as well as the increase of Т2 relaxation signal was found at early osteoarthrosis evidences. It was proven that there was (р<0.01) a connection (R=0.8) between COMP and Urine CTX II levels as well as (р<0.05) results of Т2 relaxometry (R=0.8). It was proven that collagen anisotropy and formation of chondromalacia areas as Т2 relaxometry showed in patients with early OA evidences were connected with accumulation of serum COMP and increase of type II collagen circadian renal excretion. The combination of laboratory and radiological methods of articular hyaline cartilage assessment may be used for finding early osteoarthrosis stages.

Spatially resolved proteomics in osteoarthritis: State of the art and new perspectives

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common diseases worldwide caused by chronic degeneration of the joints. Its high prevalence and the involvement of several tissues define OA as a highly heterogeneous disease. New biological markers to evaluate the progression of the pathology and improve its prognosis are needed. Among all the different -omic strategies applied to OA, solution phase bottom-up proteomics has made an extensive contribution to the field of biomarker research. However, new technologies for protein analysis should be considered for a better understanding of the disease. This review focuses on complementary proteomic methodologies and new technologies for translational research of OA and other rheumatic pathologies, especially mass spectrometry imaging and protein imaging methods not applied by the OA community yet.

Soluble biochemical markers of osteoarthritis: Are we close to using them in clinical practice?

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and a major cause of pain and disability. Recent work suggests that the global burden of OA is increasing, and costs associated with treatment are expected to increase dramatically as the aging human population expands. OA is currently diagnosed using radiography, but this technique is an indirect and insensitive measure of alterations in articular cartilage and fails to measure dynamic inflammatory processes in the joint. Radiographic changes detected overtime are small and occur in only a subset (progressors) of patients with OA. Therefore, we diagnose patients with OA on the basis of a diagnostic classification that is outdated. We also use the same tools and approaches for assessing the efficacy of new pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. In this review, we discuss the utility of soluble biochemical markers as biomarkers of OA and discuss whether we are close to using them in clinical practice. Combining patient information, functional imaging and carefully selected panels of biomarkers can help in achieving enhanced patient stratification and lead to better designed clinical trials. Biomarkers can be used for molecular endotyping and for developing more effective and more personalized treatments that will enhance clinical care for patients with OA.