1
|
Stepanenko AA, Sosnovtseva AO, Valikhov MP, Chernysheva AA, Abramova OV, Pavlov KA, Chekhonin VP. Systemic and local immunosuppression in glioblastoma and its prognostic significance. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1326753. [PMID: 38481999 PMCID: PMC10932993 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1326753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
The effectiveness of tumor therapy, especially immunotherapy and oncolytic virotherapy, critically depends on the activity of the host immune cells. However, various local and systemic mechanisms of immunosuppression operate in cancer patients. Tumor-associated immunosuppression involves deregulation of many components of immunity, including a decrease in the number of T lymphocytes (lymphopenia), an increase in the levels or ratios of circulating and tumor-infiltrating immunosuppressive subsets [e.g., macrophages, microglia, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and regulatory T cells (Tregs)], as well as defective functions of subsets of antigen-presenting, helper and effector immune cell due to altered expression of various soluble and membrane proteins (receptors, costimulatory molecules, and cytokines). In this review, we specifically focus on data from patients with glioblastoma/glioma before standard chemoradiotherapy. We discuss glioblastoma-related immunosuppression at baseline and the prognostic significance of different subsets of circulating and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (lymphocytes, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, Tregs, natural killer (NK) cells, neutrophils, macrophages, MDSCs, and dendritic cells), including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), focus on the immune landscape and prognostic significance of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant gliomas, proneural, classical and mesenchymal molecular subtypes, and highlight the features of immune surveillance in the brain. All attempts to identify a reliable prognostic immune marker in glioblastoma tissue have led to contradictory results, which can be explained, among other things, by the unprecedented level of spatial heterogeneity of the immune infiltrate and the significant phenotypic diversity and (dys)functional states of immune subpopulations. High NLR is one of the most repeatedly confirmed independent prognostic factors for shorter overall survival in patients with glioblastoma and carcinoma, and its combination with other markers of the immune response or systemic inflammation significantly improves the accuracy of prediction; however, more prospective studies are needed to confirm the prognostic/predictive power of NLR. We call for the inclusion of dynamic assessment of NLR and other blood inflammatory markers (e.g., absolute/total lymphocyte count, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index, and systemic immune response index) in all neuro-oncology studies for rigorous evaluation and comparison of their individual and combinatorial prognostic/predictive significance and relative superiority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksei A. Stepanenko
- Department of Fundamental and Applied Neurobiology, V. P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology, the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Medical Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Translational Medicine, N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, The Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anastasiia O. Sosnovtseva
- Department of Fundamental and Applied Neurobiology, V. P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology, the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marat P. Valikhov
- Department of Fundamental and Applied Neurobiology, V. P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology, the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Medical Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Translational Medicine, N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, The Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anastasia A. Chernysheva
- Department of Fundamental and Applied Neurobiology, V. P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology, the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Olga V. Abramova
- Department of Fundamental and Applied Neurobiology, V. P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology, the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Konstantin A. Pavlov
- Department of Fundamental and Applied Neurobiology, V. P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology, the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Vladimir P. Chekhonin
- Department of Fundamental and Applied Neurobiology, V. P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology, the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Medical Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Translational Medicine, N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, The Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Serban GM, Tamas CI, Tamas F, Balasa AF. Preoperative Immune-Inflammatory Status of the Patients With Newly-Diagnosed Glioblastoma - Could It Genuinely Predict Their Survival? Cureus 2023; 15:e43802. [PMID: 37731450 PMCID: PMC10508644 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive brain tumor affecting adult patients, with an extremely reduced overall survival despite rapid diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, it is crucial to establish accurate and affordable markers that allow an individualized approach to GBM patients. Serum biomarkers could be the most accessible, as complete blood counts should be performed on all GBM patients before undergoing any surgical and/or pharmacological treatment. However, their prognostic role is still unclear. Our study aims to assess the influence of various hematological markers of inflammation in predicting the outcome of GBM patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed all adult patients diagnosed with primary glioblastoma in the Neurosurgery Department of the Emergency Clinical County Hospital of Târgu Mureș, Romania, from January 2017 until December 2019. We aimed to discover whether the immune/inflammatory status of the patients before receiving any kind of pharmacological or surgical treatment influenced their overall survival. RESULTS Our study showed that pre-therapeutic elevated white blood count could predict reduced overall survival in not otherwise specified subtype (NOS) of GBMs (HR 0.4153, 95% CI 0.1825-0.9449, p 0.0362). Furthermore, patients with increased systemic immune response index (SIRI) had much larger tumors at the time of diagnosis (p 0.0359). In wild type, isocitrate dehydrogenase subpopulation (IDHwt), the higher values of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR, p 0.0412), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR, p 0.0376) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR, p 0.0412) were related to more advanced age at the moment of diagnosis. Moreover, our results revealed a weakly positive association between tumor size and NLR values in the NOS group (Spearman r 0.3212, p 0.0493). CONCLUSIONS Our study does not provide enough evidence for the immune/inflammatory status of GBM patients to be used as an efficient prognostic marker to guide the therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgiana M Serban
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care Clinic, Emergency County Hospital, Targu Mures, ROU
| | - Corina I Tamas
- Neurosurgery Clinic, Emergency County Hospital, Targu Mures, ROU
- Neurosurgery, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology, Targu Mures, ROU
| | - Flaviu Tamas
- Neurosurgery, Emergency County Hospital, Targu Mures, ROU
- Neurosurgery, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology, Targu Mures, ROU
| | - Adrian F Balasa
- Neurosurgery, Emergency County Hospital, Targu Mures, ROU
- Neurosurgery, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology, Targu Mures, ROU
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Faye MD, Easaw J, De Robles P, Agnihotram R, Torres-Vasquez A, Lamonde F, Petrecca K, Owen S, Panet-Raymond V, Shenouda G, Souhami L, Azam M, Hossain B, Alkass J, Sabri S, Abdulkarim B. Phase II trial of concurrent sunitinib, temozolomide, and radiotherapy with adjuvant temozolomide for newly diagnosed MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma. Neurooncol Adv 2023; 5:vdad106. [PMID: 37771465 PMCID: PMC10530294 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The overall prognosis of glioblastoma (GBM) remains dismal, particularly for patients with unmethylated O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter. In this phase II trial, we tested the combination of the antiangiogenic agent sunitinib with radiotherapy and temozolomide (TMZ) for newly diagnosed unmethylated MGMT GBM patients. Methods We enrolled 37 patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter GBM, age 18-70, and KPS ≥70. Patients received 12.5 mg of daily sunitinib for 7 days, followed by concurrent chemoradiation plus 12.5 mg sunitinib, then adjuvant TMZ. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), safety, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) biomarker. Results At a median follow-up time of 15.3 months (range: 3.1-71.3 months), the median PFS was 7.15 months (95% CI: 5.4-10.5) and the 6-month PFS was 54.0%. Median OS was 15.0 months (95% CI: 13.8-19.4) and 2-year OS rate was 17.1%. Patients receiving >3 cycles of adjuvant TMZ, undergoing surgery at progression, and presenting a post-concurrent NLR ≤6 experienced a significant improved OS with hazard ratios of 0.197 (P = .001), 0.46 (P = .049), and 0.38 (P = .021), respectively, on multivariable analysis. Age >65 years predicted for worse OS with hazard ratio of 3.92 (P = .037). Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia occurred in 22.9%, grade ≥3 neutropenia in 20%, and grade ≥3 thromboembolic events in 14.3% of patients. There were no grade 5 events. Conclusion Our findings suggest a potential benefit of combining sunitinib with chemoradiation in newly diagnosed GBM patients with unmethylated MGMT status and provide a strong rationale to test this combination in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mame Daro Faye
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Mcgill University Health Centre
| | - Jacob Easaw
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute
| | | | - Raman Agnihotram
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute
| | | | - Frederic Lamonde
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute
| | - Kevin Petrecca
- Division of Neurosurgery, McGill University Health Centre
| | - Scott Owen
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute
| | | | - George Shenouda
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Mcgill University Health Centre
| | - Luis Souhami
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Mcgill University Health Centre
| | - Maryam Azam
- Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bushra Hossain
- Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jad Alkass
- Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Siham Sabri
- Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bassam Abdulkarim
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Mcgill University Health Centre
- Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Deng D, Hammoudeh L, Youssef G, Chen YH, Shin KY, Lim-Fat MJ, McFaline-Figueroa JR, Chukwueke UN, Tanguturi S, Reardon DA, Lee EQ, Nayak L, Bi WL, Arnaout O, Ligon KL, Wen PY, Rahman R. Evaluating hematologic parameters in newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma: Prognostic utility and clinical trial implications of myelosuppression. Neurooncol Adv 2023; 5:vdad083. [PMID: 37554224 PMCID: PMC10406420 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) patients are treated with radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and corticosteroids, which can cause myelosuppression. To understand the relative prognostic utility of blood-based biomarkers in GBM and its implications for clinical trial design, we examined the incidence, predictors, and prognostic value of lymphopenia, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet count during chemoradiation (CRT) and recurrence. METHODS This cohort study included 764 newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients treated from 2005 to 2019 with blood counts prior to surgery, within 6 weeks of CRT, and at first recurrence available for automatic extraction from the medical record. Logistic regression was used to evaluate exposures and Kaplan-Meier was used to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS Among the cohort, median age was 60.3 years; 87% had Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70, 37.5% had gross total resection, and 90% received temozolomide (TMZ). During CRT, 37.8% (248/656) of patients developed grade 3 or higher lymphopenia. On multivariable analysis (MVA), high NLR during CRT remained an independent predictor for inferior survival (Adjusted Hazard Ratio [AHR] = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.14-2.15) and shorter progression-free survival (AHR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.05-1.90). Steroid use was associated with lymphopenia (OR = 2.66,1.20-6.00) and high NLR (OR = 3.54,2.08-6.11). Female sex was associated with lymphopenia (OR = 2.33,1.03-5.33). At first recurrence, 28% of patients exhibited grade 3 or higher lymphopenia. High NLR at recurrence was associated with worse subsequent survival on MVA (AHR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.25-2.27). CONCLUSIONS High NLR is associated with worse outcomes in newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma. Appropriate eligibility criteria and accounting and reporting of blood-based biomarkers are important in the design and interpretation of newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davy Deng
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lubna Hammoudeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Gilbert Youssef
- Center of Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts¸ USA
| | - Yu-Hui Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts¸USA
| | - Kee-Young Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mary Jane Lim-Fat
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Ugonma N Chukwueke
- Center of Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts¸ USA
| | - Shyam Tanguturi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David A Reardon
- Center of Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts¸ USA
| | - Eudocia Q Lee
- Center of Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts¸ USA
| | - Lakshmi Nayak
- Center of Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts¸ USA
| | - Wenya Linda Bi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Omar Arnaout
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Keith L Ligon
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center of Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts¸ USA
| | - Rifaquat Rahman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stoyanov GS, Lyutfi E, Georgieva R, Dzhenkov DL, Petkova L, Ivanov BD, Kaprelyan A, Ghenev P. The Role of Preoperative Neutrophil, Platelet, and Monocyte to Lymphocyte Ratios as Independent Prognostic Factors for Patient Survival in WHO 2021 Glioblastoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Cureus 2022; 14:e25801. [PMID: 35822134 PMCID: PMC9270983 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introductions Immuno-oncology is a rapidly developing field wherein tumor-immune system interactions can be harnessed for diagnostics. Herein, we set out to establish the role of the immune system response, as measured by preoperative neutrophil, platelet, and monocyte to lymphocyte ratios (NLR, PLR, and MLR) as prognostic markers for patient survival based on the newly defined criteria for glioblastoma (GBM). Materials and methods The study included patients diagnosed with GBM at a four-year interval. Exclusion criteria were patients subject to reoperation in the time period; tumors in more than one system; a history of hematological and autoimmune diseases; and cases with infectious or other inflammatory conditions. Data regarding patient demographics and preoperative blood counts were pulled from patient records and compared to postoperative survival. Results A total of 22 patients fit the established criteria, with a male to female ratio of 2.14:1, a mean age of 66.23 years, and a mean survival of 255.72 days (8.04 months, range 24-801 days). Eight patients had an elevation of NLR and five of PLR, with no statistical correlation to survival. Six patients had an increase in MLR with a statistically significant (p=0.0044) shorter postoperative survival. Synergic increases in NLR and PLR did not show significance, while synergic increases with MLR showed no added benefit. Conclusion Preoperative MLR, but not NLR or PLR, is a promising independent biomarker for patient survival in GBM. It is suggested that elevations in these ratios directly correlate to tumor biological potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George S Stoyanov
- General and Clinical Pathology/Forensic Medicine and Deontology, Medical University of Varna, Varna, BGR
| | - Emran Lyutfi
- Neurology and Neuroscience, Medical University of Varna, Varna, BGR
| | | | - Deyan L Dzhenkov
- General and Clinical Pathology/Forensic Medicine and Deontology, Medical University of Varna, Varna, BGR
| | - Lilyana Petkova
- General and Clinical Pathology/Forensic Medicine and Deontology, Medical University of Varna, Varna, BGR
| | | | - Ara Kaprelyan
- Neurology and Neuroscience, Medical University of Varna, Varna, BGR
| | - Peter Ghenev
- General and Clinical Pathology/Forensic Medicine and Deontology, Medical University of Varna, Varna, BGR
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Glioblastoma Microenvironment and Cellular Interactions. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14041092. [PMID: 35205842 PMCID: PMC8870579 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This paper summarizes the crosstalk between tumor/non-tumor cells and other elements of the glioblastoma (GB) microenvironment. In tumor pathology, glial cells result in the highest number of cancers, and GB is considered the most lethal tumor of the central nervous system (CNS). The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a complex peritumoral hallo composed of tumor cells and several non-tumor cells (e.g., nervous cells, stem cells, fibroblasts, vascular and immune cells), which might be a key factor for the ineffective treatment since the microenvironment modulates the biologic status of the tumor with the increase in its evasion capacity. A deeper understanding of cell–cell interactions in the TME and with the tumor cells could be the basis for a more efficient therapy. Abstract The central nervous system (CNS) represents a complex network of different cells, such as neurons, glial cells, and blood vessels. In tumor pathology, glial cells result in the highest number of cancers, and glioblastoma (GB) is considered the most lethal tumor in this region. The development of GB leads to the infiltration of healthy tissue through the interaction between all the elements of the brain network. This results in a GB microenvironment, a complex peritumoral hallo composed of tumor cells and several non-tumor cells (e.g., nervous cells, stem cells, fibroblasts, vascular and immune cells), which might be the principal factor for the ineffective treatment due to the fact that the microenvironment modulates the biologic status of the tumor with the increase in its evasion capacity. Crosstalk between glioma cells and the brain microenvironment finally inhibits the beneficial action of molecular pathways, favoring the development and invasion of the tumor and its increasing resistance to treatment. A deeper understanding of cell–cell interactions in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and with the tumor cells could be the basis for a more efficient therapy.
Collapse
|
7
|
Multiple Faces of the Glioblastoma Microenvironment. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23020595. [PMID: 35054779 PMCID: PMC8775531 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23020595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The tumor microenvironment is a highly dynamic accumulation of resident and infiltrating tumor cells, responsible for growth and invasion. The authors focused on the leading-edge concepts regarding the glioblastoma microenvironment. Due to the fact that the modern trend in the research and treatment of glioblastoma is represented by multiple approaches that target not only the primary tumor but also the neighboring tissue, the study of the microenvironment in the peritumoral tissue is an appealing direction for current and future therapies.
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhu S, Cheng Z, Hu Y, Chen Z, Zhang J, Ke C, Yang Q, Lin F, Chen Y, Wang J. Prognostic Value of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients With Medulloblastoma Undergoing Surgical Resection. Front Nutr 2022; 8:754958. [PMID: 34977115 PMCID: PMC8718683 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.754958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The progression and metastasis of cancers are associated with systematic immune inflammation and nutritional dysfunction. The systemic immune-inflammation index and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) have shown a prognostic impact in several malignancies. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate immune inflammation and nutritional index prognostic significance in patients with medulloblastoma (MB). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 111 patients with MB between 2001 and 2021 at our institution. The optimal cutoff values for systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte/lymphocyte counts ration (MLR), and PNI were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Clinical characteristics and SII, NLR, MLR, and PNI were tested with the Pearson's chi-squared test. The Kaplan–Meier survival curves and the Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate the effects of immune inflammation and nutritional index on overall survival (OS). Results: Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined the optimal SII, NLR, MLR, and PNI cutoff values of 2,278, 14.83, 0.219, and 56.5 that significantly interacts with OS and divided the patients into two groups. Comparative survival analysis exhibited that the high-SII cohort had significantly shorter OS (p = 0.0048) than the low-SII cohort. For the univariate analysis, the results revealed that preoperative hydrocephalus (p = 0.01), SII (p = 0.006), albumin–bilirubin score (ALBI) (p = 0.04), and coSII–PNI were predictors of OS. In the multivariate analysis, preoperative hydrocephalus (p < 0.001), ALBI (p = 0.010), SII (p < 0.001), and coSII–PNI as independent prognostic factors were significantly correlated with OS. Conclusion: The preoperative SII, ALBI, and coSII–PNI serve as robust prognostic biomarkers for patients with MB undergoing surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sihan Zhu
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhuqing Cheng
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuanjun Hu
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenghe Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ji Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chao Ke
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qunying Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fuhua Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yinsheng Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sun R, Kim AH. The multifaceted mechanisms of malignant glioblastoma progression and clinical implications. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2022; 41:871-898. [PMID: 35920986 PMCID: PMC9758111 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-022-10051-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
With the application of high throughput sequencing technologies at single-cell resolution, studies of the tumor microenvironment in glioblastoma, one of the most aggressive and invasive of all cancers, have revealed immense cellular and tissue heterogeneity. A unique extracellular scaffold system adapts to and supports progressive infiltration and migration of tumor cells, which is characterized by altered composition, effector delivery, and mechanical properties. The spatiotemporal interactions between malignant and immune cells generate an immunosuppressive microenvironment, contributing to the failure of effective anti-tumor immune attack. Among the heterogeneous tumor cell subpopulations of glioblastoma, glioma stem cells (GSCs), which exhibit tumorigenic properties and strong invasive capacity, are critical for tumor growth and are believed to contribute to therapeutic resistance and tumor recurrence. Here we discuss the role of extracellular matrix and immune cell populations, major components of the tumor ecosystem in glioblastoma, as well as signaling pathways that regulate GSC maintenance and invasion. We also highlight emerging advances in therapeutic targeting of these components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Sun
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA
| | - Albert H. Kim
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA ,The Brain Tumor Center, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA
| |
Collapse
|