1
|
Betancur MI, Case A, Ilich E, Mehta N, Meehan S, Pogrebivsky S, Keir ST, Stevenson K, Brahma B, Gregory S, Chen W, Ashley DM, Bellamkonda R, Mokarram N. A neural tract-inspired conduit for facile, on-demand biopsy of glioblastoma. Neurooncol Adv 2024; 6:vdae064. [PMID: 38813113 PMCID: PMC11135361 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Background A major hurdle to effectively treating glioblastoma (GBM) patients is the lack of longitudinal information about tumor progression, evolution, and treatment response. Methods In this study, we report the use of a neural tract-inspired conduit containing aligned polymeric nanofibers (i.e., an aligned nanofiber device) to enable on-demand access to GBM tumors in 2 rodent models. Depending on the experiment, a humanized U87MG xenograft and/or F98-GFP+ syngeneic rat tumor model was chosen to test the safety and functionality of the device in providing continuous sampling access to the tumor and its microenvironment. Results The aligned nanofiber device was safe and provided a high quantity of quality genomic materials suitable for omics analyses and yielded a sufficient number of live cells for in vitro expansion and screening. Transcriptomic and genomic analyses demonstrated continuity between material extracted from the device and that of the primary, intracortical tumor (in the in vivo model). Conclusions The results establish the potential of this neural tract-inspired, aligned nanofiber device as an on-demand, safe, and minimally invasive access point, thus enabling rapid, high-throughput, longitudinal assessment of tumor and its microenvironment, ultimately leading to more informed clinical treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ayden Case
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ekaterina Ilich
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nalini Mehta
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sean Meehan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sabrina Pogrebivsky
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Stephen T Keir
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kevin Stevenson
- Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Barun Brahma
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Simon Gregory
- Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Wei Chen
- Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, Georgia, USA
| | - David M Ashley
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ravi Bellamkonda
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Nassir Mokarram
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Traditionally, treatment responses to chemotherapy had been based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria evaluating tumor shrinkage, stabilization of disease, growth, or development of new metastatic lesions. Using the same criteria to determine response in patients on immunotherapy has proven difficult, as some patients have initial growth of disease or develop new small metastatic lesions. The phenomenon of pseudoprogression is the initial growth of a primary lesion followed by latent or delayed response. Advanced practitioners need to be aware of the possibility of pseudoprogression in order to educate patients and help them stay on effective treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Donna Lee Gerber
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yekula A, Muralidharan K, Rosh Z, Youngkin AE, Kang KM, Balaj L, Carter BS. Liquid Biopsy Strategies to Distinguish Progression from Pseudoprogression and Radiation Necrosis in Glioblastomas. ADVANCED BIOSYSTEMS 2020; 4:e2000029. [PMID: 32484293 PMCID: PMC7708392 DOI: 10.1002/adbi.202000029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Liquid biopsy for the detection and monitoring of central nervous system tumors is of significant clinical interest. At initial diagnosis, the majority of patients with central nervous system tumors undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), followed by invasive brain biopsy to determine the molecular diagnosis of the WHO 2016 classification paradigm. Despite the importance of MRI for long-term treatment monitoring, in the majority of patients who receive chemoradiation therapy for glioblastoma, it can be challenging to distinguish between radiation treatment effects including pseudoprogression, radiation necrosis, and recurrent/progressive disease based on imaging alone. Tissue biopsy-based monitoring is high risk and not always feasible. However, distinguishing these entities is of critical importance for the management of patients and can significantly affect survival. Liquid biopsy strategies including circulating tumor cells, circulating free DNA, and extracellular vesicles have the potential to afford significant useful molecular information at both the stage of diagnosis and monitoring for these tumors. Here, current liquid biopsy-based approaches in the context of tumor monitoring to differentiate progressive disease from pseudoprogression and radiation necrosis are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anudeep Yekula
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Zachary Rosh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anna E. Youngkin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Keiko M. Kang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Leonora Balaj
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bob S. Carter
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Levy M, Barletta S, Huang H, Grossman SA, Rodriguez FJ, Ellsworth SG, Dzaye O, Holdhoff M. Aquaporin-4 Expression Patterns in Glioblastoma Pre-Chemoradiation and at Time of Suspected Progression. Cancer Invest 2019; 37:67-72. [PMID: 30873889 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2018.1564927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
There has been controversy about the presence and potential role of aquaporin-4 (AQP4) in glioblastoma (GBM). We analyzed tissue from 22 patients with newly-diagnosed GBM as well as matching tissue from 17 of these cases who underwent repeat resection for suspected recurrence and performed immunohistochemical analysis for AQP-4 expression. While some degree of AQP4 expression was detected in all 22 cases (39 samples), there was no clear relationship between staining pattern and disease status (active versus inactive GBM) between baseline and time of repeat biopsy. In addition, there was no clear relationship between AQP4 expression and degree of edema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Levy
- a Department of Neurology , Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , MD , USA.,b Department of Neurology , Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA
| | - Scott Barletta
- a Department of Neurology , Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , MD , USA
| | - Hwa Huang
- a Department of Neurology , Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , MD , USA
| | - Stuart A Grossman
- c Department of Oncology , Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , MD , USA
| | - Fausto J Rodriguez
- d Department of Pathology , Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , MD , USA
| | - Susannah G Ellsworth
- e Department of Radiation Oncology , Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis , IN , USA
| | - Omar Dzaye
- c Department of Oncology , Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , MD , USA.,f Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA.,g Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology , Charité , Berlin , Germany
| | - Matthias Holdhoff
- c Department of Oncology , Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , MD , USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yu W, Si M, Li L, He P, Fan Z, Zhang Q, Jiao X. Biomarkers Reflecting The Destruction Of The Blood-Brain Barrier Are Valuable In Predicting The Risk Of Lymphomas With Central Nervous System Involvement. Onco Targets Ther 2019; 12:9505-9512. [PMID: 31807026 PMCID: PMC6857655 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s222432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to identify the biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that facilitate the diagnosis of lymphomas with central nervous system (CNS) involvement. METHODS Four cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients with/without CNS involvement were enrolled respectively, and non-CNS tumor patients (n=3) were selected to be the controls. Lab biomarkers, cytokines, and tight junction proteins (TJs) in CSF and serum were measured. RESULTS When comparing the CNS to non-CNS group, cytokine including MMP-9 (15.24 vs 0.36 ng/mL), CCL-2 (1922.04 vs 490.68 pg/mL), and sVCAM-1 (61.36 vs 9.00 pg/mL), TJs including OCLN (6.68 vs 2.59 pg/mL), and ZO-1 (710.04 vs 182.98 pg/mL) in CSF were significantly higher in lymphomas patients with CNS involvement than those without CNS involvement. However, serum biomarkers were not significantly elevated. Contrary to the major findings, all conventional biomarkers and MRI results showed no significant change. CONCLUSION CSF biomarkers affecting BBB disruption are valuable in mirroring the risk of lymphoma CNS metastasis. Further study with a larger sample size is needed to verify these biomarkers in predicting lymphoma CNS involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjun Yu
- Department of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong515041, People’s Republic of China
| | - Mengya Si
- Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong515041, People’s Republic of China
| | - Li Li
- Obstetrics Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong515041, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ping He
- Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhiqiang Fan
- Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qiaoxin Zhang
- Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong515041, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyang Jiao
- Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Xiaoyang Jiao Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Shantou University Medical College, 22 Xinling Road, Guangdong515041, People’s Republic of China Email
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Holdhoff M, Ye X, Piotrowski AF, Strowd RE, Seopaul S, Lu Y, Barker NJ, Sivakumar A, Rodriguez FJ, Grossman SA, Burger PC. The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2018; 141:347-354. [PMID: 30414096 PMCID: PMC6342857 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-03037-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Clinical factors and neuro-imaging in patients with glioblastoma who appear to progress following standard chemoradiation are unable to reliably distinguish tumor progression from pseudo-progression. As a result, surgery is commonly recommended to establish a final diagnosis. However, studies evaluating the pathologists’ agreement on pathologic diagnoses in this setting have not been previously evaluated. Methods A hypothetical clinical history coupled with images of histological sections from 13 patients with glioblastoma who underwent diagnostic surgery for suspected early recurrence were sent to 101 pathologists from 50 NCI-designated Cancer Centers. Pathologists were asked to provide a final diagnosis (active tumor, treatment effect, or unable to classify) and to report on percent active tumor, treatment effect, and degree of cellularity and degree of mitotic activity. Results Forty-eight pathologists (48%) from 30 centers responded. In three cases > 75% of pathologists diagnosed active tumor. In two cases > 75% diagnosed treatment effect. However, in the remaining eight cases the disparity in diagnoses was striking (maximum agreement on final diagnosis ranged from 36 to 68%). Overall, only marginal agreement was observed in the overall assessment of disease status [kappa score 0.228 (95% CI 0.22–0.24)]. Conclusions Confidence in any clinical diagnostic assay requires that very similar results are obtained from identical specimens evaluated by sophisticated clinicians and institutions. The findings of this study illustrate that the diagnostic agreement between different cases of repeat resection for suspected recurrent glioblastoma can be variable. This raises concerns as pathological diagnoses are critical in directing standard and experimental care in this setting. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s11060-018-03037-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Holdhoff
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Xiaobu Ye
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anna F Piotrowski
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Roy E Strowd
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Shannon Seopaul
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yao Lu
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Norman J Barker
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ananyaa Sivakumar
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Fausto J Rodriguez
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stuart A Grossman
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Peter C Burger
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ambady P, Fu R, Netto JP, Kersch C, Firkins J, Doolittle ND, Neuwelt EA. Patterns of relapse in primary central nervous system lymphoma: inferences regarding the role of the neuro-vascular unit and monoclonal antibodies in treating occult CNS disease. Fluids Barriers CNS 2017; 14:16. [PMID: 28577579 PMCID: PMC5457655 DOI: 10.1186/s12987-017-0064-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The radiologic features and patterns of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) at initial presentation are well described. High response rates can be achieved with first-line high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) based regimens, yet many relapse within 2 years of diagnosis. We describe the pattern of relapse and review the potential mechanisms involved in relapse. Methods We identified 78 consecutive patients who attained complete radiographic response (CR) during or after first-line treatment for newly diagnosed PCNSL (CD20+, diffuse large B cell type). Patients were treated with HD-MTX based regimen in conjunction with blood–brain barrier disruption (HD-MTX/BBBD); 44 subsequently relapsed. Images and medical records of these 44 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. The anatomical location of enhancing lesions at initial diagnosis and at the time of relapse were identified and compared. Results 37/44 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria and had new measureable enhancing lesions at relapse; the pattern and location of relapse of these 37 patients were identified. At relapse, the new enhancement was at a spatially distinct site in 30 of 37 patients. Local relapse was found only in seven patients. Discussion Unlike gliomas, the majority of PCNSL had radiographic relapse at spatially distinct anatomical locations within the brain behind a previously intact neurovascular unit (NVU), and in few cases outside, the central nervous system (CNS). This may suggest either (1) reactivation of occult reservoirs behind an intact NVU in the CNS (or ocular) or (2) seeding from bone marrow or other extra CNS sites. Conclusion Recognizing patterns of relapse is key for early detection and may provide insight into potential mechanisms of relapse as well as help develop strategies to extend duration of complete response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prakash Ambady
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, L603, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.,Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Rongwei Fu
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Joao Prola Netto
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, L603, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.,Department of Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Cymon Kersch
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, L603, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Jenny Firkins
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, L603, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Nancy D Doolittle
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, L603, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Edward A Neuwelt
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, L603, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. .,Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA. .,Department of Neurosurgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
von Neubeck C, Seidlitz A, Kitzler HH, Beuthien-Baumann B, Krause M. Glioblastoma multiforme: emerging treatments and stratification markers beyond new drugs. Br J Radiol 2015; 88:20150354. [PMID: 26159214 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumour in adults. The standard therapy for GBM is maximal surgical resection followed by radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). In spite of the extensive treatment, the disease is associated with poor clinical outcome. Further intensification of the standard treatment is limited by the infiltrating growth of the GBM in normal brain areas, the expected neurological toxicities with radiation doses >60 Gy and the dose-limiting toxicities induced by systemic therapy. To improve the outcome of patients with GBM, alternative treatment modalities which add low or no additional toxicities to the standard treatment are needed. Many Phase II trials on new chemotherapeutics or targeted drugs have indicated potential efficacy but failed to improve the overall or progression-free survival in Phase III clinical trials. In this review, we will discuss contemporary issues related to recent technical developments and new metabolic strategies for patients with GBM including MR (spectroscopy) imaging, (amino acid) positron emission tomography (PET), amino acid PET, surgery, radiogenomics, particle therapy, radioimmunotherapy and diets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C von Neubeck
- 1 German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,2 OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - A Seidlitz
- 2 OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,3 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - H H Kitzler
- 4 Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - B Beuthien-Baumann
- 2 OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,5 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,6 Helmholtz-Zentrum, Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), PET Centre, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - M Krause
- 1 German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,2 OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,3 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,7 Helmholtz-Zentrum, Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Institute of Radiooncology, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|