1
|
Parcha V, Heindl BF, Li P, Kalra R, Limdi NA, Pereira NL, Arora G, Arora P. Genotype-Guided P2Y
12
Inhibitor Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Bayesian Analysis. Circ Genom Precis Med 2021; 14:e003353. [DOI: 10.1161/circgen.121.003353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background:
Among patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the role of a genotype-guided approach for antiplatelet therapy compared with usual care is unclear. We conducted a Bayesian analysis of the entire TAILOR-PCI (Tailored Antiplatelet Initiation to Lessen Outcomes Due to Decreased Clopidogrel Response After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) randomized clinical trial population to evaluate the effect of the genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy post-PCI compared with the usual care on the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
Methods:
The primary outcome for our study was the composite of MACE (myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death). Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and major/minor bleeding. Bayesian modeling was used to estimate the probability of clinical benefit of genotype-guided therapy using (1) noninformative priors (ie, analyzing the TAILOR-PCI trial) and (2) informative priors derived from the ADAPT, POPular Genetics, IAC-PCI, and PHARMCLO trials (ie, analyzing TAILOR-PCI trial in the context of prior evidence). Risk ratio (RR: ratio of cumulative outcome incidence between genotype-guided and conventional therapy group) and 95% credible interval (CrI) were estimated for the study outcomes, and probability estimates for RR <1 were computed.
Results:
Using noninformative priors, in TAILOR-PCI the RR for MACE was 0.78 (95% CrI, 0.55–1.07) in genotype-guided therapy after PCI, and the probability of RR <1 was 94%. Using noninformative priors, the probability of RR <1 for cardiovascular death (RR, 0.95 [95% CrI, 0.52–1.74]), stroke (RR, 0.68 [95% CrI, 0.44–1.06]), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.84 [95% CrI, 0.37–1.89]), stent thrombosis (RR, 0.75 [95% CrI, 0.37–1.45]), and major or minor bleeding (RR, 1.22 [95% CrI, 0.84–1.77]) were 57%, 96%, 67%, 81%, and 15%, respectively. Using informative priors, the posterior probability of RR <1 for MACE, from genotype-guided therapy, was 99% (RR, 0.69 [95% CrI, 0.57–0.84]). Using informative priors, the posterior probability of RR <1 for cardiovascular death (RR, 0.86 [95% CrI, 0.61–1.19]), stroke (RR, 0.69 [95% CrI, 0.48–0.99]), myocardial infarction (RR:0.56 [95% CrI, 0.40–0.78]), stent thrombosis (RR, 0.59 [95% CrI, 0.38–0.94]), and major or minor bleeding (RR, 0.84 [95% CrI, 0.70–0.99]) were 81%, 99%, 99%, 99%, and 99%, respectively.
Conclusions:
Bayesian analysis of the TAILOR-PCI trial provides clinically meaningful data on the posterior probability of reducing MACE using genotype-guided P2Y
12
inhibitor therapy after PCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vibhu Parcha
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease (V.P., B.F.H., G.A., P.A.), University of Alabama at Birmingham. Cardiology Division, University of Minnesota, MN
| | - Brittain F. Heindl
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease (V.P., B.F.H., G.A., P.A.), University of Alabama at Birmingham. Cardiology Division, University of Minnesota, MN
| | - Peng Li
- School of Nursing (P.L.), University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Rajat Kalra
- Cardiology Division, University of Minnesota, MN (R.K.)
| | - Nita A. Limdi
- Department of Neurology (N.A.L.), University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Department of Epidemiology (N.A.L.), University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Naveen L. Pereira
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (N.L.P.)
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration (N.L.P.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (N.L.P), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Garima Arora
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease (V.P., B.F.H., G.A., P.A.), University of Alabama at Birmingham. Cardiology Division, University of Minnesota, MN
| | - Pankaj Arora
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease (V.P., B.F.H., G.A., P.A.), University of Alabama at Birmingham. Cardiology Division, University of Minnesota, MN
- Section of Cardiology, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, AL (P.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McDonough CW. Pharmacogenomics in Cardiovascular Diseases. Curr Protoc 2021; 1:e189. [PMID: 34232575 DOI: 10.1002/cpz1.189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Cardiovascular pharmacogenomics is the study and identification of genomic markers that are associated with variability in cardiovascular drug response, cardiovascular drug-related outcomes, or cardiovascular drug-related adverse events. This overview presents an introduction and historical background to cardiovascular pharmacogenomics, and a protocol for designing a cardiovascular pharmacogenomics study. Important considerations are also included for constructing a cardiovascular pharmacogenomics phenotype, designing the replication or validation strategy, common statistical approaches, and how to put the results in context with the cardiovascular drug or cardiovascular disease under investigation. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Designing a cardiovascular pharmacogenomics study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitrin W McDonough
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gower MN, Ratner LR, Williams AK, Rossi JS, Stouffer GA, Lee CR. Clinical Utility of CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients at Risk of Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events: A Review of Emerging Evidence. PHARMACOGENOMICS & PERSONALIZED MEDICINE 2020; 13:239-252. [PMID: 32821149 PMCID: PMC7419635 DOI: 10.2147/pgpm.s231475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the standard of care is dual antiplatelet therapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) and aspirin. Current clinical practice guidelines now recommend more potent P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) over clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, clopidogrel remains the most commonly prescribed P2Y12 inhibitor in the setting of PCI and is also the preferred agent in the treatment and secondary prevention of stroke. Clopidogrel is a prodrug that requires bioactivation by the CYP2C19 enzyme. It has been shown that clopidogrel use in patients who are CYP2C19 no function allele carriers are associated with impaired antiplatelet inhibition and a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Compared to clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor clinical response is not impacted by CYP2C19 genotype. Even with a demonstrated increased risk of adverse outcomes in CYP2C19 no function allele carriers treated with clopidogrel, routine implementation of CYP2C19 genotyping to guide antiplatelet therapy selection has remained controversial and has not been widely adopted. Recent results from multiple prospective randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials investigating the use of CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy following PCI have advanced the evidence base demonstrating the clinical utility of this strategy. Multiple recent studies have examined the effects of CYP2C19 genotype on clopidogrel outcomes in the setting of stroke and neurointerventional procedures. In this review, we discern the clinical utility of using CYP2C19 genotype testing to guide antiplatelet therapy prescribing by evaluating the impact of CYP2C19 genotype-guided selection of antiplatelet therapy on clinical outcomes, summarizing emerging data from cardiovascular and neurology clinical studies, and discussing implications for clinical practice guidelines, remaining knowledge gaps and future research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan N Gower
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lindsay R Ratner
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Alexis K Williams
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Joseph S Rossi
- Division of Cardiology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - George A Stouffer
- Division of Cardiology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,UNC McAllister Heart Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Craig R Lee
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,UNC McAllister Heart Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|