Antiplatelet drug therapy: role of pharmacodynamic and genetic testing

A comparison of three platelet function tests in ischemic stroke patients with antiplatelet therapy

Predicting the effectiveness of antiplatelet drugs is critical to precision antiplatelet therapy. However, there is a lack of an acceptable method, although there are a variety of methods for detecting platelet function. In this study, we compared three major platelet function tests to assess their performance and found better methods for platelet function evaluation after aspirin or clopidogrel treatment in ischemic stroke patients by comparative study. A total of 249 ischemic stroke patients were enrolled who were treated with aspirin or clopidogrel or both. Three platelet function tests including light transmittance aggregometry (LTA), thromboelastography (TEG), platelet function analyzer (PFA) were performed as well as CYP2C19 genotype determination. Correlation analyses and kappa statistics were used. All three methods were effective in evaluating aspirin function. However, only LTA and TEG had good correlation and consistency (r = -0.37, kappa = 0.634). TEG-ADP was the least sensitive for clopidogrel, as the platelet inhibition ratio did not differ between the clopidogrel-user group and the control (P = 0.074), while LTA and PFA were sensitive (P ＜ 0.001). Correlations between platelet assays were poor for clopidogrel (the absolute value of r range from 0.13 to 0.35) and so was the agreement (Kappa from 0.232 to 0.314). LTA and PFA have a good correlation with CYP2C19 genotyping (P = 0.034 and 0.014). In conclusion, all three tests were able to evaluate aspirin effect, LTA-AA and TEG-AA had a good correlation. TEG perform badly for clopidogrel effect detection. The fair-to-modest agreement among assays indicated further study was indispensable.

Temporal Changes in Platelet Response in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients With Prasugrel and Clopidogrel After Stent Implantation

BACKGROUND

Prasugrel has been shown to provide more potency and less variability than clopidogrel, but its potential temporal variability has not been described.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a prospective open-label study, evaluating platelet reactivity overtime in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients on aspirin and clopidogrel (n=60) or prasugrel (n=61), after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Blood samples were taken at discharge and at 3 and 6 months. Platelet function tests included VerifyNow (VN-P2Y12), and Multiplate Aggregometry (MEA). By means of VN-P2Y12, prasugrel patients displayed significantly (P<0.001) higher platelet inhibition than clopidogrel patients over time, although there were not significant differences using MEA. Prasugrel patients showed higher platelet inhibition at baseline than at 3 months (59.3±8.1 vs. 105.0±49.2; P<0.001), without significant change at 6 months (107.9±72.0; P=0.919 vs. 3 months). Clopidogrel patients showed a similar trend (160.1±65.1, 184.8±62.7 and 185.0±53.3; baseline vs. 3 months P=0.060; 3 months vs. 6 months P=0.974). High platelet reactivity (HPR) was shown in 16.3% prasugrel patients, with no patient consistently remaining in HPR over time. HPR was detected in 36.6% of the clopidogrel patients, being consistently observed in 15.0% of them. Low platelet reactivity (LPR) was detected in 60.5% prasugrel and 9.8% clopidogrel patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Prasugrel patients showed less temporal variation than patients on clopidogrel in terms of HPR. In contrast, higher variability in LPR was detected in prasugrel patients for up to 6 months' follow-up.

Platelet reactivity over time in coronary artery disease patients treated with a bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold

Everolimus-eluting bioabsorbable scaffolds (BVSs) have exhibited similar long-term clinical outcomes compared to its everolimus-eluting metallic counterparts. However, reports from earlier studies have shown a signal for an increased rate of stent thrombosis. The aim of the current investigation is to describe the platelet reactivity profiles over time in patients treated with everolimus-eluting BVS in comparison to everolimus-eluting metallic stents. This is a pilot study in which patients on aspirin and clopidogrel with at least 1 everolimus-eluting BVS were included (n = 24). Patients with at least 1 everolimus-eluting metallic stent implanted were included as control group (n = 25). Blood samples were taken at time of discharge and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Platelet function tests included VerifyNow (VN-P2Y12), multiplate aggregometry (MEA), and light transmission aggregometry (LTA). There was no difference in platelet reactivity at discharge, 3- and 6-month visits (unadjusted p = 0.733 and p = 0.582; p = 0.432 and p = 0.899 after adjusting for discharge value platelet reactivity0, respectively) using VN-P2Y12. Similar findings were observed with LTA. However, patients with BVS showed significantly higher platelet reactivity than patients with metallic stents at 3 and 6 months in the crude analysis (p = 0.003) and after adjusting for discharge value (p = 0.013) measured with ADP-MEA. There were no differences in platelet reactivity mediated by the T × A₂ pathway between both groups. Finally, there is no statistical difference in high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HPR) rate between both groups. The results of this pilot study suggest that BVS might have different platelet reactivity profiles, and warrants further investigation in dedicated clinical studies.

[Cardiovascular pharmacogenomics]

Cardiovascular disease remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Current medical practice takes into account information based on population studies and benefits observed in large populations or cohorts. However, individual patients present great differences in both toxicity and clinical efficacy that can be explained by variations in adherence, unknown drug to drug interactions and genetic variability. The latter seems to explain from 20% up to 95% of patient to patient variability. Treating patients with cardiovascular disorders faces the clinician with the challenge to include genomic analysis into daily practice. There are several examples within cardiovascular disease of treatments that can vary in toxicity or clinical usefulness based on genetic changes. One of the main factors affecting the efficacy of Clopidogrel is the phenotype associated with polymorphisms in the gene CYP 2C9. Furthermore, regarding oral anticoagulants, changes in CYP2C9 and VKORC1 play an important role in changing the clinical response to anticoagulation. When analyzing statin treatment, one of their main toxicities (myopathy) can be predicted by the SLCO1B1 polymorphism. The potential for prediction of toxicity and clinical efficacy from the use of genetic analysis warrants further studies aiming towards its inclusion in daily clinical practice.

[New antiplatelet drugs in coronary artery disease]

The dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel has been the mainstay of both acute and chronic phase coronary artery disease, reducing importantly the risk of adverse events. Despite a correct compliance, a non-negligible rate of adverse events still happens. New compounds, with improved properties, are now clinically available (such as prasugrel or ticagrelor) or under advanced development. The aim of the present review is the description of these new compounds, particularly prasugrel and ticagrelor.

Clopidogrel and the possibility of drug-drug interaction in primary health care

INTRODUCTION

Clopidogrel ineffectiveness is a serious problem in antiplatelet therapy. Many factors may contribute to this phenomenon. One of them is clopidogrel drug-drug interaction with CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 enzyme inhibitors. The main goal of this descriptive study was to assess the prevalence of cases of clopidogrel-drug interactions in the primary health care physicians' practices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During 2010-2011, 80 patients receiving clopidogrel antiplatelet therapy from primary care physicians' clinical practices were involved in this study. By using questionnaires and case histories, the following information was collected: Age, gender, clinical diagnoses, and medications used.

RESULTS

IN THE CURRENT STUDY, DRUGS WERE USED THAT COULD POTENTIALLY INFLUENCE THE EFFECT OF CLOPIDOGREL: Omeprazole, lipophilic statins, calcium channel blockers (CCB). There was a different use of the above-mentioned drugs before and after the initiation of the clopidogrel therapy, e.g., 12 (15.0%) and 44 (55.0%) patients used proton pump inhibitors (PPI) before and after the clopidogrel therapy accordingly (P = 0.16; χ (2) = 1.91). However, pantoprazole was recommended more often than other PPI. The use of the potential CYP3A4 inhibitors - lipophilic statins and CCB - was increased after the prescription of clopidogrel too. Concomitant use of statins (mainly atorvastatin) with clopidogrel was observed in 75 (93.8%) patients and the use of CCB (mainly amlodipine) - in 33 (41.3%) patients.

CONCLUSION

In the primary health care practices, it is revealed that there is co-medication of clopidogrel with weak CYP3A4 inhibitors, such as lipophilic statins and amlodipine, and with the moderate CYP2C19 inhibitor - omeprazole. The latter co-medication is potentially harmful and it is very important to inform the first care professionals about the opportunity to change omeprazole to pantoprazole, which does not influence clopidogrel biotransformation.

Stent-Assisted Coiling of Wide-Necked Aneurysms in the Setting of Acute Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND:

Stent-assisted coiling in the setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage remains controversial. Currently, there is a paucity of data regarding the utility of this procedure and the risks of hemorrhagic and ischemic complications.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the utility of stent-assisted coil embolization and pretreatment with antiplatelet agents in the management of ruptured wide-necked aneurysms.

METHODS:

A retrospective study of 65 patients with ruptured wide-necked aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coiling. Patients with hydrocephalus or a Hunt and Hess grade ≥ III received a ventriculostomy before endovascular intervention. Patients were treated intraoperatively with 600 mg of clopidogrel and maintained on daily doses of 75 mg of clopidogrel and 81 mg of aspirin. The Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) score was recorded at the time of discharge. We identified major bleeding complications secondary to antiplatelet therapy and cases of in-stent thrombosis that required periprocedural thrombolysis.

RESULTS:

Of the aneurysms, 66.2% arose within the anterior circulation; 69.2% of patients presented with hydrocephalus or a Hunt and Hess grade ≥ III and required a ventriculostomy. A good outcome (GOS of 4 or 5) was achieved in 63.1% of patients, and the overall mortality rate was 16.9%. There were 10 (15.38%) major complications associated with bleeding secondary to antiplatelet therapy (5 patients, 7.7%) or intraoperative in-stent thrombosis (5 patients, 7.7%). Three (4.6%) patients had a fatal hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION:

Our findings suggest that stent-assisted coiling and routine treatment with antiplatelet agents is a viable option in the management of ruptured wide-necked aneurysms.