Ceftolozane/tazobactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections

Calculated parenteral initial treatment of bacterial infections: Infections with multi-resistant Gram-negative rods - ESBL producers, carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

This is the sixteenth chapter of the guideline "Calculated initial parenteral treatment of bacterial infections in adults - update 2018" in the 2nd updated version. The German guideline by the Paul-Ehrlich-Gesellschaft für Chemotherapie e.V. (PEG) has been translated to address an international audience. Infections due to multiresistant Gram-negative rods are challenging. In this chapter recommendations for targeted therapy for infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii are given, based on the limited available evidence.

Activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Against Gram-Negative Rods of the Family Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas Spp. Isolated from Onco-Hematological Patients Hospitalized in a Clinical Hospital in Poland

Background

The most common etiological agents of infections in onco-hematological patients are Gram-negative rods resistant to many antimicrobials, including carbapenems. Recently, ceftolozane combined with tazobactam became a novel therapeutic option. The aim of the present study was to analyze the susceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam of the clinical strains of these bacteria.

Material/Methods

Material comprised rectal swabs, urine, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid obtained from onco-hematological patients hospitalized in a clinical hospital (1050 beds) in Poland. Identification of the isolated bacteria was done by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) using the MALDI Biotyper (Bruker). Ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptibility of the isolates was assessed using antimicrobial gradient strips (E-test, BioMérieux). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and interpretation of the results was done according to the current recommendations of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST).

Results

In total, 281 rectal swabs and 116 urine samples were tested for the presence of Gram-negative rods producing ESBL, and 531 rectal swabs and 8 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples were tested for the presence of Gram-negative rods resistant to carbapenems. In the analyzed period, 69 non-repetitive strains of bacteria were isolated that were in the spectrum of activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam. Among 44 clinical strains of ESBL(+) Enterobacteriaceae rods, 76% were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam. All 9 strains of non-carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa resistant or with decreased susceptibility to carbapenems were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam.

Conclusions

Ceftolozane/tazobactam may be an option in the therapy of infections caused by ESBL(+) strains of Enterobacteriaceae as well as non-carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant strains of P. aeruginosa.

Daptomycin in Combination with Ceftolozane-Tazobactam or Cefazolin against Daptomycin-Susceptible and -Nonsusceptible Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro, Hollow-Fiber Model

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (TOL-TAZ) is a novel cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor with activity against several Gram-negative pathogens. Daptomycin (DAP) has demonstrated synergistic activity with beta-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates with reduced lipopeptide and glycopeptide susceptibilities. Our objective was to determine if DAP and TOL-TAZ possess synergy in hollow-fiber pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models. One isogenic pair of daptomycin-susceptible and daptomycin-nonsusceptible MRSA strains was evaluated. DAP, TOL-TAZ, and cefazolin (CFZ) MIC determinations were performed. DAP MIC determinations were also performed in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of TOL-TAZ and CFZ. Ninety-six-hour in vitro models were run, simulating DAP at 10 mg/kg of body weight/day; TOL-TAZ at 1,500 mg every 8 h; TOL at 1,000 mg every 8 h; and DAP combined with TOL-TAZ (DAP+TOL-TAZ), DAP+TOL, DAP+TAZ, and DAP+CFZ at 2,000 mg every 8 h. DAP MICs were 0.5 and 4 μg/ml for strains R8845 and R8846, respectively. In the presence of CFZ, R8845 and R8846 DAP MICs were reduced 8-fold and 16-fold, respectively. TOL and TAZ had no effect on DAP MICs. PK/PD models demonstrated bactericidal activity with DAP+CFZ against both strains. The combination of DAP+TOL-TAZ was bactericidal against R8845 but was not bactericidal against daptomycin-nonsusceptible strain R8846. DAP+TOL and DAP+TAZ were not bactericidal. No other regimens were bactericidal. DAP+TOL-TAZ did not demonstrate synergistic activity against daptomycin-nonsusceptible S. aureus but prevented daptomycin-nonsusceptible MRSA emergence. Because DAP+TOL or TAZ alone did not prevent daptomycin-nonsusceptible MRSA emergence, the combination TOL-TAZ may be necessary for synergy with DAP. DAP+CFZ demonstrated enhancement against both strains. The combination of DAP+CFZ warrants further clinical study.