Impact of risk stratification on the duration of caspofungin therapy for invasive fungal disease in acute leukemic patients

Efficacy of Caspofungin in Unclassified Invasive Fungal Infection Cases: A Retrospective Analysis of Patients with Hematological Malignancies in China

Background

The management of invasive fungal infection (IFI) is challenging in immunocompromised patients who do not fully satisfy the EORTC/MSG diagnostic criteria of proven or probable IFI. Our study assessed caspofungin efficacy in 582 Chinese patients with hematological malignancies exhibiting unclassified signs or symptoms of IFI.

Material/Methods

This retrospective study included caspofungin treatment outcomes of an unclassified group A (n=401) of patients without microbiological or biomarker results and group B (n=181) patients with positive microbiological or biomarker results. Factors that correlated with clinical outcomes were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Cough (41.8%), expectoration (29.6%), and chest tightness (14.6%) were the most common clinical features, and changes in CT images (88.1%) were more frequently detected than in X-ray images (19.6%) in all patients. Favorable response rates for caspofungin as first-line treatment were 58.2% for group A and 56.3% for group B. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, cardiovascular disease, hemoptysis, and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1000/mm³ before antifungal treatment without recovery were associated with unfavorable clinical outcome (P<0.05 for all). Cough and ANC recovery >1000/mm³ were significantly associated with favorable (complete or partial resolution) outcome.

Conclusions

Caspofungin was effective for treating unclassified IFIs of immunocompromised patients. Cardiovascular disease, ECOG score, cough, and/or hemoptysis, as well as ANC count, represent a potential index for estimating response of unclassified IFI patients to caspofungin treatments.

Empirical antifungal treatment for diagnosed and undiagnosed invasive fungal disease in patients with hematologic malignancies

BACKGROUND

Empirical antifungal therapy is effective in some patients with risk factors for invasive fungal disease (IFD) who do not qualify for the EORTC/MSG criteria for IFD, but who fail to respond to anti-bacterial and anti-viral therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective single-center study investigated the epidemiology of IFD and empirical antifungal therapy in patients with hematological malignancies.

METHODS

This study recruited 893 patients with hematologic malignancies who had failed to respond to anti-bacterial and anti-viral treatment and received antifungal therapy, but not for antifungal prophylaxis. Antifungal therapy regimens included amphotericin B, voriconazole, itraconazole and caspofungin. A total of 689 patients were diagnosed with proven, probable, or possible IFD, while 159 patients did not meet the EORTC/MSG criteria for IFD diagnosis but recovered with antifungal treatment, and 45 were excluded from having IFD. Effective treatment was defined as the disappearance or resolution of clinical symptoms of IFD.

RESULTS

Patients diagnosed with IFD underwent chemotherapy at a higher proportion, and had significantly higher neutrophil counts compared to those who did not qualify for the EORTC/MSG criteria for IFD but responded to antifungals. The mortality due to all causes within 3 months was significantly higher for patients diagnosed with proven IFD, compared with those who did not qualify for the EORTC/MSG criteria for IFD. There was no discontinuation reported due to adverse events of caspofungin.

CONCLUSION

Empirical antifungal treatment could help save the lives of some patients with severe infections who are strongly suspected of having IFD.