Effect of propranolol with and without rosuvastatin on migraine attacks: a triple blind randomized clinical trial

Exploring the association between statins use or HMG-CoA reductase inhibition and migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Statins or 3‑hydroxy‑3‑methyl‑glutarylcoenzyme A (HMG‑CoA) reductase inhibitors are medications that act by reducing the cholesterol content of liver cells Moreover, statins have been found to improve endothelial function and reduce vascular wall inflammation. A growing body of research suggests that statins are associated with less risk of migraine, and they can be used to treat symptoms. However, the evidence has been inconclusive, so we aim to investigate the nature and strength of the effect of statins on the prevention and prophylaxis of migraines.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive systematic search across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, from inception until October 2024, to include studies on the association between statins use and migraine. The outcomes of interest involved the association of the HMG-CoA reductase gene with the risk of migraine, as well as the association and efficacy of statins in migraine patients.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in our systematic review. Mendelian Randomization (MR) studies revealed that expression of HMGCR was associated with an increased risk of migraine with odds ratio (OR) ranging from 1.38 to 1.55 (P < 0.001). Three observational studies investigating the relationship between statins and migraine risk demonstrated a protective effect, with odds ratios ranging from 0.73 to 0.94 (P < 0.001). The findings suggest a significant reduction in overall migraine risk, particularly for migraines with aura and in patients with higher vitamin D levels. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed that statins significantly reduced monthly migraine frequency (MD= -3.16, 95%CI= [-5.79, -0.53]; p = 0.02, I2 = 79%; P = 0.03). RCTs supported the efficacy of statins in reducing migraine frequency, days, and intensity compared to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Statins, already well-established for cardiovascular benefits, emerge as a promising dual-purpose therapy for many neurological disorders. The association between the HMGCR gene and increased migraine risk, coupled with the possible efficacy of statins in reducing migraine frequency, may open new avenues for migraine prophylaxis. However, the variability in study design hinders definitive conclusions, so larger studies with longer follow-ups are required to ascertain both findings.

The Association between Statin Use and Reduced Migraine Likelihood: A Comprehensive Analysis of Migraine Subtypes and Statin Types in a Nationwide Korean Cohort

Despite growing interest in the preventive effects of statins, as lipid-lowering agents, on migraine attacks, comprehensive nationwide studies comparing migraine likelihood between statin users and controls are lacking. Our nested case-control study within the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort (2002-2019) investigated this association using 38,957 migraine patients and 155,828 controls, considering migraine subtypes (with/without aura) and statin types (lipophilic vs. hydrophilic). Using propensity score matching and adjusting for confounders, statin use was linked to reduced migraine likelihood overall (odds ratio (OR) 0.93), particularly for migraines with aura (OR 0.75) and without aura (OR 0.94). Lipophilic statins were effective for both subtypes, while hydrophilic statins mainly reduced the likelihood of migraines without aura. Subgroup analyses showed consistent benefits across demographics, but varied effectiveness based on weight, smoking, alcohol use, hemoglobin levels, and dyslipidemia history. In summary, this nationwide cohort study suggests that statin use may reduce migraine likelihood among Korean adults across diverse demographics and clinical profiles, but varied effectiveness based on certain lifestyle and comorbidity factors underscores the importance of considering individual patient profiles when assessing the potential benefits of statin therapy for migraine prevention.

HMG-CoA reductase is a potential therapeutic target for migraine: a mendelian randomization study

Statins are thought to have positive effects on migraine but existing data are inconclusive. We aimed to evaluate the causal effect of such drugs on migraines using Mendelian randomization. We used four types of genetic instruments as proxies for HMG-CoA reductase inhibition. We included the expression quantitative trait loci of the HMG-CoA reductase gene and genetic variation within or near the HMG-CoA reductase gene region. Variants were associated with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and total cholesterol. Genome-wide association study summary data for the three lipids were obtained from the UK Biobank. Comparable data for migraine were obtained from the International Headache Genetic Consortium and the FinnGen Consortium. Inverse variance weighting method was used for the primary analysis. Additional analyses included pleiotropic robust methods, colocalization, and meta-analysis. Genetically determined high expression of HMG-CoA reductase was associated with an increased risk of migraines (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.30-1.84, P = 6.87 × 10-7). Similarly, three genetically determined HMG-CoA reductase-mediated lipids were associated with an increased risk of migraine. These conclusions were consistent across meta-analyses. We found no evidence of bias caused by pleiotropy or genetic confounding factors. These findings support the hypothesis that statins can be used to treat migraine.

Lipids, lipid-modifying drug target genes and migraine: a Mendelian randomization study

INTRODUCTION

Migraine, a prevalent headache disorder with unclear mechanisms and limited treatments, may be influenced by dyslipidemia and genetic factors. Statins and emerging lipid-modifying agents show potential but lack evidence for migraine management. Mendelian Randomization analysis offers insights into causal relationships and therapeutic targets. This study aims to explore genetically predicted lipid traits, drug targets, and their association with migraine risk.

METHOD

We conducted Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses utilizing genetic variants associated with lipid traits and variants in genes encoding the protein targets of various classes of lipid-lowering drugs. The specific drug classes investigated included HMGCR, PCSK9, NPC1L1, ABCG5/ABCG8, LDLR, LPL, ANGPTL3, APOB, CETP, and APOC3. To determine the effects on migraine risk, we meta-analyzed MR estimates for regional variants using data from two large sample sets. The genetic variants were weighted based on their associations with specific lipid traits, such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), Apolipoprotein A1, and Apolipoprotein B. To obtain association weights, we utilized data from lipid genetics consortia. For lipid-modifying drug targets that exhibited suggestive significance, we further employed expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) data. Additionally, we performed colocalization analysis to assess genetic confounding.

RESULT

The use of genetic proxies for HMGCR inhibition demonstrated a significant association with a decreased risk of migraine in the FinnGen dataset (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.88, p = 0.0006) and a nearly significant association in the Choquet dataset (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.60-1.01, p = 0.06). When pooling the estimates, the overall effect size showed a reduced risk of migraine (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.60-0.89, p = 0.0016). Similarly, genetic mimicry of LPL enhancement was associated with a lower risk of migraine in the FinnGen dataset (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69-0.96, p = 0.01) and the Choquet dataset (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.83-0.99, p = 0.03). Pooling the estimates showed a consistent effect size (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83-0.96, p = 0.002). Sensitivity analyses yielded no statistically significant evidence of bias arising from pleiotropy or genetic confounding.

CONCLUSION

In the study, it was observed that among the 10 lipid-lowering drug targets investigated, LPL and HMGCR showed significant associations with migraine risk. These findings indicate that LPL and HMGCR have the potential to serve as candidate drug targets for the treatment or prevention of migraines.

Serum lipid abnormalities in migraine: A meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND

The association of migraine with vascular comorbidities is long-established. The contribution of the "traditional" cardiovascular risk factors to this connection remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To determine-quantify the differences in the serum lipid concentrations between lipid-lowering agents-naïve individuals with migraine and healthy controls (HC).

METHODS

The study protocol was not preregistered with an online systematic review-protocol registry. A literature search involving MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Google Scholar, and the OpenGrey database was performed. Case-control, cross-sectional, or cohort studies involving HC and participants with migraine (with and without aura regardless of the use of prophylactic treatment) that quantitatively assessed serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (primary index) and/or total cholesterol (TC) and/or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and/or triglycerides (TG) (secondary indices) were retrieved. Articles including participants with known dyslipidemia (or under lipid-lowering medications) or with secondary causes of dyslipidemia (aside from the subjectively assessed lifestyle parameters) were excluded. Studies with abstracts and full texts not published in English and articles reporting the implementation of other study designs (reviews, meta-analyses, commentaries, case reports, etc.) were excluded as well. Conference abstracts and English abstracts from studies with full texts not published in English were evaluated as part of the gray literature. Each step of the review process was performed by two investigators independently, and relevant data were abstracted based on standardized extraction forms. Any discrepancies were resolved by a third investigator.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies (16 case-control and 1 cross-sectional) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Retrieved articles involved adult participants, principally during the fourth decade of life. Results were compatible with higher LDL-C levels in migraine individuals (1370) than in HC (1215) [12 studies, mean difference (MD) = 10.4 mg/dl, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (1.6, 19.2)]. Similarly, higher TC levels were determined in migraine patients [14 studies, migraine = 1325, HC = 1213, MD = 10.6 mg/dl, 95% CI = (1.8, 19.3)], as were TG levels [15 studies, migraine = 1526, HC = 1262, MD = 11.8 mg/dl, 95% CI = (3.6, 20.0)]. HDL-C concentrations were not different between the two groups [14 studies, migraine = 1488, HC = 1328, MD = -0.4 mg/dl, 95% CI = (-2.2, 1.5)]. Prespecified sensitivity analysis following the exclusion of studies not presenting comparable body mass index values between the groups nullified the significant difference regarding LDL-C levels [MD = 5.3 mg/dl, 95% CI = (-0.1, 10.8)]. Subgroup analyses as well as the direct comparison of migraine with aura and migraine without aura individuals were compatible with no difference regarding lipid concentrations, but only a small fraction of the retrieved studies presented relevant figures.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our results are of limited generalizability, since most retrieved studies were performed in Turkey (nine studies), TC abnormalities may provide part of the explanation for the unfavorable cardiovascular profile of migraine patients. Lifestyle may be partly or entirely accountable for the determined increased serum TC. Additional studies that will completely address the effect that lifestyle parameters exert on lipid concentrations are required to better capture existing abnormalities.