Impact of oral potentially malignant disorders on quality of life: a systematic review

Psychological problems and their impact on oral mucosal disease patients' quality of life: A cross-sectional study in the Chinese population

Objectives

We aimed to investigate the presence of common psychological factors (i.e., stress, depression, anxiety) and their impact on the Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients diagnosed with four oral mucosal diseases (OMDs): recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAU), oral lichen planus (OLP), oral leukoplakia (OLK), and oral submucous fibrosis (OSF).

Methods

A total of 229 patients with clinically diagnosed OMDs were enrolled in this study, consisting of 55 RAU, 68 OLK, 50 OLP, and 56 OSF patients. The patients were statistically analyzed for psychological problems and OHRQoL using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)､ the 5-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-5) and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) scales.

Results

There were 229 valid questionnaires collected, consisting of 83 females and 146 males with a mean age of 45.24 (SD = 11.88) years. Multiple regressions between DASS-21 scores and OHIP-5 scores revealed generally negative impacts of psychological problems on OHRQoL, with depression on OLP (β = 0.47), OLK (β = 0.65) and OSF (β = 0.38), stress on RAU (β = 0.29), OLP (β = 0.72), OLK (β = 0.38) and OSF (β = 0.60), and anxiety on OLP (β = 0.33), OLK (β = 0.49) and OSF (β = 0.51).

Conclusions

Psychological problems like depression, stress, and anxiety were found to be prevalent in OMDs patients and adversely affected their OHRQoL. The results support the biopsychosocial medical model in the treatment of OMDs patients.

Clinical significance

The present study reinforced the crucial roles of psychological factors in impacting OMDs patients' OHRQoL. Therefore, it is necessary to monitor patients' psychological status and OHRQoL using questionnaires like DASS-21 and OHIP-5. Followed by psychological interventions, the treatment is expected to be enhanced.

Clinical and Psychosocial Impact of Communication about Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders: A Scoping Review

Delivering bad news has been widely studied in cancer, thus, this scoping review aims to identify the available evidence concerning the communication of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) and their clinical and psychosocial impacts. A search was performed using electronic databases (Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science) and one grey literature database (Google Scholar). Studies focused on communicating the diagnosis of OPMDs and the patients' perceptions were included. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two authors in a two-phase process. Five publications were included in the qualitative analysis. Differences regarding the study design, population, OPMDs assessed, and outcomes of professional-patient communication were found in each study. Protocols for OPMD communication have not yet been reported and there is a need to standardize strategies as communication skills may provide better clinical outcomes for patients diagnosed with potentially malignant disorders. Although future studies are needed, a brief list recommending the aspects that must be communicated is proposed.

Heterogeneity of outcome measures in the clinical trials of treatment for oral submucous fibrosis-Systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review was performed to evaluate the range of outcome measures used in interventional trials for oral submucous fibrosis (OSF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 2004 to 2018 about OSF treatment. All the outcome measures and measurement methods mentioned in the trials were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

Out of 120 published papers, 12 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria were included. A total of 38 single outcome measures and 29 composite outcome measures were considered under four different outcome domains, of which clinical symptoms and clinical response were the most commonly used. The linear measurement of mouth opening (11 trials; 91.66%) and Visual Analogue Scale (10 trials, 83.33%) were the predominant measurement methods.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review highlights the high heterogeneity in outcome measures in therapeutic RCTs of OSF. This lack of widely agreed standard outcome measures in OSF is a great concern as it prevents the comparison of studies and meta-analyses to gather evidence. There is a dire need of establishing a core outcome set for reporting in the future clinical trials that may help facilitate treatment choice for OSF to improve life quality of patients.

Assessment of quality of life of patients with oral sub mucous fibrosis before and after treatment with topical curcumin

Background and aim: Oral Submucous Fibrosis (OSMF) is potentially pre-malignant condition of the oral cavity with a high malignant transformation rate. The condition not only affects the oral function of the patients but has a huge impact on their social and psychological wellbeing affecting the overall quality of life. To evaluate the effectivity of the treatment assessing the quality of the life of these patients before and after treatment is of utmost importance but till now has not been an integral part of the management strategy. This study was carried to assess the change in quality of life before and after treatment with curcumin in patients with OSMF. Methods: Quality of life was assessed before and after 3 months of treatment with topical curcumin in 50 patients with OSMF using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life head and neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ35). Results: At the end of 3 months there was significant (p < 0.05) change in the quality of life of patients with OSMF as suggested by assessment of the multi-item and single item scale used in the questionnaire. Conclusion: The study emphasizes the use of assessing Quality of life as an integral part of treatment strategy for OSMF and suggests curcumin as a promising treatment modality for patients with OSMF.

Management of oral leukoplakia: a position paper of the Society of Oral Medicine, Chinese Stomatological Association

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to develop the first edition of a Chinese evidence-based position paper on the management of oral leukoplakia (OLK).

STUDY DESIGN

The consultant group for drafting the position paper consisted of 31 oral medicine specialists and 2 evidence-based medicine specialists. English studies (searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library) and Chinese studies (searched in China National Knowledge Infrastructure and WanFang) published before January 2018 were used. The quality of the study was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation grid, and the strength of the recommendations was determined based on the results of 3 rounds of voting among the consultant group members using the Delphi method.

RESULTS

Twenty-two evidence-based guidelines for clinical management and monitoring of OLK were established in this position paper. A clinical path diagram for oral health practitioners was constructed based on the recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence suggests that management and monitoring of patients with OLK should be performed by experienced clinicians to control the lesion and for early detection of malignant transformation. However, all recommendations are based on evidence of low or extremely low quality and may require further modification as new evidence is produced.

Evaluation of quality of life in patients surgically treated for potentially malignant oral lesions

Background

The oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) can impair the quality of life (QOL) of an individual. The evaluation of various aspects of life getting affected will help the health service providers to better comprehend the problems faced by the patients. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative QOL of surgically treated patients for OPMDs.

Materials and Methods

It was a cross-sectional study done on 45 follow-up patients, aged 24-80 years, who were surgically treated for OPMDs. A performa with questions regarding sociodemographics, personal, and abusive habits and a questionnaire on QOL was used. Oral examination was done to analyze the oral mucosa for recurrence. Data were analyzed using frequency analysis and unpaired student's t-test to compare the mean scores.

Results

Several patients reported to have experienced a lot of pain (15, 33%), burning sensation on having spicy food (36, 80%), great difficulty in opening mouth (15, 33%), alteration in taste sensation (36, 80%), limiting of eating desired food (24, 53%), and dryness of mouth (7, 16%). Many patients felt very frustrated, depressed (9, 20%), and reported their condition to have affected their satisfaction with life (19, 42%). However, neither did social relationship with family and friends got affected by this nor did it add discomfort to them at parties, social functions, or get together. Their main concern was the likelihood of their oral condition progressing into cancer. There was a statistically significant difference in the QOL scores for habit of areca nut chewing (P = 0.05), erythroplakia lesions (P = 0.05), and recurrence of lesion (P = 0.02).

Conclusion

OPMDs affected the physical, functional, and psychological well-being of study patients, caused discomfort, and affected their daily activities. However, the social well-being of patients was unaltered and a large number of patients were reportedly satisfied with their treatments. The timely diagnosis and management can improve the quality of life and prevent its progression to malignancy.

Quality of life among Oral Potentially Malignant Disorder (OPMD) patients: A prospective study

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of life among the Oral Potentially Malignant Disorder (OPMD) patients during diagnosis, at one month and 3 months after intervention (surgical or conservative).

Methods

The University of Washington Quality of Life version (4UWQOL v4) and World Health Organization (WHO-BREF) were repeatedly administered on 54 OPMD patients.

Results

The results of Friedman's ANOVA showed a statistically significant change in the mean scores for pain, activity, speech, shoulder, taste, saliva, mood, and anxiety domains of UWQOL with time, (p-value <0.05); while physical health, social relationships, environment domains of WHO- BREF have shown significant changes in their respective mean scores.

Conclusion

The assessment of Quality of Life (QOL) should routinely be done by the clinicians. If the clinicians start considering the QOL as the primary outcome of a treatment protocol, it will enhance patients' identity, well-being, and personality.

Body mass index and self-care behaviors related to oral health-related quality of life in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma within three months posttreatment

PURPOSE

Oral dysfunction is a common adverse event of treatment and may affect oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). This study aimed to identify factors associated with OHRQoL in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) within the first three months posttreatment.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study examined OSCC patients who received treatment from the outpatient radiation department of a single cancer center in northern Taiwan. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded, and patients were assessed using the Self-Care Behaviors Scale (SCB), Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP), and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) questionnaires.

RESULTS

Among 148 OSCC patients, 11.5% reported being underweight and 70.3% reported normal weight. The most common self-care factors associated with adverse effects were decreased appetite and fatigue. Psychological disability, functional limitation, and physical pain were the most negative OHRQoL factors. Poor OHRQoL was associated with more severe adverse effects after self-care behaviors, using feeding tubes during treatment, and having BMI less than 25, which together explained 33.5% of the variance in OHRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of adverse effects after self-care behaviors and using feeding tubes during treatment strongly influenced overall OHRQoL and seven specific dimensions of OHRQoL.

Treatment outcomes of laser therapy in oral submucous fibrosis-a systematic review

Background

The mainstay of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) management is to increase the mouth opening; thereby improving oral functionalities. In modernized dentistry, laser therapy (LT) could play a major role for trismus relief in OSF patients. The present review was performed to systematically analyze the published literature on LT for OSF management.

Methods

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and CINAHL databases were searched until June 2019 using suitable key words and the information was extracted according to the PRISMA guidelines. All full text papers that assessed efficacy of LT for OSF management without limitations on age, gender, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status of the participants were considered eligible. Participants were allocated to the LT alone or in adjunct to oral physiotherapy and medicinal treatment. Outcome parameters included the reduction in trismus. Review articles, case reports, editorial, conference abstracts and in vitro studies were excluded. No restriction was applied on date and language of the publications.

Results

Out of 97 published papers, 7 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for the analysis. All the studies were clinical and mainly included stage II and III OSF patients. Although different laser types and other parameters were used, all the studies reported improvement in mouth opening in the range of 6.84 mm and 23.7 mm. Additionally, two studies noticed reduced burning sensation and increased tongue protrusion and cheek flexibility. Conclusion: The LT can provide a promising and better means for relieving trismus and probably OSF-related other symptoms in moderate stages of the disease.

Clinicopathologic data of individuals with oral lichen planus: A Brazilian case series

Background

The aim of the present series was to analyze the sociodemographic characteristics, clinicopathologic features, and oral health-related quality of life of 41 individuals with oral lichen planus (OLP).

Material and Methods

In a retrospective analysis (1998-2018), individuals with a clinical diagnosis of OLP from a referral service of Oral Medicine of Brazil were invited for follow-up. The individuals were assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) form. Histopathological data were reviewed according to the latest criteria proposed by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (AAOMP/2016).

Results

This series mainly consisted of females (70.7%) in their forties (31.7%). The buccal mucosa (68.2%) was the most commonly affected site. Reticular (56.1%) and erosive (34.3%) appearances were the most frequent. According to OHIP-14, individuals with OLP at multiple sites in the oral cavity showed worse values in the handicap domain and those who did not respond to corticosteroids showed a higher score on the psychological discomfort domain.

Conclusions

The findings of the present study, using the AAOMP/2016 criteria, agree with case series and retrospective studies reported in the literature. Besides, OLP in its more severe clinical forms had an influence on patient quality of life.

Key words:Diagnosis, epidemiology, oral lichen planus, oral mucosa, quality of life.

Assessment of oral health-related quality of life instruments for oral submucous fibrosis: A systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist

Quality of life (QoL) instruments are becoming increasingly important in research and often used in clinical practice. Various QoL instruments have been developed/ validated for assessment of oral health-related QoL (OHRQoL) in patients with oral submucous fibrosis (OSF). Selection of an adequate instrument is challenging in routine practice due to lack of information on psychometric quality of measurement instruments. This systematic review gives an extensive overview of quality of all the currently available measurement instruments for use in OSF patients. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and CINAHL were searched for relevant literature until December 2018 and the information was extracted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of the identified studies was assessed per measurement property according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurements Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Four studies that met the inclusion criteria were included. Three generic and one disease-specific QoL instruments were identified. Information regarding important measurement properties was often incomplete. The evidence for the quality of measurement instruments was found to be variable, none of the instruments performed sufficient on all measurement properties. Based on the available information, OHRQoL-OSF appeared to have adequate COSMIN measurement properties. As recently published, newer QoL instruments have not yet been evaluated in an adequate manner for use in OSF. We suggest future studies should implement OSF-specific OHRQoL-OSF to better understand OSF patients' perspectives and help inform clinicians to propose treatment strategies as per patients' needs.

Comparison of generic and condition-specific oral health-related quality of life instruments in patients with oral submucous fibrosis

PURPOSE

With the growing interest in health economics, there is a demand for best valid instrument to assess quality of life (QoL) in patients with oral submucous fibrosis (OSF). The objective of this study was to compare the convergent and discriminative properties of the condition-specific OHRQoL-OSF and generic OHIP-14 in OSF patients.

METHODS

The OHRQoL-OSF and OHIP-14 instruments were administered concurrently to 300 clinically diagnosed OSF patients. Analysis of both the instruments was carried out by using descriptive statistics. The internal consistency and reproducibility of the instruments were assessed using Cronbach's alpha and intra-class correlation coefficient respectively. The convergent and discriminative validity were then determined and compared.

RESULTS

The OHRQoL-OSF and OHIP-14 exhibited good psychometric properties for internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.88) and reproducibility (ICC > 0.85). A positive associations were observed between both the instruments, but a high prevalence of patients with no impact was noted using the OHIP-14. Both the instruments were able to discriminate between patients with different clinical stages of OSF, but OHRQoL-OSF was more responsive in the early stages of OSF. The OHRQoL-OSF demonstrated greater sensitivity for 'discomfort and functional impairment'.

CONCLUSIONS

The condition-specific OHRQoL-OSF identified OSF patients with impaired oral health-related QoL more easily with greater discriminative properties. To better understand patient reported experiences in OSF, these results may guide the choice of instrument in future researches and surveys.

Impact of socioeconomic inequalities on quality of life in oral submucous fibrosis patients

AIM

The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of socioeconomic characteristics on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients with oral submucous fibrosis (OSF).

METHODS

 A total of 300 OSF patients' quality of life (QoL) data were obtained using OHRQoL-OSF and global self ratings of oral health and overall wellbeing. The socioeconomic status (SES) of participants was analyzed by using modified Kuppuswamy scale.

RESULTS

OSF patients with lower SES had worse OHRQoL as compared with those with middle and upper SES (p < 0.001). The household income of the family was found to be strongly associated with poor OHRQoL.

CONCLUSION

Socioeconomic characteristics should be considered in the holistic management of OSF as it has been strongly associated with the OHRQoL of these patients.

Quality of life and oral potentially malignant disorders: Critical appraisal and prospects

Quality of life (QoL) is a vital and often required health outcome measure that is relevant to patient care. A healthy oral cavity enables person to perform daily activities without any limitations. However, any disturbance may result in impaired QoL. The oral health-remains an essential element of people’s health and well-being. In recent years, the tradition of clinical practice and research has been changed by incorporating QoL assessment, as it helps in assessment of patients’ needs and monitoring treatment responses. Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) are a group of chronic disorders including oral leukoplakia (OL), oral lichen planus and oral submucous fibrosis (OSF). It is evident that patients with OPMDs experience significant health-related symptoms, functional limitations and psycho-social impairment, compromising their QoL. Moreover, the worsening of QoL has been associated with advanced stages of OPMDs. Despite of increasing number of OPMD cases in recent decades, limited literature is available regarding QoL in this population. Although, there is higher prevalence of habit-related OPMDs, particularly OSF and OL in Southern Asian countries, only a few studies have been performed in these populations. Moreover, these studies administered generic QoL instruments, which offer less sensitivity to clinical changes. However, condition-specific instruments are more sensitive and allows better measurement of QoL. As the impacts of different conditions on OHRQoL may vary, the development and validation of a QoL instrument specific to each clinical entity of OPMDs is currently needed.