A real-world, cross-sectional, community survey of symptoms and health-related quality of life of adults with acute myeloid leukemia

Glasdegib combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a comprehensive meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by clonal expansion of myeloid precursors, often accompanied by poor prognostic outcomes in older populations due to molecular heterogeneity and resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic agents. Glasdegib, a potent inhibitor of the Hedgehog signaling pathway, has emerged as a targeted agent that enhances chemosensitivity and demonstrates favorable pharmacodynamic profiles in combination regimens. This systematic review evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of Glasdegib-based therapies in the management of AML.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) to identify eligible studies reported up to August 2024. Using R version R.4.4.1, we reported outcomes as pooled proportions and confidence intervals (CIs). The survival data were extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves and reconstructed.

RESULTS

The pooled two-year overall survival for Glasdegib plus chemotherapy was 30% (95% CI [27-34%], I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis showed rates of 36% (95% CI [30-42%], Cytarabine and Daunorubicin), 27% (95% CI [20-36%], Low-Dose Cytarabine), and 25% (95% CI [20-31%], Azacitidine. Median survival times were highest for Glasdegib plus Cytarabine and Daunorubicin at 17.6 months (95% CI [15.6-21.9]), followed by 10.4 months (95% CI [8.22-12.3]) for Glasdegib plus Azacitidine, and 7.89 months (95% CI [5.47-11.5]) for Glasdegib plus Low-Dose Cytarabine. Safety analysis revealed varied adverse event rates for Glasdegib plus chemotherapy, with febrile neutropenia (37%), nausea (47%), vomiting (32%), and QT prolongation (44%) being the most commonly reported.

CONCLUSION

Glasdegib combined with chemotherapy demonstrates promising efficacy in improving survival outcomes for AML patients, particularly in combination with Cytarabine and Daunorubicin. While adverse events were common, they were generally manageable, supporting Glasdegib as a viable therapeutic option. Further research is warranted to optimize treatment regimens and evaluate long-term safety and quality-of-life outcomes.

Effects of Venetoclax Combined with Azacitidine on the Immune Function and Quality of Life in Patients with Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Aims/Background Patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The combination of azacitidine and venetoclax has demonstrated some efficacy in relapsed AML. This study aimed to investigate the effects of venetoclax combined with azacitidine on immune function and quality of life in patients with relapsed AML. Methods This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 104 patients with relapsed AML who were admitted to the First People's Hospital of Fuyang from January 2020 to January 2024. The patients were divided into a combination group (n = 53, treated with a combination of venetoclax and azacitidine) and an azacitidine group (n = 51, treated with azacitidine) according to the treatment protocol. Hematological parameters (proportion of bone marrow progenitor cells [PBMPC], white blood cell count [WBC], platelet count [PLT], neutrophil count [NEUT], and hemoglobin [Hb]), serum immunoglobulin (immunoglobulin G [IgG], IgA, and IgM) and inflammatory factor (interleukin-6 [IL-6] and tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α]) levels, as well as European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30) scores were compared between the two groups, and adverse reactions were recorded. Results The remission rate in the combination group (66.0%) was significantly higher than that in the azacitidine group (45.1%, p < 0.05). Both azacitidine monotherapy and the combination therapy with venetoclax improved hematological indicators and quality of life while reducing serum immunoglobulin levels and inflammatory factors. Compared with the azacitidine group, the combination group demonstrated a significant reduction in PBMPC (p < 0.05), alongside an increase in WBC, PLT, NEUT, and Hb (p < 0.05). Additionally, combination therapy led to a greater reduction in serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM, IL-6, and TNF-α compared to azacitidine alone (p < 0.05). Moreover, combination therapy significantly improved scores for physical, emotional, cognitive, social function, and general health status (p < 0.05), while reducing scores for nausea, dyspnea, insomnia, pain, and constipation (p < 0.05). Importantly, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion The combination of venetoclax and azacitidine could regulate the immune function, improve hematological indicators and quality of life, without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions in patients with relapsed AML.

A systematic review of health state utility values for older people with acute myeloid leukaemia

PURPOSE

Older people with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) have a poor prognosis, reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and require substantial healthcare resources. The objectives of this systematic review were to determine what health state utility values (HSUVs) are reported in the literature that can be used in economic evaluations of interventions for older people with AML, identify research gaps, and discuss directions for future research.

METHODS

The following databases were searched for studies published from inception until Feb 2023: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and EconLit. Studies were included if they reported on HSUVs of people with AML >60 years, or HRQoL data that could be mapped to HSUVs using currently published algorithms.

RESULTS

Of 532 studies identified, 7 met inclusion (4 full studies and 3 conference abstracts). Twenty-eight potentially eligible studies were excluded as they did not report HRQoL measures in sufficient detail to be mapped to utility values. Included studies reported on health states of newly diagnosed disease (n=4 studies), intensive therapy (n=1 study), controlled remission (n=3 studies), and relapsed or refractory disease (n=2 studies). No studies reported on low intensity therapy or supportive care health states. Utility values were largely reported via the EuroQol and ranged from 0.535 (intensive therapy) to 0.834 (controlled remission).

CONCLUSION

There are gaps in knowledge on HSUVs for older people with AML, particularly for certain treatment-related health states. Future articles should publish comprehensive HRQoL outcomes to enable use in economic evaluation.

Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Antiviral Agents for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with higher non-relapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). But the preferred drug for preventing cytomegalovirus infection is still controversial. We evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of antiviral agents based on the most recent studies.

METHODS

A pairwise and network meta-analysis was conducted to obtain direct and indirect evidence of antivirals. The cost of allo-HSCT recipients in a teaching hospital was collected, and a cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision tree combined with Markov model was completed from the perspective of allo-HSCT recipients over a lifetime horizon.

RESULTS

A total of 19 RCTs involving 3565 patients (8 antivirals) were included. In the network meta-analysis, relative to placebo, letermovir, valacyclovir, and ganciclovir significantly reduced CMV infection incidence; ganciclovir significantly reduced CMV disease incidence; ganciclovir significantly increased the incidence of serious adverse event; none of antivirals significantly reduced all-cause mortality. Based on meta-analysis and Chinese medical data, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) saved for maribavir, acyclovir, valacyclovir, ganciclovir, and letermovir relative to placebo corresponded to US$216 635.70, US$11 590.20, US$11 816.40, US$13 049.90, and US$12 189.40, respectively. One-way sensitivity analysis showed the most influential parameter was discount rate. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a 53.0% probability of letermovir producing an ICER below the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$38 824.23/QALY. The scenario analysis demonstrated prophylaxis with letermovir is considered cost-effective in the United States.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, letermovir is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for preventing CMV infection, and it might be a cost-effective choice in allo-HSCT recipients in China.

Health-Related Quality of Life as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Predicts Outcomes of Patients Treated with Azacitidine-A Prospective Cohort Study by the AGMT

In this prospective study (NCT01595295), 272 patients treated with azacitidine completed 1456 EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaires. Linear mixed-effect modelling was used to incorporate longitudinal data. When compared with a matched reference population, myeloid patients reported more pronounced restrictions in usual activities (+28%, p < 0.0001), anxiety/depression (+21%, p < 0.0001), selfcare (+18%, p < 0.0001) and mobility (+15%, p < 0.0001), as well as lower mean EQ-5D-5L indices (0.81 vs. 0.88, p < 0.0001), and lower self-rated health on the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) (64 vs. 72%, p < 0.0001). After multivariate-adjustment, (i) the EQ-5D-5L index assessed at azacitidine start the predicted time with clinical benefit (TCB) (9.6 vs. 6.6 months; p = 0.0258; HR = 1.43), time to next treatment (TTNT) (12.8 vs. 9.8 months; p = 0.0332; HR = 1.42) and overall survival (OS) (17.9 vs. 12.9 months; p = 0.0143; HR = 1.52); (ii) Level Sum Score (LSS) predicted azacitidine response (p = 0.0160; OR = 0.451) and the EQ-5D-5L index showed a trend (p = 0.0627; OR = 0.522); (iii) up to 1432 longitudinally assessed EQ-5D-5L response/clinical parameter pairs revealed significant associations of EQ-5D-5L response parameters with haemoglobin level, transfusion dependence and hematologic improvement. Significant increases of the likelihood ratios were observed after addition of LSS, EQ-VAS or EQ-5D-5L-index to the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) or the revised IPSS (R-IPSS), indicating that they provide added value to these scores.

Venetoclax combinations delay the time to deterioration of HRQoL in unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Phase 3 trials Viale-A and Viale-C evaluated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with AML unfit for intensive chemotherapy who received venetoclax (VEN) + (AZA) (Viale-A) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) (Viale-C) or placebo (PBO) + AZA or LDAC. Patient-reported outcomes included: EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS/QoL) and physical functioning (PF), PROMIS Cancer Fatigue Short Form 7a (Fatigue), and EQ-5D-5L health status visual analog scale (HS-VAS). Time to deterioration (TTD), defined as worsening from baseline in meaningful change thresholds (MCT) of ≥10, 5, or 7 points for GHS/QoL or PF, fatigue, and HS-VAS, respectively, was assessed; differences between groups were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and unadjusted log-rank analyses. VEN + AZA vs PBO + AZA patients had longer TTD in GHS/QoL (P = 0.066) and fatigue (P = 0.189), and significantly longer TTD in PF (P = 0.028) and HS-VAS (P < 0.001). VEN + LDAC vs PBO + LDAC patients had significantly longer TTD in GHS/QoL (P = 0.011), PF (P = 0.020), and fatigue (P = 0.004), and a trend in HS-VAS (P = 0.057). Approximately 43%, 35%, 32%, and 18% of patients treated with VEN + AZA, AZA + PBO, VEN + LDAC, or LDAC + PBO, respectively, saw improvements >MCT in GHS/QoL. Overall, VEN may positively impact HRQoL in patients with AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, leading to longer preservation of functioning and overall health status.

Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms of disease or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis of CPX-351 versus 7 + 3 in older adults with newly diagnosed high-risk/secondary AML

BACKGROUND

CPX-351 (United States: Vyxeos^®; Europe: Vyxeos^® Liposomal), a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine in a synergistic 1:5 molar ratio, is approved by the US FDA and the EMA for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia or acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes. In a pivotal phase 3 study that evaluated 309 patients aged 60 to 75 years with newly diagnosed high-risk/secondary acute myeloid leukemia, CPX-351 significantly improved median overall survival versus conventional 7 + 3 chemotherapy (cytarabine continuous infusion for 7 days plus daunorubicin for 3 days), with a comparable safety profile. A Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms of disease or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis of the phase 3 study was performed to compare survival quality between patients receiving CPX-351 versus conventional 7 + 3 after 5 years of follow-up.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 between December 20, 2012 and November 11, 2014 to receive induction with CPX-351 or 7 + 3. Survival time for each patient was partitioned into 3 health states: TOX (time with any grade 3 or 4 toxicity or prior to remission), TWiST (time in remission without relapse or grade 3 or 4 toxicity), and REL (time after relapse). Within each treatment arm, Q-TWiST was calculated by adding the mean time spent in each health state weighted by its respective quality-of-life, represented by health utility. The relative Q-TWiST gain, calculated as the difference in Q-TWiST between treatment arms divided by the mean survival of the 7 + 3 control arm, was determined in order to evaluate results in the context of other Q-TWiST analyses.

RESULTS

The relative Q-TWiST gain with CPX-351 versus 7 + 3 was 53.6% in the base case scenario and 39.8% among responding patients. Across various sensitivity analyses, the relative Q-TWiST gains for CPX-351 ranged from 48.0 to 57.6%, remaining well above the standard clinically important difference threshold of 15% for oncology.

CONCLUSIONS

This post hoc analysis demonstrates that CPX-351 improved quality-adjusted survival, further supporting the clinical benefit in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk/secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Trial registration This trial was registered on September 28, 2012 at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01696084 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01696084 ) and is complete.

Clinically Significant Fatigue in Adult Leukemia Patients: Prevalence, Predictors, and Impact on Quality of Life

Background

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a common distressing symptom in leukemia patients. CRF becomes clinically significant fatigue (CSF) when adversely affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and warrants further workup, referrals, and treatment. Objective: To assess the prevalence and predictors of CSF and assesses its impact on HRQoL in adult leukemia patients.

Method

Analysis was performed on 168 leukemia patients. The primary study outcomes were CSF (score ≥4) as measured by the fatigue numerical rating scale and HRQoL using a validated Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu) scale.

Result

The prevalence of CSF was 89 (53%), with a mean score of 6.66±2.02. About 106 (63.1%) of leukemia patients had poor Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (102.61±23.50). Overall, FACT-Leu mean score indicated that study participants had poor HRQoL (114.70±29.67). There was a statistically significant difference in HRQoL between the patients with CSF 104.89±28.82 and Non-CSF 125.76±26.71, p<0.001. Poor appetite (odd ratio: 3.02 [95% CI: 1.33-6.85]) was statistically significant predictors (p<0.010) of CSF. Dependence on caregiver (odd ratio: 3.31 [95% CI: 0.41-0.75]) and having non-CSF (odd ratio: 5.22 [95% CI: 2.44-11.19]) were found statistically significant predictors of good HRQoL.

Conclusion

CSF is prevalent among leukemia patients, and adversely affects their HRQoL. Holistic assessment and supportive care are needed to reduce the burden of CSF and improve leukemia patients HRQoL.

Health-Related Quality of Life and Treatment of Older Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: a Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology Review Paper

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment landscape for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is evolving. Many treatments have comparable efficacy making their impact on quality of life (QoL) an important differentiating factor. In this review, we discuss QoL in older adults with AML, focusing on therapeutic and observational trials that have incorporated QoL assessments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a multi-dimensional concept incorporating physical, mental, emotional, and social functioning domains. HRQoL components overlap with components of geriatric assessment, a multidisciplinary diagnostic process that identifies underlying vulnerabilities of older adults and guides subsequent management strategies. HRQoL questionnaires may be general, cancer-specific, leukemia-specific, or symptom-focused. Therapeutic and observational cohort studies suggest HRQoL improves, or at least remains stable, during intensive and lower-intensity therapies. Nonetheless, HRQoL is not routinely incorporated in AML therapeutic trials. HRQoL assessments can inform both decision-making and management for older adults with AML.

Using Social Media to Uncover Treatment Experiences and Decisions in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Who Are Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Patient-Centric Qualitative Data Analysis

Background

Until recently, treatment options were limited for patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (AML and MDS) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Owing to the condition’s rapid progression, it is difficult to identify what is most important to patients when making treatment decisions. Patients’ needs can be better addressed by gaining a deeper understanding of their perspectives, which is valuable in the decision-making process. The Food and Drug Administration recently encouraged the use of social media as a tool to gain insight on patients’ perspectives regarding symptoms experienced and the impacts of their disease.

Objective

This study aimed to use disease-specific social media posts by patients with AML or MDS who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy and their caregivers to capture factors they feel are most important, and to provide current evidence to inform and characterize these perspectives.

Methods

Posts by patients with AML or MDS and their caregivers were extracted from publicly available discussions on 3 large AML- or MDS–specific sites. These posts were manually reviewed to only include patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. A total of 1443 posts from 220 AML patients/caregivers and 2733 posts from 127 MDS patients/caregivers met the study inclusion criteria. A qualitative data analysis (QDA) of a sample of 85 patients’/caregivers’ posts was conducted to identify themes, and a targeted QDA of posts from 79 users focused on treatment decision discussions. Posts were manually reviewed, and relevant text segments were coded and grouped into categories and overall themes.

Results

Eighty-six percent (73/85) of users in the overall QDA had relevant information about the key objectives. The most commonly discussed treatment experience theme was the humanistic burden of AML or MDS in terms of emotional/physical impact and impact on family (86%, 63/73 of users), followed by treatment decisions (56%, 41/73) and unmet needs (50%, 37/73). In the QDA of treatment decisions, 60 posts from 45 users contained relevant information. Patients commonly reported the desire to reach specific milestones, including birthdays and weddings. They wished for a better quality of life over quantity of life, did not want the risk of suffering from side effects, and expressed a clear preference to be at home rather than in a hospital or care home.

Conclusions

This study was a novel application of disease-specific social media. It highlighted experiences in the current treatment of AML and MDS, including information gaps, patient/caregiver uncertainty, and the importance of understanding patients’/caregivers’ goals and opinions. A clear finding from this research was the importance of reaching certain personal life goals and being at home with family and friends. The analysis showed that patients/caregivers face additional challenges, including humanistic impacts and a lack of information regarding treatment options.