Assessment and significance of quality of life in women with gynecologic cancer

Quality of Life and Stress-Related Psychological Distress Among Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cervical cancer places substantial burdens on physical and psychosocial health. This study evaluated changes in quality of life (QoL) and perceived stress in patients with cervical cancer before and six months after initiating standard treatment. Four validated instruments were used: the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30).

METHODS

Ninety-six women (mean age: 48.3 ± 7.4 years) with histologically confirmed cervical cancer were enrolled. Baseline (pre-treatment) assessments included SF-36, PSS, WHOQOL-BREF, and EORTC QLQ-C30. Follow-up was conducted six months after initiating either surgery or chemoradiation. Paired t-tests (or Wilcoxon signed-rank for non-parametric data) compared baseline and follow-up scores. Subgroup analyses were performed by disease stage (early vs. advanced) and marital status (married vs. unmarried).

RESULTS

Post-treatment assessments showed significant improvements in SF-36 physical functioning (from 61.9 ± 11.6 to 66.7 ± 12.3, p = 0.015) and mental health (from 63.4 ± 12.2 to 68.1 ± 12.4, p = 0.022). PSS scores declined from 23.2 ± 5.7 to 20.6 ± 5.5 (p = 0.001). WHOQOL-BREF physical and psychological domains increased, with physical health rising from 56.4 ± 12.0 to 60.7 ± 12.5 (p = 0.032). EORTC QLQ-C30 global health improved from 61.4 ± 13.8 to 66.3 ± 14.2 (p = 0.014). Advanced-stage patients exhibited greater absolute QoL gains yet remained below the early-stage scores. Married patients reported sharper reductions in PSS and higher final QoL scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Over six months of standard cervical cancer treatment, these patients demonstrated significant QoL improvements and reduced perceived stress. While advanced-stage disease remained associated with lower post-treatment scores, these individuals benefited from notable gains compared to baseline. Marital status emerged as a protective factor. Ongoing psychosocial support may amplify these beneficial effects, warranting further longitudinal studies to optimize integrative survivorship care.

Functional Changes of the Genitourinary and Gastrointestinal Systems before and after the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer-A Systematic Review

The incidence of endometrial cancer (EC), which coexists with such civilization diseases as diabetes, obesity or hypertension, is constantly increasing. Treatment includes surgery as well as brachytherapy, teletherapy, rarely chemotherapy or hormone therapy. Due to the good results of the treatment, the occurrence of side effects of therapy becomes a problem for the patients. One of the large groups of side effects includes the pelvic organ prolapse, urinary and fecal incontinence. The aim of this study was to present current knowledge on the occurrence of pelvic floor dysfunction in women treated for EC. A literature review was conducted in the PubMED and WoS databases, including articles on pelvic floor dysfunction in women with EC. PRISMA principles were followed in the research methodology. A total of 1361 publications were retrieved. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 24 papers were eligible for the review. Mostly retrospective studies based on different questionnaires were evaluated. No prospective studies were found in which, in addition to subjective assessment, clinical examination and objective assessment of urinary incontinence were used. Studies show a significant increase in the incidence of pelvic floor disorders, including urinary incontinence, after various forms of EC treatment. We believe that assessment of complications after endometrial cancer treatment is clinically relevant. The review emphasizes the importance of programming prospective studies to prevent and address these disorders at each stage of oncologic treatment.

Comparisons of emotional health by diagnosis among women with early stage gynecological cancers

OBJECTIVE

To assess self-reported emotional health in a cohort of women with early stage gynecologic cancers and to explore differences based on primary cancer type.

METHODS

We analyzed survey data from a cohort study of gynecological cancer patients treated at an academic cancer center. Measures of emotional health included cancer-related quality of life, distress, depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and posttraumatic growth. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models examined differences in emotional health measures by primary cancer site. Potential confounders considered for inclusion in the final models were age, stage, education, income, partner status, treatment status, and race.

RESULTS

242 patients with early stage disease completed the survey. Patients with cervical and vaginal/vulvar cancers reported greater cancer-related distress, anxiety and PTSD symptoms. Patients with endometrial cancer reported the lowest posttraumatic growth scores, which remained statistically significant after adjustment for demographic and clinical differences. No significant differences in cancer-related quality of life were observed among individuals with different primary cancer sites CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest patients with early-stage gynecologic cancer face different psychosocial sequelae based on primary cancer site, though underlying clinical and sociodemographic factors may play a significant role in this observed relationship. Further research is needed to assess poorer emotional health among individuals with vaginal/vulvar cancers and the lower posttraumatic growth among patients with endometrial cancer as posttraumatic growth is considered a potentially beneficial psychosocial outcome of cancer.

Depressive symptoms and health-related quality of life in older women with gynecologic Cancers

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess factors associated with depressive symptoms in older women with gynecologic cancers and to examine the association of depression with health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Women aged 65 and older previously diagnosed with cervical, ovarian, or uterine cancer (n=1977) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results - Medicare Health Outcomes Survey database and compared to propensity-matched cancer-free controls (n=9885). Women with and without depressive symptoms were compared by cancer status. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with depressive symptoms, and linear regression was used to determine the association of depressive symptoms with HRQOL measures.

RESULTS

The prevalence of depressive symptoms was higher among older women with gynecologic cancer (31.9%, 32.2%, and 25.3% for cervical, ovarian, and uterine cancer, respectively) than cancer-free older women (24.9%) (p=0.05). Adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, older women with ovarian cancer were significantly more likely to have depressive symptoms than controls (Prevalence Odds Ratio = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.31, 2.32, p < 0.01). Among older women with gynecologic cancer, comorbid conditions and functional limitations were strongly associated with depressive symptoms. Women with depressive symptoms showed significant decrements in both physical and mental measures of HRQOL.

CONCLUSION

This study gives insight into correlates of depressive symptoms that may be used to better identify women with gynecologic cancers who are at risk of depression. The relatively high prevalence of depressive symptoms and significant deficits in HRQOL underscore the need for effective screening and treatment of depression in older women with gynecologic cancers.

Perioperative adverse events in women undergoing concurrent urogynecologic and gynecologic oncology surgeries for suspected malignancy

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

This study's objectives were to compare the incidence of adverse events after concurrent urogynecologic and gynecologic oncology surgery to gynecologic oncology surgery alone and to describe the frequency of modification in planned urogynecologic procedures. The authors hypothesized there would be no difference in major complications.

METHODS

This was a retrospective matched cohort study of women who underwent concurrent surgery at a large tertiary care center between January 2004 and June 2017. Cohorts were matched by surgeon, surgery route, date, and final pathologic diagnosis. Perioperative data and postoperative adverse events classified by Clavien-Dindo grade were compared.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight patients underwent concurrent surgeries, with 216 matched cohorts. Concurrent-case patients were more likely to be older, postmenopausal, have greater vaginal parity, have had preoperative chemotherapy, and have preoperative cardiac or pulmonary disease. There were no differences in intraoperative complications or Dindo grade ≥ 3 adverse events between groups, but there were more grade 2 adverse events in the concurrent cohort (44 vs 19%, p < 0.0001) including postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) (26 vs 7%, p < 0.0001). Concurrent surgery remained associated with a higher incidence of grade ≥ 2 events on multivariate analysis [odds ratio (OR) 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-4.2, p = 0.0004). Discharge with a urinary catheter was more frequent after concurrent cases (35 vs 2%, p < 0.0001). Planned urogynecologic procedures were modified in 10% (n = 11) of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent surgeries have an increased incidence of minor but not serious perioperative adverse events. One in ten planned urogynecologic procedures is either modified or abandoned during combined surgeries.

Quality of Life in Women After Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecological Malignancies: A Multicentric Study

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective, multicentric study investigates quality-of-life issues and emotional distress in gynecological cancer survivors submitted to pelvic exenteration (PE).

METHODS

The Global Health Status scale of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30; the EORTC QLQ-CX24 (CX24), and EORTC QLQ-OV28 questionnaires were administered at least 12 months from surgery only in women with no evidence of further recurrence after PE. Statistical analysis was performed by the analysis of variance (for repeated measures.

RESULTS

Ninety-six subjects affected by gynecological malignancies receiving PE were enrolled in the study. Anterior PE was performed in 47 patients (49%), posterior PE was performed in 29 cases (30.2%), and total PE performed in 20 women (20.8%). In 38 cases (39.6%), a definitive colostomy was performed. Urinary diversion with continent pouch was created in 11 patients. (11.5%), whereas in the remaining cases, a noncontinent pouch was reconstructed. Patients showed a significant discomfort in attitude to disease (71.5 ± 4.7), body image (48.9 ± 6.4), financial difficulties (56.2 ± 5.8), gastrointestinal symptoms (constipation, 47.8 ± 5.1; diarrhea, 62.4 ± 6.6; appetite loss, 43.6 ± 6.7), insomnia (64.5 ± 6.6), Global Health Status (64.6 ± 3.8), physical functioning (65.8 ± 4.6), role functioning (58.8 ± 5.8), and emotional functioning (67.4 ± 4.2). A higher number of ostomies (hazard rate [HR], 7.613; P = 0.012), the creation of a noncontinent bladder (HR, 8.230; P = 0.009), and of definitive colostomy (HR, 8.516; P = 0.008) emerged as independent predictors of poorer Global Health Status scores. Older age (HR, 11.235; P = 0.003), vaginal/vulvar cancer (HR, 7.369; P = 0.013), total/posterior PE (HR, 7.393; P = 0.013), higher number of ostomies (HR, 7.613; P = 0.012), the creation of a noncontinent bladder (HR, 8.230; P = 0.009), and of definitive colostomy (HR, 8.516; P = 0.008) emerged as independent predictors of lower body image levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term psycho-oncological support is strongly recommended. The reduction of ostomies seems the most effective way to improve patients' quality of life.

Quality of life and sexuality in disease-free survivors of cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy alone: A comparison between total laparoscopy and laparotomy

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possible differences between total laparoscopy and laparotomy regarding their impact on postoperative quality of life and sexuality in disease-free cervical cancer survivors who received radical hysterectomy (RH) and/or lymphadenectomy alone and were followed for >1 year.We reviewed all patients with cervical cancer who had received surgical treatment in our hospital between January 2001 and March 2014. Consecutive sexually active survivors who received RH and/or lymphadenectomy for early stage cervical cancer were enrolled and divided into 2 groups based on surgical approach. Survivors were interviewed and completed validated questionnaires, including the European Organization for Research Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Core Questionnaire including 30 items, the Cervical Cancer-Specific Module of European Organization for Research Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire including 24 items (EORTC QLQ-CX24), and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).In total, 273 patients with histologically confirmed cervical cancer were retrospectively reviewed. However, only 64 patients had received RH and/or lymphadenectomy alone; 58 survivors meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled, including 42 total laparoscopy cases and 16 laparotomy cases, with an average follow-up of 46.1 and 51.2 months, respectively. The survivors in the 2 groups obtained good and similar scores on all items of the European Organization for Research Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Core Questionnaire including 30 items and Cervical Cancer-Specific Module of European Organization for Research Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire including 24 items, without significant differences after controlling for covariate background characteristics. To the date of submission, 21.4% (9/42) of cases in the total laparoscopy group and 31.2% (5/16) of cases in the laparotomy group had not resumed sexual behavior after RH. Additionally, the scores on the FSFI items were comparable between the 2 groups; however, the total FSFI scores were 19.7 and 17.4 for total laparoscopy and laparotomy survivors, respectively, both of which were less than the validated cutoff value of 26.6 for diagnosing female sexual dysfunction.Disease-free cervical cancer survivors after RH and/or lymphadenectomy were able to cope well, although RH could greatly impair females' sexual function regardless of surgical approach. Moreover, the long-term quality of life and sexual function of survivors seemed to be independent of the surgical approach chosen. Randomized controlled and longitudinal trials with larger populations are needed to better compare these issues between patients receiving laparoscopy and laparotomy.

Prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in women with suspected gynecological malignancy: a survey-based study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Understanding of pelvic floor disorders among women with gynecological cancer is limited. The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in women with suspected gynecological malignancy before surgery.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed of women aged ≥18 with a suspected gynecological malignancy who enrolled in the University of North Carolina Health Registry/Cancer Survivorship Cohort (HR/CSC) from August 2012 to June 2013. Demographics were obtained from the HR/CSC self-reported data; clinical data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Subjects completed validated questionnaires (Rotterdam Symptom Checklist and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms) to assess bladder and bowel function.

RESULTS

Among 186 women scheduled for surgery for gynecological malignancy, 152 (82 %) completed baseline assessments before surgery. Mean age was 58.1 ± 13.3 years, and mean BMI was 33.6 ± 8.8 kg/m(2). The majority of subjects had uterine cancer (61.8 %), followed by ovarian (17.1 %) and cervical (11.1 %). At baseline, the rate of urinary incontinence (UI) was 40.9 %. A third of subjects reported stress UI, and one quarter reported urge UI. The overall rate of fecal incontinence was 3.9 %, abdominal pain was 47.4 %, constipation was 37.7 %, and diarrhea was 20.1 %. When comparing cancer types, there were no differences in pelvic floor symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic floor disorders are common in women with suspected gynecological malignancy at baseline before surgery. Recognizing pelvic floor disorders in the preoperative setting will allow for more individualized, comprehensive care for these women.

Emotional and sexual concerns in women undergoing pelvic surgery and associated treatment for gynecologic cancer

The surgical management of gynecologic cancer can cause short- and long-term effects on sexuality, emotional well being, reproductive function, and overall quality of life (QoL). Fortunately, innovative approaches developed over the past several decades have improved oncologic outcomes and reduced treatment sequelae; however, these side effects of treatment are still prevalent. In this article, we provide an overview of the various standard-of-care pelvic surgeries and multimodality cancer treatments (chemotherapy and radiation therapy) by anatomic site and highlight the potential emotional and sexual consequences that can influence cancer survivorship and QoL. Potential screening tools that can be used in clinical practice to identify some of these concerns and treatment side effects and possible solutions are also provided. These screening tools include brief assessments that can be used in the clinical care setting to assist in the identification of problematic issues throughout the continuum of care. This optimizes quality of care, and ultimately, QoL in these women. Prospective clinical trials with gynecologic oncology populations should include patient-reported outcomes to identify subgroups at risk for difficulties during and following treatment for early intervention.

Health behaviors and quality of life in Chinese survivors of cervical cancer: a retrospective study

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate health behaviors and quality of life (QoL) in cervical cancer survivors, and to identify factors that may compromise or enhance their health-related QoL.

Methods

Data were collected retrospectively from the records of 102 consecutive patients with cervical cancer treated from May 2007 to January 2009 at the People’s Hospital of Xintai City in Shandong Province. The study methodology was guided by the contextual model of health-related QoL.

Results

The results showed the significant mediating effects of general health status and psychological well-being between life burden and health-related QoL, between sexual impact of the disease and health-related QoL, and between the patient–doctor relationship and health-related QoL. In addition, there were a significant association between health-related QoL, education level, tumor stage, marital status, and age. Life burden and the patient-doctor relationship was also related to the sexual impact of the disease. However, no significant difference in health-related QoL and sexual impact was observed according to type of treatment received.

Conclusion

These results advance our understanding of the predictors of health-related QoL and the relationship between them. Health-related QoL in cervical cancer survivors may be improved by mediating life burden, sexual functioning, and the patient–doctor relationship.

Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients

The aim of this article was to compare gene expression programming (GEP) method with three types of neural networks in the prediction of adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients. One-hundred and seven patients treated by radical hysterectomy were analyzed. Each record representing a single patient consisted of 10 parameters. The occurrence and lack of perioperative complications imposed a two-class classification problem. In the simulations, GEP algorithm was compared to a multilayer perceptron (MLP), a radial basis function network neural, and a probabilistic neural network. The generalization ability of the models was assessed on the basis of their accuracy, the sensitivity, the specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The GEP classifier provided best results in the prediction of the adverse events with the accuracy of 71.96 %. Comparable but slightly worse outcomes were obtained using MLP, i.e., 71.87 %. For each of measured indices: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the AUROC, the standard deviation was the smallest for the models generated by GEP classifier.

Patient-reported outcome measures for follow-up after gynaecological cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. Gynaecologic cancer treatment is known to have the potential for a major impact on quality of life (QoL). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is an umbrella term that covers a range of potential types of measurement but is used specifically to refer to self reports by the patient of their health and well-being. Use of QoL and cancer-specific questionnaires as alternatives to follow-up may have immense psychological benefit to the patient and cost benefit to the healthcare system.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of PROMs as an alternative to routine follow-up of women after treatment for gynaecological cancers to identify recurrences, affect overall survival and assess psychological benefit.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to November 2012. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings and reference lists of review articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs with concurrent comparison groups (of adequate quality that used statistical adjustment for baseline case mix using multivariable analyses) that compared PROMs or QoL questionnaires versus traditional follow-up with multiple visits to the hospital in women after treatment for gynaecological cancers. Studies that involved women completing PROMs at intervals and submitting results for assessment by their cancer care team or structured interviews of women during their follow-up were included in the analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed whether potentially relevant studies met the inclusion criteria. We found no studies and therefore analysed no data.

MAIN RESULTS

The search strategy identified 2524 unique references, of which all were excluded.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence to make an informed decision about PROMs for follow-up after gynaecological cancer. Ideally, RCTs which are multicentre or multinational or both, or well-designed non-randomised studies are needed that use multivariable analysis to adjust for baseline imbalances, to compare follow-up strategies and improve current knowledge.

Long-term prospective longitudinal evaluation of emotional distress and quality of life in cervical cancer patients who remained disease-free 2-years from diagnosis

Background

A long-term prospective assessment of QoL in cervical cancer patients is still lacking. Here, we provide the first 2-years prospective, longitudinal study evaluating emotional distress and QoL in early stage (ECC) and locally advanced (LACC) cervical cancer patients who remained disease-free 2-years from diagnosis.

Methods

The questionnaires: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Global Health Status items of EORTC QLQ-C30 (GHS), and EORTC QLQ-CX24 (CX24) have been administered by a dedicated team of psycho-oncologists, administered at baseline, and after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months from surgery The Generalized Linear Model for repeated measure was used to analyze modifications of QoL measures over time.

Results

In both groups, an early reduction of the percentage of patients with anxiety levels ≥11 was observed at the 3-month evaluation (ECC: 25.7% at baseline Vs 14.7% after 3 months, p value=0.001; LACC: 22.2% at baseline Vs 15.4% after 3 months, p value=0.001). Despite this favorable trend, after 2 years from diagnosis, 11.9% of ECC and 15.6% of LACC patients still showed an anxiety score ≥11. No significant changes over time were observed in term of Depression levels. Focusing on QoL issues, mean GHS and Sexual Activity scores showed an improvement over time in both groups compared to baseline (GHS: 5.7% difference for ECC, p value=0.001, and 11.0% in LACC, p value=0.001; SXA: 13.9% difference for ECC, p value=0.001; and 6.1% in LACC, p value=0.008). On the other hand, Body Image mean scores were significantly impaired by chemoradiation administration in LACC patients, without long-term recovery (7.5% difference, p value=0.001). Finally, in both groups, lymphedema (LY) and menopausal symptoms (MS) showed an early worsening which persisted 2-year after surgery (LY: 19.5% difference for ECC, p value=0.014, and 27.3% in LACC, p value=0.001; MS: 14.4% difference for ECC, p value=0.004, and 16.0% in LACC, p value=0.002).

Conclusions

Despite a significant improvement over time, elevated anxiety levels are still detectable at 24 months after surgery in approximately 10% of cervical cancer patients. Much more attention should be focused on surgical/medical approaches able to minimize the negative impact of lymphedema and menopausal symptoms on QoL.

Quality of life and emotional distress in early stage and locally advanced cervical cancer patients: a prospective, longitudinal study

OBJECTIVES

This prospective, longitudinal study investigates QoL issues and emotional distress in early stage cervical cancer (ECC) patients undergoing radical surgery (RS) and in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) patients triaged to chemoradiation (CT/RT) followed by RS.

METHODS

The Global Health Status scale of EORTC QLQ-C30 (GHS), the EORTC QLQ-CX24 (CX24) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire were administered at baseline, and after 3, 6, and 12 months from surgery. For LACC patients QoL assessment was also performed after CT/RT. Statistical analysis was performed by the ANOVA for repeated measures and the Between Subject test.

RESULTS

In ECC and LACC patients, the GHS scores improved over time (5.5% difference in mean scores compared to baseline in ECC, and 7.0% difference in mean score compared to baseline in LACC patients). An early worsening of lymphedema scores was documented in ECC cases (14.6% difference in mean values compared to baseline, p value=0.001), and in LACC patients (difference up to 28.3% of mean values, value=0.0001). Menopausal symptoms persistently worsened over time reaching >15% difference of mean values compared to baseline in both groups. Sexual activity scores markedly improved both in ECC and LACC patients (difference of mean score values compared to baseline was 16.5% in ECC, and 6.7% in LACC patients). Both ECC and LACC patients experienced an improvement of anxiety scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphedema and menopausal symptoms were the most disabling treatment-related sequelae; the amount of QoL issues and their multifaceted aspects require the cooperation of multidisciplinary teams.