Effect of SAMITAL® in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced mucositis in adult oncohematological patients

Managing strategies of chemotherapy and radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis

Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are widely employed as primary non-surgical cancer treatments; however, their non-selective cytotoxicity often leads to adverse events such as oral mucositis (OM), particularly in head and neck cancer therapies. International guidelines provide recommendations for managing chemoradiotherapy-induced OM in various clinical contexts. Subsequently, emerging researches have introduced evidence supporting novel approaches or existing regimens for OM prevention and treatment. The repurposing of established drugs has garnered significant interest due to its shorter development timeline, improved safety profiles, and lower costs compared to new drug development. For example, clinical trials assessing established drugs such as melatonin, clonidine, and pentoxifylline indicate promising potential for managing OM. Additionally, several emerging pharmacological interventions have demonstrated considerable efficacy; SAMITAL and rhIL-11 are supported by phase II clinical trials and prospective studies, while probiotics like Streptococcus salivarius K12 and curcumin have shown effectiveness in randomized clinical trials. Furthermore, recent high-level studies have reinforced the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions, such as photobiomodulation (PBM) and cryotherapy, over the past two years. In all, given the evidence supporting different strategies, PBM and oral cryotherapy are highly recommended for managing OM when feasible. Topical clonidine, melatonin, oral pentoxifylline, topical SAMITAL or rhIL-11, oral SsK12, and curcumin may also be utilized but would benefit from validation in larger trials. Besides, Verbascoside, Palifermin, Amifostine, and Avasopasem manganese can be suggested for OM management, while the side effects should be monitored. The accessibility and cost/effectiveness of specific managing strategies of OM should be considered when selecting appropriate options.

Role of SAMITAL in the Prevention and Treatment of Chemo-Radiotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis in Head and Neck Carcinoma: A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial (ROSAM)

BACKGROUND

In patients affected by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, the onset of severe oral mucositis is a decisive factor in completing concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, and few interventions have demonstrated a modest benefit. The primary aim of this clinical study was to evaluate the role of SAMITAL in reducing the incidence of severe mucositis induced by concurrent chemo-radiotherapy; the secondary aims were the tolerability and patient-reported quality of life measures.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive SAMITAL granules for oral suspension of 20 mL, four-time daily or matching placebo in a 1:1 fashion using a stratified-block randomization scheme by disease site and type of chemotherapy. The SAMITAL/placebo was dispensed at the baseline visit and at each weekly visit following radiotherapy initiation. Patients were subjected to weekly endoscopic evaluations to assess the presence of mucositis. In addition, patient-reported outcomes were measured.

RESULTS

Among the 116 patients treated with a median total dose of 66 Gy, 59 were randomized to SAMITAL and 57 to placebo. Overall, the incidence of severe mucositis was 51.7%, with 45.8% in the SAMITAL and 57.9% in the placebo arm (OR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.3-1.3). After chemo-radiotherapy, patients randomized to SAMITAL reported significantly lower xerostomia, coughing and swallowing scores and a better quality of life.

CONCLUSION

SAMITAL did not significantly reduce the incidence of severe mucositis in all studied populations. However, the lower rate of mucositis, together with a significantly better quality of life, suggested that a clinical benefit existed. This trial is registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register database, number 2012-002046-20, and with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01941992.

Medicinal plants used for the treatment of mucositis induced by oncotherapy: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review aimed to identify effective medicinal plants for the treatment of mucositis induced by oncotherapy.

METHODS

The clinical question was the following: "Which medicinal plants are effective in the treatment of oral mucositis induced by cancer treatment?" (PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Lilacs, and SciELO). The keywords were the following: phytotherapy OR "herbal drug" OR "plant extract" OR plant OR "medicinal plant" OR pharmacognosy OR ethnobotany OR ethnomedicine OR ethnopharmacology OR "flower essences" OR "natural product" AND mucositis OR mucositides OR stomatitis OR stomatitides OR "oral ulcer" AND chemotherapy OR radiotherapy OR immunotherapy OR cancer OR neoplasm OR neoplasm OR tumor OR tumor. The inclusion criteria for the selection of articles were the type of study design (clinical trials) and the studied population (cancer patients presenting lesions of oral mucositis having undergone treatment with medicinal plants).

RESULTS

After evaluation of the works, 24 of 893 articles were selected. Matricaria chamomilla (chamomilla) presented promising results, such as a reduction in severity and lesion incidence with improved pain symptomatology. The plant extracts Isatis indigótica, Olea europaea, Calendula officinalis, A. digitatae, and M. sylvestris improved the lesions. Mucotrol™ and QRLYD herbal products improved the degree of severity of the lesions, while SAMITAL® and MUCOSYTE allowed for greater pain control.

CONCLUSION

The complementary treatment of oral mucositis in cancer patients, with analgesic and anti-inflammatory actions with lower side effects, is an alternative for healthcare professionals.

Systematic review of natural and miscellaneous agents, for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients and clinical practice guidelines - part 2: honey, herbal compounds, saliva stimulants, probiotics, and miscellaneous agents

OBJECTIVE

To update the clinical practice guidelines for the management of oral mucositis (OM) that were developed by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). This part focuses on honey, herbal compounds, saliva stimulants, probiotics, and miscellaneous agents.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of MASCC/ISOO. The body of evidence for each intervention, in each clinical setting, was assigned an evidence level. The findings were added to the database used to develop the 2014 MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines. Based on the evidence level, one of the following guidelines were determined: Recommendation, Suggestion, No Guideline Possible.

RESULTS

A total of 78 papers were identified within the scope of this section, of which 49 were included in this review and merged with nine publications that were reported in the previous guidelines update. A new Suggestion was made for honey (combined topical and systemic delivery) for the prevention of OM in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. A new Suggestion clarified that chewing gum is not effective for the prevention of OM in pediatric patients with hematological or solid cancer treated with chemotherapy. No guideline was possible for other interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous natural products and herbal remedies were studied for the management of OM. Of the agents reviewed in this systematic review, a guideline in favor was made for honey (combined topical and systemic), while a guideline against was made for chewing gum. Additional research is warranted to clarify the potential of other interventions.