Multi-reoperations for lung metastases

Reoperative Pulmonary Metastasectomy: Outcomes and Indications

Recurrent pulmonary metastasis after initial pulmonary metastasectomy is common and poses a clinical dilemma. Reoperative pulmonary metastasectomy is an option that in select patients has been shown to be safe and technically feasible resulting in encouraging survival results from non-randomized retrospective studies. As with metastasectomy in general, there is ongoing debate if observed benefit of repeat pulmonary resection is a result of surgery or a reflection of selection bias. This review summarizes available evidence regarding reoperative pulmonary metastasectomy, discusses selection bias, and outlines future directions in the context of our evolving understanding of the oligometastatic state.

The Case for Pulmonary Metastasectomy-Clinical Practice Narrative Review and Commentary

Pulmonary metastasectomy has become a well-established procedure for patients with certain types of solid tumors. Patients are usually scheduled for staged lung metastasectomy in case of primary tumor control, the absence of distant non-lung metastases, and when complete resection is achievable. Nodules are removed with precision resection in order to ensure radical resection with minimal margins; this technique permits good oncological results, preserving the surrounding pulmonary parenchyma and causing minimal distortion compared to staplers. When possible, anatomical resections should be avoided since they are not justified by real oncological advantages and, in the majority of cases, sacrifice too much healthy tissue, possibly leading to inoperability in the case of metachronous relapses. Thus, preserving the maximum amount of pulmonary parenchyma is crucial because repeated metastasectomies are possible and frequent, with no theoretical limits to the number of reinterventions. In our multidisciplinary board team, we support the role of pulmonary metastasectomy as a useful curative therapy, with acceptable morbidity and mortality, with indications to be discussed case-by-case.

Pulmonary metastasectomy and repeat metastasectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases: outcomes from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Surgery

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection of recurrent pulmonary metastases in patients with colorectal cancer is an established treatment option; however, the evidence for repeat resection is limited. The aim of this study was to analyse long-term outcomes from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Surgery.

METHODS

Data from the mandatory Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Surgery were used to analyse all patients after metastasectomy or repeat metastasectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases from January 2012 to December 2019 in the Netherlands. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine the difference in survival. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of survival.

RESULTS

A total of 1237 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 127 patients underwent repeat metastasectomy. Five-year overall survival was 53 per cent after pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases and 52 per cent after repeat metastasectomy (P = 0.852). The median follow-up was 42 (range 0-285) months. More patients experienced postoperative complications after repeat metastasectomy compared with the first metastasectomy (18.1 per cent versus 11.6 per cent respectively; P = 0.033). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 1 (HR 1.33, 95 per cent c.i. 1.08 to 1.65; P = 0.008), multiple metastases (HR 1.30, 95 per cent c.i. 1.01 to 1.67; P = 0.038), and bilateral metastases (HR 1.50, 95 per cent c.i. 1.01 to 2.22; P = 0.045) were prognostic factors on multivariable analysis for pulmonary metastasectomy. Diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide less than 80 per cent (HR 1.04, 95 per cent c.i. 1.01 to 1.06; P = 0.004) was the only prognostic factor on multivariable analysis for repeat metastasectomy.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that patients with colorectal pulmonary metastases have comparable median and 5-year overall survival rates after primary or recurrent pulmonary metastasectomy. However, repeat metastasectomy has a higher risk of postoperative complications.

Outcome of Repeat Pulmonary Metastasectomy

Pulmonary metastasectomy is a well-established contribution to the cure of oligometastatic cancers, but its exact effectiveness is poorly understood. Here we report the outcomes of repeat pulmonary metastasectomy from a multicenter trial. This retrospective study included patients who underwent re-do metastasectomies between January 2010 and December 2014. The exclusion criterion was metastasectomy without curative intent. We reviewed medical files of 621 consecutive patients who underwent initial pulmonary metastasectomy. Of those, 64 patients underwent repeat metastasectomies, and these patients were included in the analysis. All the 64 patients underwent a second metastasectomy, later 35 of them underwent a third metastasectomy, 12 underwent a fourth metastasectomy, and 6 underwent a fifth metastasectomy. The total number of re-do metastasectomies was 181. The median overall survival among the patients undergoing re-do metastasectomy was 66.0 ± 3.8 months. Three and 5-year survival rates were 82.3% and 63.3%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates were 63.3% after the first, 50.9% after the second, 74.4% after the third, 83.3% after the fourth, and 60.0% after the fifth metastasectomy. We conclude that at the current stage of knowledge, there is an indication for repeat re-do metastasectomy with curative intent.

Results of redo pulmonary metastasectomy

Repeat surgical resection (redo) for pulmonary metastases is a questionable, albeit intriguing topic. We performed an extensive review of the literature, to specifically analyze results of redo pulmonary metastasectomies. We reviewed a total of 3,523 papers. Among these, 2,019 were excluded for redundancy and 1,105 because they were not completely retrievable. Out of 399 eligible papers, 183 had missing information or missing abstract, while 96 lacked data on survival. A total of 120 papers dated from 1991 onwards were finally included. Data regarding mortality, major morbidity, prognostic factors and long-term survivals of the first redo pulmonary metastasectomies were retrieved and analyzed. Homogeneity of data was affected by the lack of guidelines for redo pulmonary metastasectomy and the risks of bias when comparing different studies has to be considered. According to the histology sub-types, redo metastasectomies papers were grouped as: colorectal (n=42), sarcomas (n=36), others (n=20) and all histologies (n=22); the total number of patients was 3,015. Data about chemotherapy were reported in half of the papers, whereas targeted or immunotherapy in 9. None of these associated therapies, except chemotherapy in two records, did significantly modify outcomes. Disease-free interval before the redo procedure was the prevailing prognostic factor and nearly all papers showed a significant correlation between patients’ comorbidities and prognosis. No perioperative mortality was reported, while perioperative major morbidity was overall quite low. Where available, overall survival after the first redo metastasectomy ranged from 10 to 72 months, with a 5-years survival of approximately 50%. The site of first recurrence after the redo procedure was mainly lung. Despite the data retrievable from literature are heterogeneous and confounding, we can state that redo lung metastasectomy is worthwhile when the lesions are resectable and the perioperative risk is low. At present, there are no “non-surgical” therapeutic options to replace redo pulmonary metastasectomies.

Uniportal non-intubated lung metastasectomy

BACKGROUND

More than 15 years ago, we started a program of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopies (VATS) lung metastasectomy in non-intubated local anesthesia. Hereby we present the short and long-term results of this combined surgical-anesthesiological technique.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2015, 71 patients (37 men and 34 women) with pulmonary oligometastases, at the first episode, underwent uniportal VATS metastasectomy under non-intubated anesthesia.

RESULTS

Four patients (5.6%) required intubation for intolerance. Mean number of lesions resected per patient was 1.51. There was no mortality. The study group demonstrated a significant reduction of operative time from the beginning of the experience (P=0.001), good level of consciousness at Richmond scale and quality of recovery after both 24 and 48 hours. Median hospital stay was 3 days and major morbidity rate was 5.5%. Both disease-free survival and overall survival were similar to those achieved with intubated surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

VATS lung metastasectomy in non-intubated local anesthesia was safely performed in selected patients with oligometastases with significant advantages in overall operative time, hospital stay and economical costs. Long-term results were similar.

Immunological and Inflammatory Impact of Non-Intubated Lung Metastasectomy

Background: We hypothesized that video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lung metastasectomy under non-intubated anesthesia may have a lesser immunological and inflammatory impact than the same procedure under general anesthesia. Methods: Between December 2005 and October 2015, 55 patients with pulmonary oligometastases (at the first episode) successfully underwent VATS metastasectomy under non-intubated anesthesia. Lymphocytes subpopulation and interleukins 6 and 10 were measured at different intervals and matched with a control group composed of 13 patients with similar clinical features who refused non-intubated surgery. Results: The non-intubated group demonstrated a lesser reduction of natural killer lymphocytes at 7 days from the procedure (p = 0.04) compared to control. Furthermore, the group revealed a lesser spillage of interleukin 6 after 1 (p = 0.03), 7 (p = 0.04), and 14 (p = 0.05) days. There was no mortality in any groups. Major morbidity rate was significantly higher in the general anesthesia group 3 (5%) vs. 3 (23%) (p = 0.04). The median hospital stay was 3.0 vs. 3.7 (p = 0.033) days, the estimated costs with the non-intubated procedure was significantly lower, even excluding the hospital stay. Conclusions: VATS lung metastasectomy in non-intubated anesthesia had significantly lesser impact on both immunological and inflammatory response compared to traditional procedure in intubated general anesthesia.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery colorectal lung metastasectomy in non-intubated anesthesia

BACKGROUND

More than ten years ago we started a program of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lung metastasectomy in non-intubated local anesthesia. In this study we investigated the effectiveness and long term results of this combined surgical-anesthesiological technique.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2014, 48 patients (25 men and 23 women) with pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer, at the first episode, underwent VATS metastasectomy under non-intubated local anesthesia. Three patients required intubation for intolerance. In the same period 13 patients scheduled for non-intubated metastasectomy refused awake surgery and were used as a control group.

RESULTS

The two groups were homogeneous for both demographic and pathological features. Mean number of lesions resected per patient were 1.51 (non-intubated) vs. 1.77 (control), respectively (P=0.1). The oxygenation was significantly lower in the non-intubated group especially at the end of the procedure, but the values inverted from the first postoperative hour. There was no mortality in any groups. The non-intubated group demonstrated a significant shorter overall operating time (P=0.04), better quality of recovery after both 24 (P=0.04) and 48 hours (P=0.04), shorter median hospital stay (P=0.03) and lower estimated costs (P=0.03), even excluding the hospital stay. Major morbidity rate was lower (6% vs. 23%) yet not significant (P=0.1). Both disease free survival and overall survival were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

VATS lung metastasectomy in non-intubated local anesthesia was safely performed in selected patients with oligometastases with significant advantages in overall operative time, hospital stay and economical costs. Morbidity rate was lower yet not significant. Long term results were similar.

Pulmonary metastases from gastric cancer: Is there any indication for lung metastasectomy? A systematic review

It is still not clear whether pulmonary resection may have a role in the multidisciplinary management of gastric cancer lung metastases. A systematic literature search was performed to identify all studies published between January 1998 and December 2014 about pulmonary resection of gastric cancer metastases. Ten studies published between 1998 and 2013 were retrieved, including a total of 44 patients. After gastrectomy, median disease-free interval was 35 months. Thirty-eight patients had single lung metastases, whereas six presented with more than one lesion. Median overall survival after lung resection was 45 months, and median disease-free survival was 9 months. Our analysis of the recent literature shows that lung metastasectomy for gastric cancer pulmonary metastases has been reported only in the setting of anecdotic cases or small series of highly selected patients. Lung metastasectomy has no role in the standard management of metastatic gastric patients and may actually be proposed only in individual highly selected cases.