Sorafenib as first- or second-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a community setting

A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of sorafenib versus other targeted agents for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Molecular targeted therapies were found to be efficacious and safer in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Sorafenib is the first target agent (TA) to report a benefit in this disease and has largely established a prominent role in progression-free survival (PFS). However, there have been conflicting results across the trials that evaluated the efficacy of sorafenib.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to perform a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in first-line treatments of mRCC.

METHODS

We searched online electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library updated on September 2017. Trials on the efficacy of sorafenib in first-line treatments of advanced RCC were included, of which the primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), PFS, overall survival (OS), and grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of 5 trials were included in this analysis. The group of AEs showed significantly improved PFS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70-0.86, P < .001), as well with the ORR (OR = 1.89, 95%CI = 1.38-2.59, P < .0001) compared with sorafenib. However, there was no significant difference in OS (OR = 0.97, 95%CI = 0.78-1.22, P = .82).

CONCLUSION

Sorafenib did not achieve efficacy and safety benefit in patients with mRCC compared with those treated with TAs. The role of sorafenib in first-line treatments of mRCC may change in favor of newer drugs. More research is needed to confirm whether these new TAs could replace sorafenib as the gold standard in the future.

Sorafenib: key lessons from over 10 years of experience

Introduction: In 2005, sorafenib was the first targeted therapy approved for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), transforming treatment. In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), for more than a decade, sorafenib remained the only approved systemic therapy to have demonstrated a survival benefit in first-line unresectable HCC. In 2013, sorafenib was the first targeted agent approved for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) refractory to radioactive iodine treatment. Areas covered: This review discusses the development, advances, and challenges associated with sorafenib use in RCC, HCC, and DTC over the past decade. A search was performed on PubMed and key congresses as required, with no time limits. Expert commentary: Sorafenib has had a lasting impact on the therapeutic landscape of RCC, HCC, and DTC, and remains an important treatment option despite a rapidly evolving treatment landscape. Extensive clinical and real-world experience has been invaluable in improving patient management and maximizing benefit from treatment. Ongoing clinical trials continue to evaluate sorafenib in different settings, and in combination with other therapies in HCC and DTC. We have no doubt that sorafenib will continue to be an important treatment option in the coming years.

Clinicopathological and prognostic factors for long-term survival in Chinese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sorafenib: a single-center retrospective study

Data on long-term survival and prognostic significance of demographic factors and adverse events (AEs) associated with sorafenib, an orally administered multikinase inhibitor in Chinese population with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are limited. Outcome data from adult patients (n = 256) with advanced RCC who received sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) either as first-line or second-line therapy between April 2006 and May 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (OS), determined to be 22.2 (95% CI: 17.1–27.4) months, and the secondary endpoint was overall median progression-free survival (PFS), determined to be 13.6 (95% CI: 10.7–16.4) months at a median follow-up time of 61.8 (95% CI: 16.2–97.4) months. Analysis of the incidence of AEs revealed the most common side effect as hand-foot skin reactions (60.5%) followed by diarrhea (38.7%), fatigue (35.5%), alopecia (34.0%), rash (24.6%), hypertension (21.5%) and gingival hemorrhage (21.1%). Multivariate regression analysis revealed older age (≥ 58 years), lower Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center score, time from nephrectomy to sorafenib treatment, number of metastatic tumors and best response as significant and independent demographic predictors for improved PFS and/or OS (p ≤ 0.05). Alopecia was identified as a significant and independent predictor of increased OS, whereas vomiting and weight loss were identified as significant predictors of decreased OS (p ≤ 0.05). Sorafenib significantly improved OS and PFS in Chinese patients with advanced RCC. Considering the identified significant prognostic demographic factors along with the advocated prognostic manageable AEs while identifying treatment strategy may help clinicians select the best treatment modality and better predict survival in these patients.

Sorafenib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment agents in Chinese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the largest multicenter retrospective analysis of survival and prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy of sorafenib and sunitinib with regard to overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in Chinese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective study was performed to elucidate the relationship between clinical variables and prognosis comparing sorafenib and sunitinib as first-line treatment agents in Chinese patients with mRCC. Between September 2006 and December 2014, 845 patients received either sorafenib (400 mg bid; n = 483) or sunitinib (50 mg q.d; n = 362). The primary end point was OS and PFS.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients with low and moderate risk according to Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) score was significantly higher in sunitinib group, and that with high risk was significantly higher in sorafenib group (15.1 vs. 5.2%; p < 0.001). Median OS was similar in sorafenib and sunitinib group (24 vs. 24 months; p = 0.298). Sorafenib group exhibited higher mPFS compared to sunitinib group (11.1 vs. 10.0 months; p = 0.028). Treatment (sorafenib vs sunitinib), pathology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, MSKCC scores, Heng's criteria of risk, and number of metastases were identified as significant predictors for OS and along with liver metastasis for PFS. Clinical outcomes in terms of mOS was significantly better with sorafenib in patients ≥65 years of age (p = .041), ECOG 0 (p = 0.0001), and median MSKCC risk score (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Sorafenib and sunitinib are both effective in treating mRCC. However, sorafenib might be more effective in elderly patients (≥65 years) and in patients with an ECOG status of 0, classified under MSKCC moderate risk.

Sorafenib: 10 years after the first pivotal trial

Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor with anticancer activity against a wide spectrum of cancers. It is currently approved for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, advanced renal cell carcinoma or progressive, locally advanced or metastatic differentiated thyroid carcinoma. In this review, we present a number of studies that investigated the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in these settings. We also discuss the perspectives on the use of this molecule, including the role of sorafenib as comparator for the development of new drugs, the combination of sorafenib with additional therapies (such as transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma) and the use of this treatment in several other advanced refractory solid tumors.

Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib Therapy on Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in Korean Patients: Results from a Retrospective Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sorafenib for Korean patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

METHODS

A total of 177 mRCC patients using sorafenib as first- (N = 116), second- (N = 43), and third-line (N = 18) therapies were enrolled from 11 Korean centers between 2006 and 2012. The patient characteristics, therapy duration, tumor response, disease control rate, and tolerability were assessed at baseline and at routine follow-ups, and the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times and rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among all patients, 18 (10.2%) stopped sorafenib treatment for a median of 1.7 weeks, including 15 (8.5%) who discontinued the drug, while 40 (22.6%) and 12 (6.8%) patients required dose reductions and drug interruptions, respectively. Severe adverse events (AEs) or poor compliance was observed in 64 (36.2%) patients, with 118 (7.4%) ≥grade 3 AEs. During the treatment, one myocardial infarction was observed. The number of ≥grade 3 AEs in the first-line sorafenib group was 71 (6.8% of the total 1048 AEs). During a median follow-up of 17.2 months, the radiologically confirmed best objective response rate, disease control rate, median PFS, and median OS were 22.0%, 53.0%, 6.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2-8.9), and 32.6 months (95% CI, 27.3-63.8) for the total 177 sorafenib-treated patients, respectively, and 23.2%, 56.0%, 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.5-10.5), and not reached yet (95% CI, 1.0-31.1) for the first-line sorafenib group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Sorafenib produced tolerable safety, with a ≥grade 3 AE rate of 7.4% and an acceptable disease control rate (53.0%) in Korean mRCC patients.

A multicenter, phase II study of the RAF-kinase inhibitor sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

The treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has advanced significantly over the last two decades. This multicenter study was designed with the primary objective to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sorafenib as first-line treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic RCC in the Middle East, who were considered to be ineligible for other approved first-line therapies. A total of 75 eligible patients from 8 centers in the Middle East were included in this study. The patients comprised 48 men and 27 women, with a median age of 52 years (range, 19-78 years). A total of 50 patients had clear cell carcinoma, 17 had papillary carcinoma and 8 had other pathological subtypes. At enrollment, 55 of the 75 patients had undergone previous nephrectomy. A total of 67 patients presented with metastatic disease, while 8 patients had regional residual lesions or local recurrence. The patients were treated with 400 mg oral sorafenib twice daily on a continuous basis as a single agent. Treatment was discontinued upon disease progression, prohibitive toxicity, surgical complications, loss to follow-up, or refusal to continue therapy. The median treatment duration was 21 weeks (range, 1-137 weeks). Sorafenib was tolerated by the majority of the patients. Grade 3/4 hand-foot syndrome occurred in 17 patients; diarrhea, elevated liver enzymes and fatigue were observed in 3 patients each; and grade 3/4 vomiting, hypertension and anemia, in 1 patient each. Of the 75 patients included in this study, 60 were evaluable for response. One patient achieved a complete response for 91 weeks and 6 patients exhibited a partial response (median duration of 23 weeks) with an overall response rate of 11.7%. Disease stabilization occurred in 37 patients (61.7%). Thus, disease control was achieved in 44 of the 60 patientrs (73%). At a median follow-up period of 53.5 weeks (range, 8.5-192 weeks), an intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated a median time-to-disease progression of 25.7 weeks, with a median overall survival of 54.8 weeks. In conclusion, sorafenib was found to be tolerable and effective as first-line therapy in patients with advanced RCC.

SWITCH: A Randomised, Sequential, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib-sunitinib Versus Sunitinib-sorafenib in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer

BACKGROUND

Understanding how to sequence targeted therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is important for maximisation of clinical benefit.

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively evaluate sequential use of the multikinase inhibitors sorafenib followed by sunitinib (So-Su) versus sunitinib followed by sorafenib (Su-So) in patients with mRCC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 SWITCH study assessed So-Su versus Su-So in patients with mRCC without prior systemic therapy, and stratified by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk score (favourable or intermediate).

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomised to sorafenib 400mg twice daily followed, on progression or intolerable toxicity, by sunitinib 50mg once daily (4 wk on, 2 wk off) (So-Su), or vice versa (Su-So).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint was improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with So-Su versus Su-So, assessed from randomisation to progression or death during second-line therapy. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

In total, 365 patients were randomised (So-Su, n=182; Su-So, n=183). There was no significant difference in total PFS between So-Su and Su-So (median 12.5 vs 14.9 mo; hazard ratio [HR] 1.01; 90% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-1.27; p=0.5 for superiority). OS was similar for So-Su and Su-So (median 31.5 and 30.2 mo; HR 1.00, 90% CI 0.77-1.30; p=0.5 for superiority). More So-Su patients than Su-So patients reached protocol-defined second-line therapy (57% vs 42%). Overall, adverse event rates were generally similar between the treatment arms. The most frequent any-grade treatment-emergent first-line adverse events were diarrhoea (54%) and hand-foot skin reaction (39%) for sorafenib; and diarrhoea (40%) and fatigue (40%) for sunitinib.

CONCLUSIONS

Total PFS was not superior with So-Su versus Su-So. These results demonstrate that sorafenib followed by sunitinib and vice versa provide similar clinical benefit in mRCC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We investigated if total progression-free survival (PFS) is improved in patients with advanced/metastatic kidney cancer who are treated with sorafenib and then with sunitinib (So-Su), compared with sunitinib and then sorafenib (Su-So). We found that total PFS was not improved with So-Su compared with Su-So, but both treatment options were similarly effective in patients with advanced/metastatic kidney cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00732914, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Cyclophilin D-mediated apoptosis attributes to sorafenib-induced cytotoxicity in clear cell-renal cell carcinoma

Cyclophilin D (CypD) is an essential regulatory component of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) and mediates cell necrosis. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of the multi-target drug, sorafenib, on clear cell-renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) necrosis by regulating CypD expression and to explore whether this effect was related to the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs). We used immunohistochemical analysis to compare CypD and p-ERK expression in human ccRCC tissues (n=53) and adjacent non-cancerous tissues (ANCT, n=34). CypD expression was localized to the cytoplasm of renal tubular epithelial cells and was lower in ccRCC samples while p-ERK expression was higher in ccRCC samples. In the in vitro assay, CypD was downregulated in ccRCC cell lines 786-O and A498 as compared with HK-2 which is a normal human renal tubular epithelial cell line. Overexpression of CypD induced the apoptosis of 786-O and A498 cells. Sorafenib induced the apoptosis of 786-O cells, which was coupled with the upregulation of CypD. Cyclosporin A (CsA, the inhibitor of CypD) and CypD siRNA inhibited the effect of sorafenib on apoptosis-induced 786-O and mitochondrial membrane potential depolarization. Epidermal growth factor (EGF, the activator of ERK) and ERK overexpression inhibited the effect of sorafenib on CypD expression, apoptosis-induced 786-O and mitochondrial membrane potential depolarization. In conclusion, our results suggested that CypD may represent a new therapeutic target for the treatment of ccRCC. Sorafenib induced apoptosis in ccRCC through CypD upregulation and this effect was related to the inhibition of p-ERK.

Small molecule adenosine 5'-monophosphate activated protein kinase (AMPK) modulators and human diseases

Adenosine 5'-monophosphate activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a master sensor of cellular energy status that plays a key role in the regulation of whole-body energy homeostasis. AMPK is a serine/threonine kinase that is activated by upstream kinases LKB1, CaMKKβ, and Tak1, among others. AMPK exists as αβγ trimeric complexes that are allosterically regulated by AMP, ADP, and ATP. Dysregulation of AMPK has been implicated in a number of metabolic diseases including type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity. Recent studies have associated roles of AMPK with the development of cancer and neurological disorders, making it a potential therapeutic target to treat human diseases. This review focuses on the structure and function of AMPK, its role in human diseases, and its direct substrates and provides a brief synopsis of key AMPK modulators and their relevance in human diseases.