IMA901 for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the context of new approaches to immunotherapy

Clinical potential of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC): a rapidly evolving strategy

Programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade therapy has become a game-changing therapeutic approach revolutionizing the treatment setting of human malignancies, such as renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Despite the remarkable clinical activity of anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies, only a small portion of patients exhibit a positive response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy, and the primary or acquired resistance might ultimately favor cancer development in patients with clinical responses. In light of this, recent reports have signified that the addition of other therapeutic modalities to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy might improve clinical responses in advanced RCC patients. Until, combination therapy with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy plus cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor (ipilimumab) or various vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) inhibitors axitinib, such as axitinib and cabozantinib, has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as first-line treatment for metastatic RCC. In the present review, we have focused on the therapeutic benefits of the PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy as a single agent or in combination with other conventional or innovative targeted therapies in RCC patients. We also offer a glimpse into the well-determined prognostic factor associated with the clinical response of RCC patients to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy.

HLA-DR Presentation of the Tumor Antigen MSLN Associates with Clinical Outcome of Ovarian Cancer Patients

Simple Summary

The immunopeptidome represents the entirety of peptides that are presented on the surface of cells on human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules and are recognized by the T-cell receptors of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cells. Malignant cells present tumor-associated antigens essential for tumor immune surveillance, which can be targeted by T-cell-based immunotherapy approaches. For ovarian carcinomas, various tumor-associated antigens, such as Mucin-16 and Mesothelin, have been described. The aim of our study is to analyze immunopeptidome-defined tumor antigen presentation in ovarian carcinoma patients in relation to clinical characteristics and disease outcomes to define potential biomarkers. Our work demonstrates the central role of HLA-DR-restricted peptide presentation of the tumor antigen Mesothelin and of CD4⁺ T-cell responses for tumor immune surveillance, and underlines Mesothelin as a prime target antigen for novel immunotherapeutic approaches for ovarian carcinoma patients.

Abstract

T-cell recognition of HLA-presented antigens is central for the immunological surveillance of malignant disease and key for the development of novel T-cell-based immunotherapy approaches. In recent years, large-scale immunopeptidome studies identified naturally presented tumor-associated antigens for several malignancies. Regarding ovarian carcinoma (OvCa), Mucin-16 (MUC16) and Mesothelin (MSLN) were recently described as the top HLA class I- and HLA class II-presented tumor antigens, respectively. Here, we investigate the role and impact of immunopeptidome-presented tumor antigens on the clinical outcomes of 39 OvCa patients with a follow-up time of up to 50 months after surgery. Patients with a HLA-restricted presentation of high numbers of different MSLN-derived peptides on their tumors exhibited significantly prolonged progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), whereas the presentation of MUC16-derived HLA class I-restricted peptides had no impact. Furthermore, a high HLA-DRB gene expression was associated with increased PFS and OS. In line, in silico prediction revealed that MSLN-derived HLA class II-presented peptides are predominantly presented on HLA-DR allotypes. In conclusion, the correlation of MSLN tumor antigen presentation and HLA-DRB gene expression with prolonged survival indicates a central role of CD4⁺ T-cell responses for tumor immune surveillance in OvCa, and highlights the importance of immunopeptidome-guided tumor antigen discovery.

Immunotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: Where will we go?

INTRODUCTION

Historically, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is considered a chemotherapy-resistant tumor. The cornerstone of systemic therapy included mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Currently, a new era is enteres with promising immunotherapeutic treatments, which are becoming commercially available. Areas covered: We provide a comprehensive review using PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov about the following immunotherapies in RCC: i) vaccine therapy, ii) adoptive T Cell Transfer and CAR T cells, iii) nonspecific immunotherapy - IL-2 (new formulations), iv) Checkpoint inhibitors, v) other checkpoint-molecules. We will also discuss their mechanism of action and toxicity, the importance of developing new patient selection algorithms (immunoprofiling, guidelines updates) and new biomarkers such as PD-1 expression. Expert commentary: Immunotherapy shows promise, and the current tools used in clinical practice, including guidelines, staging-classification and algorithms should be revised and adapted to the new immunotherapeutic drugs. Although immunotherapy in RCC show promising results, more research is needed in parallel to discover biomarkers that enable the prediction of a treatment response and therefore lead to better patient selection.

Immunobiology and immunotherapy in genitourinary malignancies

Immunotherapy has traditionally been a critical component of the cancer treatment armamentarium in genitourinary (GU) cancers. It has an established role in the management of carefully selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) [e.g., high dose interleukin-2 (IL-2)] and non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) [e.g., intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)]. In 2010, the sipuleucel-T vaccine was approved by the FDA for the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), based on a phase III trial showing overall survival (OS) benefit compared to placebo. The immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab (anti-PD-1) recently received FDA approval for the management of patients with advanced RCC patients previously treated with anti-angiogenic therapy, based on OS benefit compared to everolimus. Recently, large clinical trials demonstrated meaningful clinical benefit, including durable responses, as well as a good tolerability/safety profile with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced RCC and chemotherapy-resistant advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC), while FDA just approved atezolizumab for platinum-treated advanced UC. Numerous interesting trials in different cancers are ongoing. Several combinations of immune checkpoint blockade with chemotherapeutics, vaccines, targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors & monoclonal antibodies, epigenetic modifiers, anti-angiogenic agents, tumor microenvironment & myeloid cell targeting therapies, metabolic modification strategies, radiation, and others, are being tested in clinical trials. Comprehensive understanding of the factors underlying antitumor immune responses in physiologically relevant animal models and humans will refine further the clinical benefit of immunotherapy. Discovery and validation of appropriate molecular biomarkers via coordinated translational research efforts, rational clinical trial designs with suitable endpoints and well-defined eligibility criteria, prospective registries/databases, careful evaluation of cost-effectiveness and safety/tolerability, adequate funding and open continuous discussions among all stakeholders will support the revolutionary nature of immunotherapy in GU cancers.

Differential expression and clinical relevance of MUC1 in renal cell carcinoma metastasis

PURPOSE

To determine the differential expression patterns and prognostic relevance of Mucin-1 (MUC1) expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) metastasis.

METHODS

Tissue microarrays (TMA) from samples of 151 RCC metastases, 61 primary RCCs and corresponding benign renal tissues were immunohistochemically stained for MUC1 and semi-quantitatively evaluated by immunoreactivity scores (IRS). MUC1 differential expression in metastasis, primary RCC and normal tissue were comparatively analyzed. Patient characteristics and clinical follow-up for patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) were recorded. Correlations of MUC1 expression with mRCC survival were determined.

RESULTS

Median cytoplasmic expression was highest in benign tissue (IRS = 1.04). Primary RCC (0.50) and metastasis (0.12) showed significantly lower cytoplasmic staining intensity. Membranous expression in benign tissue was, however, significantly lower (0.21) compared with primary RCC (0.59) and metastasis (0.57). Notable differences of MUC1 cytoplasmic and membranous expression were observed between different metastasis sites. Significantly higher (P = 0.014) membranous expression was observed in pulmonary versus non-pulmonary lesions, while no significant differences of cytoplasmic MUC1 expression were observed. The prognostic relevance of MUC1 expression in metastatic RCC was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

MUC1 is differentially expressed in benign renal tissue, primary RCC and RCC metastasis. Membranous MUC1 expression was significantly elevated in pulmonary metastases compared to non-pulmonary lesions, which may reflect individual biology and putative response to MUC1-based anti-cancer therapy.

Peptide-Based Treatment: A Promising Cancer Therapy

Many new therapies are currently being used to treat cancer. Among these new methods, chemotherapy based on peptides has been of great interest due to the unique advantages of peptides, such as a low molecular weight, the ability to specifically target tumor cells, and low toxicity in normal tissues. In treating cancer, peptide-based chemotherapy can be mainly divided into three types, peptide-alone therapy, peptide vaccines, and peptide-conjugated nanomaterials. Peptide-alone therapy may specifically enhance the immune system's response to kill tumor cells. Peptide-based vaccines have been used in advanced cancers to improve patients' overall survival. Additionally, the combination of peptides with nanomaterials expands the therapeutic ability of peptides to treat cancer by enhancing drug delivery and sensitivity. In this review, we mainly focus on the new advances in the application of peptides in treating cancer in recent years, including diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.

New clinical advances in immunotherapy for the treatment of solid tumours

Advances in understanding the mechanisms of cancer cells for evading the immune system surveillance, including how the immune system modulates the phenotype of tumours, have allowed the development of new therapies that benefit from this complex cellular network to specifically target and destroy cancer cells. Immunotherapy researchers have mainly focused on the discovery of tumour antigens that could confer specificity to immune cells to detect and destroy cancer cells, as well as on the mechanisms leading to an improved activation of effector immune cells. The Food and Drug Administration approval in 2010 of ipilumumab for melanoma treatment and of pembrolizumab in 2014, monoclonal antibodies against T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 and programmed cell death 1, respectively, are encouraging examples of how research in this area can successfully translate into clinical use with promising results. Currently, several ongoing clinical trials are in progress testing new anti-cancer therapies based on the enhancement of immune cell activity against tumour antigens. Here we discuss the general concepts related to immunotherapy and the recent application to the treatment of cancer with positive results that support their consideration of clinical application to patients.

Peptide Immunotherapy in Vaccine Development: From Epitope to Adjuvant

Vaccines are designed to educate the host immune system to prevent infectious disease or to fight against various diseases such as cancers. Peptides were first employed to provide specific immune responses while minimizing unintended allergenic or reactogenic adverse effects. Discoveries of virus or cancer-specific antigens and the advanced knowledge of immunology accelerate the peptide vaccine development. Despite the overwhelming research pipelines, a very few of them reached to market approvals or phase III clinical trials, because of the lack of efficacy. Several strategies for the next generation peptide vaccines are devised to overcome the weak immunogenicity and the poor delivery. In this review, we discuss the new promising strategies of peptide vaccine development which are recently developed in preclinical and/or clinical stage focusing the roles of peptides in the vaccine formulation from epitope to adjuvant. Additionally, we discuss the future perspectives of peptide vaccine and immunotherapy.