Adherence to subcutaneous biological therapies in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases and inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review

Exploring the emotional impact of axial Spondyloarthritis: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies and a review of social media

BACKGROUND

The psychological burden in people with inflammatory arthritis is substantial, yet little is known about the disease-related affect experienced by individuals with axial Spondyloarthritis (axial SpA). The aim of this study was to conduct a qualitative evidence synthesis and a review of social media to explore the emotional impact of living with axial SpA.

METHODS

We searched nine databases for studies reporting qualitative data about participants' emotional experience of living with axial SpA. In addition, we searched social media platforms for posts from people with axial SpA based in the UK that offered insights into emotional responses to living with the condition. We employed a thematic approach to synthesise the data.

RESULTS

We included 27 studies (1314 participants; 72% men) in our qualitative evidence synthesis and developed seven descriptive themes from the data: 1) delayed diagnosis: a barrier to emotional wellbeing; 2) disruptive symptoms: a source of mood swings; 3) work disability: a loss of self-esteem; 4) obstacles in interpersonal relationships: a trigger of distress; 5) taking up exercise: personal pride or unwelcomed reminders; 6) anti-TNF therapy: hope reignited despite concerns and 7) a journey of acceptance: worry mixed with hope. Posts extracted from social media fora (537; 48% from women) for the most part supported the seven themes. One additional theme-COVID-19, uncertainty and anxiety during the pandemic, was developed, reflecting common emotions expressed during the UK's first wave of the coronavirus pandemic.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights a preponderance of negative affect experienced by people living with axial SpA, conditioned through existing and anticipated symptoms, failed expectations, and lost sense of self. Given the bidirectional relationships between negative emotions and inflammation, negative emotions and perceptions of pain, and the influence of affect in self-care behaviours, this finding has important implications for treatment and management of people with axial SpA.

Customer-centric product presentations for monoclonal antibodies

Delivering customer-centric product presentations for biotherapeutics, such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), represents a long-standing and paramount area of engagement for pharmaceutical scientists. Activities include improving experience with the dosing procedure, reducing drug administration-related expenditures, and ultimately shifting parenteral treatments outside of a controlled healthcare institutional setting. In times of increasingly cost-constrained markets and reinforced with the coronavirus pandemic, this discipline of "Product Optimization" in healthcare has gained momentum and changed from a nice-to-have into a must. This review summarizes latest trends in the healthcare ecosystem that inform key strategies for developing customer-centric products, including the availability of a wider array of sustainable drug delivery options and treatment management plans that support dosing in a flexible care setting. Three disease area archetypes with varying degree of implementation of customer-centric concepts are introduced to highlight relevant market differences and similarities. Namely, rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, and oncology have been chosen due to differences in the availability of subcutaneously dosed and ready-to-use self-administration products for mAb medicines and their follow-on biologics. Different launch scenarios are described from a manufacturer's perspective highlighting the necessity of platform approaches. To unfold the full potential of customer-centric care, value-based healthcare provider reimbursement schemes that incentivize the efficiency of care need to be broadly implemented.

The effects of golimumab on patient centric outcomes amongst rheumatoid arthritis patients in Greece. The GO-Q study

This study aimed at assessing the impact of golimumab on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in real-world settings. GO-Q was an observational, prospective, 12-month study, which recruited patients with moderate-to-severely active RA initiating golimumab treatment per label in rheumatology clinics and private practices. Primary endpoint was the change in PROs [EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disease Index (HAQ-DI), and Work Productivity and Activity Index for RA (WPAI:RA)] after 12 months of treatment. Other endpoints included Disease Activity Score for 28 joints with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), healthcare resource utilization, and golimumab adherence. Changes in continuous variables from baseline were evaluated with the paired t test. One hundred forty-five patients were recruited. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] EQ-5D-3L index increased significantly at 12 months versus baseline [from 0.427 (0.206) to 0.801 (0.229); p < 0.0001], with changes as early as 3 and 6 months (both p < 0.0001). Accordingly, there were statistically significant changes in all WPAI:RA domains from baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months (p < 0.0001). Patients' function improved gradually from the third month until the end of follow-up (p < 0.0001 for all time-points). Thirty (27.3%) and 60 (54.6%) patients achieved remission (DAS28-ESR < 2.6) and low disease activity (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2), respectively, at 12 months. Adherence rate to golimumab was high (mean [SD] 90.3% (7.5) at 12 months). In patients with moderate-to-severely active RA, golimumab significantly improved HRQoL, physical function, and work productivity and activity, with improvements in disease activity over 12 months in real-world settings.

Multilevel factors predict medication adherence in rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-month cohort study

Non-adherence challenges efficacy and costs of healthcare. Knowledge of the underlying factors is essential to design effective intervention strategies.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the prevalence of treatment adherence in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to evaluate its predictors.

METHODS

A 6-month prospective cohort study of patients with RA selected by systematic stratified sampling (33% on first disease-modifying rheumatic drug (DMARD), 33% on second-line DMARD and 33% on biologics). The outcome measure was treatment adherence, defined by a score greater than 80% both in the Compliance Questionnaire in Rheumatology and the Reported Adherence to Medication scale, and was estimated with 95% CIs. Predictive factors included sociodemographic, psychological, clinical, drug-related, patient-doctor relationship related and logistic. Their effect on 6-month adherence was examined by multilevel logistic models adjusted for baseline covariates.

RESULTS

180 patients were recruited (77% women, mean age 60.8). The prevalence of adherence was 59.1% (95% CI 48.1% to 71.8%). Patients on biologics showed higher adherence and perceived a higher medication need than the others; patients on second-line DMARDs had experienced more adverse events than the others. The variables explaining adherence in the final multivariate model were the type of treatment prescribed (second-line DMARDs OR=5.22, and biologics OR=3.76), agreement on treatment (OR=4.57), having received information on treatment adaptation (OR=1.42) and the physician perception of patient trust (OR=1.58). These effects were independent of disease activity.

CONCLUSION

Treatment adherence in RA is far from complete. Psychological, communicational and logistic factors influence treatment adherence in RA to a greater extent than sociodemographic or clinical factors.