Cancer CARtography: charting out a new approach to cancer immunotherapy

Efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib combined with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy targeting CD19 in refractory or relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

While chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy has shown promise in treating B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, its efficacy is variable in patients with poor initial responses. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib combined with CAR T therapy targeting CD19 in refractory/relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 17 patients with R/R DLBCL who received zanubrutinib combined with anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. We assessed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and conducted subgroup analyses. We also monitored CAR T-cell expansion by quantifying vector copy numbers (VCN). Safety and tolerability were assessed by documenting adverse events, including cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 30 months (range, 4-36). The overall response rate(ORR) was 88.2 %, with 70.5 % achieving complete remission. At 24 months, the estimated PFS was 59 % (95 %CI, 40-88 %), and the OS was 71 % (95 %CI, 52-90 %). At 36 months, the estimated OS was 65 % (95 %CI, 46-92 %). Patients with non-elevated lactate dehydrogenase(LDH) levels showed a higher PFS probability (100 %) compared to those with elevated LDH (42 %, 95 %CI: 21 %-81 %) (log-rank, p = 0.071). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for peak CAR T-cell expansion was 0.773, suggesting an optimal cutoff at day 13 for enhancing survival (sensitivity 66.7 %, specificity 90.9 %; p = 0.07). Early peak expansion (before day 13) correlated with better PFS and OS (log-rank, p = 0.0018 and p = 0.0053, respectively). The total VCN AUC was 0.636, with a cutoff of 12,690 significantly predicting survival (sensitivity 83.3 %, specificity 72.7 %; p = 0.366). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated statistically significant differences in OS for patients with VCN below 12,690 (log-rank, p = 0.017) in comparison to those exceeding 12,690, though trends in PFS did not reach statistical significance (log-rank, p = 0.12). Safety profiles indicated manageable cytokine release syndrome, with no severe neurotoxicity reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Zanubrutinib combined with CAR T-cell therapy offers an effective treatment option for patients with R/R DLBCL, enhancing response rates and survival. Detailed analysis of CAR T-cell expansion provides insight into the dynamics of cellular responses, underscoring the potential for tailored therapeutic approaches based on biological markers.

Updated Clinical Perspectives and Challenges of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy in Colorectal Cancer and Invasive Breast Cancer

In recent years, the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and breast cancer (BC) has increased worldwide and caused a higher mortality rate due to the lack of selective anti-tumor therapies. Current chemotherapies and surgical interventions are significantly preferred modalities to treat CRC or BC in advanced stages but the prognosis for patients with advanced CRC and BC remains dismal. The immunotherapy technique of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells has resulted in significant clinical outcomes when treating hematologic malignancies. The novel CAR-T therapy target antigens include GUCY2C, CLEC14A, CD26, TEM8/ANTXR1, PDPN, PTK7, PODXL, CD44, CD19, CD20, CD22, BCMA, GD2, Mesothelin, TAG-72, CEA, EGFR, B7H3, HER2, IL13Ra2, MUC1, EpCAM, PSMA, PSCA, NKG2D. The significant aim of this review is to explore the recently updated information pertinent to several novel targets of CAR-T for CRC, and BC. We vividly described the challenges of CAR-T therapies when treating CRC or BC. The immunosuppressive microenvironment of solid tumors, the shortage of tumor-specific antigens, and post-treatment side effects are the major hindrances to promoting the development of CAR-T cells. Several clinical trials related to CAR-T immunotherapy against CRC or BC have already been in progress. This review benefits academicians, clinicians, and clinical oncologists to explore more about the novel CAR-T targets and overcome the challenges during this therapy.

Immunotherapeutic advances in gastric cancer

Advanced gastric cancers are responsible for overwhelming human suffering and death. Despite the development of combination chemotherapies, the survival rates of patients with gastric cancer remain unsatisfactory. Given the growing evidence of the benefits of immunotherapy as an alternative treatment for other cancers such as advanced melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma, researchers have begun to explore its application in the treatment of gastric cancer. Three types of immunotherapy have shown promising effects against gastric cancer: immune checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen rector (CAR)-T cells, and tumor vaccines. Clinical trials have used either immuno-oncology monotherapies or combination immuno-chemotherapies to improve the overall survival times and objective response rates of patients with gastric cancer. We review the clinical efficacy of immunotherapy including checkpoint inhibitors, CAR‑T, and tumor vaccines, in the treatment of gastric cancer. Based on initial evidence, we believe that immunotherapy could positively impact the natural history and improve the outcomes of a subgroup of patients with gastric cancer.

The Application of CAR-T Cells in Haematological Malignancies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells (CART) remain one of the most advanced and promising forms of adoptive T-cell immunotherapy. CART represent autologous, genetically engineered T lymphocytes expressing CAR, i.e. fusion proteins that combine components and features of T cells as well as antibodies providing their more effective and direct anti-tumour effect. The technology of CART construction is highly advanced in vitro and every element of their structure influence their mechanism of action in vivo. Patients with haematological malignancies are faced with the possibility of disease relapse after the implementation of conventional chemo-immunotherapy. Since the most preferable result of therapy is a partial or complete remission, cancer treatment regimens are constantly being improved and customized to individual patients. This individualization could be ensured by CART therapy. This paper characterized CART strategy in details in terms of their structure, generations, mechanism of action and published the results of clinical trials in haematological malignancies including acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and multiple myeloma.

Cell Therapy for Liver Disease: From Promise to Reality

Over the last decade, there has been a considerable progress in the development of cell therapy products for the treatment of liver diseases. The quest to generate well-defined homogenous cell populations with defined mechanism(s) of action has enabled the progression from use of autologous bone marrow stem cells comprising of heterogeneous cell populations to allogeneic cell types such as monocyte-derived macrophages, regulatory T cells, mesenchymal stromal cells, macrophages, etc. There is growing evidence regarding the multiple molecular mechanisms pivotal to various therapeutic effects and hence, careful selection of cell therapy product for the desired putative effects is crucial. In this review, we have presented an overview of the cell therapies that have been developed thus far, with preclinical and clinical evidence for their use in liver disease. Limitations associated with these therapies have also been discussed. Despite the advances made, there remain multiple challenges to overcome before cell therapies can be considered as viable treatment options, and these include larger scale clinical trials, scalable production of cells according to good manufacturing practice standards, pathways for delivery of cell therapy within hospital environments, and costs associated with the production.

Immune System Evasion as Hallmark of Melanoma Progression: The Role of Dendritic Cells

Melanoma is an immunogenic tumor whose relationship with immune cells resident in the microenvironment significantly influences cancer cell proliferation, progression, and metastasis. During melanomagenesis, both immune and melanoma cells undergo the immunoediting process that includes interconnected phases as elimination, equilibrium, and escape or immune evasion. In this context, dendritic cells (DCs) are active players that indirectly counteract the proliferation of melanoma cells. Moreover, DC maturation, migration, and cross-priming as well as their functional interplay with cytotoxic T-cells through ligands of immune checkpoint receptors result impaired. A number of signals propagated by highly proliferating melanoma cells and accessory cells as T-cells, natural killer cells (NKs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), T-regulatory cells (T-regs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and endothelial cells participate to create an immunosuppressive milieu that results engulfed of tolerogenic factors and interleukins (IL) as IL-6 and IL-10. To underline the role of the immune infiltrate in blocking the melanoma progression, it has been described that the composition, density, and distribution of cytotoxic T-cells in the surrounding stroma is predictive of responsiveness to immunotherapy. Here, we review the major mechanisms implicated in melanoma progression, focusing on the role of DCs.

Use of immunotherapy in the treatment of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is a malignant tumor that negatively impacts human health, which typically presents in the advanced stages of disease in the majority of patients. Despite the development of combination chemotherapy, only a modest survival advantage is gained in patients with GC treated by this method. Recently, cancer immunotherapies have received considerable attention as a viable therapeutic option for GC. Specifically, the immune checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen rector (CAR)-T cells and tumor vaccines, represent immunotherapies that have exhibited promising effects in the treatment of GC. A number of clinical trials have employed either immuno-oncology monotherapies or combination therapies to improve the overall survival time (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) of patients with GC. The current review presents a summary of the clinical effects of checkpoint inhibitors, including CAR-T and tumor vaccines, in the treatment of GC.

CAR-T cell therapy in gastrointestinal tumors and hepatic carcinoma: From bench to bedside

The chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) is a genetically engineered receptor that combines a scFv domain, which specifically recognizes the tumor-specific antigen, with T cell activation domains. CAR-T cell therapies have demonstrated tremendous efficacy against hematologic malignancies in many clinical trials. Recent studies have extended these efforts to the treatment of solid tumors. However, the outcomes of CAR-T cell therapy for solid tumors are not as remarkable as the outcomes have been for hematologic malignancies. A series of hurdles has arisen with respect to CAR-T cell-based immunotherapy, which needs to be overcome to target solid tumors. The major challenge for CAR-T cell therapy in solid tumors is the selection of the appropriate specific antigen to demarcate the tumor from normal tissue. In this review, we discuss the application of CAR-T cells to gastrointestinal and hepatic carcinomas in preclinical and clinical research. Furthermore, we analyze the usefulness of several specific markers in the study of gastrointestinal tumors and hepatic carcinoma.

The New Era of Cancer Immunotherapy: Manipulating T-Cell Activity to Overcome Malignancy

Using the immune system to control cancer has been investigated for over a century. Yet it is only over the last several years that therapeutic agents acting directly on the immune system have demonstrated improved overall survival for cancer patients in phase III clinical trials. Furthermore, it appears that some patients treated with such agents have been cured of metastatic cancer. This has led to increased interest and acceleration in the rate of progress in cancer immunotherapy. Most of the current immunotherapeutic success in cancer treatment is based on the use of immune-modulating antibodies targeting critical checkpoints (CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1). Several other immune-modulating molecules targeting inhibitory or stimulatory pathways are being developed. The combined use of these medicines is the subject of intense investigation and holds important promise. Combination regimens include those that incorporate targeted therapies that act on growth signaling pathways, as well as standard chemotherapy and radiation therapy. In fact, these standard therapies have intrinsic immune-modulating properties that can support antitumor immunity. In the years ahead, adoptive T-cell therapy will also be an important part of treatment for some cancer patients. Other areas which are regaining interest are the use of oncolytic viruses that immunize patients against their own tumors and the use of vaccines against tumor antigens. Immunotherapy has demonstrated unprecedented durability in controlling multiple types of cancer and we expect its use to continue expanding rapidly.