1
|
Gupta S, Sharma A, Petrovski G, Verma RS. Vascular reconstruction of the decellularized biomatrix for whole-organ engineering-a critical perspective and future strategies. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023; 11:1221159. [PMID: 38026872 PMCID: PMC10680456 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1221159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Whole-organ re-engineering is the most challenging goal yet to be achieved in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. One essential factor in any transplantable and functional tissue engineering is fabricating a perfusable vascular network with macro- and micro-sized blood vessels. Whole-organ development has become more practical with the use of the decellularized organ biomatrix (DOB) as it provides a native biochemical and structural framework for a particular organ. However, reconstructing vasculature and re-endothelialization in the DOB is a highly challenging task and has not been achieved for constructing a clinically transplantable vascularized organ with an efficient perfusable capability. Here, we critically and articulately emphasized factors that have been studied for the vascular reconstruction in the DOB. Furthermore, we highlighted the factors used for vasculature development studies in general and their application in whole-organ vascular reconstruction. We also analyzed in detail the strategies explored so far for vascular reconstruction and angiogenesis in the DOB for functional and perfusable vasculature development. Finally, we discussed some of the crucial factors that have been largely ignored in the vascular reconstruction of the DOB and the future directions that should be addressed systematically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santosh Gupta
- Stem Cell and Molecular Biology, Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences. Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
- Center for Eye Research and Innovative Diagnostics, Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Akriti Sharma
- Stem Cell and Molecular Biology, Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences. Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
| | - Goran Petrovski
- Center for Eye Research and Innovative Diagnostics, Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Split School of Medicine and University Hospital Centre, Split, Croatia
| | - Rama Shanker Verma
- Stem Cell and Molecular Biology, Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences. Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reyna-Urrutia VA, Estevez M, González-González AM, Rosales-Ibáñez R. 3D scaffolds of caprolactone/chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol/hydroxyapatite stabilized by physical bonds seeded with swine dental pulp stem cell for bone tissue engineering. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE. MATERIALS IN MEDICINE 2022; 33:81. [PMID: 36484847 PMCID: PMC9734232 DOI: 10.1007/s10856-022-06702-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Bone Regeneration represents a clinical need, related to bone defects such as congenital anomalies, trauma with bone loss, and/or some pathologies such as cysts or tumors This is why a polymeric biomaterial that mimics the osteogenic composition and structure represents a high potential to face this problem. The method of obtaining these materials was first to prepare a stabilized hydrogel by means of physical bonds and then to make use of the lyophilization technique to obtain the 3D porous scaffolds with temperature conditions of -58 °C and pressure of 1 Pa for 16 h. The physicochemical and bioactive properties of the scaffolds were studied. FTIR and TGA results confirm the presence of the initial components in the 3d matrix of the scaffold. The scaffolds exhibited a morphology with pore size and interconnectivity that promote good cell viability. Together, the cell viability and proliferation test, Alamar BlueTM and the differentiation test: alizarin staining, showed the ability of physically stabilized scaffolds to proliferate and differentiate swine dental pulp stem cell (DPSCs) followed by mineralization. Therefore, the Cs-PCL-PVA-HA scaffold stabilized by physical bonds has characteristics that suggest great utility for future complementary in vitro tests and in vivo studies on bone defects. Likewise, this biomaterial was enhanced with the addition of HA, providing a scaffold with osteoconductive properties necessary for good regeneration of bone tissue. Graphical abstract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V A Reyna-Urrutia
- Tissue Engineering and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Iztacala School of Higher Studies, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Tenayuca-Chalmita S/N, Cuautepec Barrio Bajo, Gustavo A. Madero, Mexico, CP, 07239, Mexico
| | - Miriam Estevez
- Center for Applied Physics and Advanced Technology, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Campus Juriquilla, Boulevard Juriquilla No. 3001, Querétaro, Juriquilla, CP, 76230, Mexico
| | - A M González-González
- Tissue Engineering and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Iztacala School of Higher Studies, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Tenayuca-Chalmita S/N, Cuautepec Barrio Bajo, Gustavo A. Madero, Mexico, CP, 07239, Mexico
| | - R Rosales-Ibáñez
- Tissue Engineering and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Iztacala School of Higher Studies, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Tenayuca-Chalmita S/N, Cuautepec Barrio Bajo, Gustavo A. Madero, Mexico, CP, 07239, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reyna-Urrutia VA, González-González AM, Rosales-Ibáñez R. Compositions and Structural Geometries of Scaffolds Used in the Regeneration of Cleft Palates: A Review of the Literature. Polymers (Basel) 2022; 14:polym14030547. [PMID: 35160534 PMCID: PMC8840587 DOI: 10.3390/polym14030547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Cleft palate (CP) is one of the most common birth defects, presenting a multitude of negative impacts on the health of the patient. It also leads to increased mortality at all stages of life, economic costs and psychosocial effects. The embryological development of CP has been outlined thanks to the advances made in recent years due to biomolecular successions. The etiology is broad and combines certain environmental and genetic factors. Currently, all surgical interventions work off the principle of restoring the area of the fissure and aesthetics of the patient, making use of bone substitutes. These can involve biological products, such as a demineralized bone matrix, as well as natural–synthetic polymers, and can be supplemented with nutrients or growth factors. For this reason, the following review analyzes different biomaterials in which nutrients or biomolecules have been added to improve the bioactive properties of the tissue construct to regenerate new bone, taking into account the greatest limitations of this approach, which are its use for bone substitutes for large areas exclusively and the lack of vascularity. Bone tissue engineering is a promising field, since it favors the development of porous synthetic substitutes with the ability to promote rapid and extensive vascularization within their structures for the regeneration of the CP area.
Collapse
|
4
|
Mechanistic Illustration: How Newly-Formed Blood Vessels Stopped by the Mineral Blocks of Bone Substitutes Can Be Avoided by Using Innovative Combined Therapeutics. Biomedicines 2021; 9:biomedicines9080952. [PMID: 34440156 PMCID: PMC8394928 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9080952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
One major limitation for the vascularization of bone substitutes used for filling is the presence of mineral blocks. The newly-formed blood vessels are stopped or have to circumvent the mineral blocks, resulting in inefficient delivery of oxygen and nutrients to the implant. This leads to necrosis within the implant and to poor engraftment of the bone substitute. The aim of the present study is to provide a bone substitute currently used in the clinic with suitably guided vascularization properties. This therapeutic hybrid bone filling, containing a mineral and a polymeric component, is fortified with pro-angiogenic smart nano-therapeutics that allow the release of angiogenic molecules. Our data showed that the improved vasculature within the implant promoted new bone formation and that the newly-formed bone swapped the mineral blocks of the bone substitutes much more efficiently than in non-functionalized bone substitutes. Therefore, we demonstrated that our therapeutic bone substitute is an advanced therapeutical medicinal product, with great potential to recuperate and guide vascularization that is stopped by mineral blocks, and can improve the regeneration of critical-sized bone defects. We have also elucidated the mechanism to understand how the newly-formed vessels can no longer encounter mineral blocks and pursue their course of vasculature, giving our advanced therapeutical bone filling great potential to be used in many applications, by combining filling and nano-regenerative medicine that currently fall short because of problems related to the lack of oxygen and nutrients.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bjelić D, Finšgar M. The Role of Growth Factors in Bioactive Coatings. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13:1083. [PMID: 34371775 PMCID: PMC8309025 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13071083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
With increasing obesity and an ageing population, health complications are also on the rise, such as the need to replace a joint with an artificial one. In both humans and animals, the integration of the implant is crucial, and bioactive coatings play an important role in bone tissue engineering. Since bone tissue engineering is about designing an implant that maximally mimics natural bone and is accepted by the tissue, the search for optimal materials and therapeutic agents and their concentrations is increasing. The incorporation of growth factors (GFs) in a bioactive coating represents a novel approach in bone tissue engineering, in which osteoinduction is enhanced in order to create the optimal conditions for the bone healing process, which crucially affects implant fixation. For the application of GFs in coatings and their implementation in clinical practice, factors such as the choice of one or more GFs, their concentration, the coating material, the method of incorporation, and the implant material must be considered to achieve the desired controlled release. Therefore, the avoidance of revision surgery also depends on the success of the design of the most appropriate bioactive coating. This overview considers the integration of the most common GFs that have been investigated in in vitro and in vivo studies, as well as in human clinical trials, with the aim of applying them in bioactive coatings. An overview of the main therapeutic agents that can stimulate cells to express the GFs necessary for bone tissue development is also provided. The main objective is to present the advantages and disadvantages of the GFs that have shown promise for inclusion in bioactive coatings according to the results of numerous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matjaž Finšgar
- Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Maribor, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
How Surface Properties of Silica Nanoparticles Influence Structural, Microstructural and Biological Properties of Polymer Nanocomposites. MATERIALS 2021; 14:ma14040843. [PMID: 33578744 PMCID: PMC7916496 DOI: 10.3390/ma14040843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Revised: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this work was to study effect of the type of silica nanoparticles on the properties of nanocomposites for application in the guided bone regeneration (GBR). Two types of nanometric silica particles with different size, morphology and specific surface area (SSA) i.e., high specific surface silica (hss-SiO2) and low specific surface silica (lss-SiO2), were used as nano-fillers for a resorbable polymer matrix: poly(L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide), called PLDLA. It was shown that higher surface specific area and morphology (including pore size distribution) recorded for hss-SiO2 influences chemical activity of the nanoparticle; in addition, hydroxyl groups appeared on the surface. The nanoparticle with 10 times lower specific surface area (lss-SiO2) characterized lower chemical action. In addition, a lack of hydroxyl groups on the surface obstructed apatite nucleation (reduced zeta potential in comparison to hss-SiO2), where an apatite layer appeared already after 48 h of incubation in the simulated body fluid (SBF), and no significant changes in crystallinity of PLDLA/lss-SiO2 nanocomposite material in comparison to neat PLDLA foil were observed. The presence and type of inorganic particles in the PLDLA matrix influenced various physicochemical properties such as the wettability, and the roughness parameter note for PLDLA/lss-SiO2 increased. The results of biological investigation show that the bioactive nanocomposites with hss-SiO2 may stimulate osteoblast and fibroblast cells’proliferation and secretion of collagen type I. Additionally, both nanocomposites with the nanometric silica inducted differentiation of mesenchymal cells into osteoblasts at a proliferation stage in in vitro conditions. A higher concentration of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was observed on the material modified with hss-SiO2 silica.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ghorbani F, Zamanian A. An efficient functionalization of dexamethasone-loaded polymeric scaffold with [3-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)-propyl]-trimethoxysilane coupling agent for bone regeneration: Synthesis, characterization, and in vitro evaluation. J BIOACT COMPAT POL 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/0883911520903761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
In this study, dexamethasone-loaded gelatin–starch scaffolds were fabricated by the freeze-drying technique under different cooling temperatures and polymeric compositions. The constructs were modified via [3-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)-propyl]-trimethoxysilane coupling agent in order to produce a bioactive network structure for bone tissue engineering applications. Herein, the synergistic effect of [3-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)-propyl]-trimethoxysilane and dexamethasone was examined on the bioactivity and osteogenic behavior of scaffolds. Based on scanning electron microscopy micrographs, more fine pores were formed at higher freezing temperatures. The prepared microstructure at a rapid freezing rate resulted in diminished mechanical properties and a greater level of swelling and durability compared with a slow freezing rate. According to the acquired results, the mechanical strength decreased, while both absorption capacity and mass loss rate increased as a function of starch addition. Furthermore, the enhancement of hydrophilicity and reduction of mechanical stability enhanced the dexamethasone release levels. In addition, the synthesized constructs confirmed the positive effect of [3-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)-propyl]-trimethoxysilane and dexamethasone on biomimetic mineralization of the scaffolds. Supporting the cellular adhesion and proliferation alongside the expression of alkaline phosphatase, especially in the presence of dexamethasone, was the other advantage of synthetic scaffolds as a bone reconstructive substitute. Accordingly, drug-loaded hybrid constructs seem to be promising for further preclinical and clinical investigations in bone tissue engineering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farnaz Ghorbani
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Fudan University Pudong Medical Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Ali Zamanian
- Department of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, Materials and Energy Research Center, Karaj, Islamic Republic of Iran
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Amin K, Moscalu R, Imere A, Murphy R, Barr S, Tan Y, Wong R, Sorooshian P, Zhang F, Stone J, Fildes J, Reid A, Wong J. The future application of nanomedicine and biomimicry in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2019; 14:2679-2696. [DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2019-0119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Plastic surgery encompasses a broad spectrum of reconstructive challenges and prides itself upon developing and adopting new innovations. Practice has transitioned from microsurgery to supermicrosurgery with a possible future role in even smaller surgical frontiers. Exploiting materials on a nanoscale has enabled better visualization and enhancement of biological processes toward better wound healing, tumor identification and viability of tissues, all cornerstones of plastic surgery practice. Recent advances in nanomedicine and biomimicry herald further reconstructive progress facilitating soft and hard tissue, nerve and vascular engineering. These lay the foundation for improved biocompatibility and tissue integration by the optimization of engineered implants or tissues. This review will broadly examine each of these technologies, highlighting areas of progress that reconstructive surgeons may not be familiar with, which could see adoption into our armamentarium in the not-so-distant future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavit Amin
- Blond McIndoe Laboratories, Division of Cell Matrix Biology & Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Department of Plastic Surgery & Burns, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Collaborative Centre for Inflammation Research (MCCIR), Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- The Transplant Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Roxana Moscalu
- Blond McIndoe Laboratories, Division of Cell Matrix Biology & Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Angela Imere
- Blond McIndoe Laboratories, Division of Cell Matrix Biology & Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Department of Materials, School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science & Engineering Research Institutes, The University of Manchester, MSS Tower, Manchester, UK
| | - Ralph Murphy
- Blond McIndoe Laboratories, Division of Cell Matrix Biology & Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Department of Plastic Surgery & Burns, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Simon Barr
- Blond McIndoe Laboratories, Division of Cell Matrix Biology & Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Department of Plastic Surgery & Burns, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Youri Tan
- Blond McIndoe Laboratories, Division of Cell Matrix Biology & Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Department of Plastic Surgery & Burns, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Wong
- Blond McIndoe Laboratories, Division of Cell Matrix Biology & Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Department of Plastic Surgery & Burns, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Parviz Sorooshian
- Blond McIndoe Laboratories, Division of Cell Matrix Biology & Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Fei Zhang
- Blond McIndoe Laboratories, Division of Cell Matrix Biology & Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Department of Materials, School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science & Engineering Research Institutes, The University of Manchester, MSS Tower, Manchester, UK
| | - John Stone
- Manchester Collaborative Centre for Inflammation Research (MCCIR), Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- The Transplant Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - James Fildes
- Manchester Collaborative Centre for Inflammation Research (MCCIR), Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- The Transplant Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Adam Reid
- Blond McIndoe Laboratories, Division of Cell Matrix Biology & Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Department of Plastic Surgery & Burns, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Jason Wong
- Blond McIndoe Laboratories, Division of Cell Matrix Biology & Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Department of Plastic Surgery & Burns, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Offner D, de Grado GF, Meisels I, Pijnenburg L, Fioretti F, Benkirane-Jessel N, Musset AM. Bone Grafts, Bone Substitutes and Regenerative Medicine Acceptance for the Management of Bone Defects Among French Population: Issues about Ethics, Religion or Fear? CELL MEDICINE 2019; 11:2155179019857661. [PMID: 32634194 PMCID: PMC6587382 DOI: 10.1177/2155179019857661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Several techniques exist to manage bone defects in patients: bone grafts (autograft, allograft, xenograft), use of synthetic bone substitutes, or use of the products of bone regenerative medicine. Studies generally focus on their efficacy, but few focus on their acceptance. Our objectives were to assess their theoretical acceptance among the French general population, and to identify issues justifying refusals, by mean of an open e-questionnaire. The questionnaire was submitted to a general French population, and explained these techniques in an understandable way. Participants were asked to say whether they would accept or refuse these techniques, specifying why in case of refusal (fear of the technique, ethical reasons, religious reasons). In total, 562 persons participated. Autograft and use of the products of bone regenerative medicine were the most accepted techniques (93.4% and 94.1%, respectively). Xenograft was the least accepted technique (58.2%). Most refusals were due to fear such as failure, pain, infection (autograft 8%, allograft 14.9%, xenograft 25.3%, synthetic bone substitutes 14.6%, and products of bone regenerative medicine 6.8%). Ethical reasons were mostly mentioned for allograft (6.4%) and xenograft (18.3%). Religious reasons were scarcely mentioned, only for xenograft (1.2%). Thus, acceptance of techniques does not seem to be greatly linked to sociodemographic characteristics in France. However, other countries with their own cultural, religious, and population patterns may show different levels of acceptance. This study shows that bone regenerative medicine is a promising research direction, reaching biological and also humanist quality standards, expected to improve the health of patients. Information is still the cornerstone to defuse issues about fear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien Offner
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), UMR1260, Regenerative Nanomedicine (RNM), FMTS.,Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg.,Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg.,Both the authors contributed equally to this article
| | - Gabriel Fernandez de Grado
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), UMR1260, Regenerative Nanomedicine (RNM), FMTS.,Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg.,Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg.,Both the authors contributed equally to this article
| | - Inès Meisels
- Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg.,Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg
| | - Luc Pijnenburg
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), UMR1260, Regenerative Nanomedicine (RNM), FMTS.,Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg.,Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg
| | - Florence Fioretti
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), UMR1260, Regenerative Nanomedicine (RNM), FMTS.,Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg.,Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg
| | - Nadia Benkirane-Jessel
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), UMR1260, Regenerative Nanomedicine (RNM), FMTS.,Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg.,Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg
| | - Anne-Marie Musset
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), UMR1260, Regenerative Nanomedicine (RNM), FMTS.,Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg.,Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Singla R, Abidi SMS, Dar AI, Acharya A. Nanomaterials as potential and versatile platform for next generation tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2019; 107:2433-2449. [PMID: 30690870 DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2018] [Revised: 11/28/2018] [Accepted: 12/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Tissue engineering (TE) is an emerging field where alternate/artificial tissues or organ substitutes are implanted to mimic the functionality of damaged or injured tissues. Earlier efforts were made to develop natural, synthetic, or semisynthetic materials for skin equivalents to treat burns or skin wounds. Nowadays, many more tissues like bone, cardiac, cartilage, heart, liver, cornea, blood vessels, and so forth are being engineered using 3-D biomaterial constructs or scaffolds that could deliver active molecules such as peptides or growth factors. Nanomaterials (NMs) due to their unique mechanical, electrical, and optical properties possess significant opportunities in TE applications. Traditional TE scaffolds were based on hydrolytically degradable macroporous materials, whereas current approaches emphasize on controlling cell behaviors and tissue formation by nano-scale topography that closely mimics the natural extracellular matrix. This review article gives a comprehensive outlook of different organ specific NMs which are being used for diversified TE applications. Varieties of NMs are known to serve as biological alternatives to repair or replace a portion or whole of the nonfunctional or damaged tissue. NMs may promote greater amounts of specific interactions stimulated at the cellular level, ultimately leading to more efficient new tissue formation. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 107B: 2433-2449, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rubbel Singla
- Biotechnology Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, 176061, India.,Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, 176061, India
| | - Syed M S Abidi
- Biotechnology Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, 176061, India.,Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, 176061, India
| | - Aqib Iqbal Dar
- Biotechnology Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, 176061, India
| | - Amitabha Acharya
- Biotechnology Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, 176061, India.,Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, 176061, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fernandez de Grado G, Keller L, Idoux-Gillet Y, Wagner Q, Musset AM, Benkirane-Jessel N, Bornert F, Offner D. Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management. J Tissue Eng 2018; 9:2041731418776819. [PMID: 29899969 PMCID: PMC5990883 DOI: 10.1177/2041731418776819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 364] [Impact Index Per Article: 60.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Bone replacement might have been practiced for centuries with various materials of natural origin, but had rarely met success until the late 19th century. Nowadays, many different bone substitutes can be used. They can be either derived from biological products such as demineralized bone matrix, platelet-rich plasma, hydroxyapatite, adjunction of growth factors (like bone morphogenetic protein) or synthetic such as calcium sulfate, tri-calcium phosphate ceramics, bioactive glasses, or polymer-based substitutes. All these substitutes are not suitable for every clinical use, and they have to be chosen selectively depending on their purpose. Thus, this review aims to highlight the principal characteristics of the most commonly used bone substitutes and to give some directions concerning their clinical use, as spine fusion, open-wedge tibial osteotomy, long bone fracture, oral and maxillofacial surgery, or periodontal treatments. However, the main limitations to bone substitutes use remain the management of large defects and the lack of vascularization in their central part, which is likely to appear following their utilization. In the field of bone tissue engineering, developing porous synthetic substitutes able to support a faster and a wider vascularization within their structure seems to be a promising way of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Fernandez de Grado
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), “Regenerative Nanomedicine” laboratory, http://www.regmed.fr, UMR 1260, Faculté de Médecine, FMTS, F-67085 Strasbourg Cedex
- Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Ste Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, F-67000 Strasbourg
| | - Laetitia Keller
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), “Regenerative Nanomedicine” laboratory, http://www.regmed.fr, UMR 1260, Faculté de Médecine, FMTS, F-67085 Strasbourg Cedex
- Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Ste Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg
| | - Ysia Idoux-Gillet
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), “Regenerative Nanomedicine” laboratory, http://www.regmed.fr, UMR 1260, Faculté de Médecine, FMTS, F-67085 Strasbourg Cedex
- Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Ste Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg
| | - Quentin Wagner
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), “Regenerative Nanomedicine” laboratory, http://www.regmed.fr, UMR 1260, Faculté de Médecine, FMTS, F-67085 Strasbourg Cedex
- Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Ste Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg
| | - Anne-Marie Musset
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), “Regenerative Nanomedicine” laboratory, http://www.regmed.fr, UMR 1260, Faculté de Médecine, FMTS, F-67085 Strasbourg Cedex
- Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Ste Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, F-67000 Strasbourg
| | - Nadia Benkirane-Jessel
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), “Regenerative Nanomedicine” laboratory, http://www.regmed.fr, UMR 1260, Faculté de Médecine, FMTS, F-67085 Strasbourg Cedex
- Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Ste Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg
| | - Fabien Bornert
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), “Regenerative Nanomedicine” laboratory, http://www.regmed.fr, UMR 1260, Faculté de Médecine, FMTS, F-67085 Strasbourg Cedex
- Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Ste Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, F-67000 Strasbourg
| | - Damien Offner
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), “Regenerative Nanomedicine” laboratory, http://www.regmed.fr, UMR 1260, Faculté de Médecine, FMTS, F-67085 Strasbourg Cedex
- Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Ste Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, F-67000 Strasbourg
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Offner D, Wagner Q, Idoux-Gillet Y, Gegout H, Ferrandon A, Schwinté P, Musset AM, Benkirane-Jessel N, Keller L. Hybrid collagen sponge and stem cells as a new combined scaffold able to induce the re-organization of endothelial cells into clustered networks. Biomed Mater Eng 2017; 28:S185-S192. [PMID: 28372294 DOI: 10.3233/bme-171640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The time needed to obtain functional regenerated bone tissue depends on the existence of a reliable vascular support. Current techniques used in clinic, for example after tooth extraction, do not allow regaining or preserving the same bone volume. Our aim is to develop a cellularized active implant of the third generation, equipped with human mesenchymal stem cells to improve the quality of implant vascularization. We seeded a commercialized collagen implant with human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) and then with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). We analyzed the biocompatibility and the behavior of endothelial cells with this implant. We observed a biocompatibility of the active implant, and a re-organization of endothelial cells into clustered networks. This work shows the possibility to develop an implant of the third generation supporting vascularization, improving the medical care of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien Offner
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), 'Osteoarticular and Dental Regenerative Nanomedicine' Laboratory, UMR 1109, Faculté de Médecine, F-67085 Strasbourg cedex, FMTS, France.,Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Sainte Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg, France.,Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (HUS), 1 place de l'Hôpital, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Quentin Wagner
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), 'Osteoarticular and Dental Regenerative Nanomedicine' Laboratory, UMR 1109, Faculté de Médecine, F-67085 Strasbourg cedex, FMTS, France.,Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Sainte Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Ysia Idoux-Gillet
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), 'Osteoarticular and Dental Regenerative Nanomedicine' Laboratory, UMR 1109, Faculté de Médecine, F-67085 Strasbourg cedex, FMTS, France.,Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Sainte Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Hervé Gegout
- Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Sainte Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Arielle Ferrandon
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), 'Osteoarticular and Dental Regenerative Nanomedicine' Laboratory, UMR 1109, Faculté de Médecine, F-67085 Strasbourg cedex, FMTS, France.,Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Sainte Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Pascale Schwinté
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), 'Osteoarticular and Dental Regenerative Nanomedicine' Laboratory, UMR 1109, Faculté de Médecine, F-67085 Strasbourg cedex, FMTS, France.,Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Sainte Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Anne-Marie Musset
- Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Sainte Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg, France.,Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (HUS), 1 place de l'Hôpital, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Nadia Benkirane-Jessel
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), 'Osteoarticular and Dental Regenerative Nanomedicine' Laboratory, UMR 1109, Faculté de Médecine, F-67085 Strasbourg cedex, FMTS, France.,Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Sainte Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Laetitia Keller
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), 'Osteoarticular and Dental Regenerative Nanomedicine' Laboratory, UMR 1109, Faculté de Médecine, F-67085 Strasbourg cedex, FMTS, France.,Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Sainte Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Frey BM, Zeisberger SM, Hoerstrup SP. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine - New Initiatives for Individual Treatment Offers. Transfus Med Hemother 2016; 43:318-319. [PMID: 27781018 DOI: 10.1159/000450716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2016] [Accepted: 09/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Beat M Frey
- Blood Transfusion Service Zurich, Zurich-Schlieren, Switzerland
| | - Steffen M Zeisberger
- Wyss Translational Center Zurich, Regenerative Medicine Technologies Platform, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich; Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Simon P Hoerstrup
- Wyss Translational Center Zurich, Regenerative Medicine Technologies Platform, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich; Zurich, Switzerland; Institute for Regenerative Medicine (IREM), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|