1
|
Rakicevic L. DNA and RNA Molecules as a Foundation of Therapy Strategies for Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:2141. [PMID: 37631355 PMCID: PMC10459020 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15082141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
There has always been a tendency of medicine to take an individualised approach to treating patients, but the most significant advances were achieved through the methods of molecular biology, where the nucleic acids are in the limelight. Decades of research of molecular biology resulted in setting medicine on a completely new platform. The most significant current research is related to the possibilities that DNA and RNA analyses can offer in terms of more precise diagnostics and more subtle stratification of patients in order to identify patients for specific therapy treatments. Additionally, principles of structure and functioning of nucleic acids have become a motive for creating entirely new therapy strategies and an innovative generation of drugs. All this also applies to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) which are the leading cause of mortality in developed countries. This review considers the most up-to-date achievements related to the use of translatory potential of DNA and RNA in treatment of cardiovascular diseases, and considers the challenges and prospects in this field. The foundations which allow the use of translatory potential are also presented. The first part of this review focuses on the potential of the DNA variants which impact conventional therapies and on the DNA variants which are starting points for designing new pharmacotherapeutics. The second part of this review considers the translatory potential of non-coding RNA molecules which can be used to formulate new generations of therapeutics for CVDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ljiljana Rakicevic
- Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 444a, 11042 Belgrade, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morris SA, Alsaidi AT, Verbyla A, Cruz A, Macfarlane C, Bauer J, Patel JN. Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Drugs with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guidelines: A Systematic Review. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2022; 112:1318-1328. [PMID: 36149409 PMCID: PMC9828439 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the evidence on cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenetic (PGx)-guided treatment for drugs with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines. A systematic review was conducted using multiple biomedical literature databases from inception to June 2021. Full articles comparing PGx-guided with nonguided treatment were included for data extraction. Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) was used to assess robustness of each study (0-100). Data are reported using descriptive statistics. Of 108 studies evaluating 39 drugs, 77 (71%) showed PGx testing was cost-effective (CE) (N = 48) or cost-saving (CS) (N = 29); 21 (20%) were not CE; 10 (9%) were uncertain. Clopidogrel had the most articles (N = 23), of which 22 demonstrated CE or CS, followed by warfarin (N = 16), of which 7 demonstrated CE or CS. Of 26 studies evaluating human leukocyte antigen (HLA) testing for abacavir (N = 8), allopurinol (N = 10), or carbamazepine/phenytoin (N = 8), 15 demonstrated CE or CS. Nine of 11 antidepressant articles demonstrated CE or CS. The median QHES score reflected high-quality studies (91; range 48-100). Most studies evaluating cost-effectiveness favored PGx testing. Limited data exist on cost-effectiveness of preemptive and multigene testing across disease states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A. Morris
- Department of Cancer Pharmacology and PharmacogenomicsLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium HealthCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | - Allison Verbyla
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Department of BiostatisticsLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium HealthCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Adilen Cruz
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Department of BiostatisticsLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium HealthCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | - Joseph Bauer
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Department of BiostatisticsLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium HealthCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Jai N. Patel
- Department of Cancer Pharmacology and PharmacogenomicsLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium HealthCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pandi MT, Koromina M, Vonitsanos G, van der Spek PJ, Patrinos GP, Mitropoulou C. Development of an optimized and generic cost-utility model for analyzing genome-guided treatment data. Pharmacol Res 2022; 178:106187. [PMID: 35331864 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Economic evaluation is an integral component of informed public health decision-making in personalized medicine. However, performing economic evaluation assessments often requires specialized knowledge, expertise, and significant resources. To this end, developing generic models can significantly assist towards providing the necessary evidence for the cost-effectiveness of genome-guided therapeutic interventions, compared to the traditional drug treatment modalities. Here, we report a generic cost-utility analysis model, developed in R, which encompasses essential economic evaluation steps. Specifically, critical steps towards a comprehensive deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were incorporated in our model, while also providing an easy-to-use graphical user interface, which allows even non-experts in the field to produce a fully comprehensive cost-utility analysis report. To further demonstrate the model's reproducibility, two sets of data were assessed, one stemming from in-house clinical data and one based on previously published data. By implementing the generic model presented herein, we show that the model produces results in complete concordance with the traditionally performed cost-utility analysis for both datasets. Overall, this work demonstrates the potential of generic models to provide useful economic evidence for personalized medicine interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria-Theodora Pandi
- Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Clinical Bioinformatics Unit, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maria Koromina
- University of Patras, School of Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacy, Patras, Greece
| | | | - Peter J van der Spek
- Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Clinical Bioinformatics Unit, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - George P Patrinos
- Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Clinical Bioinformatics Unit, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; University of Patras, School of Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacy, Patras, Greece; United Arab Emirates University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Genetics and Genomics, Al-Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE; United Arab Emirates University, Zayed Center for Health Sciences, Al-Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pharmacogenetic-guided glimepiride therapy in type-2 diabetes mellitus: a cost-effectiveness study. THE PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL 2021; 21:559-565. [PMID: 33731883 DOI: 10.1038/s41397-021-00232-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The demonstration of the link between certain genetic variations and drug response has allowed the emergence of pharmacogenetics, which offers many opportunities to improve patient care. Type-2 diabetes mellitus is a disease for which several gene polymorphisms have been reported to be associated with drug response. Sulfonylureas are commonly used for the management of this disease. Genetic polymorphisms of CYP2C9, the main enzyme involved in the metabolism of sulfonylureas, have been associated with the risk of severe hypoglycaemia, particularly in poor metabolizers carrying CYP2C9 *3/*3 genotype, and especially in the case of patients treated with glimepiride. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the potential clinical and economic outcomes of using CYP2C9 genotype data to guide the management of SU regimen in patients initiating glimepiride therapy, and to identify factors affecting the cost-effectiveness of this treatment scheme. The analysis was conducted using a decision tree, considering a 1-year time horizon, and taking as perspective that of the French national health insurance system. With pharmacogenetic-guided therapy, the cost to avoid an episode of severe hypoglycaemia event per 100 000 patients treated was €421 834. Genotyping cost was the most influential factor on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. In conclusion, the potential cost of CYP2C9 genotype-guided dosing for glimepiride therapy is relatively high, and associated with modest improvements with respect to the number of hypoglycaemia avoided, as compared with standard dosing. Additional economic studies are required to better specify the usefulness of CYP2C9 genotyping prior to glimepiride regimen initiation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Economic evaluation in psychiatric pharmacogenomics: a systematic review. THE PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL 2021; 21:533-541. [PMID: 34215853 DOI: 10.1038/s41397-021-00249-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Nowadays, many relevant drug-gene associations have been discovered, but pharmacogenomics (PGx)-guided treatment needs to be cost-effective as well as clinically beneficial to be incorporated into standard health care. To address current challenges, this systematic review provides an update regarding previously published studies, which assessed the cost-effectiveness of PGx testing for the prescription of antidepressants and antipsychotics. From a total of 1159 studies initially identified by literature database querying, and after manual assessment and curation of all of them, a mere 18 studies met our inclusion criteria. Of the 18 studies evaluations, 16 studies (88.89%) drew conclusions in favor of PGx testing, of which 9 (50%) genome-guided interventions were cost-effective and 7 (38.9%) were less costly compared to standard treatment based on cost analysis. More precisely, supportive evidence exists for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 drug-gene associations and for combinatorial PGx panels, but evidence is limited for many other drug-gene combinations. Amongst the limitations of the field are the unclear explanation of perspective and cost inputs, as well as the underreporting of study design elements, which can influence though the economic evaluation. Overall, the findings of this article demonstrate that although there is growing evidence on the cost-effectiveness of genome-guided interventions in psychiatric diseases, there is still a need for performing additional research on economic evaluations of PGx implementation with an emphasis on psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
|
6
|
Mitropoulou C, Litinski V, Kabakchiev B, Rogers S, P Patrinos G. PARC report: health outcomes and value of personalized medicine interventions: impact on patient care. Pharmacogenomics 2020; 21:797-807. [PMID: 32635813 DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2019-0194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The incorporation of personalized medicine interventions into routine healthcare constitutes an opportunity to improve patients' quality of life, as it empowers implementation of innovative, individualized clinical interventions that maximize efficacy and/or minimize the risk of adverse drug reactions. In order to ensure equal access to genomic testing for all patients, the costs associated with these interventions must be reimbursed by payers and insurance bodies. As such, it is of utmost importance to thoroughly evaluate these interventions both in terms of their clinical effectiveness and their economic cost. This article discusses the impact of personalized medicine interventions in terms of both health outcomes and value, which directly impacts on their pricing and reimbursement by the various national healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sara Rogers
- American Society of Pharmacovigilance, Houston, TX 77225-0433, USA
| | - George P Patrinos
- University of Patras School of Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacy, Patras, 26504, Greece.,United Arab Emirates University, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Al-Ain, UAE.,United Arab Emirates University, Zayed Center of Health Sciences, Al-Ain, UAE
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fragoulakis V, Bartsakoulia M, Díaz-Villamarín X, Chalikiopoulou K, Kehagia K, Ramos JGS, Martínez-González LJ, Gkotsi M, Katrali E, Skoufas E, Vozikis A, John A, Ali BR, Wordsworth S, Dávila-Fajardo CL, Katsila T, Patrinos GP, Mitropoulou C. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmacogenomics-guided clopidogrel treatment in Spanish patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. THE PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL 2019; 19:438-445. [PMID: 30647444 DOI: 10.1038/s41397-019-0069-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2018] [Revised: 10/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet drug given to patients before and after having a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Genomic variants in the CYP2C19 gene are associated with variable enzyme activities affecting drug metabolism and hence, patients with reduced or increased enzymatic function have increased risk of bleeding. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare a pharmacogenomics versus a non-pharmacogenomics-guided clopidogrel treatment for coronary artery syndrome patients undergoing PCI in the Spanish healthcare setting. A total of 549 patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease followed by PCI were recruited. Dual antiplatelet therapy was administrated to all patients from 1 to 12 months after PCI. Patients were classified into two groups: the Retrospective group was treated with clopidogrel based on the clinical routine practice and the Prospective group were initially genotyped for the presence of CYP2C19 variant alleles before treatment with those carrying more than one CYP2C19 variant alleles given prasugrel treatment. We collected data on established clinical and health outcome measures, including, per treatment arm: the percentage of patients that suffered from (a) myocardial infraction, (b) major bleeding and minor bleeding, (c) stroke, (d) the number of hospitalization days, and (e) the number of days patients spent in Intensive Care Unit. Our primary outcome measure for the cost-effectiveness analysis was Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). To estimate the treatment cost for each patient, individual data on its resource used were combined with unit price data, obtained from Spanish national sources. The analysis predicts a survival of 0.9446 QALYs in the pharmacogenomics arm and 0.9379 QALYs in the non-pharmacogenomics arm within a 1-year horizon. The cumulative costs per patient were €2971 and €3205 for the Prospective and Retrospective groups, respectively. The main cost driver of total cost in both arms was hospitalization costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was negative indicating that the PGx was a dominant option. Our data show that pharmacogenomics-guided clopidogrel treatment strategy may represent a cost-effective choice compared with non-pharmacogenomics-guided strategy for patients undergoing PCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marina Bartsakoulia
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras School of Health Sciences, Patras, Greece
| | | | | | - Konstantina Kehagia
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras School of Health Sciences, Patras, Greece
| | - Jesús Gabriel Sánchez Ramos
- Cardiología, hospital Universitario San Cecilio/hospital Campus de la Salud, Institute for biomedical research, ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
| | - Luis Javier Martínez-González
- Genomics Unit, Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research (GENYO), University of Granada, Health Sciences Technology Park, Granada, Spain
| | - Maria Gkotsi
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras School of Health Sciences, Patras, Greece
| | - Eva Katrali
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras School of Health Sciences, Patras, Greece
| | - Efthimios Skoufas
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras School of Health Sciences, Patras, Greece
| | | | - Anne John
- Department of Pathology, United Arab Emirates University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Al-Ain, UAE
| | - Bassam R Ali
- Department of Pathology, United Arab Emirates University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Al-Ain, UAE
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Health Economics Research Centre, Oxford, UK.,Oxford National Institute for Health Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Theodora Katsila
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras School of Health Sciences, Patras, Greece
| | - George P Patrinos
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras School of Health Sciences, Patras, Greece. .,Department of Pathology, United Arab Emirates University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Al-Ain, UAE.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mitropoulos K, Cooper DN, Mitropoulou C, Agathos S, Reichardt JKV, Al-Maskari F, Chantratita W, Wonkam A, Dandara C, Katsila T, Lopez-Correa C, Ali BR, Patrinos GP. Genomic Medicine Without Borders: Which Strategies Should Developing Countries Employ to Invest in Precision Medicine? A New "Fast-Second Winner" Strategy. OMICS : A JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY 2018; 21:647-657. [PMID: 29140767 DOI: 10.1089/omi.2017.0141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Genomic medicine has greatly matured in terms of its technical capabilities, but the diffusion of genomic innovations worldwide faces significant barriers beyond mere access to technology. New global development strategies are sorely needed for biotechnologies such as genomics and their applications toward precision medicine without borders. Moreover, diffusion of genomic medicine globally cannot adhere to a "one-size-fits-all-countries" development strategy, in the same way that drug treatments should be customized. This begs a timely, difficult but crucial question: How should developing countries, and the resource-limited regions of developed countries, invest in genomic medicine? Although a full-scale investment in infrastructure from discovery to the translational implementation of genomic science is ideal, this may not always be feasible in all countries at all times. A simple "transplantation of genomics" from developed to developing countries is unlikely to be feasible. Nor should developing countries be seen as simple recipients and beneficiaries of genomic medicine developed elsewhere because important advances in genomic medicine have materialized in developing countries as well. There are several noteworthy examples of genomic medicine success stories involving resource-limited settings that are contextualized and described in this global genomic medicine innovation analysis. In addition, we outline here a new long-term development strategy for global genomic medicine in a way that recognizes the individual country's pressing public health priorities and disease burdens. We term this approach the "Fast-Second Winner" model of innovation that supports innovation commencing not only "upstream" of discovery science but also "mid-stream," building on emerging highly promising biomarker and diagnostic candidates from the global science discovery pipeline, based on the unique needs of each country. A mid-stream entry into innovation can enhance collective learning from other innovators' mistakes upstream in discovery science and boost the probability of success for translation and implementation when resources are limited. This à la carte model of global innovation and development strategy offers multiple entry points into the global genomics innovation ecosystem for developing countries, whether or not extensive and expensive discovery infrastructures are already in place. Ultimately, broadening our thinking beyond the linear model of innovation will help us to enable the vision and practice of genomics without borders in both developed and resource-limited settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David N Cooper
- 2 Institute of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University , Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | | | - Spiros Agathos
- 4 Yachay Tech University , San Miguel de Urcuquí, Ecuador
| | | | - Fatima Al-Maskari
- 5 Department of Pathology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University , Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates .,6 Zayed Bin Sultan Center for Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University , Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Wasun Chantratita
- 7 Department of Pathology, Medical Genomic Center, Ramathibodi Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mahidol University , Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ambroise Wonkam
- 8 Division of Human Genetics, Department of Medicine and Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town , Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Collet Dandara
- 8 Division of Human Genetics, Department of Medicine and Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town , Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Theodora Katsila
- 9 Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras , Patras, Greece
| | | | - Bassam R Ali
- 5 Department of Pathology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University , Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates .,6 Zayed Bin Sultan Center for Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University , Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - George P Patrinos
- 5 Department of Pathology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University , Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates .,6 Zayed Bin Sultan Center for Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University , Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates .,9 Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras , Patras, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Novkovic M, Matic D, Kusic-Tisma J, Antonijevic N, Radojkovic D, Rakicevic L. Analysis of the CYP2C19 genotype associated with bleeding in Serbian STEMI patients who have undergone primary PCI and treatment with clopidogrel. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2017; 74:443-451. [PMID: 29260275 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-017-2401-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Bleeding is one of the possible adverse events during clopidogrel therapy. The CYP2C19 gene is the most significant genetic factor which influences response to clopidogrel treatment. We aimed to examine the contribution of the CYP2C19 gene to bleeding occurrence during clopidogrel therapy in Serbian patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS This case-control study included 53 patients who experienced bleeding and 55 patients without bleeding. Bleeding events were defined and classified using the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria. All patients were prescribed daily doses of clopidogrel during the 1-year follow-up after PCI. The CYP2C19*17 (c.-806C>T, rs12248560), rs11568732 (c.-889T>G, CYP2C19*20), CYP2C19*2 (c.681G>A; rs4244285) and CYP2C19*3 (c.636G>A; rs4986893) variants were analysed in all 108 patients. Additionally, sequencing of all nine exons, 5'UTR and 3'UTR in the rs11568732 carriers was performed. RESULTS Association between bleeding (BARC type ≥ 2) and the CYP2C19*17 variant was not observed [odds ratio (OR), 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.2-1.1; p = 0.107). The rs11568732 variant showed significant association with bleeding (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.12-12.44; p = 0.025). Also, we found that the rs11568732 variant appears independently of haplotype CYP2C19*3B, which is contrary to the previous findings. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate the absence of CYP2C19*17 influence and turn the attention to the potential significance of the rs11568732 variant in terms of adverse effects of clopidogrel. However, it is necessary to conduct an independent conformation study in order to verify this finding. Also, an analysis of the functional implication of the rs11568732 variant is necessary in order to confirm the significance of this variant, both in relation to its influence on gene expression and in relation to its medical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjana Novkovic
- Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 444a, P.O. Box 23, 11010, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Dragan Matic
- Emergency Department, Clinic for Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Jelena Kusic-Tisma
- Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 444a, P.O. Box 23, 11010, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Nebojsa Antonijevic
- Emergency Department, Clinic for Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Dragica Radojkovic
- Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 444a, P.O. Box 23, 11010, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Ljiljana Rakicevic
- Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 444a, P.O. Box 23, 11010, Belgrade, Serbia.
| |
Collapse
|