Polymorphisms of genes related to phase II metabolism and resistance to clopidogrel

The Complement System and C4b-Binding Protein: A Focus on the Promise of C4BPα as a Biomarker to Predict Clopidogrel Resistance

The complement system plays a dual role in the body, either as a first-line defense barrier when balanced between activation and inhibition or as a potential driver of complement-associated injury or diseases when unbalanced or over-activated. C4b-binding protein (C4BP) was the first circulating complement regulatory protein identified and it functions as an important complement inhibitor. C4BP can suppress the over-activation of complement components and prevent the complement system from attacking the host cells through the binding of complement cleavage products C4b and C3b, working in concert as a cofactor for factor I in the degradation of C4b and C3b, and consequently preventing or reducing the assembly of C3 convertase and C5 convertase, respectively. C4BP, particularly C4BP α-chain (C4BPα), exerts its unique inhibitory effects on complement activation and opsonization, systemic inflammation, and platelet activation and aggregation. It has long been acknowledged that crosstalk or interplay exists between the complement system and platelets. Our unpublished preliminary data suggest that circulating C4BPα exerts its antiplatelet effects through inhibition of both complement activity levels and complement-induced platelet reactivity. Plasma C4BPα levels appear to be significantly higher in patients sensitive to, rather than resistant to, clopidogrel, and we suggest that a plasma C4BPα measurement could be used to predict clopidogrel resistance in the clinical settings.

Transcriptome-wide map of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) profiling in coronary artery disease (CAD) with clopidogrel resistance

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel resistance profoundly increases the risk of major cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Here, we comprehensively analyse global m6A modification alterations in clopidogrel-resistant (CR) and non-CR patients.

METHODS

After RNA isolation, the RNA transcriptome expression (lncRNA, circRNA, and mRNA) was analysed via RNA-seq, and m6A peaks were identified by MeRIP-seq. The altered m6A methylation sites on mRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs were identified, and then, GO and KEGG pathway analyses were performed. Through joint analysis with RNA-seq and MeRIP-seq data, differentially expressed mRNAs harbouring differentially methylated sites were identified. The changes in m6A regulator levels and the abundance of differentially methylated sites were measured by RT-PCR. The identification of m6A-modified RNAs was verified by m6A-IP-qPCR.

RESULTS

The expression of 2919 hypermethylated and 2519 hypomethylated mRNAs, 192 hypermethylated and 391 hypomethylated lncRNAs, and 375 hypermethylated and 546 hypomethylated circRNAs was shown to be altered in CR patients. The m6A peaks related to CR indicated lower mark density at the CDS region. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that inflammatory pathways and insulin signalling pathways might be involved in the pathological processes underlying CR. The expression of mRNAs (ST5, KDM6B, GLB1L2, and LSM14B), lncRNAs (MSTRG.13776.1 and ENST00000627981.1), and circRNAs (hsa_circ_0070675_CBC1, hsa-circRNA13011-5_CBC1, and hsa-circRNA6406-3_CBC1) was upregulated in CR patients, while the expression of mRNAs (RPS16 and CREG1), lncRNAs (MSTRG.9215.1), and circRNAs (hsa_circ_0082972_CBC1) was downregulated in CR patients. Moreover, m6A regulators (FTO, YTHDF3, and WTAP) were also differentially expressed. An additional combined analysis of gene expression and m6A peaks revealed that the expression of mRNAs (such as ST5, LYPD2, and RPS16 mRNAs) was significantly altered in the CR patients.

CONCLUSION

The expression of m6A regulators, the RNA transcriptome, and the m6A landscape was altered in CR patients. These findings reveal epitranscriptomic regulation in CR patients, which might be novel therapeutic targets in future.