Survey on warfarin pharmacogenetic testing among anticoagulation providers

Pharmacogenetics in clinical practice: current level of knowledge among Flemish physicians and pharmacists

Over the past decade, pharmacogenetics (PGx) became an essential tool for personalized medicine although its clinical implementation is still limited. We aimed to assess the current level of knowledge, applications, and expectations of Flemish pharmacists and physicians towards PGx and determine the factors that influence healthcare professionals' knowledge of PGx, aiming to guide future implementation initiatives. A web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted from 8 March 2019 to 8 April 2019, targeting pharmacists, physicians, and trainees of both professions. Ten questions were used to assess the participants' knowledge about PGx. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess the association of profession, experience, practice setting, and prior education with the level of PGx knowledge. In total, 201 Flemish healthcare providers participated, including 100 pharmacists, 73 physicians, and 28 trainees. The majority (78%) of participants were unfamiliar with the basic principles of PGx and its application in clinical practice. The mean percentage of correct answers achieved for the knowledge assessment questions was 34%. Only 9% had counseled patients, while 8% assisted other healthcare professionals on PGx tests the past year. Participants' PGx knowledge was significantly affected by their profession, practice setting, and level of prior education independent of years of experience. These findings provide insight into factors affecting the knowledge of PGx and the current level of PGx implementation in Flemish clinical practice. This may form a basis for developing educational initiatives to enhance the clinical application of PGx in Flanders.

Characteristics and evaluation outcomes of genomics curricula for health professional students: a systematic literature review

PURPOSE

With the increased advances in genomics, leading health authorities have advocated the importance of incorporating genomics content into health professional school education to ensure those students achieve adequate genomic competencies. Yet, information regarding the genomics education status for this particular group is lacking. We conducted a systematic literature review to summarize the characteristics and evaluation outcomes of genomics curricula for health professional students.

METHODS

Medline (OVID), EMBASE, CAB (EBSCO), Global Health, MedEdPORTAL, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles.

RESULTS

Forty-one articles met our inclusion criteria. The majority were conducted in the United States and offered to pharmacy and medical students (the number of students ranged from 10 to 2674). The effects of genomics curricula on students' knowledge (n = 36), attitudes (n = 16), self-efficacy (n = 14), comfort level (n = 4), intention (n = 3), motivation (n = 3), and behavior (n = 2) were assessed. Although those results were generally positive, 68.3% of the genomics curricula were not theory-based, and most studies did not report follow-up data (85.4%).

CONCLUSION

Our findings provided information on the existing genomics curricula available for health professional students.

International survey of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and their attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate perceptions toward pharmacogenetic testing of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who are prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and whether geographical differences in these perceptions exist.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

TAILOR-PCI is the largest genotype-based cardiovascular clinical trial randomizing participants to conventional DAPT or prospective genotyping-guided DAPT. Enrolled patients completed surveys before and 6 months after randomization.

RESULTS

A total of 1327 patients completed baseline surveys of whom 28, 29, and 43% were from Korea, Canada and the USA, respectively. Most patients (77%) valued identifying pharmacogenetic variants; however, fewer Koreans (44%) as compared with Canadians (91%) and USA (89%) patients identified pharmacogenetics as being important (P<0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, and country, those who were confident in their ability to understand genetic information were significantly more likely to value identifying pharmacogenetic variants (odds ratio: 30.0; 95% confidence interval: 20.5-43.8). Only 21% of Koreans, as opposed to 86 and 77% of patients in Canada and USA, respectively, were confident in their ability to understand genetic information (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although genetically mediated clopidogrel resistance is more prevalent amongst Asians, Koreans undergoing PCI identified pharmacogenetic variants as less important to their healthcare, likely related to their lack of confidence in their ability to understand genetic information. To enable successful implementation of pharmacogenetic testing on a global scale, the possibility of international population differences in perceptions should be considered.

A theory-informed systematic review of clinicians' genetic testing practices

This systematic literature review investigates factors impacting on clinicians' decisions to offer genetic tests in their practice, and maps them to a theoretical behaviour change framework. Better understanding of these factors will inform the design of effective interventions to integrate genomics tests into clinical care. We conducted a narrative synthesis of empirical research of medical specialists' perspectives on and experiences of offering genetic tests to their patients. This review was based upon the PRISMA statement and guidelines for reviewing qualitative research. Four electronic data sources were searched-MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed. Studies were independently assessed by two authors. Content analysis was applied to map the findings of included studies to a framework validated for behaviour and implementation research, the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). The TDF describes 14 factors known to influence behaviour and has been applied in diverse clinical settings to understand and/or modify health professional behaviour. Thirty-four studies published in 39 articles met inclusion and quality criteria. Most studies were published after 2011 (54%), Northern American (82%), quantitative in design (68%) and addressed familial cancer genetic tests (53%). Of the 14 TDF factors, 13 were identified. The three most common factors were: Environmental Context and Resources (n = 33), Beliefs about Consequences (n = 26), and Knowledge (n = 23). To support the adoption of genomic tests beyond specialist services, nuanced interventions targeting considerations beyond clinician education are needed. For instance, interventions addressing organisational constraints which may restrict clinicians' ability to offer genomic tests are required alongside those targeting factors intrinsic to the clinician.

Striking a balance in communicating pharmacogenetic test results: promoting comprehension and minimizing adverse psychological and behavioral response

OBJECTIVE

Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing can provide information about a patient's likelihood to respond to a medication or experience an adverse event, and be used to inform medication selection and/or dosing. Promoting patient comprehension of PGx test results will be important to improving engagement and understanding of treatment decisions.

METHODS

The discussion in this paper is based on our experiences and the literature on communication of genetic test results for disease risk and broad risk communication strategies.

RESULTS

Clinical laboratory reports often describe PGx test results using standard terminology such as 'poor metabolizer' or 'ultra-rapid metabolizer.' While this type of terminology may promote patient recall with its simple, yet descriptive nature, it may be difficult for some patients to comprehend and/or cause adverse psychological or behavioral responses.

CONCLUSION

The language used to communicate results and their significance to patients will be important to consider in order to minimize confusion and potential psychological consequences such as increased anxiety that can adversely impact medication-taking behaviors.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Due to patients' unfamiliarity with PGx testing and the potential for confusion, adverse psychological effects, and decreased medication adherence, health providers need to be cognizant of the language used in discussing PGx test results with patients.

Pharmacogenomics primer course for first professional year pharmacy students

BACKGROUND

The importance of pharmacogenomics (PGx) is widely recognized in healthcare; however, PGx knowledge and confidence is lacking among many healthcare professionals. Pharmacists are the most logical PGx experts, yet most pharmacy schools do not require the basic science foundations of PGx as admission prerequisites.

METHODS

A PGx primer course was developed for first year pharmacy students. In addition to genomics-based didactic material, this course also contains 'journaling' exercises and a group term paper based on a self-genotyping/phenotype exercise. The effectiveness of this course was evaluated by anonymous genomics knowledge surveys, course evaluations and unsolicited student comments.

RESULTS

Data demonstrate this course engendered a significant increase in genomics knowledge and a positive perspective towards PGx.

CONCLUSION

A course such as this bridges the current PGx basic science knowledge gap and can serve as a template for providing fundamental genomics knowledge until admissions prerequisites ensure that all incoming students are ready to embrace PGx.

Diffusion of molecular diagnostic lung cancer tests: a survey of german oncologists

This study was aimed at examining the diffusion of diagnostic lung cancer tests in Germany. It was motivated by the high potential of detecting and targeting oncogenic drivers. Recognizing that the diffusion of diagnostic tests is a conditio sine qua non for the success of personalized lung cancer therapies, this study analyzed the diffusion of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tests in Germany. Qualitative and quantitative research strategies were combined in a mixed-method design. A literature review and subsequent Key Opinion Leader interviews identified a set of qualitative factors driving the diffusion process, which were then translated into an online survey. The survey was conducted among a sample of 961 oncologists (11.34% response rate). The responses were analyzed in a multiple linear regression which identified six statistically significant factors driving the diffusion of molecular diagnostic lung cancer tests: reimbursement, attitude towards R&D, information self-assessment, perceived attitudes of colleagues, age and test-pathway strategies. Besides the important role of adequate reimbursement and relevant guidelines, the results of this study suggest that an increasing usage of test-pathway strategies, especially in an office-based setting, can increase the diffusion of molecular diagnostic lung cancer tests in the future.

Cancer pharmacogenomics, adoption by oncologists and patient benefit

Aim: The study aim was to understand physician experience and factors influencing the adoption of cancer pharmacogenomic (caPGx) testing by oncologists practicing in academic and nonacademic settings. Method: Anonymous paper surveys were distributed to oncologists practicing in North Carolina (USA). Results: Although 98% of oncologists see promise in utilizing PGx tests in their practice, few were comfortable with their knowledge (33%) or interpreting test results (37%). At one site, the survey was not distributed due to clinician unfamiliarity with the term ‘pharmacogenomics’. Compared with oncologists in academia, community oncologists were more likely to order the new Oncotype Dx™ test for colon cancer (33% vs 0; p = 0.0071), more likely to indicate future use of caPGx tests (94 vs 75%; p = 0.012) and less likely to have never ordered a caPGx test (2 vs 35%%; p < 0.001). Nearly every oncologist was interested in additional PGx education. Conclusion: A critical need exists to disseminate accurate and updated caPGx information to oncologists practicing in both academic and nonacademic settings.

Out-of-school genomics program for young women demystifies genomics and fosters interest in biomedical sciences

Background: Pharmacogenomics (PGx) plays a critical role in personalized medicine; however, most healthcare practitioners lack the training and confidence in PGx required to fully utilize its potential. Although continuing education and inclusion of PGx into the professional curricula will begin to address this deficiency, PGx education at the secondary and postsecondary levels would demystify PGx and pique interest at an academic stage that is key to funneling PGx curious students into the science and healthcare pipeline earlier. Methods: This article describes the development and evaluation of a genomics outreach program targeted at young women in high school with the ultimate goal of recruiting students into an undergraduate PGx program and school of pharmacy. Results: This program increased participants’ genomics knowledge, influenced their careers interests, and imparted positive feelings towards a genomics-based and/or biomedical career. Conclusion: Genomics-based educational outreach programs geared towards secondary school students can increase interest in and confidence to pursue a PGx-centric degree/career.

Original submitted 3 July 2013; Revision submitted 6 January 2014

Community pharmacists' attitudes towards clinical utility and ethical implications of pharmacogenetic testing

AIM

To examine community pharmacists' attitudes towards pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing, including their views of the clinical utility of PGx and the ethical, social, legal and practical implications of PGx testing.

METHODS

A web-based survey administered to 5600 licensed community pharmacists in the states of Ohio and Pennsylvania (USA).

RESULTS

Of 580 respondents, 78% had a Bachelor of Science degree in pharmacy and 58% worked in a chain drug store. Doctors of pharmacy-trained pharmacists had a significantly higher knowledge score than those with a Bachelor of Science in pharmacy (3.2 ± 0.9 vs 2.6 ± 0.6; p < 0.0001). All pharmacists had positive attitudes towards PGx and most (87%) felt it would decrease the number of adverse events, and optimize drug dosing. More than half (57%) of pharmacists felt that it was their role to counsel patients regarding PGx information. Many (65%) were concerned that PGx test results may be used to deny health insurance.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of the type of education, all pharmacists had positive attitudes towards PGx. There is still a concern among pharmacists that PGx test results may be used to deny health insurance and, thus, there is a need to educate pharmacists about legal protections prohibiting certain forms of unfair discrimination based on genotype.

Pharmacogenomics and patient care: one size does not fit all

The time is ripe to assess whether pharmacogenomics research--the study of the genetic basis for variation in drug response--has provided important insights into a personalized approach to prescribing and dosing medications. Here, we describe the status of the field and approaches for addressing some of the open questions in pharmacogenomics research and use of genetic testing in guiding drug therapy.

Clinical delivery of pharmacogenetic testing services: a proposed partnership between genetic counselors and pharmacists

One of the basic questions in the early uses of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing revolves around the clinical delivery of testing. Because multiple health professionals may play a role in the delivery of PGx testing, various clinical delivery models have begun to be studied. We propose that a partnership between genetic counselors and pharmacists can assist clinicians in the delivery of comprehensive PGx services. Based on their expert knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, pharmacists can facilitate the appropriate application of PGx test results to adjust medication use as warranted and act as a liaison to the healthcare team recommending changes in medication based on test results and patient input. Genetic counselors are well-trained in genetics as well as risk communication and counseling methodology, but have limited knowledge of pharmaceuticals. The complementary knowledge and skill set supports the partnership between genetic counselors and pharmacists to provide effective PGx testing services.

Implementation and outcomes of a live continuing education program on pharmacogenomics

Aim: This study evaluated the implementation and outcomes of a pharmacogenomics education program among pharmacists. Materials & methods: Continuing education lectures were presented at local, state and national pharmacy conferences. Results: Six hundred and seventy three pharmacist participants (mean ± standard deviation: 45 ± 14 years of age with 19 ± 13 years of practice experience) completed program evaluations. Participants’ knowledge and overall ability to address pharmacogenomics testing significantly improved (p < 0.001). More than 50% rated self-efficacy for putting pharmacogenomics knowledge into clinical practice to be likely or very likely. Attitudes toward increasing the number of patients to educate, updating pharmacogenomics knowledge, and providing advice were 39, 76 and 64%, respectively. Participants rated program components to be useful or very useful, and the quality of the program format, program content and audience response system as good, very good or excellent. Conclusion: Through live continuing education presentations at pharmacy conferences, participants showed significant increases in knowledge and their overall ability to address pharmacogenomics testing with patients.

Original submitted 30 January 2013; Revision submitted 10 April 2013

The current and future state of pharmacogenomics medical education in the USA

Healthcare professionals (e.g., physicians, physician assistants, pharmacists, nurses and genetic counselors) believe pharmacogenomics (PGx) is essential to personalized medicine; however, they still lack confidence prescribing, dosing, interacting with other healthcare professionals and counseling patients with regard to PGx. This is due to the inadequate incorporation of PGx content into professional curricula. Compared with other health professions, Doctor of Pharmacy programs have integrated more PGx content. Unlike other healthcare professionals, pharmacists have extensive training in pharmacology, drug selection, drug dosage, drug-drug interactions and are uniquely accessible to patients. We suggest pharmacists are the best poised to facilitate incorporating PGx into therapeutic decision-making. Based on our experience as undergraduate and pharmacy PGx educators, we further reflect on our experience educating future healthcare professionals on PGx.

Primary care physicians' knowledge of and experience with pharmacogenetic testing

It is anticipated that as the range of drugs for which pharmacogenetic testing becomes available expands, primary care physicians (PCPs) will become major users of these tests. To assess their training, familiarity, and attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing in order to identify barriers to uptake that may be addressed at this early stage of test use, we conducted a national survey of a sample of PCPs. Respondents were mostly white (79%), based primarily in community-based primary care (81%) and almost evenly divided between family medicine and internal medicine. The majority of respondents had heard of PGx testing and anticipated that these tests are or would soon become a valuable tool to inform drug response. However, only a minority of respondents (13%) indicated they felt comfortable ordering PGx tests and almost a quarter reported not having any education about pharmacogenetics. Our results indicate that primary care practitioners envision a major role for themselves in the delivery of PGx testing but recognize their lack of adequate knowledge and experience about these tests. Development of effective tools for guiding PCPs in the use of PGx tests should be a high priority.

Incorporating direct-to-consumer genomic information into patient care: attitudes and experiences of primary care physicians

AIM

Despite predictions of increased clinical applications, little is known about primary care providers' (PCPs') readiness to apply genomics to patient care. The aim was to assess PCPs' current experience with genetic testing, their assessment of the understandability and clinical utility of information in sample direct-to-consumer reports for genomic assessment of disease risk and warfarin dosing and attitudes toward genomic medicine.

MATERIALS & METHODS

A web-based survey of PCPs who are members of Knowledge Networks' Physician Consulting Network was conducted.

RESULTS

Of the 502 respondents (23.3% response rate), most ordered genetic tests infrequently. When presented with the direct-to-consumer genomic testing reports, most believed the reports were understandable, and would be willing to review results with a patient, and many believed the results would be helpful in patient management.

CONCLUSION

Despite limited experience with genetic tests, PCPs are open to helping patients understand genomic information. However, additional physician education is needed.

Clinical Pharmacogenomics of Warfarin and Clopidogrel

Genetic polymorphisms significantly influence responses to warfarin and clopidogrel. Polymorphisms in the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and vitamin K epoxide reductase genes change warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, respectively. Because these polymorphisms influence warfarin dose requirements, they may primarily help determine therapeutic warfarin doses in patients who newly start on the drug. To assist in estimating therapeutic warfarin doses, the warfarin label provides a pharmacogenomic dosing table and various warfarin pharmacogenomic dosing algorithms are available. On the other hand, polymorphisms in the CYP2C19 gene affect clopidogrel pharmacokinetics. These polymorphisms may be useful to identify clopidogrel nonresponders who may benefit from taking an alternative antiplatelet agent such as prasugrel and ticagrelor. Although both drugs have pharmacogenomic tests available for clinical use, their clinical utilities have not been established and are currently being actively studied. In this review, clinical application of warfarin and clopidogrel pharmacogenomics will be focused. With the current level of evidence, potential patients who may get benefit from warfarin and clopidogrel pharmacogenomic testing will be discussed. In addition, the interpretation of the warfarin and clopidogrel test results and the current barriers to widespread use of warfarin and clopidogrel pharmacogenomic testing will be discussed.

Clinical decision support for personalized medicine: an opportunity for pharmacist-physician collaboration

Pharmacogenomics has significant potential to improve the efficacy and safety of medication therapy, but it requires new expertise and adds a new layer of complexity for all healthcare professionals. Pharmacists and pharmacy management systems can play a leading role in providing clinical decision support for the use and interpretation of pharmacogenomic tests. To serve this role effectively, pharmacists will need to expand their expertise in the emerging field of clinical pharmacogenomics. Pharmacy-based clinical programs can expedite the use of pharmacogenomic testing, help physicians interpret the test results and identify future medication risks associated with the patient's phenotype. Over time, some of these functions can be embedded in clinical decision support systems as part of the broader automation of the healthcare system.

Role of pharmacogenomics in the management of traditional and novel oral anticoagulants

Warfarin is the most commonly prescribed oral anticoagulant. However, it remains a difficult drug to manage mostly because of its narrow therapeutic index and wide interpatient variability in anticoagulant effects. Over the past decade, there has been substantial progress in our understanding of genetic contributions to variable warfarin response, particularly with regard to warfarin dose requirements. The genes encoding for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 (CYP2C9) and vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 (VKORC1) are the major genetic determinants of warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, respectively. Numerous studies have demonstrated significant contributions of these genes to warfarin dose requirements. The CYP2C9 gene has also been associated with bleeding risk with warfarin. The CYP4F2 gene influences vitamin K availability and makes minor contributions to warfarin dose requirements. Less is known about genes influencing warfarin response in African-American patients compared with other racial groups, but this is the focus of ongoing research. Several warfarin pharmacogenetic dosing algorithms and United States Food and Drug Administration-cleared genotyping tests are available for clinical use. Clinical trials are ongoing to determine the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of genotypeguided warfarin dosing. Results from these trials will likely influence clinical uptake and third party payer reimbursement for genotype-guided warfarin therapy. There is still a lack of pharmacogenetic data for the newly approved oral anticoagulants, dabigatran and rivaroxaban, and with other oral anticoagulants in the research and development pipeline. These data, once known, could be of great importance as routine monitoring parameters for these agents are not available.

Knowledge, attitudes and education of pharmacists regarding pharmacogenetic testing

AIM

Pharmacists are positioned to provide medication counseling and drug information to patients. This study assessed the knowledge, attitudes and education of over 700 pharmacists concerning pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenetic testing.

METHODS

A multiquestion, online survey was developed to assess healthcare provider knowledge, attitudes and education concerning pharmacogenetic testing.

RESULTS

More than 90% of pharmacists were interested in learning more about pharmacogenetics and testing, with those with less than 10 years of experience were more likely to want web-based continuing education programs. The pharmacists were unlikely to have had formalized education regarding pharmacogenetics, were very likely to rate their knowledge accurately, and were more likely to have a positive attitude about pharmacogenetics if they had received education regarding pharmacogenetics.

CONCLUSION

Most pharmacists were interested in learning more about pharmacogenetic testing.

Healthcare payers: a gate or translational bridge to personalized medicine?

Healthcare payers represent stakeholders who can act as either a bridge or a gate to the translation of personalized medicine into routine clinical practice. To date, the slow realization of the promise of personalized medicine has been partly attributable to the lack of clear evidence supporting the clinical utility of genetic and genomic tests and the lag in development of clinical guidelines for the use and interpretation of tests. These factors, along with a paucity of clear guidance from healthcare payers and clinical experience with genomic tests, serve as impediments to timely and consistent reimbursement decisions. The design of alternative strategies for collaborative evidence-generation, clinical decision support and educational initiatives for healthcare providers, patients and the payers themselves are critical needs to achieve the full benefit of personalized medicine in day-to-day healthcare settings.

Knowledge and attitudes concerning pharmacogenomics among healthcare professionals

Pharmacogenomics has become an area of great potential in the medical community. Therefore, the assessment of the knowledge and attitudes among healthcare professionals is essential. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to explore the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals regarding pharmacogenetic testing with a specific emphasis in oncology. A total of 12 articles were found and reviewed. A majority of the articles reported only on the attitudes of healthcare professionals. Four of the articles reported on both knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals concerning pharmacogenetic testing, and one article reported only on the knowledge level of healthcare professionals. This systematic literature review revealed that healthcare professionals generally perceive themselves to have limited knowledge regarding pharmacogenetic testing. In addition, these articles highlighted the overwhelming ethical concerns surrounding pharmacogenomics. However, these articles also revealed that healthcare professionals believed that there were also many advantages regarding the utilization of pharmacogenomics.

Clinical applications of pharmacogenomics guided warfarin dosing

AIM OF THE REVIEW

To assess the state of the literature concerning pharmacogenomic testing in patients requiring vitamin K antagonists, specifically warfarin.

METHOD

We conducted a literature search of MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts using the following words: warfarin, pharmacogenetic, and pharmacogenomic. The search results were reviewed by the authors and papers concerning pharmacogenomic testing in warfarin dosing were procured and reviewed. Additionally bibliographies of papers procured were also examined for other studies. The authors focused on clinical trials concerning the use of pharmacogenomic testing in warfarin dosing.

RESULTS

Although numerous studies have demonstrated that a significant portion of warfarin dosing variability can be explained by genetic polymorphisms, few prospective studies have been conducted that examine the integration of this information in practical dosing situations. Those that have, have shown that using pharmacogenomic information improves initial dosing estimates and decreases the need for frequent clinic visits and laboratory testing. Data showing a reduction in serious bleeding events is sparse. Cost-effectiveness analyses have generally shown a small but positive effect with pharmacogenomic testing in patients receiving warfarin.

CONCLUSION

Several studies have shown that pharmacogenomic testing for warfarin dosing is more accurate that other dosing schemes. Pharmacogenomic testing improves time to a therapeutic international normalized ratio while requiring fewer dosing adjustments. Patients who require higher or lower than usual doses seem to benefit the most. The cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomic testing as well as preventing of outcomes such as bleeding or thrombosis are not yet elucidated. Pharmacists, especially those in a community setting can play a role in this new technology by educating prescribers and patients concerning pharmacogenomic testing, and by developing and using dosing protocols that incorporate its use.