MTHFR functional genetic variation and methotrexate treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis

Innovative trial approaches in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: current use and future potential

BACKGROUND

Despite progress that has been made in the treatment of many immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), there remains a need for improved treatments. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide the highest form of evidence on the effectiveness of a potential new treatment regimen, but they are extremely expensive and time consuming to conduct. Consequently, much focus has been given in recent years to innovative design and analysis methods that could improve the efficiency of RCTs. In this article, we review the current use and future potential of these methods within the context of IMID trials.

METHODS

We provide a review of several innovative methods that would provide utility in IMID research. These include novel study designs (adaptive trials, Sequential Multi-Assignment Randomised Trials, basket, and umbrella trials) and data analysis methodologies (augmented analyses of composite responder endpoints, using high-dimensional biomarker information to stratify patients, and emulation of RCTs from routinely collected data). IMID trials are now well-placed to embrace innovative methods. For example, well-developed statistical frameworks for adaptive trial design are ready for implementation, whilst the growing availability of historical datasets makes the use of Bayesian methods particularly applicable. To assess whether and how these innovative methods have been used in practice, we conducted a review via PubMed of clinical trials pertaining to any of 51 IMIDs that were published between 2018 and 20 in five high impact factor clinical journals.

RESULTS

Amongst 97 articles included in the review, 19 (19.6%) used an innovative design method, but most of these were relatively straightforward examples of innovative approaches. Only two (2.1%) reported the use of evidence from routinely collected data, cohorts, or biobanks. Eight (9.2%) collected high-dimensional data.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of innovative statistical methodology to IMID trials has the potential to greatly improve efficiency, to generalise and extrapolate trial results, and to further personalise treatment strategies. Currently, such methods are infrequently utilised in practice. New research is required to ensure that IMID trials can benefit from the most suitable methods.

Are gene polymorphisms related to adverse events of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis? A retrospective cohort study based on an updated meta-analysis

Aims:

We performed an updated meta-analysis to verify correlations between gene polymorphisms and adverse events in methotrexate (MTX)-treated rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Then, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of Han Chinese in China.

Methods:

Relevant studies were collected from the PubMed database and the EMBASE database until December 2017. Pre-allele, dominant, recessive, codominant, and homozygotic models were applied. In addition, a retrospective cohort study enrolling 162 RA patients treated with MTX was conducted. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping was analyzed by PCR and product sequencing.

Results:

A total of 39 studies were included in 20 meta-analyses; meta-analysis showed a significant association between MTX-related toxicity and 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C>T(rs1801133) polymorphism in East Asian RA patients, and significant associations were observed between MTX-related toxicity and 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase/IMP cyclohydrolase (ATIC) 347C>G (rs2372536), reduced folate carrier 1 (RFC-1) 80G>A (rs1051266), and adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette B1 (ABCB1) 3435C>T(rs1045642) polymorphisms in European RA patients but not in East Asian RA patients. Moreover, in our retrospective cohort study, ATIC 347C>G(rs2372536) and ABCB1 3435C>T(rs1045642) polymorphisms were not associated with MTX-related toxicity. However, a significant association was observed between MTX-related toxicity and RFC-1 80G>A (rs1051266) polymorphism in Chinese Han RA patients.

Conclusion:

Evidence-based results suggest that the MTHFR 677C>T(rs1801133), ATIC 347C>G(rs2372536), RFC-1 80G>A (rs1051266), ABCB1 3435C>T(rs1045642) polymorphisms are associated with MTX-related toxicity. Larger and more stringent study designs may provide more accurate findings for the effects of these SNPs on MTX-related toxicity, and larger sample-size studies of the Chinese Han population should be conducted for further validation.

Association of MTHFR and RFC1 gene polymorphisms with methotrexate efficacy and toxicity in Chinese Han patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Objective

The objective was to explore the association of methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C667T and A1298C and reduced folate carrier 1 (RFC-1) A80G single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and efficacy and toxicity of methotrexate (MTX) treatment in Chinese Han patients in Henan, China.

Methods

Two hundred ninety-six patients with RA were enrolled (cases) and 120 healthy individuals served as controls. The genotypes of MTHFR C667T and A1298C SNP and RFC-1 A80G SNP were detected by restriction fragment length polymorphism-PCR and compared between cases and controls. We analyzed correlations of clinical effect, toxicity, and SNPs after 6 months of MTX treatment.

Results

We detected no significant differences in MTHFR C677T and A1298C and RFC-1 A80G SNPs between cases and controls. The RFC-1 A80G SNP differed between RA patients with good and poor efficacy after 6 months of MTX, and was an independent factor of MTX efficacy. The MTHFR C677T SNP was differently distributed in the adverse drug reaction (ADR) and non-ADR groups and was an independent factor of MTX toxicity.

Conclusions

In Chinese Han patients with RA, the MTHFR C667T SNP may correlate with MTX toxicity, whereas the RFC-1 A80G SNP may correlate with MTX efficacy rather than toxicity.

Pharmacogenetics: A strategy for personalized medicine for autoimmune diseases

For many years, a considerable number of patients with autoimmune diseases (ADs) have suffered from a lack of drug response and drug-related toxicity. Despite the emergence of new therapeutic options such as biological agents, patients continue to struggle with these problems. Unfortunately, new challenges, including the paradoxical effects of biological drugs, have complicated the situation. In recent decades, efforts have been made to predict drug response as well as drug-related side effects. Thanks to the many advances in genetics, evaluation of markers to predict drug response/toxicity before the initiation of treatment may be an avenue toward personalizing treatments. Implementing pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in the clinic could improve clinical care; however, obstacles remain to effective personalized medicine for ADs. The present study attempted to clarify the concept of pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics for ADs. After an overview on the pathogenesis of the most common types of treatments, this paper focuses on pharmacogenetic studies related to the selected ADs. Bridging the gap between pharmacogenetics and personalized medicine is also discussed. Moreover, the advantages, disadvantages and recommendations related to making personalized medicine practical for ADs have been addressed.

Association of MTHFR C677T and A1298C gene polymorphisms with methotrexate efficiency and toxicity in Algerian rheumatoid arthritis patients

Methotrexate (MTX) is the most used drug in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. However, it shows variability in clinical response, which is explained by an association with genetic polymorphisms. This study aimed to elucidate the role of the two gene polymorphism C677T and A1298C of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) in response to MTX in Algerian RA patients. Study included 54 early RA patient treated with MTX for one year. MTX efficiency and toxicity were evaluated at 6 and 12 months respectively and the two gene polymorphisms were genotyped. No association was found between A1298C polymorphism and MTX toxicity. However, T allele of the C677T polymorphism was associated with the occurrence of MTX adverse effects (p = 0,019, OR: 3,63, 95% CI [1,12 - 12,80]). No association was found between C677T polymorphism and MTX efficiency, while A allele of the A1298C polymorphism was associated with good and moderate response (p = 0,02, OR = 3,28, 95% CI: [1,11– 9,42]). The study of RA biological markers kinetics showed that MTX did not affect antibodies rate unlike inflammatory markers. Our study suggests that MTHFR C677T and A1298C genotyping are associated to MTX toxicity and efficiency, respectively, in RA patients. This offers new perspectives in the personalization of RA treatment in Algeria.

Polymorphisms and Pharmacogenomics for the Clinical Efficacy of Methotrexate in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Methotrexate (MTX) is widely used and considered a first-line disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Many of the relevant genes have been investigated to estimate the association between gene polymorphisms and MTX effectiveness in RA patients, although inconsistent results have been reported. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to identify genetic variants associated with MTX efficacy. A total of 30 publications that included 34 genes and 125 SNPs associated with the transporters, enzymes, and metabolites of MTX or the progression of RA were included in the systematic review (SR), and 21 studies were included in 9 meta-analyses. Associations between MTX response in RA patients in MTHFR 1298A > C (rs1801131), ATIC 347C > G (rs2372536), RFC-1 80G > A (rs1051266), SLC19A1 A > G (rs2838956) and SLC19A1 G > A (rs7499) genetic polymorphisms were found, but not observed between the MTHFR 677C > T (rs1801133), TYMS 28 bp VNTR (rs34743033), MTRR 66A > G (rs1801394), and ABCB1 3435C > T (rs1045642). However, for the polymorphisms not being associated following meta-analysis could still be associated if larger cohorts were used, and studies of other polymorphisms are necessary in large cohorts and a rigorous way, which may provide more accurate results for the effect of the gene polymorphisms on the MTX response.

Are gene polymorphisms related to treatment outcomes of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: Identifying the predictors of responsiveness and adverse events in methotrexate (MTX) treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been the focus of most concern, but still without consistent consensus. Methods: PubMed and OVID EMBASE were searched to collect relevant studies that addressed correlations between gene polymorphisms and efficacy and/or toxicity in MTX-treated RA patients. Allelic, recessive, dominant and over-dominant model were applied. Results: A total of 68 studies were included. For associations with efficacy, AMPD1 34C>T polymorphism was related to responsiveness in dominant model (odds ratio [OR]: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.19–2.63) and over-dominant model (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.04–2.45). ATIC T675C polymorphism had association with responsiveness in recessive model (OR: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.23–5.26). For associations with toxicity, polymorphisms in TYMS 1494 del6 and FPGS rs10106 were correlated to absenting overall adverse events in recessive model (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49–0.95) and dominant model (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.35–0.83) respectively while MTHFR C677T was associated with presenting overall adverse events in allelic model (OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.02–1.63), recessive model (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.00–1.89) and dominant model (OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.02–1.94). Conclusion: Polymorphisms in AMPD1 34C>T and ATIC T675C predict responsiveness. The absence of TYMS 1494 del6 and FPGS rs10106 and presence of MTHFR C677T predict adverse events in RA patients treated with MTX. Moreover, variations of the associations were found between Caucasians and non-Caucasians.

Mechanism of action of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis, and the search for biomarkers

The treatment and outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been transformed over the past two decades. Low disease activity and remission are now frequently achieved, and this success is largely the result of the evolution of treatment paradigms and the introduction of new therapeutic agents. Despite the rapid pace of change, the most commonly used drug in RA remains methotrexate, which is considered the anchor drug for this condition. In this Review, we describe the known pharmacokinetic properties and putative mechanisms of action of methotrexate. Consideration of the pharmacodynamic perspective could inform the development of biomarkers of responsiveness to methotrexate, enabling therapy to be targeted to specific groups of patients. Such biomarkers could revolutionize the management of RA.

The impact of C677T and A1298C MTHFR polymorphisms on methotrexate therapeutic response in East Bohemian region rheumatoid arthritis patients

Some single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) might be predictive of methotrexate (MTX) therapeutic outcome in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to determine whether SNPs in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene are predictive of MTX response. Comparison was made using EULAR response criteria and according to the change of DAS28 (∆DAS28) after a 6-month MTX treatment in RA patient cohort. The two SNPs C677T (rs1801133) and A1298C (rs1801131) have been genotyped. A total of 120 patients were enrolled in the study, and all of them fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology 1987 RA criteria and are currently or previously taking MTX oral treatment, either as a monotherapy (n = 65) or in a combination with other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (n = 55). Genotyping was performed using qPCR allelic discrimination. We did not found any association of C677T and A1298C genotypes with MTX treatment inefficacy in dominant model (OR 1.23, 95 % CI 0.57-2.65, P = 0.697; and OR 0.98, 95 % CI 0.47-2.14, P = 1.0, respectively), or in recessive and codominant models. However, when ∆DAS28 after a 6-month therapy was used as a measure of treatment efficacy, the 677CT and 1298AC genotypes were found to be significantly associated with less favorable response to MTX (P = 0.025 and P = 0.043, respectively). In addition, even lower ∆DAS28 was determined for double-mutated 677CT-1298AC heterozygotes. It means that a synergistic effect of 677CT and 1298AC genotypes was observed. Nevertheless, the DAS28 baseline was lower here comparing to other genotypes. Unexpectedly, quite the opposite trend-i.e., better response to MTX-was found in genotypes 677CC-1298CC and 677TT-1298AA. It is an intriguing finding, because these double-mutated homozygotes are known for their low MTHFR-specific activity. Global significance was P = 0.013, η (2) = 0.160-i.e., large-size effect. Thus, our data show greater ability of 677CC-1298CC and 677TT-1298AA genotypes to respond to MTX treatment.