Implications of mass screening for childhood celiac disease

Coeliac Disease Case-Control Study: Has the Time Come to Explore beyond Patients at Risk?

The worldwide prevalence of asymptomatic coeliac disease (CD) is increasing, which is in part due to the routine screening of children with risk factors. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with CD are at risk of long-term complications. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics of asymptomatic and symptomatic children at the time of CD diagnosis. A case-control study was conducted using data from a cohort of 4838 CD patients recruited from 73 centers across Spain between 2011 and 2017. A total of 468 asymptomatic patients (cases) were selected and matched by age and sex with 468 symptomatic patients (controls). Clinical data, including any reported symptoms, as well as serologic, genetic, and histopathologic data were collected. No significant differences were found between the two groups in most clinical variables, nor in the degree of intestinal lesion. However, the asymptomatic patients were taller (height z-score -0.12 (1.06) vs. -0.45 (1.19), p < 0.001) and were less likely to have anti transglutaminase IgA antibodies ≥ 10 times the upper normal limit (66.2% vs. 758.4%, p = 0.002). Among the 37.1% of asymptomatic patients who were not screened for CD due to the absence of risk factors, only 34% were truly asymptomatic, while the remaining 66% reported non-specific CD-related symptoms. Therefore, expanding CD screening to any child who undergoes a blood test could reduce the burden of care for some children, as many of those considered asymptomatic reported non-specific CD-related symptoms.

Diagnosis of celiac disease is being missed in over 80% of children particularly in those from socioeconomically deprived backgrounds

Population-based screening studies have documented prevalence of celiac disease (CD) at 1% at age 7 years, but 90% of children remain undiagnosed. This prospective cohort study aims to examine whether observed differences in diagnosis rates of CD exist between children from different socioeconomic groups and how this has changed over a 12-year period. All children aged ≤15 years with a postcode within South West of England (SWE) diagnosed with CD during a 12-year period (1999-2010) when all diagnoses were based on endoscopic histology were included in the study. The incidence rates in socioeconomic groups were determined using the Index of Multiple Deprivation Score and Office of National Statistics population data. Four hundred fifteen children were diagnosed with CD; 65 within the City of Bristol (CoB). Diagnosis rate rose 4.2 times in SWE and 3.1 times in CoB between the first and last 4 years of the study. The rate was 1.6 times higher in the least socioeconomically deprived compared to most deprived (2.2 times in CoB), and the gap widened over the 12 years. Missed cases estimates for CoB and SWE are at least 83% and 91%, respectively.Conclusion: These findings suggest that while incidence of diagnosed CD in children has increased over a 12-year period, 83-91% remained undiagnosed. Socioeconomically deprived children are more likely to be underdiagnosed, and the gap between the least and most deprived has widened. To fully address massive underdiagnosis, further strategies including pilot studies using finger prick serological mass screening for CD in children entering primary schools are needed. What is Known: • Epidemiological studies record a 1% prevalence of celiac disease (CD), but up to 90% of children may remain undiagnosed. • Previous studies have documented an increased incidence of CD in higher socioeconomic groups, but proposed reasons remain conflicting. What is New: • Incidence of diagnosed CDhas gone up across all social classes but more so in higher socioeconomic groups and there is an increasing health/wealth gap. • This study estimates that 83-91% of children with CD are still being missed despite improved and easily available serological testing and suggest that population screening should be reconsidered.